jrodmc wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:jrodmc wrote:toodarkmark wrote:Wow that people say yes to this. A'mare signed with us when we were nothing, put us on his back and carried us into the playoffs, had people chanting MVP mid season. And you would just straight up trade him for a guy who has never said he wanted to be here, who may not be a better player. This board sometimes shows me why fans are just always Grass is Greener and never appreciating how good they got it. No wonder Patrick Ewing was disgusted by this fan base at times in his career.



As you can see by the majority of replies, most posters in here would trade their own infants, zygotes, hoons, girlfriends, wives and mothers for whatever's winning in the last and next 5 minutes.
This thread should be included in the stupid frontrunners forum, along with the "WE NEED CRAWFORD BACK" and "ZBO's BETTER THAN TWO STATS" posts.
STAT carried a bunch of rooks and 2 1/2 tier players to the playoffs,
What's your argument? All you've done is attack the people picking Dwight. The one argument you made is that Amare has taken minimal talent to the playoffs but Dwight has carried comparable talent much farther. What does Amare do better than Dwight? On offense, he'll give you 2 more PPG (although on a lower shooting percentage). I'll grant that he has a tiny edge on offense. But Dwight has a HUGE edge on defense.
My argument is from loyalty to the great players on MY team; long time past, that used to define being a fan. I don't give two sh-ts what Dwight's carried anywhere, until he starts doing it here. I respect what STAT's done since he's been here. Given your argument, why keep anyone? There are 3's better than Melo, 2's tremendoously better than Fields.
You prove my point.
Given your argument, why trade anyone?Maybe with very rare exceptions (like if a player had 14 outstanding years here), I keep anyone and everyone only until I can make an upgrade. That's what winning requires. Some players would be harder to lose than others but none are worth sacrificing a championship for.