[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

The Miami Heat Ain't No Joke! They have that Killer instinct. How do we beat them?
Author Thread
BlueSeats
Posts: 27272
Alba Posts: 41
Joined: 11/6/2005
Member: #1024

12/26/2010  8:23 PM
orangeblobman wrote:
BlueSeats wrote:
orangeblobman wrote:
BlueSeats wrote:
fishmike wrote:obvious... trade Chandler, Gallo, AR, cash, 2014,2016 first rounders and Fields for Carmelo Anthony

If depleting the roster to get three studs is so foolish why are we (and most teams in the league) even having a conversation about how to beat the Heat?

Not one of the Heat players from the 2009-2010 that were a part of the 'depleting' were of the caliber of Gallinari or Chandler.

That's irrelevant to the point.

It's really not. One depletion is not equal to another. If 'depleting' your roster means getting rid of, let's say, a Brad Lohaus versus getting rid of a Danilo Gallinari, then that can't be an equal depletion.

Who's talking about equal depletion? The point is that they decimated the roster to get 3 studs and were then able to surround them with role players, a task for some reason considered impossible for the Knicks.

Again, if cleaning house for 3 studs were a foolish proposition no one would be talking about how to beat the Heat.

AUTOADVERT
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
12/26/2010  8:24 PM
nixluva wrote:
Vmart wrote:
nixluva wrote:
Vmart wrote:Knicks are not going to beat the Heat until Chandler and Gallo step up and say F' LeBron and Wade they can't stop me. Guys I don't know if that day will ever come. With Melo you know he thinks he belongs in elite group of players and guys that is very hard to teach.

I'm tellin you that they don't fear the Heat like that. Just watch the 1st half and you can tell that the Knicks are a confident bunch, they just GASSED. Miami caught us at the end of a brutal schedule and an emotional wave that lasted for a few games. We just flat lost the energy level to keep up. I don't expect that to happen again. If it does then i'll concede that we can't play with those guys. Right now I don't feel that way.

Your just being a fan and want to believe. Reality is that Miami turned it up on the Knicks and that was that. They were gassed for other reason also, mental fatigue.


The Knicks haven't been that out of any game they've played against other top teams. I just get the feeling that they didn't have it and the Heat were able to as you say turn it up and the Knicks didn't have the juice to respond. Right now the team is much stronger than they were at that point. I'm not saying they'll win, just that it should'nt be anything like the last game where we got blownout in the 2nd half like that.

The Heat have a very solid defense in terms of stopping teams from scoring inside. You can't easily penetrate cuz they clog the paint and rotate towards the ball. Thus IMO you have to keep them guessing as to what you want to do. Your offense has to be one filled with motion. If you stagnate they will shut you down. You have to trust in your jump shooting too. They aren't really designed to stop you from hitting 3's. but if you throw it inside they swarm the ball and make it impossible to score easily inside.

You need to keep them moving tho and get into your offense as early as possible. They like to double the PG and do anything to slow down your offense. They just have a great defensive group in terms of moving to the ball. They can close on a post and recover better then any team i've seen in a long time. This means we have to push the ball at all times. Keep them off balance.

the Heat made some great adjustments & picked up their intensity on the defense by a wide margin in that game in the 2nd half... the Knicks had no answer for their double teams on Amare... i think that had as much to do w/that loss as being gassed did... that doesn't mean i don't think the Knicks could ever play the Heat close over the course of 48 minutes, but in a best of 7 game series, i don't see any way we could stack up... they simply have too much talent in that 1-2-3 punch they run out there every night... plus they have some able role players like Arroyo, Chalmers, Miller, Anthony, Dampier & Jones that play their roles well... guys like that can afford to exert most of their energy on playing defense & doing other things on the court while the big 3 carry the offense on most nights... that's a luxury that our team simply does not have... we rely heavily on 1 guy to have a big game every night in order to compete w/the big boys... that's not a great formula for longterm success... Amare is bound to wear down if he has to battle double teams every night to get off his points... this is why people are looking at Melo as an essential piece for any possible championship aspirations we might have going forward.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
orangeblobman
Posts: 27269
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/1/2009
Member: #2539
Nauru
12/26/2010  8:27 PM
BlueSeats wrote:
orangeblobman wrote:
BlueSeats wrote:
orangeblobman wrote:
BlueSeats wrote:
fishmike wrote:obvious... trade Chandler, Gallo, AR, cash, 2014,2016 first rounders and Fields for Carmelo Anthony

If depleting the roster to get three studs is so foolish why are we (and most teams in the league) even having a conversation about how to beat the Heat?

Not one of the Heat players from the 2009-2010 that were a part of the 'depleting' were of the caliber of Gallinari or Chandler.

That's irrelevant to the point.

It's really not. One depletion is not equal to another. If 'depleting' your roster means getting rid of, let's say, a Brad Lohaus versus getting rid of a Danilo Gallinari, then that can't be an equal depletion.

Who's talking about equal depletion? The point is that they decimated the roster to get 3 studs and were then able to surround them with role players, a task for some reason considered impossible for the Knicks.

Again, if cleaning house for 3 studs were a foolish proposition no one would be talking about how to beat the Heat.

You're talking about equal depletion. For example, bombing Mogadishu to the ground is very different from bombing Paris to the ground; you're losing a lot more quality in the latter. Blowing up a Gallo-Chandler-Fields core is different than decimating a roster that has Brad Lohaus on it.

WE AIN'T NOWHERE WITH THIS BUM CHOKER IN CARMELO. GIVE ME STARKS'S 2-21 ANY DAY OVER THIS LACKLUSTER CLUSTEREFF.
BlueSeats
Posts: 27272
Alba Posts: 41
Joined: 11/6/2005
Member: #1024

12/26/2010  9:29 PM
orangeblobman wrote:
BlueSeats wrote:
orangeblobman wrote:
BlueSeats wrote:
orangeblobman wrote:
BlueSeats wrote:
fishmike wrote:obvious... trade Chandler, Gallo, AR, cash, 2014,2016 first rounders and Fields for Carmelo Anthony

If depleting the roster to get three studs is so foolish why are we (and most teams in the league) even having a conversation about how to beat the Heat?

Not one of the Heat players from the 2009-2010 that were a part of the 'depleting' were of the caliber of Gallinari or Chandler.

That's irrelevant to the point.

It's really not. One depletion is not equal to another. If 'depleting' your roster means getting rid of, let's say, a Brad Lohaus versus getting rid of a Danilo Gallinari, then that can't be an equal depletion.

Who's talking about equal depletion? The point is that they decimated the roster to get 3 studs and were then able to surround them with role players, a task for some reason considered impossible for the Knicks.

Again, if cleaning house for 3 studs were a foolish proposition no one would be talking about how to beat the Heat.

You're talking about equal depletion. For example, bombing Mogadishu to the ground is very different from bombing Paris to the ground; you're losing a lot more quality in the latter. Blowing up a Gallo-Chandler-Fields core is different than decimating a roster that has Brad Lohaus on it.

IOW, the Heat were able to go from the dregs to elite overnight because they didn't have someone of Gallo's caliber holding them back.


Stop thinking that 4 $20s is worth more than 3 $100s because 4 is greater than 3.

orangeblobman
Posts: 27269
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/1/2009
Member: #2539
Nauru
12/26/2010  9:42 PM
BlueSeats wrote:
orangeblobman wrote:
BlueSeats wrote:
orangeblobman wrote:
BlueSeats wrote:
orangeblobman wrote:
BlueSeats wrote:
fishmike wrote:obvious... trade Chandler, Gallo, AR, cash, 2014,2016 first rounders and Fields for Carmelo Anthony

If depleting the roster to get three studs is so foolish why are we (and most teams in the league) even having a conversation about how to beat the Heat?

Not one of the Heat players from the 2009-2010 that were a part of the 'depleting' were of the caliber of Gallinari or Chandler.

That's irrelevant to the point.

It's really not. One depletion is not equal to another. If 'depleting' your roster means getting rid of, let's say, a Brad Lohaus versus getting rid of a Danilo Gallinari, then that can't be an equal depletion.

Who's talking about equal depletion? The point is that they decimated the roster to get 3 studs and were then able to surround them with role players, a task for some reason considered impossible for the Knicks.

Again, if cleaning house for 3 studs were a foolish proposition no one would be talking about how to beat the Heat.

You're talking about equal depletion. For example, bombing Mogadishu to the ground is very different from bombing Paris to the ground; you're losing a lot more quality in the latter. Blowing up a Gallo-Chandler-Fields core is different than decimating a roster that has Brad Lohaus on it.

IOW, the Heat were able to go from the dregs to elite overnight because they didn't have someone of Gallo's caliber holding them back.


Stop thinking that 4 $20s is worth more than 3 $100s because 4 is greater than 3.

What's 60% man, that's 50 wins I think. Chop the 3-8 start off, we're balling at .800. You're blowing up an .800 team. That's talent, that's a healthy core, all young on their rookie deals. That's wild, you don't get that in the league very often, a core that solid, it's like the core of the earth, the planet, we've never been down there but it's wild, man.

You're talking about blowing up a 47-35 team last year, the Heat, and the players they threw up the river to Shanghai weren't worth what we're talking about wasting. So you wait and sign Melo in the off-season, if not, you win 50+ games this year. I'm in no rush. You're in a rush?

WE AIN'T NOWHERE WITH THIS BUM CHOKER IN CARMELO. GIVE ME STARKS'S 2-21 ANY DAY OVER THIS LACKLUSTER CLUSTEREFF.
knickstorrents
Posts: 21121
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/23/2010
Member: #3050
Hong Kong
12/26/2010  9:44 PM
nixluva wrote:The Heat have trouble when you have a guy that can breakdown a defense just like they have with Bron and Wade. This is the reason why you'd want to add a guy like Melo or even Ellis. You want a guy that is nearly impossible to guard so that it breaks down their D which when it's set is very tough to beat. They swarm to the ball so quickly once a player puts the ball on the floor. They also recover very quickly if you pass the ball, but you have to do that and then attack as well. You can't just pass the ball around the perimeter against the Heat. They're too quick.

So adding Melo could actually be a huge improvement in going against the Heat. If you're only losing one starter then I don't see the issue. If it's gonna be Gallo and Chan then it's a tougher sell, but you would have to promote a guy like walker into the rotation and give Williams more of a look. It's still doable.

I would argue that someone who can dribble penetrate is more important to breaking down the Heat defense than someone like a Melo. Melo doesn't take good shots, and he tends to clog the lane, and he does not pass very well. You will not be able to beat the Heat defense with a player like that. You need excellent ball movement and excellent outside shooting. I would argue that a D'Antoni offense is the one offense that is designed from the ground up to beat the Heat defense.

If the D'Antoni offense is clicking there's no good way to defend it. The Celtics were the top defense in the league (they allow 91.2 points/game) and we made them play OUR game, we dictated the tempo and they followed it. In a playoff series that is what's important, dictating the terms and making the other team uncomfortable. We just couldn't get it done that game, but the Celts are way deeper and we lost by 2 points. 2 more seconds and we would have won!!!

In my opinion, either Melo or Amare can share the floor at the same time on offense. They are both lane cloggers, and Amare is a better finisher and shoots a better percentage, so I don't see the net benefit of a Melo.

Players like Ellis, or Kevin Martin even who can break down defenses, with excellent perimeter shot making are better fits for Amare. If we got Melo, would he be down with taking similar pay to Wade/Lebron, and would he be good with playing off the bench? If we max Melo we are already behind the Heat because we'd be paying an inferior player more money.

Rose is not the answer.
BlueSeats
Posts: 27272
Alba Posts: 41
Joined: 11/6/2005
Member: #1024

12/26/2010  10:08 PM
orangeblobman wrote:
BlueSeats wrote:
orangeblobman wrote:
BlueSeats wrote:
orangeblobman wrote:
BlueSeats wrote:
orangeblobman wrote:
BlueSeats wrote:
fishmike wrote:obvious... trade Chandler, Gallo, AR, cash, 2014,2016 first rounders and Fields for Carmelo Anthony

If depleting the roster to get three studs is so foolish why are we (and most teams in the league) even having a conversation about how to beat the Heat?

Not one of the Heat players from the 2009-2010 that were a part of the 'depleting' were of the caliber of Gallinari or Chandler.

That's irrelevant to the point.

It's really not. One depletion is not equal to another. If 'depleting' your roster means getting rid of, let's say, a Brad Lohaus versus getting rid of a Danilo Gallinari, then that can't be an equal depletion.

Who's talking about equal depletion? The point is that they decimated the roster to get 3 studs and were then able to surround them with role players, a task for some reason considered impossible for the Knicks.

Again, if cleaning house for 3 studs were a foolish proposition no one would be talking about how to beat the Heat.

You're talking about equal depletion. For example, bombing Mogadishu to the ground is very different from bombing Paris to the ground; you're losing a lot more quality in the latter. Blowing up a Gallo-Chandler-Fields core is different than decimating a roster that has Brad Lohaus on it.

IOW, the Heat were able to go from the dregs to elite overnight because they didn't have someone of Gallo's caliber holding them back.


Stop thinking that 4 $20s is worth more than 3 $100s because 4 is greater than 3.

What's 60% man, that's 50 wins I think. Chop the 3-8 start off, we're balling at .800. You're blowing up an .800 team. That's talent, that's a healthy core, all young on their rookie deals. That's wild, you don't get that in the league very often, a core that solid, it's like the core of the earth, the planet, we've never been down there but it's wild, man.

You're talking about blowing up a 47-35 team last year, the Heat, and the players they threw up the river to Shanghai weren't worth what we're talking about wasting. So you wait and sign Melo in the off-season, if not, you win 50+ games this year. I'm in no rush. You're in a rush?

It's not about being in a rush, it's that you're only under the cap with an elite FA dying to sign with you every so often. When they Heat had a chance to be in that situation they knew what to do with it. They knew one franchise guy would only take them so far. And despite all the dire misgivings that they'd be too thin to support their core they seem to have done quite admirably, and quickly too.

You don't get to chop off 3-8 starts or 3 game losing streaks and think you're an .800 club. We really are a .600 team. We will get better with internal development, and could get better still with some front court help, but elite is a ways off.

scoshin
Posts: 20584
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/23/2004
Member: #568
12/26/2010  10:17 PM    LAST EDITED: 12/26/2010  10:19 PM
I think we need to play zone D against them. That's what the Wizards did and when I was watching that game, their scrubs (they had just made the Arenas trade and Wall was still injured) were able to stifle LeBron and Wade better than us or the Lakers. I get the sense that a lot of teams like the Lakers take pride in the fact that they can play man-to-man D and have the size and defenders to do so...but Miami just has too many superstars to be guarded 1-on-1. And you can't really rely on doubling/trapping like we did cause LeBron and Wade are both great passers.

Then again, the Knicks haven't played much zone at all this year it seems, which is strange considering we relied on it quite a bit last season with Jeffries as our anchor.

I'm not sure how to crack their D though cause it looked VERY good, in every game I've seen of theirs. Just swarming D, and LeBron and Wade are two of the best perimeter defenders in the league.

TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
12/26/2010  10:28 PM    LAST EDITED: 12/26/2010  10:30 PM
knickstorrents wrote:
nixluva wrote:The Heat have trouble when you have a guy that can breakdown a defense just like they have with Bron and Wade. This is the reason why you'd want to add a guy like Melo or even Ellis. You want a guy that is nearly impossible to guard so that it breaks down their D which when it's set is very tough to beat. They swarm to the ball so quickly once a player puts the ball on the floor. They also recover very quickly if you pass the ball, but you have to do that and then attack as well. You can't just pass the ball around the perimeter against the Heat. They're too quick.

So adding Melo could actually be a huge improvement in going against the Heat. If you're only losing one starter then I don't see the issue. If it's gonna be Gallo and Chan then it's a tougher sell, but you would have to promote a guy like walker into the rotation and give Williams more of a look. It's still doable.

I would argue that someone who can dribble penetrate is more important to breaking down the Heat defense than someone like a Melo. Melo doesn't take good shots, and he tends to clog the lane, and he does not pass very well. You will not be able to beat the Heat defense with a player like that. You need excellent ball movement and excellent outside shooting. I would argue that a D'Antoni offense is the one offense that is designed from the ground up to beat the Heat defense.

If the D'Antoni offense is clicking there's no good way to defend it. The Celtics were the top defense in the league (they allow 91.2 points/game) and we made them play OUR game, we dictated the tempo and they followed it. In a playoff series that is what's important, dictating the terms and making the other team uncomfortable. We just couldn't get it done that game, but the Celts are way deeper and we lost by 2 points. 2 more seconds and we would have won!!!

In my opinion, either Melo or Amare can share the floor at the same time on offense. They are both lane cloggers, and Amare is a better finisher and shoots a better percentage, so I don't see the net benefit of a Melo.

Players like Ellis, or Kevin Martin even who can break down defenses, with excellent perimeter shot making are better fits for Amare. If we got Melo, would he be down with taking similar pay to Wade/Lebron, and would he be good with playing off the bench? If we max Melo we are already behind the Heat because we'd be paying an inferior player more money.

we already have a dribble penetrator on this team by the name of Ray Felton... if u put Melo on the wing w/Amare in the frontcourt, how do u possibly defend against that type of attack? having elite players at both F positions & an Allstar calibre PG, that's as good as anything we could hope for to match up with Miami's big 3... i agree w/ur point about also needing a 3 pt shooter to stretch the defense, but u don't need an elite player to fill that type of role... guys like BJ Armstrong, John Paxson & Steve Kerr did that for the Bulls because they were left wide open by teams that had to defend against Jordan & Pippen... someone like Shawne Williams or Toney Douglas could easily fill that type of role for you if you play them next to 2 superstars.

& i dunno where u get the idea that Melo can't dribble penetrate... he's got tremendous handle for a SF & is one of the most explosive players in the NBA in getting to the hole & finishing at the rim... i would also argue that it's more important to add a guy like Melo who can create his own shot to this squad so that you have 2 guys that can match the production that Lebron & Wade will put up on any given night if you want to have any kind of chance to beat the Heat in a playoff series... ball movement is always important, but the defense they play clogs up the passing lanes & gets them steals, which accounts for much of their easy fastbreak scoring opportunities... if u have a guy like Melo who can beat the double teams on his own & either score or get to the foul line while drawing contact, it does 2 things... first, it takes a lot of pressure off of Amare's shoulders & he wouldn't have to face the constant double & triple teams in the paint... second, & most importantly, it puts a ton of pressure on Lebron, Wade & Bosh's shoulders to focus a lot more energy on playing defense on the other end of the floor & quite possibly puts them into foul trouble... is that a proven formula to beat the Heat? no one seems to be having much luck these days so who's to say for certain? but it allows u to match up better personel wise... the rest is up to the players to execute on the floor.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
12/26/2010  10:30 PM
TMS wrote:
nixluva wrote:
Vmart wrote:
nixluva wrote:
Vmart wrote:Knicks are not going to beat the Heat until Chandler and Gallo step up and say F' LeBron and Wade they can't stop me. Guys I don't know if that day will ever come. With Melo you know he thinks he belongs in elite group of players and guys that is very hard to teach.

I'm tellin you that they don't fear the Heat like that. Just watch the 1st half and you can tell that the Knicks are a confident bunch, they just GASSED. Miami caught us at the end of a brutal schedule and an emotional wave that lasted for a few games. We just flat lost the energy level to keep up. I don't expect that to happen again. If it does then i'll concede that we can't play with those guys. Right now I don't feel that way.

Your just being a fan and want to believe. Reality is that Miami turned it up on the Knicks and that was that. They were gassed for other reason also, mental fatigue.


The Knicks haven't been that out of any game they've played against other top teams. I just get the feeling that they didn't have it and the Heat were able to as you say turn it up and the Knicks didn't have the juice to respond. Right now the team is much stronger than they were at that point. I'm not saying they'll win, just that it should'nt be anything like the last game where we got blownout in the 2nd half like that.

The Heat have a very solid defense in terms of stopping teams from scoring inside. You can't easily penetrate cuz they clog the paint and rotate towards the ball. Thus IMO you have to keep them guessing as to what you want to do. Your offense has to be one filled with motion. If you stagnate they will shut you down. You have to trust in your jump shooting too. They aren't really designed to stop you from hitting 3's. but if you throw it inside they swarm the ball and make it impossible to score easily inside.

You need to keep them moving tho and get into your offense as early as possible. They like to double the PG and do anything to slow down your offense. They just have a great defensive group in terms of moving to the ball. They can close on a post and recover better then any team i've seen in a long time. This means we have to push the ball at all times. Keep them off balance.

the Heat made some great adjustments & picked up their intensity on the defense by a wide margin in that game in the 2nd half... the Knicks had no answer for their double teams on Amare... i think that had as much to do w/that loss as being gassed did... that doesn't mean i don't think the Knicks could ever play the Heat close over the course of 48 minutes, but in a best of 7 game series, i don't see any way we could stack up... they simply have too much talent in that 1-2-3 punch they run out there every night... plus they have some able role players like Arroyo, Chalmers, Miller, Anthony, Dampier & Jones that play their roles well... guys like that can afford to exert most of their energy on playing defense & doing other things on the court while the big 3 carry the offense on most nights... that's a luxury that our team simply does not have... we rely heavily on 1 guy to have a big game every night in order to compete w/the big boys... that's not a great formula for longterm success... Amare is bound to wear down if he has to battle double teams every night to get off his points... this is why people are looking at Melo as an essential piece for any possible championship aspirations we might have going forward.

Can't forget how out of it Turiaf and TD were and we hadn't really established a rotation that included S. Will to the point where he could help. I think that Miami was a tough cover to begin with, but they just blitzed us defensively and we weren't having a great shooting game to begin with. If we're hitting from outside it forces teams to have to pick a poison. They can take away Amar'e, but not everything else we do. Also we got flustered and didn't think our way out of the bad play. Again I think fatigue had something to do with it too. Miami is good but they ain't that good! I've seen enough of their games to see that they have holes too. We can compete with them and even more so as we develop our bench or improve it slightly.

I'm happy about TD, Turiaf and Williams starting to develop their games a bit more. IF we could somehow add AR or Timo to that mix it could really help.

misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
12/26/2010  10:36 PM
Balance

"Balance was another big reason for the Knicks’ win. (against the Bulls), the Knicks got 20 points each from Stoudemire and Felton, 15 apiece from Chandler and Danilo Gallinari and 14 from Landry Fields. And four Knick players posted double-doubles in the game - the first time that’s happened this season. STAT, Chandler and Fields posted double-doubles in points and rebounds, Felton in points and assists."

Play Sunday's tenacioius defensive against Miami, throw in 10 bonus points from Shawne Wiliams, and the Knicks beat Miami.

Just like old times.

once a knick always a knick
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
12/26/2010  10:42 PM
nixluva wrote:I think that Miami was a tough cover to begin with, but they just blitzed us defensively and we weren't having a great shooting game to begin with. If we're hitting from outside it forces teams to have to pick a poison. They can take away Amar'e, but not everything else we do. Also we got flustered and didn't think our way out of the bad play. Again I think fatigue had something to do with it too. Miami is good but they ain't that good! I've seen enough of their games to see that they have holes too. We can compete with them and even more so as we develop our bench or improve it slightly.

that's just it... you're saying if we were hitting our 3's then we would have had better luck against them... do u really want to depend on hitting a high percentage of our 3 point shots to beat any team? that's way too hit or miss... that's not a good way to achieve longterm success, especially against a team like the Heat who have the athletic ability to close out quickly to our outside shooters & contest shots... i think it's better to establish our inside game first & then play hit & run on a team to dictate the pace then to rely on making 3 pt shots... they were doing a good job of that in the 1st half but the Heat started to dictate the pace in the 2nd half & took over the game... the thing that appeals to me about CA is that he can score in a variety of different ways... he's probably the most versatile scorer in the league right now... it gives MDA huge flexibility in how he can use him in this offense & keeps teams like the Heat from double teaming Amare inside the post on every single possession like they were doing to us in that second half.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
12/26/2010  10:47 PM
misterearl wrote:Balance

"Balance was another big reason for the Knicks’ win. (against the Bulls), the Knicks got 20 points each from Stoudemire and Felton, 15 apiece from Chandler and Danilo Gallinari and 14 from Landry Fields. And four Knick players posted double-doubles in the game - the first time that’s happened this season. STAT, Chandler and Fields posted double-doubles in points and rebounds, Felton in points and assists."

Play Sunday's tenacioius defensive against Miami, throw in 10 bonus points from Shawne Wiliams, and the Knicks beat Miami.

Just like old times.

Miami is starting to develop this mythos about how vaunted their defense is. They've had some amazing shutdowns against good teams. I've seen them in action and it's a tough D, but it's not perfect. You can't panic and you can't just keep forcing into the teeth of their D. It's like teams keep trying to go at us inside after we've blocked 4-6 shots and they don't seem to realize that we're good at it. The same with Miami. You have to realize that they're fast to the ball and they swarm an area so that you can't put the ball on the ground and you can't score in the paint with ease.

It seems to me you have to force them to move and use misdirection in your plays. You also MUST RUN. Even off makes you want to try your best to get early offense before they're defense gets set. That is something we can do cuz it's our strength. We stopped pushing the ball in the 2nd half of the Heat game and I feel it's cuz we were gassed. Even our open jumpers were off. We had rubber legs and they just jumped on it. I don't expect that to happen again.

FistOfOakley
Posts: 21079
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 2/18/2010
Member: #3075

12/26/2010  11:26 PM
they beat us because they just could not miss from anywhere on the court.

they are weak in the frontcourt and at point guard. we were doing fine until amar'e started forcing a lot of shots. against the heat, you better learn to pass. amar'e doesn't have that yet.

we match up fairly well against them all things considered. just be physical on bosh and make it the lebron and wade show and hope they're not hitting 3s and 20 footers. easier said than done of course.

Nalod
Posts: 71181
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
12/26/2010  11:32 PM

Not sure we can beat them just yet but I'd be very pleased with a better game than the last.

Lose by less than 10 in a close game.

Progress is measured not always by wins.

There are collections of talent and then there are "Teams"

No doubt talent is important but this team can still improve. Chandler and Gallo can still play better.

Don't believe in mature players improving? Look at felton!

This guy is playing like at top ten point in the league.

How to do we beat the Heat?

Keep playing hard!

loweyecue
Posts: 27468
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 11/20/2005
Member: #1037

12/27/2010  12:23 AM
TMS wrote:
nixluva wrote:I think that Miami was a tough cover to begin with, but they just blitzed us defensively and we weren't having a great shooting game to begin with. If we're hitting from outside it forces teams to have to pick a poison. They can take away Amar'e, but not everything else we do. Also we got flustered and didn't think our way out of the bad play. Again I think fatigue had something to do with it too. Miami is good but they ain't that good! I've seen enough of their games to see that they have holes too. We can compete with them and even more so as we develop our bench or improve it slightly.

that's just it... you're saying if we were hitting our 3's then we would have had better luck against them... do u really want to depend on hitting a high percentage of our 3 point shots to beat any team? that's way too hit or miss... that's not a good way to achieve longterm success, especially against a team like the Heat who have the athletic ability to close out quickly to our outside shooters & contest shots... i think it's better to establish our inside game first & then play hit & run on a team to dictate the pace then to rely on making 3 pt shots... they were doing a good job of that in the 1st half but the Heat started to dictate the pace in the 2nd half & took over the game... the thing that appeals to me about CA is that he can score in a variety of different ways... he's probably the most versatile scorer in the league right now... it gives MDA huge flexibility in how he can use him in this offense & keeps teams like the Heat from double teaming Amare inside the post on every single possession like they were doing to us in that second half.

Well to be fair, if Arroyo and other scrubs weren't torching us fro threes in that game then it would have been closer than it was. Miami relied on their ability to hit the threes to keep their offensive balance, why is it a bad thing if we do the same?

TKF on Melo ::....he is a punk, a jerk, a self absorbed out of shape, self aggrandizing, unprofessional, volume chucking coach killing playoff loser!!
Paladin55
Posts: 24321
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/6/2008
Member: #2098

12/27/2010  1:43 AM
Papabear wrote:Papabear Says

If they continue to get better they may just take everything this season. Now I'm not saying they can't be beat but they sure is starting to look good.

This may be the only way to deal with the Heat based on your assessment...

http://tinyurl.com/26pt74e

No man is happy without a delusion of some kind. Delusions are as necessary to our happiness as realities- C.N. Bovee
simrud
Posts: 23392
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/13/2003
Member: #474
USA
12/27/2010  2:25 AM
Ohnestly, the way things are right now, I don't think we have any business beating the Heat. It would have to be a combination of us playing a perfect game and them an average one.

To have a chance against them, we need scorer of the bench to keep the scoring going so we can stay close when the starters rest. Also a C who rebounds and blocks to get us more possesions and reduce their 2nd chance attempts.

Need to push the temp also so they don't get a chance to set on defense. At the end of the day, going to have to outscore them. Can't stop a team with Wade, Bron and Bosh from scoring. In a way a team like us that has a better chance to beat them actually than a team that relies on defense to win. Nobody can stop them, but at least we can outscore them. I am thinkin the showtime Lakers against the Celts back in the day.

A glimmer of hope maybe?!?
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
12/27/2010  11:54 AM
loweyecue wrote:
TMS wrote:
nixluva wrote:I think that Miami was a tough cover to begin with, but they just blitzed us defensively and we weren't having a great shooting game to begin with. If we're hitting from outside it forces teams to have to pick a poison. They can take away Amar'e, but not everything else we do. Also we got flustered and didn't think our way out of the bad play. Again I think fatigue had something to do with it too. Miami is good but they ain't that good! I've seen enough of their games to see that they have holes too. We can compete with them and even more so as we develop our bench or improve it slightly.

that's just it... you're saying if we were hitting our 3's then we would have had better luck against them... do u really want to depend on hitting a high percentage of our 3 point shots to beat any team? that's way too hit or miss... that's not a good way to achieve longterm success, especially against a team like the Heat who have the athletic ability to close out quickly to our outside shooters & contest shots... i think it's better to establish our inside game first & then play hit & run on a team to dictate the pace then to rely on making 3 pt shots... they were doing a good job of that in the 1st half but the Heat started to dictate the pace in the 2nd half & took over the game... the thing that appeals to me about CA is that he can score in a variety of different ways... he's probably the most versatile scorer in the league right now... it gives MDA huge flexibility in how he can use him in this offense & keeps teams like the Heat from double teaming Amare inside the post on every single possession like they were doing to us in that second half.

Well to be fair, if Arroyo and other scrubs weren't torching us fro threes in that game then it would have been closer than it was. Miami relied on their ability to hit the threes to keep their offensive balance, why is it a bad thing if we do the same?

Arroyo & Chalmers were the only other players other than Lebron & Wade to hit 3's in that game... i never said u shouldn't use the 3 to augment your gameplan, but you shouldn't rely on it as your main strategy to win games... Miami wins their games by playing terrific defense & by running other teams out of the building using their speed & athleticism... every team in the NBA is going to attempt & make 3's over the course of the game, i don't mean to say you completely take it out of your game plan... the Heat blew us out in that game because they clamped down on defense & took away what we were trying to do in the low post & PnR... our spot up shooters had no room to take the uncontested 3's they're more accustomed to taking in the 2nd half because of Miami's ability to close out quickly off rotations, & the Heat defenders were overplaying the passing lanes on their way to collecting 10 steals... that's why i think u need a player who can break down a defense by himself & beat that kind of smothering defense like a CA to match up against teams that like to throw doubles down low on Amare.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
12/27/2010  12:11 PM
TMS wrote:
loweyecue wrote:
TMS wrote:
nixluva wrote:I think that Miami was a tough cover to begin with, but they just blitzed us defensively and we weren't having a great shooting game to begin with. If we're hitting from outside it forces teams to have to pick a poison. They can take away Amar'e, but not everything else we do. Also we got flustered and didn't think our way out of the bad play. Again I think fatigue had something to do with it too. Miami is good but they ain't that good! I've seen enough of their games to see that they have holes too. We can compete with them and even more so as we develop our bench or improve it slightly.

that's just it... you're saying if we were hitting our 3's then we would have had better luck against them... do u really want to depend on hitting a high percentage of our 3 point shots to beat any team? that's way too hit or miss... that's not a good way to achieve longterm success, especially against a team like the Heat who have the athletic ability to close out quickly to our outside shooters & contest shots... i think it's better to establish our inside game first & then play hit & run on a team to dictate the pace then to rely on making 3 pt shots... they were doing a good job of that in the 1st half but the Heat started to dictate the pace in the 2nd half & took over the game... the thing that appeals to me about CA is that he can score in a variety of different ways... he's probably the most versatile scorer in the league right now... it gives MDA huge flexibility in how he can use him in this offense & keeps teams like the Heat from double teaming Amare inside the post on every single possession like they were doing to us in that second half.

Well to be fair, if Arroyo and other scrubs weren't torching us fro threes in that game then it would have been closer than it was. Miami relied on their ability to hit the threes to keep their offensive balance, why is it a bad thing if we do the same?

Arroyo & Chalmers were the only other players other than Lebron & Wade to hit 3's in that game... i never said u shouldn't use the 3 to augment your gameplan, but you shouldn't rely on it as your main strategy to win games... Miami wins their games by playing terrific defense & by running other teams out of the building using their speed & athleticism... every team in the NBA is going to attempt & make 3's over the course of the game, i don't mean to say you completely take it out of your game plan... the Heat blew us out in that game because they clamped down on defense & took away what we were trying to do in the low post & PnR... our spot up shooters had no room to take the uncontested 3's they're more accustomed to taking in the 2nd half because of Miami's ability to close out quickly off rotations, & the Heat defenders were overplaying the passing lanes on their way to collecting 10 steals... that's why i think u need a player who can break down a defense by himself & beat that kind of smothering defense like a CA to match up against teams that like to throw doubles down low on Amare.

The 3 ball is a major part of our offense and isn't some lucky thing we get once in a while as you seem to be making it out to be. We REGULARLY hit for a good percentage. The fact that we missed so many open shots is a clear sign of tired legs. We really didn't even try to use the many other plays we have and that suggests a bit of mental fatigue.

I also think that we won't be run out the building by any team very often and the fact that it happened in that game was a FLUKE. We had just finished a brutal schedule and had to deal with a diminished rotations due to injuries, plus those guys were just getting back and not in the best shape. We simply ran out of gas. All of those things weren't a problem after we got some rest and a chance to work on our game a bit.

The Heat's D is smothering but it's not unbeatable. You have to exploit the fact that they are basically blitzing every play, much like a football team. Misdirection is gonna be key. Give it some time and teams will figure out how to deal with what they do. I noticed that they had a very tough D even back when they were losing. They remind of of the Jordan Bulls in how much ground they can cover. Still We have guys at 6-10, 6-8, 6-7 and 6-9 on the perimeter shooting 3's. If we run our offense properly they should be able to get their shots off regardless of the speed of the Heats defenders. Since we had a bad shooting game all the way around, the Heat were able to get out and run and score easily. There were a lot of factors the led to the blowout that I don't think will all happen again. As I said then, i just don't think they Heat are 20 pts better than us.

The Miami Heat Ain't No Joke! They have that Killer instinct. How do we beat them?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy