GodSaveTheKnicks wrote:

cheers wrote:

GodSaveTheKnicks wrote:

cheers wrote:

GodSaveTheKnicks wrote:

cheers wrote:

GodSaveTheKnicks wrote:

cheers wrote:

Vmart wrote:Rumors have it that he is being shopped around. Guys this is the guy the Knicks should target because he fit MDA style of play. I'm down for a Gallo for Blatche trade. He would give the Knicks the much needed Center/PF that MDA can utilize in his system. I don't see McGee as a player that MDA can use probably goes the way of Randolph and Mozgov in this system.

true. it is not like the knicks can say no if blatche trade presents itself. knicks dont got it like that.

um. why can't the knicks say no if a blatche trade presents itself?

see miami game for answer.

what does that even mean?

if you lose to miami, you can't say no to blatche because your team sucks?
we needed another shooter?

i am confused as to what you are trying to say.

yes you answered correctly., the team sucks in regards to trying to beat miami. ergo you have options. A) the one i like fire the coach and replace him with one who likes to watch game tapes and game plan. B) satisfy the coaches needs for shooters. mda reminds me of a coach that toronto fans used to clown.. toronto's former head coach sam need mo' shawts mitchell. the canadian version of SSOL.

just to make sure we're on the same page. you're saying

1: MDA does not like to watch game tapes and game plan

2: Since MDA only wants shooters, adding Andre Blatche will help us contend with Miami.

Is that correct?

is this jeopardy? are you going to come out with the real answer that mda is not as predictable as a sun rise. sry to disappoint but even the miami announcers were calling what mda was going to do in game, plus what would be the end result, tired amar'e in the fourth.

the only deference between sam need mo' shawts mitchell and mda is, sam has the cooler nickname.

It's not jeopardy. I just can't believe you're saying what you're saying so I needed to double check.

If you have issues with MDA's offense being predictable, then you can state your case. It looked fine against OKC and Chicago. Miami has beat some quality teams (Utah, Lakers).

Saying "fire the coach and replace him with one who likes to watch game tapes and game plan." doesn't really make a lot of sense.

But hey..if you're convinced MDA not game planning is the problem and Andray Blatche is the answer then uhh..yeah.

I have no words.

i have posted what is the answer. start a gallo/wilson chemistry going, where they play off each other. this will minimize gallo disappearing act by giving him more offensive responsibility. bring in ar to clean offensive boards. stuff like that.

but that is never gonna happen. what will happen is what always happens SSOL or amar'e iso. one or the other. and if either/both fail well need mo' minutes mda will ride his top guys to the grave every game.

so yes you either give mda the players for his SSOL or you get another star for amar'e or fire the coach.

cheers wrote:

GodSaveTheKnicks wrote:

cheers wrote:

GodSaveTheKnicks wrote:

cheers wrote:

GodSaveTheKnicks wrote:

cheers wrote:

GodSaveTheKnicks wrote:

cheers wrote:

Vmart wrote:Rumors have it that he is being shopped around. Guys this is the guy the Knicks should target because he fit MDA style of play. I'm down for a Gallo for Blatche trade. He would give the Knicks the much needed Center/PF that MDA can utilize in his system. I don't see McGee as a player that MDA can use probably goes the way of Randolph and Mozgov in this system.

true. it is not like the knicks can say no if blatche trade presents itself. knicks dont got it like that.

um. why can't the knicks say no if a blatche trade presents itself?

see miami game for answer.

what does that even mean?

if you lose to miami, you can't say no to blatche because your team sucks?
we needed another shooter?

i am confused as to what you are trying to say.

yes you answered correctly., the team sucks in regards to trying to beat miami. ergo you have options. A) the one i like fire the coach and replace him with one who likes to watch game tapes and game plan. B) satisfy the coaches needs for shooters. mda reminds me of a coach that toronto fans used to clown.. toronto's former head coach sam need mo' shawts mitchell. the canadian version of SSOL.

just to make sure we're on the same page. you're saying

1: MDA does not like to watch game tapes and game plan

2: Since MDA only wants shooters, adding Andre Blatche will help us contend with Miami.

Is that correct?

is this jeopardy? are you going to come out with the real answer that mda is not as predictable as a sun rise. sry to disappoint but even the miami announcers were calling what mda was going to do in game, plus what would be the end result, tired amar'e in the fourth.

the only deference between sam need mo' shawts mitchell and mda is, sam has the cooler nickname.

It's not jeopardy. I just can't believe you're saying what you're saying so I needed to double check.

If you have issues with MDA's offense being predictable, then you can state your case. It looked fine against OKC and Chicago. Miami has beat some quality teams (Utah, Lakers).

Saying "fire the coach and replace him with one who likes to watch game tapes and game plan." doesn't really make a lot of sense.

But hey..if you're convinced MDA not game planning is the problem and Andray Blatche is the answer then uhh..yeah.

I have no words.

i have posted what is the answer. start a gallo/wilson chemistry going, where they play off each other. this will minimize gallo disappearing act by giving him more offensive responsibility. bring in ar to clean offensive boards. stuff like that.

but that is never gonna happen. what will happen is what always happens SSOL or amar'e iso. one or the other. and if either/both fail well need mo' minutes mda will ride his top guys to the grave every game.

so yes you either give mda the players for his SSOL or you get another star for amar'e or fire the coach.

I have no idea what you're saying anymore. I thought we were talking about Blatche.

cheers wrote:

GodSaveTheKnicks wrote:

cheers wrote:

GodSaveTheKnicks wrote:

cheers wrote:

GodSaveTheKnicks wrote:

cheers wrote:

GodSaveTheKnicks wrote:

cheers wrote:

GodSaveTheKnicks wrote:

cheers wrote:

Vmart wrote:Rumors have it that he is being shopped around. Guys this is the guy the Knicks should target because he fit MDA style of play. I'm down for a Gallo for Blatche trade. He would give the Knicks the much needed Center/PF that MDA can utilize in his system. I don't see McGee as a player that MDA can use probably goes the way of Randolph and Mozgov in this system.

true. it is not like the knicks can say no if blatche trade presents itself. knicks dont got it like that.

um. why can't the knicks say no if a blatche trade presents itself?

see miami game for answer.

what does that even mean?

if you lose to miami, you can't say no to blatche because your team sucks?
we needed another shooter?

i am confused as to what you are trying to say.

yes you answered correctly., the team sucks in regards to trying to beat miami. ergo you have options. A) the one i like fire the coach and replace him with one who likes to watch game tapes and game plan. B) satisfy the coaches needs for shooters. mda reminds me of a coach that toronto fans used to clown.. toronto's former head coach sam need mo' shawts mitchell. the canadian version of SSOL.

just to make sure we're on the same page. you're saying

1: MDA does not like to watch game tapes and game plan

2: Since MDA only wants shooters, adding Andre Blatche will help us contend with Miami.

Is that correct?

is this jeopardy? are you going to come out with the real answer that mda is not as predictable as a sun rise. sry to disappoint but even the miami announcers were calling what mda was going to do in game, plus what would be the end result, tired amar'e in the fourth.

the only deference between sam need mo' shawts mitchell and mda is, sam has the cooler nickname.

It's not jeopardy. I just can't believe you're saying what you're saying so I needed to double check.

If you have issues with MDA's offense being predictable, then you can state your case. It looked fine against OKC and Chicago. Miami has beat some quality teams (Utah, Lakers).

Saying "fire the coach and replace him with one who likes to watch game tapes and game plan." doesn't really make a lot of sense.

But hey..if you're convinced MDA not game planning is the problem and Andray Blatche is the answer then uhh..yeah.

I have no words.

i have posted what is the answer. start a gallo/wilson chemistry going, where they play off each other. this will minimize gallo disappearing act by giving him more offensive responsibility. bring in ar to clean offensive boards. stuff like that.

but that is never gonna happen. what will happen is what always happens SSOL or amar'e iso. one or the other. and if either/both fail well need mo' minutes mda will ride his top guys to the grave every game.

so yes you either give mda the players for his SSOL or you get another star for amar'e or fire the coach.

I have no idea what you're saying anymore. I thought we were talking about Blatche.

dude are you pretending to not have reading comprehension? because what i posted is in english and has progressed with each post of yours with me replying to your points. if you have no idea then you have no idea of the points you are making and that i am replying to. and i we will leave it at that. because im not gonna bother replying to posts if you come back with either playing dumb or being dumb. apologies.

Dude all I know is that you said

Andray Blatche is the answer to beating the heat because MDA doesn't watch game tape or game plan. All MDA wants is guys who can shoot so he can run his predictable SSOL offense so we might as well go out and get shooters.

That doesn't make any sense to me. There's no logic to what you're saying. You can tell because if you try your exact logic out with other teams, it doesn't make any sense.

Ex:

The UTAH Jazz lost to the Heat. Is it because Jerry Sloan doesn't game plan? His offense is predictable? Because the Jazz need Andray Blatche?

Could you say the same about the Lakers because they lost to the Heat?

I thought the Heat beat us this last game because we had no size to prevent Ilgauskus from blowing up in the first quarter. We were never able to close that gap.

When you just say stuff like "see Miami heat game" type responses, that doesn't really give me an idea of what you mean other than you think we lost to the Miami heat because we didn't have an Andray Blatche on the floor.

GodSaveTheKnicks wrote:

AnubisADL wrote:

GodSaveTheKnicks wrote:Blatche = talented but dumb, doesn't play with passion, bit of a headcase. not a big fan.

he has a looooong contract too.

we need a big who can

- defend bigs
- rebound
- contribute to the team first, move the ball, hustle attitude this squad has.

these are NOT Blatche's strengths. he's a good shooter.

Nothing wrong with Blatche or his contract. He just should not be the best player on a team.

Put Blatche on a team devoid of offense like Milwaukee and he'd be a great fit.

He should not be the best player on a team. This is true. I don't know what you mean by "Nothing wrong with Blatche."

As far as his contract goes it's long. He's young and improving sure but if he turns out to be a headcase you're stuck with him for 4 more seasons after this one. That's what I think is wrong with his contract.

Good contract

Manu: only 2 more years after this one at 11.8 this season, 12.9 next and 14.1 the season after that.

Bad contract:

Luol Deng. Bulls committed $78 M to him in 2008. And they still have him for about the same $ as Manu but for 1 season longer.

I would have no problem with Andray Blatche going to Milwaukee. That would make me happy. Because he wouldn't be on the Knicks. I think Scott Skiles will either be great for him or he'll take up permanent residence in his doghouse. Skiles don't mess around.

Blatche is actually a highly skilled big. Luol Deng is injury prone and shows up every 2-3 seasons.

Blatche can handle the ball, shoot, and has a little post game. His number one issue is his defense is less than stellar.

Blatche was recently extended and will make $6,442,083, $7,118,502, $7,794,921, and $8,471,339 starting next season. The guy is current 24 yrs old and will be 29 at the end of his current deal. You have guys like Drew Gooden making the full MLE at age 29.

Blatche for his production, salary, and age is far from a bad deal. He might not be a all star but they have no reason to give him away or want to dump him for peanuts.

AnubisADL wrote:

GodSaveTheKnicks wrote:

AnubisADL wrote:

GodSaveTheKnicks wrote:Blatche = talented but dumb, doesn't play with passion, bit of a headcase. not a big fan.

he has a looooong contract too.

we need a big who can

- defend bigs
- rebound
- contribute to the team first, move the ball, hustle attitude this squad has.

these are NOT Blatche's strengths. he's a good shooter.

Nothing wrong with Blatche or his contract. He just should not be the best player on a team.

Put Blatche on a team devoid of offense like Milwaukee and he'd be a great fit.

He should not be the best player on a team. This is true. I don't know what you mean by "Nothing wrong with Blatche."

As far as his contract goes it's long. He's young and improving sure but if he turns out to be a headcase you're stuck with him for 4 more seasons after this one. That's what I think is wrong with his contract.

Good contract

Manu: only 2 more years after this one at 11.8 this season, 12.9 next and 14.1 the season after that.

Bad contract:

Luol Deng. Bulls committed $78 M to him in 2008. And they still have him for about the same $ as Manu but for 1 season longer.

I would have no problem with Andray Blatche going to Milwaukee. That would make me happy. Because he wouldn't be on the Knicks. I think Scott Skiles will either be great for him or he'll take up permanent residence in his doghouse. Skiles don't mess around.

Blatche is actually a highly skilled big. Luol Deng is injury prone and shows up every 2-3 seasons.

Blatche can handle the ball, shoot, and has a little post game. His number one issue is his defense is less than stellar.

Blatche was recently extended and will make $6,442,083, $7,118,502, $7,794,921, and $8,471,339 starting next season. The guy is current 24 yrs old and will be 29 at the end of his current deal. You have guys like Drew Gooden making the full MLE at age 29.

Blatche for his production, salary, and age is far from a bad deal. He might not be a all star but they have no reason to give him away or want to dump him for peanuts.

I never said that the Wizards should give away Blatche for peanuts.

I did say he is young and improving so you're preaching to the choir on those points.

Knuckle headed acts aside, the main reason I don't think it makes sense to bother looking at Blatche:

The Knicks need a big man who can defend and rebound. People have been talking about this for a while now. Chicago killed us on the offensive boards WITHOUT Noah. Big Z killed us in the 1st quarter of the Heat game.

Blatche is young and obviously has skills but his strengths are not defense and rebounding. The Knicks resources would best be used to get someone who brings that to the table.

Bizzy211 wrote:I prefer McGee over Blatche!!

I agree!

But Gallo stays no matter what!!

Unless its for Lebron

CrushAlot wrote:

martin wrote:One year removed from lottery and the team sucks cause it can't beat Miami. Our posters suck.

Maybe Boudreau could get posters back on track.

i love this fukn coach.

umynot wrote:

Bizzy211 wrote:I prefer McGee over Blatche!!

I agree!

But Gallo stays no matter what!!

Unless its for Lebron

At this point... Lebron is not welcomed here like Jordan, Hardaway, Morning, Miller!! But i'm a die-hard fan talking!!

Ira wrote:I'm not a Blatche fan. Scoring 17 ppg on 15.6 fga is not very good offensive production. And that's supposed to be the best part of his game. When you add his reputation as a low character guy, he's a player that we should stay away from. I'd love to get McGee if the terms were reasonable.

Everyone says McGee is the better of the two but McGee won't get off the pine in a MDA system that is the truth. Blatche actually fits MDA style of play and probably his number increase under MDA the fact that he can score in many ways works to MDA system his versatility and his ability to create his own shot is an attribute that MDA covets. He will, fit nicely with Amare and give the Knicks another threat.

Vmart wrote:

Ira wrote:I'm not a Blatche fan. Scoring 17 ppg on 15.6 fga is not very good offensive production. And that's supposed to be the best part of his game. When you add his reputation as a low character guy, he's a player that we should stay away from. I'd love to get McGee if the terms were reasonable.

Everyone says McGee is the better of the two but McGee won't get off the pine in a MDA system that is the truth. Blatche actually fits MDA style of play and probably his number increase under MDA the fact that he can score in many ways works to MDA system his versatility and his ability to create his own shot is an attribute that MDA covets. He will, fit nicely with Amare and give the Knicks another threat.

if MDA was willing to give Mozgov minutes..why wouldn't he give McGee minutes?