[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

The Real Problem of a Melo/Amare Pairing
Author Thread
loweyecue
Posts: 27468
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 11/20/2005
Member: #1037

2/5/2012  2:37 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
loweyecue wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
loweyecue wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
loweyecue wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
loweyecue wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
loweyecue wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
loweyecue wrote:If you expected it to work within the the first 15 games then there is reason to despair. But that is essentially what being short sighted means.

So you can't address anything about the passing and turnovers? You can only repeat the same criticism we've heard for the past ten years - just give it more time?

Giving it more time is not a criticism. Amare is a finisher not known for his passing, Melo will definitely improve. Bringing the ball up the court is something he has not done before again expecting all this to work out in 15 games is short sighted.


But how are they ever going to complement each other? Has it ever worked where the top 2 players on a team are have bad A/TO ratios AND are also bad on defense? Can you or Nixluva cite some historical precedents?

Melo is not bad on defense. Can you cite examples of a team that has succeeded without a starting quality backcourt? People see what they want to see. I we had guards racking up assists Melo and Amare would be finishing.


Why? My argument is not that back-courts are unimportant. It's that our front-court duo doesn't make sense.
For argument's sake, let's put the defense aside and just address the first part of my question: Has it ever worked where the top 2 players on a team are have bad A/TO ratios?

Because you are evaluating an incomplete product and jumping to conclusions. For a team to play as a team it needs to have some fundamental coherence. If you don't have guards you front court will look out of sorts regardless of how they fit with each other.


In this thread, I'm evaluating their career A/TO ratios in order to evaluate whether the pairing makes sense. I'm not even referring to this year.

Why did you choose to focus on th A/TO ratio to judge level of fit? I am not saying its not relevant but is it the only thing?


It's a reasonable statistical approach to examining whether the two individual scorers will compliment each other on offense. If they compensated for being a poor fit on offense by playing outstanding defense, that would be another story. But we know that's not the case.

Cant say I agree with the premie here. Chemistry is a team thing, you can't really measure chemistry using stats by isolating two players. It doesn't work that way, at least not in my mind.


I don't buy your statement but I'll play along. What is it that they're doing so well together that tells you the "chemistry" currently compensates or in the future will compensate for the low assists and high turnovers? What players in the past have Amare and Melo had great chemistry with? (My guess is it's only players who had excellent A/TO #s.) Likewise, what pairs with bad assist/TO ratios in the past have had good chemistry?

I said I didn't buy your premise that A/TO ratios is the best way to look at chemistry. I didn't present a counter position. I agree with one part of your argument. History is not full of great SF/PF combinations - but to project from that and say it can't work is a stretch. Just give them time. Let's make a decision in a year or so. Constant change is a huge impediment to success.

TKF on Melo ::....he is a punk, a jerk, a self absorbed out of shape, self aggrandizing, unprofessional, volume chucking coach killing playoff loser!!
AUTOADVERT
rvwink
Posts: 20412
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/3/2006
Member: #1145

2/6/2012  1:41 PM
Bonn,

How many years have the two stars on the championship teams been playing together? I suggest, plenty of time. Giving us their assist/turn over ratios when they were playing their best and then comparing it to numbers compiled when Amare and Melo were playing at their absolute worst and were struggling without a point guard, plus only having played about 1 season together, is simply comparing Apples vs Oranges. Numbers lie when you don't get the contexts right, and that is exactly what you have failed to do.

tj23
Posts: 21851
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/20/2010
Member: #3119

2/6/2012  1:52 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
CashMoney wrote:The real problem with the Melo & Amare pairing is that we're missing a PG (hopefully not anymore with Lin) and a consistant shooting guard. I know there are many here who are sick of the "it takes time" argument but that's my argument. We tend to forget that the pairing hasn't been going on for that long. It may seem like a long time but in reality it hasn't been. Lets look at an 82 game season body of work than dissect!

People forget that a team is not only 2 players. Melo is not a point forward, never has been never will. A strong PG will not force the action, he'll space the floor and distribute the ball. Look at Miami for God sake. Yeah they have Lebron, Dwade and Bosh but they also have guys like Chalmers, Anthony and Haslem. Look at the Bulls Dyansty. It was not just Jordan & Pippen. You also had guys like Paxson, Grant, Cartwright, Armstrong, Hodges, etc.

The Knicks are close. We have our 2 main pieces in Melo and STAT. We have our future #2 in Shump. We have our C in Chandler. We have Landry who can play the 2 and the 4. Lin may turn into our #1 but at minimum we may have found our backup PG. We have a big who can defend, rebound and shoot from the outside in Harrelson. If TD can get his stroke and his confidence back we have our backup 2.

STAT strugging this year has more to do with coming off an injury and not having camp to get his crap together. He's been playing much better as of late. 6 games under .500 is dissapointing but there is ton of ball left to play and the team is starting to take shape.

Wer beat Utah and Washington and will get to see how close we are when we take on the Lakers. As for the pairing it can and will work...mark my words.


They can play a lot better than they currently are playing if they have a better PG and SG. Even with an outstanding supporting cast (something Dolan has never been able to construct), I can't imagine a serious contending team ever having these two guys as the #1 and 2 players on their roster, though.
I think they can but they need a very high quality pg. I don't think baron is that guy anymore. Plus they would still need more pieces. It's not a chemistry problem imo it's a basketball iq problem. Amare has tunnel vision as do most of the Knicks just not as severe.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
2/6/2012  4:39 PM
rvwink wrote:Bonn,

How many years have the two stars on the championship teams been playing together? I suggest, plenty of time. Giving us their assist/turn over ratios when they were playing their best and then comparing it to numbers compiled when Amare and Melo were playing at their absolute worst and were struggling without a point guard, plus only having played about 1 season together, is simply comparing Apples vs Oranges. Numbers lie when you don't get the contexts right, and that is exactly what you have failed to do.


As indicated earlier, I was looking at their career numbers, not their numbers for this season.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
2/6/2012  4:43 PM    LAST EDITED: 2/6/2012  4:44 PM
tj23 wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
CashMoney wrote:The real problem with the Melo & Amare pairing is that we're missing a PG (hopefully not anymore with Lin) and a consistant shooting guard. I know there are many here who are sick of the "it takes time" argument but that's my argument. We tend to forget that the pairing hasn't been going on for that long. It may seem like a long time but in reality it hasn't been. Lets look at an 82 game season body of work than dissect!

People forget that a team is not only 2 players. Melo is not a point forward, never has been never will. A strong PG will not force the action, he'll space the floor and distribute the ball. Look at Miami for God sake. Yeah they have Lebron, Dwade and Bosh but they also have guys like Chalmers, Anthony and Haslem. Look at the Bulls Dyansty. It was not just Jordan & Pippen. You also had guys like Paxson, Grant, Cartwright, Armstrong, Hodges, etc.

The Knicks are close. We have our 2 main pieces in Melo and STAT. We have our future #2 in Shump. We have our C in Chandler. We have Landry who can play the 2 and the 4. Lin may turn into our #1 but at minimum we may have found our backup PG. We have a big who can defend, rebound and shoot from the outside in Harrelson. If TD can get his stroke and his confidence back we have our backup 2.

STAT strugging this year has more to do with coming off an injury and not having camp to get his crap together. He's been playing much better as of late. 6 games under .500 is dissapointing but there is ton of ball left to play and the team is starting to take shape.

Wer beat Utah and Washington and will get to see how close we are when we take on the Lakers. As for the pairing it can and will work...mark my words.


They can play a lot better than they currently are playing if they have a better PG and SG. Even with an outstanding supporting cast (something Dolan has never been able to construct), I can't imagine a serious contending team ever having these two guys as the #1 and 2 players on their roster, though.
I think they can but they need a very high quality pg. I don't think baron is that guy anymore. Plus they would still need more pieces. It's not a chemistry problem imo it's a basketball iq problem. Amare has tunnel vision as do most of the Knicks just not as severe.

I agree. A better PG would undoubtedly help, but if Amare and Melo are your top 2 scorers that means that the majority of the time the ball is going to be in the hands of a below average decision-maker. I'm not debating whether they can play much better (they obviously can) but as long as Melo and Amare are #1 and #2, I can't see how they'll ever be a 60 win championship contending team.
CashMoney
Posts: 23145
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 1/15/2011
Member: #3374
USA
2/6/2012  4:52 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
tj23 wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
CashMoney wrote:The real problem with the Melo & Amare pairing is that we're missing a PG (hopefully not anymore with Lin) and a consistant shooting guard. I know there are many here who are sick of the "it takes time" argument but that's my argument. We tend to forget that the pairing hasn't been going on for that long. It may seem like a long time but in reality it hasn't been. Lets look at an 82 game season body of work than dissect!

People forget that a team is not only 2 players. Melo is not a point forward, never has been never will. A strong PG will not force the action, he'll space the floor and distribute the ball. Look at Miami for God sake. Yeah they have Lebron, Dwade and Bosh but they also have guys like Chalmers, Anthony and Haslem. Look at the Bulls Dyansty. It was not just Jordan & Pippen. You also had guys like Paxson, Grant, Cartwright, Armstrong, Hodges, etc.

The Knicks are close. We have our 2 main pieces in Melo and STAT. We have our future #2 in Shump. We have our C in Chandler. We have Landry who can play the 2 and the 4. Lin may turn into our #1 but at minimum we may have found our backup PG. We have a big who can defend, rebound and shoot from the outside in Harrelson. If TD can get his stroke and his confidence back we have our backup 2.

STAT strugging this year has more to do with coming off an injury and not having camp to get his crap together. He's been playing much better as of late. 6 games under .500 is dissapointing but there is ton of ball left to play and the team is starting to take shape.

Wer beat Utah and Washington and will get to see how close we are when we take on the Lakers. As for the pairing it can and will work...mark my words.


They can play a lot better than they currently are playing if they have a better PG and SG. Even with an outstanding supporting cast (something Dolan has never been able to construct), I can't imagine a serious contending team ever having these two guys as the #1 and 2 players on their roster, though.
I think they can but they need a very high quality pg. I don't think baron is that guy anymore. Plus they would still need more pieces. It's not a chemistry problem imo it's a basketball iq problem. Amare has tunnel vision as do most of the Knicks just not as severe.

I agree. A better PG would undoubtedly help, but if Amare and Melo are your top 2 scorers that means that the majority of the time the ball is going to be in the hands of a below average decision-maker. I'm not debating whether they can play much better (they obviously can) but as long as Melo and Amare are #1 and #2, I can't see how they'll ever be a 60 win championship contending team.

Melo is pretty good at making the correct pass as is STAT. 60 Wins may be a stretch but I can see a consistant 50+ once this team comes together.

Blue & Orange 4 Life!
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
2/6/2012  5:30 PM
CashMoney wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
tj23 wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
CashMoney wrote:The real problem with the Melo & Amare pairing is that we're missing a PG (hopefully not anymore with Lin) and a consistant shooting guard. I know there are many here who are sick of the "it takes time" argument but that's my argument. We tend to forget that the pairing hasn't been going on for that long. It may seem like a long time but in reality it hasn't been. Lets look at an 82 game season body of work than dissect!

People forget that a team is not only 2 players. Melo is not a point forward, never has been never will. A strong PG will not force the action, he'll space the floor and distribute the ball. Look at Miami for God sake. Yeah they have Lebron, Dwade and Bosh but they also have guys like Chalmers, Anthony and Haslem. Look at the Bulls Dyansty. It was not just Jordan & Pippen. You also had guys like Paxson, Grant, Cartwright, Armstrong, Hodges, etc.

The Knicks are close. We have our 2 main pieces in Melo and STAT. We have our future #2 in Shump. We have our C in Chandler. We have Landry who can play the 2 and the 4. Lin may turn into our #1 but at minimum we may have found our backup PG. We have a big who can defend, rebound and shoot from the outside in Harrelson. If TD can get his stroke and his confidence back we have our backup 2.

STAT strugging this year has more to do with coming off an injury and not having camp to get his crap together. He's been playing much better as of late. 6 games under .500 is dissapointing but there is ton of ball left to play and the team is starting to take shape.

Wer beat Utah and Washington and will get to see how close we are when we take on the Lakers. As for the pairing it can and will work...mark my words.


They can play a lot better than they currently are playing if they have a better PG and SG. Even with an outstanding supporting cast (something Dolan has never been able to construct), I can't imagine a serious contending team ever having these two guys as the #1 and 2 players on their roster, though.
I think they can but they need a very high quality pg. I don't think baron is that guy anymore. Plus they would still need more pieces. It's not a chemistry problem imo it's a basketball iq problem. Amare has tunnel vision as do most of the Knicks just not as severe.

I agree. A better PG would undoubtedly help, but if Amare and Melo are your top 2 scorers that means that the majority of the time the ball is going to be in the hands of a below average decision-maker. I'm not debating whether they can play much better (they obviously can) but as long as Melo and Amare are #1 and #2, I can't see how they'll ever be a 60 win championship contending team.

Melo is pretty good at making the correct pass as is STAT. 60 Wins may be a stretch but I can see a consistant 50+ once this team comes together.


Being a good passer is more than making the correct pass (which Melo often does do). It's also not making the incorrect pass. People who call him a good passer are just recollecting a number of good passes he's made without paying attention to the number of bad passes. The A/TO ratio doesn't lie.
Knixkik
Posts: 35449
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
2/6/2012  5:38 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
nixluva wrote:That's a good stat, but are you trying to tell us that if they had a capable PG that having STAT and Melo wouldn't work? We get that STAT and Melo aren't perfect players. Still they are very effective at their main skills of scoring the ball. It seems to me that if you have a PG and a SG like say JR or someone on the floor with them that this would be a devastating team.

We saw last night that we lack the punch at PG and SG to make teams pay for doubling STAT and Melo. It would be hard to do if you have legit threats at PG and SG. I think you're wrong about this team and the future of this team is bright if they continue to add talent to this core.


So you deplete the entire roster and give up your draft picks just to get a duo that won't work unless you get a C to make up for their defensive deficiencies and a PG to make up for their passing and turnovers? Brilliant!

These players aren't perfect, you must build around them. Melo and Stat are best when they get the ball in scoring position. They are not players who should be trusted to create for others. Any stars would struggle without players who compliment them. There are only a few rare players in the league like LeBron who do it all. There is nothing wrong with needing serviceable players around them. It doesn't mean they aren't great players.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
2/6/2012  5:51 PM    LAST EDITED: 2/6/2012  5:52 PM
Knixkik wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
nixluva wrote:That's a good stat, but are you trying to tell us that if they had a capable PG that having STAT and Melo wouldn't work? We get that STAT and Melo aren't perfect players. Still they are very effective at their main skills of scoring the ball. It seems to me that if you have a PG and a SG like say JR or someone on the floor with them that this would be a devastating team.

We saw last night that we lack the punch at PG and SG to make teams pay for doubling STAT and Melo. It would be hard to do if you have legit threats at PG and SG. I think you're wrong about this team and the future of this team is bright if they continue to add talent to this core.


So you deplete the entire roster and give up your draft picks just to get a duo that won't work unless you get a C to make up for their defensive deficiencies and a PG to make up for their passing and turnovers? Brilliant!

These players aren't perfect, you must build around them. Melo and Stat are best when they get the ball in scoring position. They are not players who should be trusted to create for others. Any stars would struggle without players who compliment them. There are only a few rare players in the league like LeBron who do it all. There is nothing wrong with needing serviceable players around them. It doesn't mean they aren't great players.

It's a poor plan though when neither of your top 2 scorers can create for others. Your top 2 scorers are going to be the ones with the ball more often than any other players. I just can't think of any examples of very successful playoff teams where neither of the top 2 scorers could be "trusted to create for others."
mrKnickShot
Posts: 28157
Alba Posts: 16
Joined: 5/3/2011
Member: #3553

2/6/2012  6:44 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
CashMoney wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
tj23 wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
CashMoney wrote:The real problem with the Melo & Amare pairing is that we're missing a PG (hopefully not anymore with Lin) and a consistant shooting guard. I know there are many here who are sick of the "it takes time" argument but that's my argument. We tend to forget that the pairing hasn't been going on for that long. It may seem like a long time but in reality it hasn't been. Lets look at an 82 game season body of work than dissect!

People forget that a team is not only 2 players. Melo is not a point forward, never has been never will. A strong PG will not force the action, he'll space the floor and distribute the ball. Look at Miami for God sake. Yeah they have Lebron, Dwade and Bosh but they also have guys like Chalmers, Anthony and Haslem. Look at the Bulls Dyansty. It was not just Jordan & Pippen. You also had guys like Paxson, Grant, Cartwright, Armstrong, Hodges, etc.

The Knicks are close. We have our 2 main pieces in Melo and STAT. We have our future #2 in Shump. We have our C in Chandler. We have Landry who can play the 2 and the 4. Lin may turn into our #1 but at minimum we may have found our backup PG. We have a big who can defend, rebound and shoot from the outside in Harrelson. If TD can get his stroke and his confidence back we have our backup 2.

STAT strugging this year has more to do with coming off an injury and not having camp to get his crap together. He's been playing much better as of late. 6 games under .500 is dissapointing but there is ton of ball left to play and the team is starting to take shape.

Wer beat Utah and Washington and will get to see how close we are when we take on the Lakers. As for the pairing it can and will work...mark my words.


They can play a lot better than they currently are playing if they have a better PG and SG. Even with an outstanding supporting cast (something Dolan has never been able to construct), I can't imagine a serious contending team ever having these two guys as the #1 and 2 players on their roster, though.
I think they can but they need a very high quality pg. I don't think baron is that guy anymore. Plus they would still need more pieces. It's not a chemistry problem imo it's a basketball iq problem. Amare has tunnel vision as do most of the Knicks just not as severe.

I agree. A better PG would undoubtedly help, but if Amare and Melo are your top 2 scorers that means that the majority of the time the ball is going to be in the hands of a below average decision-maker. I'm not debating whether they can play much better (they obviously can) but as long as Melo and Amare are #1 and #2, I can't see how they'll ever be a 60 win championship contending team.

Melo is pretty good at making the correct pass as is STAT. 60 Wins may be a stretch but I can see a consistant 50+ once this team comes together.


Being a good passer is more than making the correct pass (which Melo often does do). It's also not making the incorrect pass. People who call him a good passer are just recollecting a number of good passes he's made without paying attention to the number of bad passes. The A/TO ratio doesn't lie.

Lets not forget that Amare has vasonline on his hands. And he did last year too. Melo is an excellent passer - if - big if - he wants to pass and he trusts his teammates to hit the shot or make a good play.

rvwink
Posts: 20412
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/3/2006
Member: #1145

2/6/2012  11:36 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
"As indicated earlier, I was looking at their career numbers, not their numbers for this season."

Melo's previous career in Denver was primarily as a ball stopper, not a ball passer. How can that provide any meaningful information about how good a passer he can become. Amare too was a destination for the ball, and not much of a passer. He had Steve Nash to set him up, so that he had a clear path to the basket once he got the ball. Neither player knew anything about being an unselfish passer. So you think comparing them to celebrated teammates who spent years passing to each other is a meaningful comparison?

The Dallas Mavericks didn't play good defense and statistics proved it. Does that mean they were doomed to never play good defense? Then Tyson Chandler came to town and things changed. Dallas played good defense, despite the previous statistics. Motivated players like Amare and Melo have the ability to improve their passing, and do a better job moving the ball. The past most definitely does not dictate the future.

Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
2/7/2012  7:29 AM
rvwink wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
"As indicated earlier, I was looking at their career numbers, not their numbers for this season."

Melo's previous career in Denver was primarily as a ball stopper, not a ball passer. How can that provide any meaningful information about how good a passer he can become. Amare too was a destination for the ball, and not much of a passer. He had Steve Nash to set him up, so that he had a clear path to the basket once he got the ball. Neither player knew anything about being an unselfish passer. So you think comparing them to celebrated teammates who spent years passing to each other is a meaningful comparison?

The Dallas Mavericks didn't play good defense and statistics proved it. Does that mean they were doomed to never play good defense? Then Tyson Chandler came to town and things changed. Dallas played good defense, despite the previous statistics. Motivated players like Amare and Melo have the ability to improve their passing, and do a better job moving the ball. The past most definitely does not dictate the future.


Give me some historical precedents of guys who had played 8 to 10 years with around a 1:1 A/TO ratio and then showed major improvement. Or are you asking them to do something unprecedented? Carmelo's shown small improvement this year (which he definitely deserves credit for) but he's still below where you'd want your primary play-maker to be, and Amare is way below where you'd want your 2nd option to be. Nalod's brilliant wisdom (paraphrased): "You don't bring veterans in to change them"
CashMoney
Posts: 23145
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 1/15/2011
Member: #3374
USA
2/7/2012  7:40 AM
Bonn1997 wrote:
rvwink wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
"As indicated earlier, I was looking at their career numbers, not their numbers for this season."

Melo's previous career in Denver was primarily as a ball stopper, not a ball passer. How can that provide any meaningful information about how good a passer he can become. Amare too was a destination for the ball, and not much of a passer. He had Steve Nash to set him up, so that he had a clear path to the basket once he got the ball. Neither player knew anything about being an unselfish passer. So you think comparing them to celebrated teammates who spent years passing to each other is a meaningful comparison?

The Dallas Mavericks didn't play good defense and statistics proved it. Does that mean they were doomed to never play good defense? Then Tyson Chandler came to town and things changed. Dallas played good defense, despite the previous statistics. Motivated players like Amare and Melo have the ability to improve their passing, and do a better job moving the ball. The past most definitely does not dictate the future.


Give me some historical precedents of guys who had played 8 to 10 years with around a 1:1 A/TO ratio and then showed major improvement. Or are you asking them to do something unprecedented? Carmelo's shown small improvement this year (which he definitely deserves credit for) but he's still below where you'd want your primary play-maker to be, and Amare is way below where you'd want your 2nd option to be. Nalod's brilliant wisdom (paraphrased): "You don't bring veterans in to change them"

Melo is not our primary play maker, he's our primary scorer....big difference. STAT is our 2nd scorer. They'll both kick the ball out when they need to but the primary playmaker on this squad will be the PG. Looking at assist to turnover ration for 2 forwards is flawed analysis. When speaking about the C's primary playmaker do we talk about KG/Pierce or Rondo making it happen?

Blue & Orange 4 Life!
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
2/7/2012  8:15 AM
CashMoney wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
rvwink wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
"As indicated earlier, I was looking at their career numbers, not their numbers for this season."

Melo's previous career in Denver was primarily as a ball stopper, not a ball passer. How can that provide any meaningful information about how good a passer he can become. Amare too was a destination for the ball, and not much of a passer. He had Steve Nash to set him up, so that he had a clear path to the basket once he got the ball. Neither player knew anything about being an unselfish passer. So you think comparing them to celebrated teammates who spent years passing to each other is a meaningful comparison?

The Dallas Mavericks didn't play good defense and statistics proved it. Does that mean they were doomed to never play good defense? Then Tyson Chandler came to town and things changed. Dallas played good defense, despite the previous statistics. Motivated players like Amare and Melo have the ability to improve their passing, and do a better job moving the ball. The past most definitely does not dictate the future.


Give me some historical precedents of guys who had played 8 to 10 years with around a 1:1 A/TO ratio and then showed major improvement. Or are you asking them to do something unprecedented? Carmelo's shown small improvement this year (which he definitely deserves credit for) but he's still below where you'd want your primary play-maker to be, and Amare is way below where you'd want your 2nd option to be. Nalod's brilliant wisdom (paraphrased): "You don't bring veterans in to change them"

Melo is not our primary play maker, he's our primary scorer....big difference. STAT is our 2nd scorer. They'll both kick the ball out when they need to but the primary playmaker on this squad will be the PG. Looking at assist to turnover ration for 2 forwards is flawed analysis. When speaking about the C's primary playmaker do we talk about KG/Pierce or Rondo making it happen?


They're all great play-makers. And they were throughout their entire careers. That's what you need in order to have an offense that flows very well.
rvwink
Posts: 20412
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/3/2006
Member: #1145

2/7/2012  2:21 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
Give me some historical precedents of guys who had played 8 to 10 years with around a 1:1 A/TO ratio and then showed major improvement. Or are you asking them to do something unprecedented? Carmelo's shown small improvement this year (which he definitely deserves credit for) but he's still below where you'd want your primary play-maker to be, and Amare is way below where you'd want your 2nd option to be. Nalod's brilliant wisdom (paraphrased): "You don't bring veterans in to change them"

First of all, the assists to turnover stat is entirely flawed concerning Amare. Take Paul Pierce, by and large his turnovers and his assists are based on the quality of his passing. Compare that the Amare who is driving the ball to the basket on the majority of his possessions. Many of the turnovers, have nothing to do with the quality of his passing. He just has the ball knocked away before he gets to the basket. So that stat for him is irrelevant as measure of how accurately he passes.

Concerning historical precedents, how about this. Melo who spent years in Denver, had about 3 assists a game and about 3 turnovers a game. This year he is averaging 33% higher assists per game, over 4. Seems to me that is a significant improvement. One would also expect that they more time he spends passing, based on his high talent level, the better he should get. But Melo too has a large number of turnovers that are not passing related. First, like Amare he likes to dribble around to make something happen and he also suffers from double teams which increases the odds of a turnover. So he has already demonstrated that he can create a significantly higher amount of assists if he tried. Plus the turnover assist ratio is inaccurate because on too many instances the turnovers have nothing to do with sloppy passing. Clearly Melo needs to learn that ignoring the fact that he is being double teamed and shooting anyway is a low percentage move.

What your stats do reveal is that Melo and Stat both thrive on drives to the basket, and that the likely result is that defenses will pack the middle, and make driving to the basket much less profitable for our two stars. To make limit turnovers, the Knick's need more consistent shooting from the outside to make their opponents pay for double teaming their stars. Landry, Shumpert, and Steve Novak in particular need to increase their shooting averages from the outside.

BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
2/7/2012  2:40 PM
Melo and Amare need to alter their games to the team game(like earl monroe did on the Knicks). It would take a lot of wear and tear off their bodies as well as make the team much better.
RIP Crushalot😞
mrKnickShot
Posts: 28157
Alba Posts: 16
Joined: 5/3/2011
Member: #3553

2/7/2012  2:42 PM
BRIGGS wrote:Melo and Amare need to alter their games to the team game(like earl monroe did on the Knicks). It would take a lot of wear and tear off their bodies as well as make the team much better.

Great point about Earl The Pearl. Frazier was just talking about that a couple of weeks ago saying that Melo needs to do what Monroe did. He was shooting 30 shots a game for B-more and the Knicks wanted 15.

tj23
Posts: 21851
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/20/2010
Member: #3119

2/7/2012  2:47 PM
People are intrigued by Melos alley oops but he doesn't see the floor well. He rarely kicks out to open shooters. He likes to jam it inside whether it's there or not. And stat is just blind. He drives into double n triple teams.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
2/7/2012  3:25 PM
First of all, the assists to turnover stat is entirely flawed concerning Amare. Take Paul Pierce, by and large his turnovers and his assists are based on the quality of his passing. Compare that the Amare who is driving the ball to the basket on the majority of his possessions. Many of the turnovers, have nothing to do with the quality of his passing. He just has the ball knocked away before he gets to the basket. So that stat for him is irrelevant as measure of how accurately he passes.

If you look at my OP, you'll see I'm discussing whether their decision-making will bring out the best or worst in each other. I'm not talking simply about passing, although we have talked about passing many times in the thread.

Concerning historical precedents, how about this. Melo who spent years in Denver, had about 3 assists a game and about 3 turnovers a game. This year he is averaging 33% higher assists per game, over 4.

I've praised him for the increase. He's still not where you want your main offensive player to be, and his assists may go back down when we get a PG who handles the ball more.
rvwink
Posts: 20412
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/3/2006
Member: #1145

2/7/2012  8:50 PM
tj23 wrote:People are intrigued by Melo's alley oops but he doesn't see the floor well. He rarely kicks out to open shooters. He likes to jam it inside whether it's there or not. And stat is just blind. He drives into double n triple teams.

There are two possibilities.

1) Melo doesn't see the floor well.
2) Melo is so focused on scoring, he simply isn't looking for better opportunities for the team to score often enough.

Stat was a much better passer last year. This year because his statistics are so far below Melos, it seems like Stat can't afford to pass up scoring opportunities. He seems unable to resist trying to convert scoring opportunity into points himself.

I don't think either are unable to see. Rather they just aren't looking elsewhere yet.

The Real Problem of a Melo/Amare Pairing

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy