nyk4ever wrote:

DurzoBlint wrote:

martin wrote:

rp wrote:I don't really think Davis is coming back if they let go of Balkman over Bibby.

Bibby kept in case Lin gets hurt. Or Davis.

Balk worthless.

Balkman is not worthless. Are you die hard enough to have watched EVERY GAME. If you are, then you know that when Balk was getting play earlier in the season, he performed well, rebounded, defended and had a few put backs. He's definitely more productive than Bibby who has shown that A: He is no longer a viable ball handle. B: He can't hit the broadside of a barn anymore.

You cut the least valuable player on the team and Balk has proven when giving playing time that he will be the more productive of the two.

NOW, with that said, I believe Balk will be the one cut

him and andrew are die hard enough to pay for, run, and constantly work on this site. nuff said.

your point is ass off point as the one your defending. He made an incorrect statement and what are you, his bodyguard.

Allanfan20 wrote:Careless move but if this doesn't kill Shumps and Fields minutes, then I am OK with this. I can see more coach fighting happening if Smith shows a lack of effort on defense and Novak starts playing.

The best players should get the most minutes. In defensive situation (end of closer games) we will see Shump for sure. We just have to see how things work out. I think Walkers minutes will be mostly gone. They did try trading him instead of cutting Balkman.

earthmansurfer wrote:

Allanfan20 wrote:Careless move but if this doesn't kill Shumps and Fields minutes, then I am OK with this. I can see more coach fighting happening if Smith shows a lack of effort on defense and Novak starts playing.

The best players should get the most minutes. In defensive situation (end of closer games) we will see Shump for sure. We just have to see how things work out. I think Walkers minutes will be mostly gone. They did try trading him instead of cutting Balkman.

Really hope you're right about Shump playing at the end of the game and I hope JR shows some maturity to understand the situation. I wonder if we could see all 3 on the floor at once when Lin and Melo are on the bench 1. Shump 2. JR 3. Fields. MDA does like to go small

I'm OK w/ Balkman getting cut because as bad as Bibby is, he can handle limited minutes without hurting the team like TD has done all season.

earthmansurfer wrote:

Bibby does add some stability but so did our old PG who in now on Orlando, can't say his name without feeling sharp pain go through my body. His name rhymed with Doo Doo.

If Davis is not coming back I wouldn't mind Duhon or Anthony Carter

martin wrote:

DurzoBlint wrote:

nyk4ever wrote:

DurzoBlint wrote:

martin wrote:

rp wrote:I don't really think Davis is coming back if they let go of Balkman over Bibby.

Bibby kept in case Lin gets hurt. Or Davis.

Balk worthless.

Balkman is not worthless. Are you die hard enough to have watched EVERY GAME. If you are, then you know that when Balk was getting play earlier in the season, he performed well, rebounded, defended and had a few put backs. He's definitely more productive than Bibby who has shown that A: He is no longer a viable ball handle. B: He can't hit the broadside of a barn anymore.

You cut the least valuable player on the team and Balk has proven when giving playing time that he will be the more productive of the two.

NOW, with that said, I believe Balk will be the one cut

him and andrew are die hard enough to pay for, run, and constantly work on this site. nuff said.

your point is ass off point as the one your defending. He made an incorrect statement and what are you, his bodyguard.

Join the Balkman fan club if you would like. Bibby is worth keeping if one of Lin/Davis gets hurt.

What role does Balkman have? He hasn't been productive for a team since NIIT.

Bibby and Balkman don't play the same role on team, so there is no direct comparison for them.

WOW, Your memory is short. He was getting PT earlier this season and produced. Bibby produced in like one game....ALSO, if you read the entire post, I said I expected BALKMAN to be the one cut. I only disagreed with your assessment of him being garbage. I even put the smiley face on it so, you and the body guard need to relax.

subzero0 wrote:...if you dont believe me just look at what DeMarcus Cousins did to the Kings.

What did Cousins do to the Kings? They haven't been good in years.

DurzoBlint wrote:

martin wrote:

rp wrote:I don't really think Davis is coming back if they let go of Balkman over Bibby.

Bibby kept in case Lin gets hurt. Or Davis.

Balk worthless.

Balkman is not worthless. Are you die hard enough to have watched EVERY GAME. If you are, then you know that when Balk was getting play earlier in the season, he performed well, rebounded, defended and had a few put backs. He's definitely more productive than Bibby who has shown that A: He is no longer a viable ball handle. B: He can't hit the broadside of a barn anymore.

You cut the least valuable player on the team and Balk has proven when giving playing time that he will be the more productive of the two.

NOW, with that said, I believe Balk will be the one cut

I will never forgive Balkman for what he did to my gamepicker last game...GOOD RIDDANCE!!

Allanfan20 wrote:Durzo, Balkman made good plays and there were other times when he played with his head up his ars, such as when he fouled Kobe while he took a 3 from 35 feet away from the basket. The guy looked disinterested out there a lot of times.

At least Bibby gives it his all. He may have nothing left but he leaves it on the court. I am happy we cut Balk instead of Bibby. Bibby is a better leader and better vet and has winning experience.

there is truth to that, it's that that even though Bibby gives his all, nothing from nothing still leaves nothing :) I have grown to hate seeing Bibby taking up space.

I do agree with Martin saying we do need the extra ball handling and guard insurance. Who is Balk insuring since he's not even backing up Melo as he did earlier this season.