colombian0725 wrote:MarburyAnd1Crossover wrote:colombian0725 wrote:MarburyAnd1Crossover wrote:skeng wrote:MarburyAnd1Crossover wrote:martin wrote:MarburyAnd1Crossover wrote:colombian0725 wrote:Wait so when Melo is injured Amare only scores 20 points and like 8 rebounds IN TWO games??? Our team goes down by 25 both games? Or when it's the fourth quarter and Melo is on the bench and Amare is out there we start to fall behind and can't score than everyone is begging for Melo to come back in. Or when we are down by 5 with 2 mins left who is the only one on the team that plays bully ball? Melo or Amare?
Heroin is one hell of a drug and the team was suffering what they call the "dope sickness".
Give it 10 games without Melo and see how Amar'e rolls.
Amare needs a PG more than anyone on the team, so why would 10 games without Melo amount to anything? Amare had plenty of games without Melo last year and he did fine.
It's true, Amar'e needs a PG more than anyone, but this is in the current context.
If things are given time to settle and Melo is out for an extended period, for example, my brain is 100% confident that Amar'e would regain some of his swag and find a comfortable zone to work in.
Plus, if you take Melo out for an extended period, the other guys would settle to their more natural roles.
All this would help Amar'e find his comfort zone in the offense.
But Marblob, we would be back to square 2010-11 pre melo. Minus everyone.
Which is the problem of this situation.
All I'm saying is, we can't blast Amar'e because the situation is out of his hands.
The guy isn't a garbage baller out of nowhere. He's still Amar'e.
Melo needs to make it happen if he will ever live up to his Very Special Max Contract Superstar billing.
Amare has a very special Max Contract and he plays no defense and does not rebound the ball. He has shown zero effort on defense. His block total is down. He gives wide open lay ups and dunks!!!! What do you have to say about his lack of D with his very special Max contract?
The max contract has no effect on this situation. He very well might deserve the big money, like some rare and ancient fish, but if you do not give this fish a healthy aquarium, what will happen?
The guy is still special, but we are not giving him good water to swim in.
So your okay with Amare playing zero defense and being a mediocre rebounder, zero effort on D and you see no problem paying him max money. But Melo who is top 3 rebounder at his position and his brought his defense to "Solid" and your questioning his max contract? Really dude? but it's okay to turn your head the other way about Amare?
I'm not okay with any of it.
But if we're tossing the garbage heap around, I say we should take it easier on Amar'e than on Melo.
We know what Amar'e does, the fans didn't pay him, but we know what he brings. We also know what Melo brings. The fans didn't pay him either.
Out of the two, Melo is the dominant talent.
So before we blast Amar'e, I think we should blast Melo, statistics be damned. The guy is the big fish, naturally, and as the big fish he has it in his hands to swivel the shiny ball.
If you're asking me, what would I pay, and fairly? Amar'e makes 5M$ less per year then Melo, based on talent.
So who will we blast more? The weaker student or the better?