[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Nash giving Knicks time to Work S&T
Author Thread
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
7/4/2012  2:14 AM
mrKnickShot wrote:
crzymdups wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
crzymdups wrote:
JamesKPolk wrote:Yes, i'm sure he got Lin off waivers with Linsanity in mind. He had that planned out brilliantly.

yeah, he also probably didn't plan for tyson to win defensive player of the year so we can write that move off, too. also, he probably didn't expect novak to shoot 47% from 3pt range, so that doesn't count either.

when you get right down to it, why hasn't glen grunwald been fired yet?

The Tyson / Billups move was/is awful. I don't care how shortsighted everyone chooses to be.

huh? okay, i'm clearly posting in bizarro land. do we take into account the fact that billups missed almost the entire season and might retire at age 35? and that tyson won defensive player of the year at age 29 and is a knick for three more seasons at least?

do we take into account that the knicks were the FIFTH BEST DEFENSIVE TEAM IN THE LEAGUE with tyson?

or does that not matter?

fire grunwald! waive tyson! waaaaah.

You clearly missed my point and reverted to Bizzaro world.

Tyson cost the Billups amnesty which disabled us from being able to use that on Amare which they would have clearly done.

No! Tyson is not worth Amare and Tyson's contracts - not even close

And, in hindsight, they would never have made that move. NEVER!

in hindsight, i'm glad you don't run the team.

¿ △ ?
AUTOADVERT
mrKnickShot
Posts: 28157
Alba Posts: 16
Joined: 5/3/2011
Member: #3553

7/4/2012  2:15 AM
crzymdups wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
crzymdups wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
crzymdups wrote:
JamesKPolk wrote:Yes, i'm sure he got Lin off waivers with Linsanity in mind. He had that planned out brilliantly.

yeah, he also probably didn't plan for tyson to win defensive player of the year so we can write that move off, too. also, he probably didn't expect novak to shoot 47% from 3pt range, so that doesn't count either.

when you get right down to it, why hasn't glen grunwald been fired yet?

The Tyson / Billups move was/is awful. I don't care how shortsighted everyone chooses to be.

huh? okay, i'm clearly posting in bizarro land. do we take into account the fact that billups missed almost the entire season and might retire at age 35? and that tyson won defensive player of the year at age 29 and is a knick for three more seasons at least?

do we take into account that the knicks were the FIFTH BEST DEFENSIVE TEAM IN THE LEAGUE with tyson?

or does that not matter?

fire grunwald! waive tyson! waaaaah.

You clearly missed my point and reverted to Bizzaro world.

Tyson cost the Billups amnesty which disabled us from being able to use that on Amare which they would have clearly done.

No! Tyson is not worth Amare and Tyson's contracts - not even close

And, in hindsight, they would never have made that move. NEVER!

in hindsight, i'm glad you don't run the team.

I'm sure you are because I know how much you love Amare and how sad you would have been if he was jetted

smackeddog
Posts: 38390
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/30/2005
Member: #883
7/4/2012  2:17 AM
No way do I want Nash if it means losing Shump. Can't the Suns just do Nash a favour after everything he's done for them? The TD, JJ and Gadzuric plus money costs them nothing. Maybe if we could trade TD to another team for a trade exemption then the Suns get more money out of it, which their owner seems to love.
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
7/4/2012  2:18 AM
mrKnickShot wrote:
crzymdups wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
crzymdups wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
crzymdups wrote:
JamesKPolk wrote:Yes, i'm sure he got Lin off waivers with Linsanity in mind. He had that planned out brilliantly.

yeah, he also probably didn't plan for tyson to win defensive player of the year so we can write that move off, too. also, he probably didn't expect novak to shoot 47% from 3pt range, so that doesn't count either.

when you get right down to it, why hasn't glen grunwald been fired yet?

The Tyson / Billups move was/is awful. I don't care how shortsighted everyone chooses to be.

huh? okay, i'm clearly posting in bizarro land. do we take into account the fact that billups missed almost the entire season and might retire at age 35? and that tyson won defensive player of the year at age 29 and is a knick for three more seasons at least?

do we take into account that the knicks were the FIFTH BEST DEFENSIVE TEAM IN THE LEAGUE with tyson?

or does that not matter?

fire grunwald! waive tyson! waaaaah.

You clearly missed my point and reverted to Bizzaro world.

Tyson cost the Billups amnesty which disabled us from being able to use that on Amare which they would have clearly done.

No! Tyson is not worth Amare and Tyson's contracts - not even close

And, in hindsight, they would never have made that move. NEVER!

in hindsight, i'm glad you don't run the team.

I'm sure you are because I know how much you love Amare and how sad you would have been if he was jetted

i'd be sad if this team still had a gaping hole at center as opposed to an olympian world champion defensive player of the year who completely changed the defensive culture of the entire team.

¿ △ ?
mrKnickShot
Posts: 28157
Alba Posts: 16
Joined: 5/3/2011
Member: #3553

7/4/2012  2:20 AM
crzymdups wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
crzymdups wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
crzymdups wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
crzymdups wrote:
JamesKPolk wrote:Yes, i'm sure he got Lin off waivers with Linsanity in mind. He had that planned out brilliantly.

yeah, he also probably didn't plan for tyson to win defensive player of the year so we can write that move off, too. also, he probably didn't expect novak to shoot 47% from 3pt range, so that doesn't count either.

when you get right down to it, why hasn't glen grunwald been fired yet?

The Tyson / Billups move was/is awful. I don't care how shortsighted everyone chooses to be.

huh? okay, i'm clearly posting in bizarro land. do we take into account the fact that billups missed almost the entire season and might retire at age 35? and that tyson won defensive player of the year at age 29 and is a knick for three more seasons at least?

do we take into account that the knicks were the FIFTH BEST DEFENSIVE TEAM IN THE LEAGUE with tyson?

or does that not matter?

fire grunwald! waive tyson! waaaaah.

You clearly missed my point and reverted to Bizzaro world.

Tyson cost the Billups amnesty which disabled us from being able to use that on Amare which they would have clearly done.

No! Tyson is not worth Amare and Tyson's contracts - not even close

And, in hindsight, they would never have made that move. NEVER!

in hindsight, i'm glad you don't run the team.

I'm sure you are because I know how much you love Amare and how sad you would have been if he was jetted

i'd be sad if this team still had a gaping hole at center as opposed to an olympian world champion defensive player of the year who completely changed the defensive culture of the entire team.

You keep stating the same thing while refusing to address the cost!

JamesKPolk
Posts: 21204
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/15/2012
Member: #4093

7/4/2012  2:22 AM
crzymdups wrote:
JamesKPolk wrote:Why is Woodson genius? LOL. Ah yes, his patented iso-offense is pure genius. Give the ball to your best player and isolate him. Nobody in the NBA has thought of this as an option.

JR Smith genius? Did you watch him play at all? Then again, you're the one who was fighting tooth and nail for Jamal Crawford to sign here. The same Crawford who's been an awful shooter most of his career and shot 38% last season with the Blazers. Jr Smith is a more athletic Crawford but dumber. There wasn't much genius in signing him. I don't even want him back.

But yes, please tell me how great Knicks brass has been. The best GM to come through here in the past decade is Donnie and he was run out of town for Dolan yes men. And that's the bottom line because the 11th President of the United States said so.

really? tell me about donnie's moves. tell me about how he gave zach randolph away 19 months before lebron james could be a free agent and then zach randolph became one of the most valuable players in the western conference. tell me about the jordan hill draft pick that was so bad donnie had to trade the 2012 first round pick just to clear hill off the cap. tell me about all the players donnie passed over for jordan hill. jrue holiday. ty lawson. brandon jennings. tell me about the david lee trade that netted us.... what exactly? nothing. tell me about how donnie laid down and retired when dolan took the reigns on the melo deal. please, tell me all these stories about donnie. also be sure to tell me about donnie's coaching hire mike d'antoni and how he was a perfect fit for new york. tell me how he gave amar'e 5yrs $100M when no one else offered more than 3yrs.

then i'll tell you about glen grunwald and how mike woodson went 18-6 after d'antoni farted his way to 18-24. i'll tell you that jr smith played defense and is a great player when he's not forced to be the second option in the offense due to injury. how tyson chandler won defensive player of the year. how the knicks had the fifth best defense in the league, their best mark since van gundy quit. how the jeremy lin signing was the kind of signing that people around here have been begging the knicks to make for years. ditto novak.

walsh changed the culture. he was a breath of fresh air after isiah. i like him a lot. but his record here is over-inflated by a lot. grunwald's first season was better than any year walsh had as knicks gm.

This is complete mumbo jumbo. Randolph was trash for us and the Clippers turned around and traded him again after one season for Quentin Richardson. Nobody wanted Randolph. He had a bad name in the league and then somehow overcame that with the Grizzlies. He's still the same black hole of a player. He just finds himself surrounded by very good players for the first time in his career.

Jordan Hill wasn't a good pick. That and the D'Antoni signing were his biggest mistakes.

David Lee was going to leave our team regardless and we got back young players who still had potential at the time. Azubuike ended up never playing due to an injury and Randolph was a dud while Turiaf was a sparkplug. He got back something of value where otherwise he would have gotten absolutely nothing for Lee. Nothing wrong this move at all.

Amare in the first year of his contract was amazing and lived up to the money. We had to give more years to attract someone here after years of losing. I never had a problem with that thought process. Everything was gravy until Carmelo showed up and spoiled the party for everyone.

Stop with the Woodson 18-6 crap please. 24 games does not make a coach. The guy is mediocre his entire coaching career, especially in the playoffs. Hawks fans laughed at this hire. The guy is a mediocre coach and will not improve this team as much as you think he will. He's the defensive version of Mike D'Antoni, except his defense relies on switching and he only has one play on offense.

More fluff for Mr. Grunwald. I want to read how he is the savior of this franchise. Maybe he needs a statue in front of MSG before the start of the season.

"Peace, plenty, and contentment reign throughout our borders, and our beloved country presents a sublime moral spectacle to the world." - James K Polk
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
7/4/2012  2:22 AM
mrKnickShot wrote:
crzymdups wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
crzymdups wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
crzymdups wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
crzymdups wrote:
JamesKPolk wrote:Yes, i'm sure he got Lin off waivers with Linsanity in mind. He had that planned out brilliantly.

yeah, he also probably didn't plan for tyson to win defensive player of the year so we can write that move off, too. also, he probably didn't expect novak to shoot 47% from 3pt range, so that doesn't count either.

when you get right down to it, why hasn't glen grunwald been fired yet?

The Tyson / Billups move was/is awful. I don't care how shortsighted everyone chooses to be.

huh? okay, i'm clearly posting in bizarro land. do we take into account the fact that billups missed almost the entire season and might retire at age 35? and that tyson won defensive player of the year at age 29 and is a knick for three more seasons at least?

do we take into account that the knicks were the FIFTH BEST DEFENSIVE TEAM IN THE LEAGUE with tyson?

or does that not matter?

fire grunwald! waive tyson! waaaaah.

You clearly missed my point and reverted to Bizzaro world.

Tyson cost the Billups amnesty which disabled us from being able to use that on Amare which they would have clearly done.

No! Tyson is not worth Amare and Tyson's contracts - not even close

And, in hindsight, they would never have made that move. NEVER!

in hindsight, i'm glad you don't run the team.

I'm sure you are because I know how much you love Amare and how sad you would have been if he was jetted

i'd be sad if this team still had a gaping hole at center as opposed to an olympian world champion defensive player of the year who completely changed the defensive culture of the team.

You keep stating the same thing while refusing to address the cost!

the knicks would never waive amar'e. maybe at the end of this season they might.

i'd still rather have tyson. trading the amnesty for him was the best move this team has made in years.

¿ △ ?
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
7/4/2012  2:24 AM
JamesKPolk wrote:
crzymdups wrote:
JamesKPolk wrote:Why is Woodson genius? LOL. Ah yes, his patented iso-offense is pure genius. Give the ball to your best player and isolate him. Nobody in the NBA has thought of this as an option.

JR Smith genius? Did you watch him play at all? Then again, you're the one who was fighting tooth and nail for Jamal Crawford to sign here. The same Crawford who's been an awful shooter most of his career and shot 38% last season with the Blazers. Jr Smith is a more athletic Crawford but dumber. There wasn't much genius in signing him. I don't even want him back.

But yes, please tell me how great Knicks brass has been. The best GM to come through here in the past decade is Donnie and he was run out of town for Dolan yes men. And that's the bottom line because the 11th President of the United States said so.

really? tell me about donnie's moves. tell me about how he gave zach randolph away 19 months before lebron james could be a free agent and then zach randolph became one of the most valuable players in the western conference. tell me about the jordan hill draft pick that was so bad donnie had to trade the 2012 first round pick just to clear hill off the cap. tell me about all the players donnie passed over for jordan hill. jrue holiday. ty lawson. brandon jennings. tell me about the david lee trade that netted us.... what exactly? nothing. tell me about how donnie laid down and retired when dolan took the reigns on the melo deal. please, tell me all these stories about donnie. also be sure to tell me about donnie's coaching hire mike d'antoni and how he was a perfect fit for new york. tell me how he gave amar'e 5yrs $100M when no one else offered more than 3yrs.

then i'll tell you about glen grunwald and how mike woodson went 18-6 after d'antoni farted his way to 18-24. i'll tell you that jr smith played defense and is a great player when he's not forced to be the second option in the offense due to injury. how tyson chandler won defensive player of the year. how the knicks had the fifth best defense in the league, their best mark since van gundy quit. how the jeremy lin signing was the kind of signing that people around here have been begging the knicks to make for years. ditto novak.

walsh changed the culture. he was a breath of fresh air after isiah. i like him a lot. but his record here is over-inflated by a lot. grunwald's first season was better than any year walsh had as knicks gm.

This is complete mumbo jumbo. Randolph was trash for us and the Clippers turned around and traded him again after one season for Quentin Richardson. Nobody wanted Randolph. He had a bad name in the league and then somehow overcame that with the Grizzlies. He's still the same black hole of a player. He just finds himself surrounded by very good players for the first time in his career.

Jordan Hill wasn't a good pick. That and the D'Antoni signing were his biggest mistakes.

David Lee was going to leave our team regardless and we got back young players who still had potential at the time. Azubuike ended up never playing due to an injury and Randolph was a dud while Turiaf was a sparkplug. He got back something of value where otherwise he would have gotten absolutely nothing for Lee. Nothing wrong this move at all.

Amare in the first year of his contract was amazing and lived up to the money. We had to give more years to attract someone here after years of losing. I never had a problem with that thought process. Everything was gravy until Carmelo showed up and spoiled the party for everyone.

Stop with the Woodson 18-6 crap please. 24 games does not make a coach. The guy is mediocre his entire coaching career, especially in the playoffs. Hawks fans laughed at this hire. The guy is a mediocre coach and will not improve this team as much as you think he will. He's the defensive version of Mike D'Antoni, except his defense relies on switching and he only has one play on offense.

More fluff for Mr. Grunwald. I want to read how he is the savior of this franchise. Maybe he needs a statue in front of MSG before the start of the season.

i didn't say statue, but you said nothing to write home about. knicks are in better position heading into next season than they have been in a while. grunwald doesn't get all the credit, but he gets a fair amount.

¿ △ ?
mrKnickShot
Posts: 28157
Alba Posts: 16
Joined: 5/3/2011
Member: #3553

7/4/2012  2:30 AM
crzymdups wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
crzymdups wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
crzymdups wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
crzymdups wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
crzymdups wrote:
JamesKPolk wrote:Yes, i'm sure he got Lin off waivers with Linsanity in mind. He had that planned out brilliantly.

yeah, he also probably didn't plan for tyson to win defensive player of the year so we can write that move off, too. also, he probably didn't expect novak to shoot 47% from 3pt range, so that doesn't count either.

when you get right down to it, why hasn't glen grunwald been fired yet?

The Tyson / Billups move was/is awful. I don't care how shortsighted everyone chooses to be.

huh? okay, i'm clearly posting in bizarro land. do we take into account the fact that billups missed almost the entire season and might retire at age 35? and that tyson won defensive player of the year at age 29 and is a knick for three more seasons at least?

do we take into account that the knicks were the FIFTH BEST DEFENSIVE TEAM IN THE LEAGUE with tyson?

or does that not matter?

fire grunwald! waive tyson! waaaaah.

You clearly missed my point and reverted to Bizzaro world.

Tyson cost the Billups amnesty which disabled us from being able to use that on Amare which they would have clearly done.

No! Tyson is not worth Amare and Tyson's contracts - not even close

And, in hindsight, they would never have made that move. NEVER!

in hindsight, i'm glad you don't run the team.

I'm sure you are because I know how much you love Amare and how sad you would have been if he was jetted

i'd be sad if this team still had a gaping hole at center as opposed to an olympian world champion defensive player of the year who completely changed the defensive culture of the team.

You keep stating the same thing while refusing to address the cost!

the knicks would never waive amar'e. maybe at the end of this season they might.

i'd still rather have tyson. trading the amnesty for him was the best move this team has made in years.

In hindsight, you are as bad as Grunwald as GM :-)

Funny how finally the media has been reporting on this and that they would not have done it IN HINDSIGHT - but I guess since all the Knicks moves over the years have been so bloody awful that this is "the best" one.

They would/could have waived him now. But, they gambled and they lost.

Now we have a bloated Tyson (based on his last 2 years - he has always been a mediocre/injury prone player) and a useless Amare taking up a combined 34 million a year.

GOOD DEAL!

And lets not forget that Billups expiring contract would have been very valuable moving forward.

Jmpasq
Posts: 25243
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/10/2012
Member: #4182

7/4/2012  6:30 AM
crzymdups wrote:
JamesKPolk wrote:Why is Woodson genius? LOL. Ah yes, his patented iso-offense is pure genius. Give the ball to your best player and isolate him. Nobody in the NBA has thought of this as an option.

JR Smith genius? Did you watch him play at all? Then again, you're the one who was fighting tooth and nail for Jamal Crawford to sign here. The same Crawford who's been an awful shooter most of his career and shot 38% last season with the Blazers. Jr Smith is a more athletic Crawford but dumber. There wasn't much genius in signing him. I don't even want him back.

But yes, please tell me how great Knicks brass has been. The best GM to come through here in the past decade is Donnie and he was run out of town for Dolan yes men. And that's the bottom line because the 11th President of the United States said so.

really? tell me about donnie's moves. tell me about how he gave zach randolph away 19 months before lebron james could be a free agent and then zach randolph became one of the most valuable players in the western conference. tell me about the jordan hill draft pick that was so bad donnie had to trade the 2012 first round pick just to clear hill off the cap. tell me about all the players donnie passed over for jordan hill. jrue holiday. ty lawson. brandon jennings. tell me about the david lee trade that netted us.... what exactly? nothing. tell me about how donnie laid down and retired when dolan took the reigns on the melo deal. please, tell me all these stories about donnie. also be sure to tell me about donnie's coaching hire mike d'antoni and how he was a perfect fit for new york. tell me how he gave amar'e 5yrs $100M when no one else offered more than 3yrs.

then i'll tell you about glen grunwald and how mike woodson went 18-6 after d'antoni farted his way to 18-24. i'll tell you that jr smith played defense and is a great player when he's not forced to be the second option in the offense due to injury. how tyson chandler won defensive player of the year. how the knicks had the fifth best defense in the league, their best mark since van gundy quit. how the jeremy lin signing was the kind of signing that people around here have been begging the knicks to make for years. ditto novak.

walsh changed the culture. he was a breath of fresh air after isiah. i like him a lot. but his record here is over-inflated by a lot. grunwald's first season was better than any year walsh had as knicks gm.


Picks were used to clear Jeffries not Jordan Hill. Jordan Hill pick was awful though. Part of me wonders had that player been of better quality if we didnt have to trade the picks with along with Hill
Check out My NFL Draft Prospect Videos at Youtube User Pages Jmpasq,JPdraftjedi,Jmpasqdraftjedi. www.Draftbreakdown.com
Jmpasq
Posts: 25243
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/10/2012
Member: #4182

7/4/2012  6:35 AM    LAST EDITED: 7/4/2012  7:08 AM
mrKnickShot wrote:
crzymdups wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
crzymdups wrote:
JamesKPolk wrote:Yes, i'm sure he got Lin off waivers with Linsanity in mind. He had that planned out brilliantly.

yeah, he also probably didn't plan for tyson to win defensive player of the year so we can write that move off, too. also, he probably didn't expect novak to shoot 47% from 3pt range, so that doesn't count either.

when you get right down to it, why hasn't glen grunwald been fired yet?

The Tyson / Billups move was/is awful. I don't care how shortsighted everyone chooses to be.

huh? okay, i'm clearly posting in bizarro land. do we take into account the fact that billups missed almost the entire season and might retire at age 35? and that tyson won defensive player of the year at age 29 and is a knick for three more seasons at least?

do we take into account that the knicks were the FIFTH BEST DEFENSIVE TEAM IN THE LEAGUE with tyson?

or does that not matter?

fire grunwald! waive tyson! waaaaah.

You clearly missed my point and reverted to Bizzaro world.

Tyson cost the Billups amnesty which disabled us from being able to use that on Amare which they would have clearly done.

No! Tyson is not worth Amare and Tyson's contracts - not even close

And, in hindsight, they would never have made that move. NEVER!


No way they would use the amnesty on Amare. U really believe they would eat 63 million dollars like it was nothing and just give it away.U think Dolan would give Amare a 100 million for 2 years. Give me a fng break they would of never used that on him. Even if they were going to flush that contract down the toilet how would that help the Knicks now. They would already be right at the cap so its not like they could bring other FA's in. I love how half way thrugh the season people start with this amnesty crap which never would of happened. Like the Knicks would amnesty Amare coming off a 25 and 8 season, thats just stupid. No GM would amnesty a guy who had that kind of season to pay him 100 million for 1 year. If anyone suggested an amnesty on Amare after that season he would of been ridiculed
Check out My NFL Draft Prospect Videos at Youtube User Pages Jmpasq,JPdraftjedi,Jmpasqdraftjedi. www.Draftbreakdown.com
knickscity
Posts: 24533
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/2/2012
Member: #4241
USA
7/4/2012  6:43 AM
JamesKPolk wrote:
crzymdups wrote:
JamesKPolk wrote:He did not draft Shumpert and Jorts.

he was working for the knicks when they were drafted and took over the interim role like 8 days after the draft. also, two months before the draft everyone on the team knew donnie wouldn't be back.

you really think he wasn't leading the draft last year? ok.

Yes, I really think he wasn't leading the draft. Donnie came out and said the picks were his decisions and his final moves with the team. But let's give Saint Grunwald all the credit, even the ones he doesn't deserve.

Donnie also said he thanked Isiah for his help in signing Amare, and the Melo trade was all his.

You can't pick and choose what to believe.

What we do know is Grunwald was the heir apparent, and he's been with the club for well over 5 years.

Nalod
Posts: 71204
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
7/4/2012  8:39 AM
I don't like the idea of trading Shump cuz we got burned on Lando. Not to say Nash is not worth it, but the voice in my head says you have to grow your own to compliment the starphuchs and 39 year old Nash with bad back might not be enough.

We really start Lin and Nash?

ON paper it sound exciting.

loweyecue
Posts: 27468
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 11/20/2005
Member: #1037

7/4/2012  10:02 AM
crzymdups wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
crzymdups wrote:
JamesKPolk wrote:Yes, i'm sure he got Lin off waivers with Linsanity in mind. He had that planned out brilliantly.

yeah, he also probably didn't plan for tyson to win defensive player of the year so we can write that move off, too. also, he probably didn't expect novak to shoot 47% from 3pt range, so that doesn't count either.

when you get right down to it, why hasn't glen grunwald been fired yet?

The Tyson / Billups move was/is awful. I don't care how shortsighted everyone chooses to be.

huh? okay, i'm clearly posting in bizarro land. do we take into account the fact that billups missed almost the entire season and might retire at age 35? and that tyson won defensive player of the year at age 29 and is a knick for three more seasons at least?

do we take into account that the knicks were the FIFTH BEST DEFENSIVE TEAM IN THE LEAGUE with tyson?

or does that not matter?

fire grunwald! waive tyson! waaaaah.

I think what he is trying to say is that using he amnesty on Billups was a bad idea and I agree. Getting Tyson on the other hand was a really good idea. Now if we had amnestied Amare instead we would have been in a hell of a position.

I think Grunwald was opportunistic and clearly was thinkin outside the box. So I give him credit for that, but wish he had gone the whole hog and amnestied Amare instead. I am not saying Amare is a horrible player but with his injury issues he is clearly on the decline and his performance as a Knick has been well below what is expected of a Max player. And I think Walsh is somewhat to blame for giving Amare that much money, I always maintained we should have offered him $75-80M for guranteed 5.

Lin was a desparation move that just played out, NO ONE saw that coming - Grunwald get no credit for that. He was in the right place at the right time and he had no other choice.

Novak was great pickup that fit MDA's offense perfectly and it maximized his output. Now that we have gone to an offense without a system, Novak will no longer be that useful of even that much of a threat. Woody refuses to call plays or get role players involved in the offense, unless he is down 0-2 in the playoffs etc. Bu for the situation at hand (MDA offense) Novak was a great.

TKF on Melo ::....he is a punk, a jerk, a self absorbed out of shape, self aggrandizing, unprofessional, volume chucking coach killing playoff loser!!
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
7/4/2012  10:28 AM
loweyecue wrote:
crzymdups wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
crzymdups wrote:
JamesKPolk wrote:Yes, i'm sure he got Lin off waivers with Linsanity in mind. He had that planned out brilliantly.

yeah, he also probably didn't plan for tyson to win defensive player of the year so we can write that move off, too. also, he probably didn't expect novak to shoot 47% from 3pt range, so that doesn't count either.

when you get right down to it, why hasn't glen grunwald been fired yet?

The Tyson / Billups move was/is awful. I don't care how shortsighted everyone chooses to be.

huh? okay, i'm clearly posting in bizarro land. do we take into account the fact that billups missed almost the entire season and might retire at age 35? and that tyson won defensive player of the year at age 29 and is a knick for three more seasons at least?

do we take into account that the knicks were the FIFTH BEST DEFENSIVE TEAM IN THE LEAGUE with tyson?

or does that not matter?

fire grunwald! waive tyson! waaaaah.

I think what he is trying to say is that using he amnesty on Billups was a bad idea and I agree. Getting Tyson on the other hand was a really good idea. Now if we had amnestied Amare instead we would have been in a hell of a position.

I think Grunwald was opportunistic and clearly was thinkin outside the box. So I give him credit for that, but wish he had gone the whole hog and amnestied Amare instead. I am not saying Amare is a horrible player but with his injury issues he is clearly on the decline and his performance as a Knick has been well below what is expected of a Max player. And I think Walsh is somewhat to blame for giving Amare that much money, I always maintained we should have offered him $75-80M for guranteed 5.

Lin was a desparation move that just played out, NO ONE saw that coming - Grunwald get no credit for that. He was in the right place at the right time and he had no other choice.

Novak was great pickup that fit MDA's offense perfectly and it maximized his output. Now that we have gone to an offense without a system, Novak will no longer be that useful of even that much of a threat. Woody refuses to call plays or get role players involved in the offense, unless he is down 0-2 in the playoffs etc. Bu for the situation at hand (MDA offense) Novak was a great.

huh? look up novak's numbers under woodson when you get a chance. he was better and got more playing time than under d'antoni.

nice to know grunwald gets no credit for it. i'm sure if the knicks had waived lin and linsanity happened somewhere else grunwald would get plenty of blame.

and it's complete hindsight horse manure to say you would have amnestied amar'e over billups a year later.

¿ △ ?
GustavBahler
Posts: 42845
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 7/12/2010
Member: #3186

7/4/2012  10:43 AM
This is great news. If this story is true, it sounds like Nash wants to play in NY. Two of our stars have missed a lot of games over their career due to injury. Before joining the Mavs, Tyson missed 68 games over two seasons. Stat has missed his share as well. I keep hearing bout Nash and his age but not very much about the ability of our stars to stay healthy.

I'm more concerned with our star's diminishing returns than I am about Nash's. He almost took a bunch of scrubs to the playoffs last season, imagine what he could do with the Knicks.

Right now its about taking the talent we have as far as we can, while we can, unless you believe that they have 4-5 years to contend with this lineup, I don't.

With Nash on the squad, Stat won't have to work as hard to get a good look. He will get Tyson a lot of easy buckets. One of the best scorers in the league in Melo will have one of the all time best PGs (who can still play at a high level) setting him up.

You are giving up some defense with Nash, but good team defense should help with that problem. Nash has 2-3 good years left in him IMO. That's around what Melo/Tyson/Stat have left as possible contenders. I would worry more about their health than Nash's age and health at this point. We will have to give up some youth, but maximizing the talent we have now is more important IMO. Nash will bring out the best in Stat/Melo/Tyson.

loweyecue
Posts: 27468
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 11/20/2005
Member: #1037

7/4/2012  10:52 AM
crzymdups wrote:
loweyecue wrote:
crzymdups wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
crzymdups wrote:
JamesKPolk wrote:Yes, i'm sure he got Lin off waivers with Linsanity in mind. He had that planned out brilliantly.

yeah, he also probably didn't plan for tyson to win defensive player of the year so we can write that move off, too. also, he probably didn't expect novak to shoot 47% from 3pt range, so that doesn't count either.

when you get right down to it, why hasn't glen grunwald been fired yet?

The Tyson / Billups move was/is awful. I don't care how shortsighted everyone chooses to be.

huh? okay, i'm clearly posting in bizarro land. do we take into account the fact that billups missed almost the entire season and might retire at age 35? and that tyson won defensive player of the year at age 29 and is a knick for three more seasons at least?

do we take into account that the knicks were the FIFTH BEST DEFENSIVE TEAM IN THE LEAGUE with tyson?

or does that not matter?

fire grunwald! waive tyson! waaaaah.

I think what he is trying to say is that using he amnesty on Billups was a bad idea and I agree. Getting Tyson on the other hand was a really good idea. Now if we had amnestied Amare instead we would have been in a hell of a position.

I think Grunwald was opportunistic and clearly was thinkin outside the box. So I give him credit for that, but wish he had gone the whole hog and amnestied Amare instead. I am not saying Amare is a horrible player but with his injury issues he is clearly on the decline and his performance as a Knick has been well below what is expected of a Max player. And I think Walsh is somewhat to blame for giving Amare that much money, I always maintained we should have offered him $75-80M for guranteed 5.

Lin was a desparation move that just played out, NO ONE saw that coming - Grunwald get no credit for that. He was in the right place at the right time and he had no other choice.

Novak was great pickup that fit MDA's offense perfectly and it maximized his output. Now that we have gone to an offense without a system, Novak will no longer be that useful of even that much of a threat. Woody refuses to call plays or get role players involved in the offense, unless he is down 0-2 in the playoffs etc. Bu for the situation at hand (MDA offense) Novak was a great.

huh? look up novak's numbers under woodson when you get a chance. he was better and got more playing time than under d'antoni.

nice to know grunwald gets no credit for it. i'm sure if the knicks had waived lin and linsanity happened somewhere else grunwald would get plenty of blame.

and it's complete hindsight horse manure to say you would have amnestied amar'e over billups a year later.

Novak played better under Woodson, show me?

I was calling for Amare to be amnestied from when the CBA was being signed, so no it's not hindsight.

You give Grunwald cedit for signing Lin and then accuse others of hindsight? How ****ing lame is that?

TKF on Melo ::....he is a punk, a jerk, a self absorbed out of shape, self aggrandizing, unprofessional, volume chucking coach killing playoff loser!!
loweyecue
Posts: 27468
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 11/20/2005
Member: #1037

7/4/2012  10:57 AM
Here is one example - http://www.ultimateknicks.com/forum/topic.asp?t=40062&page=2
TKF on Melo ::....he is a punk, a jerk, a self absorbed out of shape, self aggrandizing, unprofessional, volume chucking coach killing playoff loser!!
Nalod
Posts: 71204
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
7/4/2012  11:21 AM
Ebb and flow gentleman.

Donnie had one set of directives and that was to put us in a position to sign two free agents.

Grunwald has been here the whole time and is just keeping that directive going.

One cannot be compared to the other. Grunwald, like donnie at the moments in time have to make some decisions and go with it. They don't get benefit of hindsight.

I fear Dolan is going to panic with Nets recent moves and pay too much for Nash. Raps smoked us fair and square.

Just seems like we all good about the hype. Then preseason we get Media Hate. UK homers then whine about ESPN hate. Then the Hate comes to be reality. By then, we starphuching ahead toward the next season.

Nash is a free agent. This trade crap of moving utes for olds not cool.

My thinking is we have to create a higher market for nash so other teams pay up for him. Its ok to use us for bigger contracts other teams have to pay.

mrKnickShot
Posts: 28157
Alba Posts: 16
Joined: 5/3/2011
Member: #3553

7/4/2012  11:24 AM
crzymdups wrote:
loweyecue wrote:
crzymdups wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
crzymdups wrote:
JamesKPolk wrote:Yes, i'm sure he got Lin off waivers with Linsanity in mind. He had that planned out brilliantly.

yeah, he also probably didn't plan for tyson to win defensive player of the year so we can write that move off, too. also, he probably didn't expect novak to shoot 47% from 3pt range, so that doesn't count either.

when you get right down to it, why hasn't glen grunwald been fired yet?

The Tyson / Billups move was/is awful. I don't care how shortsighted everyone chooses to be.

huh? okay, i'm clearly posting in bizarro land. do we take into account the fact that billups missed almost the entire season and might retire at age 35? and that tyson won defensive player of the year at age 29 and is a knick for three more seasons at least?

do we take into account that the knicks were the FIFTH BEST DEFENSIVE TEAM IN THE LEAGUE with tyson?

or does that not matter?

fire grunwald! waive tyson! waaaaah.

I think what he is trying to say is that using he amnesty on Billups was a bad idea and I agree. Getting Tyson on the other hand was a really good idea. Now if we had amnestied Amare instead we would have been in a hell of a position.

I think Grunwald was opportunistic and clearly was thinkin outside the box. So I give him credit for that, but wish he had gone the whole hog and amnestied Amare instead. I am not saying Amare is a horrible player but with his injury issues he is clearly on the decline and his performance as a Knick has been well below what is expected of a Max player. And I think Walsh is somewhat to blame for giving Amare that much money, I always maintained we should have offered him $75-80M for guranteed 5.

Lin was a desparation move that just played out, NO ONE saw that coming - Grunwald get no credit for that. He was in the right place at the right time and he had no other choice.

Novak was great pickup that fit MDA's offense perfectly and it maximized his output. Now that we have gone to an offense without a system, Novak will no longer be that useful of even that much of a threat. Woody refuses to call plays or get role players involved in the offense, unless he is down 0-2 in the playoffs etc. Bu for the situation at hand (MDA offense) Novak was a great.

huh? look up novak's numbers under woodson when you get a chance. he was better and got more playing time than under d'antoni.

nice to know grunwald gets no credit for it. i'm sure if the knicks had waived lin and linsanity happened somewhere else grunwald would get plenty of blame.

and it's complete hindsight horse manure to say you would have amnestied amar'e over billups a year later.

Before saying "horse manure", you should check if one actually stated their position at the point of impact.

And please let us not forget that it left us with Toney Fukkin Douglass as our starting PG before the Lin miracle. Or, did GG already know how Lin would turn out?

Nash giving Knicks time to Work S&T

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy