[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Randolph OFFICIALLY in the Dog House
Author Thread
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
12/11/2010  11:13 PM    LAST EDITED: 12/11/2010  11:14 PM
nixluva wrote:TMS and Crush, the Knicks were 12-6 during the stretch from Dec. 1 thru Jan. 7th last year. We had gotten to 5 games under .500 and still had a shot at the playoffs. The season wasn't over!!! All this crap you guys keep spouting is revisionist history. You don't give up on a season when you get to within 5 games of .500 after playing just 35 games!!! When exactly was the cutoff point at which a coach is supposed to give up on the season and just play kids? Well it wasn't at that point. Soon enough the team fell off and then it became clear that the season was over, but not up until that point. You guys are too much. Who gives up on a season at 15-20? Just do us a favor and give a freakin rest already.

This is a man that has gone to the WCF's 2x and had some amazing playoff runs get cut short by strange circumstances or losing to great teams. He's about winning. When you're winning 60 games you aren't thinking about petty crap. You're only thinking about winning. If Mike plays AR it's gonna be cuz he thinks he can help the team win and if he doesn't play him it's cuz he doesn't think he can help. PERIOD!!!

9 wins, 16 losses in the games Bender played last year... those are facts, not opinion... call it spouting crap all u want, it doesn't change facts no matter what u wanna call it.

like i told u before, put me on ignore if u don't wanna read what i'm spouting & stfu already... i'm getting sick of you telling me how i should or shouldn't post on this forum.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
AUTOADVERT
fishmike
Posts: 53841
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
12/11/2010  11:21 PM
AnubisADL wrote:
fishmike wrote:
AnubisADL wrote:
Anthony Randolph seems frustrated at being out of Mike D'Antoni's rotation.

"I have no choice. I have to deal with it," Randolph said.

Asked if he is confident that he will get another opportunity to prove himself to the coach, Randolph said "No."

D'Antoni expressed the opposite point of view.

"I'd be very surprised, it's a long year, if things don't come around where you get a heck of a chance," D'Antoni said.

Source: http://basketball.realgm.com/src_wiretap_archives/70512/20101210/randolph_frustrated_in_new_york/

Right on time with our tough schedule.

Before anyone jumps down my throat, clearly by D'Antoni's comment that Randolph will get the Jordan Hill treatment for the foreseeable future.

how is that 33 win prediction looking?

He's not ready. Big difference from the doghouse. Like Bip said... try reading what MDA said

I read the same crap about Jordan Hill last year when Jefferies was getting 30+ minutes. Hill gets traded then D'Antoni starts talking slick.

Guess how many minutes Jefferies is getting in Houston? ZERO.

D'Antoni plays favorites plain and simple. If he wanted to he could find 10-15 minutes a game for Randolph.

funny how the favorites are the guys who give the Knicks the best chance to win the game. In year 2 Hill is like a dozen minutes a game off the bench and a foul magnet. WOW... MDA was really holding bad a monster.

Hows your 33 win prediction looking?

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
12/11/2010  11:30 PM
TMS wrote:
nixluva wrote:TMS and Crush, the Knicks were 12-6 during the stretch from Dec. 1 thru Jan. 7th last year. We had gotten to 5 games under .500 and still had a shot at the playoffs. The season wasn't over!!! All this crap you guys keep spouting is revisionist history. You don't give up on a season when you get to within 5 games of .500 after playing just 35 games!!! When exactly was the cutoff point at which a coach is supposed to give up on the season and just play kids? Well it wasn't at that point. Soon enough the team fell off and then it became clear that the season was over, but not up until that point. You guys are too much. Who gives up on a season at 15-20? Just do us a favor and give a freakin rest already.

This is a man that has gone to the WCF's 2x and had some amazing playoff runs get cut short by strange circumstances or losing to great teams. He's about winning. When you're winning 60 games you aren't thinking about petty crap. You're only thinking about winning. If Mike plays AR it's gonna be cuz he thinks he can help the team win and if he doesn't play him it's cuz he doesn't think he can help. PERIOD!!!

9 wins, 16 losses in the games Bender played last year... those are facts, not opinion... call it spouting crap all u want, it doesn't change facts no matter what u wanna call it.

like i told u before, put me on ignore if u don't wanna read what i'm spouting & stfu already... i'm getting sick of you telling me how i should or shouldn't post on this forum.

You keep spouting your little pissy opinion when it comes to D'Antoni and so I keep responding. I don't care what the record was in Bender's games, that wasn't even my argument. My point was that Mike isn't making decisions based on petty personality issues as you and others keep making it seem. He's not playing guys just cuz he likes them more than some other guy. He's a coach that wants to win. That's how coaches like him think. The guy had something going last year after the bad start and it was still too early in the season to give up and just play kids regardless of the outcome. Until it's pretty much a done deal many coaches will keep trying to win games.

You have no proof of you take on Mike and you just keep sticking it out there as if it's some kind of fact that he's petty. I'll keep speaking up when you do cuz it's wrong!!! He's been accused of not playing young players and then when he does, it's ignored. The man wants to win and his entire career has been about trying to win. I see far more evidence to this fact than you and others can come up with to the contrary. Your argument is weak and I'll keep pointing that out as long as you keep trying to make it.

The facts are that Hill came to SL out of shape and wasn't much better in Training Camp. That along with not really giving max effort was the main reason this kid didn't get more of a look early on. TD was being groomed to play PG and he really wasn't that good at it. He did some things well, so he played more, but even to this day they aren't satisfied with is PG play. AR has been lost and for the most part hasn't shown any improvement. When he does i'm positive he'll play. None of this has anything to do with playing favorites or holding some petty grudge. It's not even about being young.

TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
12/11/2010  11:38 PM
nixluva wrote:
TMS wrote:
nixluva wrote:TMS and Crush, the Knicks were 12-6 during the stretch from Dec. 1 thru Jan. 7th last year. We had gotten to 5 games under .500 and still had a shot at the playoffs. The season wasn't over!!! All this crap you guys keep spouting is revisionist history. You don't give up on a season when you get to within 5 games of .500 after playing just 35 games!!! When exactly was the cutoff point at which a coach is supposed to give up on the season and just play kids? Well it wasn't at that point. Soon enough the team fell off and then it became clear that the season was over, but not up until that point. You guys are too much. Who gives up on a season at 15-20? Just do us a favor and give a freakin rest already.

This is a man that has gone to the WCF's 2x and had some amazing playoff runs get cut short by strange circumstances or losing to great teams. He's about winning. When you're winning 60 games you aren't thinking about petty crap. You're only thinking about winning. If Mike plays AR it's gonna be cuz he thinks he can help the team win and if he doesn't play him it's cuz he doesn't think he can help. PERIOD!!!

9 wins, 16 losses in the games Bender played last year... those are facts, not opinion... call it spouting crap all u want, it doesn't change facts no matter what u wanna call it.

like i told u before, put me on ignore if u don't wanna read what i'm spouting & stfu already... i'm getting sick of you telling me how i should or shouldn't post on this forum.

You keep spouting your little pissy opinion when it comes to D'Antoni and so I keep responding. I don't care what the record was in Bender's games, that wasn't even my argument. My point was that Mike isn't making decisions based on petty personality issues as you and others keep making it seem. He's not playing guys just cuz he likes them more than some other guy. He's a coach that wants to win. That's how coaches like him think. The guy had something going last year after the bad start and it was still too early in the season to give up and just play kids regardless of the outcome. Until it's pretty much a done deal many coaches will keep trying to win games.

You have no proof of you take on Mike and you just keep sticking it out there as if it's some kind of fact that he's petty. I'll keep speaking up when you do cuz it's wrong!!! He's been accused of not playing young players and then when he does, it's ignored. The man wants to win and his entire career has been about trying to win. I see far more evidence to this fact than you and others can come up with to the contrary. Your argument is weak and I'll keep pointing that out as long as you keep trying to make it.

The facts are that Hill came to SL out of shape and wasn't much better in Training Camp. That along with not really giving max effort was the main reason this kid didn't get more of a look early on. TD was being groomed to play PG and he really wasn't that good at it. He did some things well, so he played more, but even to this day they aren't satisfied with is PG play. AR has been lost and for the most part hasn't shown any improvement. When he does i'm positive he'll play. None of this has anything to do with playing favorites or holding some petty grudge. It's not even about being young.

my "pissy little opinions" are based on facts... Bender played in 25 games in which he helped us win 9... that doesn't show me MDA only plays guys that help his team win games... TD worked harder than any other player in practice from all the reports i ever read but he wasn't able to see any playing time until DW started to travel w/the team... that doesn't show me MDA only plays guys that work hard in practice either

your pissy little opinions that you spout off about everytime you rush to MDA's defense does nothing to hide the facts i've presented.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
12/11/2010  11:59 PM
TMS wrote:my "pissy little opinions" are based on facts... Bender played in 25 games in which he helped us win 9... that doesn't show me MDA only plays guys that help his team win games... TD worked harder than any other player in practice from all the reports i ever read but he wasn't able to see any playing time until DW started to travel w/the team... that doesn't show me MDA only plays guys that work hard in practice either

your pissy little opinions that you spout off about everytime you rush to MDA's defense does nothing to hide the facts i've presented.


This is some great body of evidence? A coach's entire career can be wrapped up in the W/L record of a marginal player who played in 25 games and a rookie Combo guard who still hasn't figured out how to play the PG position. You really need to think about your argument.

I'm not making Bender the center of my argument you are. TD did play in games last year. Just to show you how much you're exaggerating the truth of what happened last year, here's TD's game log.


 
Gamedate Opp Result MIN FG FGA FG3 FG3A A STL BLK TO PF PTS
10/28 @MIA L 93-115 6 1 4 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 3
10/30 @CHA L 100-102 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
10/31 PHI L 127-141 Did Not Play
November Shooting  
Gamedate Opp Result MIN FG FGA FG3 FG3A A STL BLK TO PF PTS
11/02 NO W 117-111 6 0 3 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 0
11/04 IND L 89-101 12 2 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4
11/06 CLE L 91-100 15 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 2
11/07 @MIL L 87-102 17 6 9 4 5 1 1 0 1 2 16
11/09 UTA L 93-95 23 9 14 3 7 1 2 0 2 2 21
11/11 ATL L 101-114 36 10 19 2 6 1 0 0 3 4 23
11/13 GS L 107-121 28 7 16 0 2 3 1 0 1 1 15
11/18 @IND W 110-103 12 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 4
11/21 @NJ W 98-91 9 2 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 4
11/22 BOS L 105-107 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
11/24 @LAL L 90-100 17 5 8 2 3 0 1 0 1 1 12
11/25 @SAC L 97-111 16 1 6 0 4 2 1 0 1 3 2
11/27 @DEN L 125-128 Did Not Play
11/29 ORL L 102-114 Did Not Play
December Shooting  
Gamedate Opp Result MIN FG FGA FG3 FG3A A STL BLK TO PF PTS
12/01 PHO W 126-99 9 2 3 2 2 2 0 0 1 2 6
12/02 @ORL L 104-118 21 7 11 2 5 1 1 0 0 4 17
12/04 @ATL W 114-107 12 3 5 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 6
12/06 NJ W 106-97 6 1 3 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 2
12/07 POR W 93-84 11 1 3 1 1 2 1 0 1 2 3
12/11 @NO W 113-96 Did Not Play
12/15 @CHA L 87-94 Did Not Play
12/17 @CHI L 89-98 4 1 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 4 2
12/18 LAC W 95-91 11 3 4 1 2 0 0 0 1 1 7
12/20 CHA W 98-94 15 0 3 0 2 4 2 0 1 1 2
12/22 CHI W 88-81 Did Not Play
12/25 MIA L 87-93 Did Not Play
12/27 SA L 88-95 Did Not Play
12/29 @DET W 104-87 13 0 3 0 2 1 0 0 1 1 2
12/30 @NJ L 95-104 7 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 2
January Shooting  
Gamedate Opp Result MIN FG FGA FG3 FG3A A STL BLK TO PF PTS
01/01 @ATL W 112-108 Did Not Play
01/03 IND W 132-89 12 3 5 1 2 2 2 0 1 0 7
01/07 CHA W 97-93 Did Not Play
01/09 @HOU L 96-105 Did Not Play
01/11 @OKC L 88-106 8 2 4 1 3 0 0 0 2 0 5
01/13 @PHI W 93-92 Did Not Play
01/15 TOR L 104-112 Did Not Play
01/16 @DET L 90-94 Did Not Play
01/18 DET W 99-91 Did Not Play
01/22 LAL L 105-115 Did Not Play
01/24 DAL L 78-128 25 2 7 2 5 1 0 0 1 2 8
01/26 MIN W 132-105 13 3 4 3 4 2 0 1 0 4 9
01/28 TOR L 104-106 Did Not Play
01/30 @WAS L 96-106 Did Not Play
01/31 @MIN L 91-112 3 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
February Shooting  
Gamedate Opp Result MIN FG FGA FG3 FG3A A STL BLK TO PF PTS
02/03 WAS W 107-85 Did Not Play
02/05 MIL L 107-114 Did Not Play
02/06 @CLE L 106-113 Did Not Play
02/09 SAC L 114-118 Did Not Play
02/16 @CHI L 85-118 24 2 7 1 5 1 2 0 1 2 5
02/17 CHI L 109-115 28 2 8 2 5 3 0 1 0 2 6
02/20 OKC L 118-121 Did Not Play
02/22 MIL L 67-83 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
02/23 @BOS L 106-110 Did Not Play
02/26 @WAS W 118-116 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2
02/27 MEM L 109-120 10 2 2 0 0 3 1 0 0 2 7
March Shooting  
Gamedate Opp Result MIN FG FGA FG3 FG3A A STL BLK TO PF PTS
03/01 @CLE L 93-124 21 2 6 1 3 6 0 0 0 2 6
03/03 DET W 128-104 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
03/05 @TOR L 96-102 Did Not Play
03/06 NJ L 93-113 Did Not Play
03/08 ATL W 99-98 24 4 8 1 1 3 0 0 1 4 11
03/10 @SA L 87-97 23 0 3 0 0 2 1 0 0 3 2
03/12 @MEM L 112-119 26 8 13 2 4 1 1 0 2 3 19
03/13 @DAL W 128-94 31 8 10 4 4 8 1 1 0 2 21
03/15 @PHI W 94-84 37 7 13 2 6 7 3 0 3 2 20
03/17 @BOS L 97-109 41 5 13 1 6 3 3 0 3 1 11
03/19 PHI W 92-88 24 7 13 4 7 2 2 0 2 5 22
03/21 HOU L 112-116 37 10 19 6 10 4 2 0 5 5 26
03/23 DEN W 109-104 35 5 11 2 5 7 0 0 2 3 16
03/26 @PHO L 96-132 37 2 11 1 5 4 1 0 2 5 5
03/29 @UTA L 98-103 29 2 7 0 2 1 2 0 0 3 5
03/31 @POR L 90-118 31 4 10 2 4 3 1 0 1 5 14
April Shooting  
Gamedate Opp Result MIN FG FGA FG3 FG3A A STL BLK TO PF PTS
04/02 @GS L 117-128 24 3 6 1 3 5 1 0 2 1 7
04/04 @LAC W 113-107 30 4 8 3 4 4 1 0 0 4 13
04/06 BOS W 104-101 29 4 14 1 5 4 1 0 0 1 10
04/07 @IND L 105-113 31 7 14 4 10 1 0 0 1 5 20
04/09 @ORL L 103-118 29 4 10 2 6 2 2 0 0 3 12
04/11 MIA L 98-111 25 3 9 0 3 3 1 0 0 3 7
04/12 WAS W 114-103 39 5 10 2 5 5 2 0 2 2 16
04/14 @TOR L 113-131 35 5 12 2 5 5 1 0 2 2 14
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
12/12/2010  12:45 AM
nixluva wrote:This is some great body of evidence? A coach's entire career can be wrapped up in the W/L record of a marginal player who played in 25 games and a rookie Combo guard who still hasn't figured out how to play the PG position. You really need to think about your argument.

I'm not making Bender the center of my argument you are. TD did play in games last year. Just to show you how much you're exaggerating the truth of what happened last year, here's TD's game log.

please show me where i have ever said MDA's entire career can be wrapped up in the W/L record of how he handled TD & Bender last year... i have made simple observations about certain decisions he's made as Knicks' head coach & related how those decisions seem to fly in the face of some the statements you & the other MDA apologists have put forth on these forums... if you're going to comment on my posts at least represent them correctly.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
12/12/2010  12:51 AM
TMS wrote:
nixluva wrote:This is some great body of evidence? A coach's entire career can be wrapped up in the W/L record of a marginal player who played in 25 games and a rookie Combo guard who still hasn't figured out how to play the PG position. You really need to think about your argument.

I'm not making Bender the center of my argument you are. TD did play in games last year. Just to show you how much you're exaggerating the truth of what happened last year, here's TD's game log.

please show me where i have ever said MDA's entire career can be wrapped up in the W/L record of how he handled TD & Bender last year... i have made simple observations about certain decisions he's made as Knicks' head coach & related how those decisions seem to fly in the face of some the statements you & the other MDA apologists have put forth on these forums... if you're going to comment on my posts at least represent them correctly.


What I meant by that is that you can't cast aspersions on a coach who has a record of being a fierce competitor and winning coach from his playing days on thru to now, based on some idea that he plays favorites rather than make his decisions based on trying to win. Nothing in his career suggests that, even the small number of incidents you're listing. The last 2 years before this one aren't a good barometer to base that judgement on and certainly not when weighed against his entire career which doesn't support that kind of behavior. A couple of rookies not playing is just not a good basis for argument against a good coach.
umynot
Posts: 21465
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/4/2008
Member: #2093
USA
12/12/2010  1:11 AM
BlueSeats wrote:You know, sometimes its okay to just develop a layer slowly. You don't have to play 10+ guys a night.

Turiaf is brittle, Amare or Moz could go down. AR will get a chance to play again, and hopefully when he does he'll be ready. He's not well schooled, give them time.

This is smartly said....

The Don and the Coach love this kid....

He just needs time

We are winning and all Knick fans can talk about is the next trade!!

Back in the day we rooted for our team...... Then when we made trade
we started giving opinions bout them!!

Starks rode bench early .... As did Mason ( Randolph can play his role on this team )
Jermaine Oneal rode pine 4 years in Portland.....
It happens!! ..... But being premature and just trading to trade makes no sense.

AR is not in Dog House he is just odd man out

When he got to play he didn't perform up to his standards and got
hurt.... Not to mention kid missed a lot of time last year with injury.

He will learn his role and get his chance once we feel comfy with him'
in this offense.....

Word is he has been playing really well in practice so it's just a matter of time!!

KNICKS on the way UP!!!
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
12/12/2010  1:13 AM
this has nothing to do with MDA being a good coach or not, & this is not about me trying to categorize MDA as some petty & malicious Satan worshipping head coach who takes sadomasichistic pleasure in ruining the careers of young players he doesn't happen to like & sticks needles into self-made voodoo dolls of Jordan Hill & Toney Douglas... but i'm not gonna sit here & pretend like i've agreed with & supported every single decision he's made since he took this job when i haven't... i'm sorry if this disturbs you but that's just the way it is.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
umynot
Posts: 21465
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/4/2008
Member: #2093
USA
12/12/2010  1:13 AM
Bippity10 wrote:
Nalod wrote:Mike said "if he don't turn it around".

He had great opportunity and other guys are better. When he is better than them , he'll play. Williams jumped over him and Walker. If we not winning it might be different.

Mike never said "if he don't turn it around"

Mike said " I'm pretty SURE AR will get his chance. He is too talented not to"

KNICKS on the way UP!!!
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
12/12/2010  1:56 AM
Knicks are 15-9 and you care about d'antoni's doghouse? Give it up dude youre foolin noone. Sure itd be nice if ar got some pt but clearly in miked's eyes he hasnt earned it. Again the knicks are 15-9 STFU.
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
Sangfroid
Posts: 24681
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/7/2009
Member: #2784

12/12/2010  8:45 AM
TMS wrote:
rvwink wrote:From what Don Nelson said previously, this is the same argument he had with AR. Both coaches wanted him to forget about his offense and primarily supply rebounding and interior defense for the Knicks. Randolph has this vision of himself being a complete player, and last year he wasn't willing to play a limited role, and stop doing what he thought he could do on offense. Mike, too, is telling him that if he wants to get on the court, he needs to be willing to become a defensive role player first. Is Randolph going to come to his senses, or is he going to sit on the bench and stew. Its seems a battle of wills between a coach who doesn't want to waste offensive possessions on Randolph, and Randolph who doesn't want to accept limitations on how he can play on the court. (Why should I only be allowed to show them half of my game?)

this is very feasable... MDA wants him to play like Jared Jefferies & AR envisions himself as being much more... it's hard to blame AR for not wanting to limit himself when he does have the skills to do much more than just being a Fishlips type role player, but he's got to realize he needs to win MDA's trust first by playing the way he wants him to play before he can expect to get the opportunity to play the way he wants to play himself... hopefully things resolve themselves as the season goes along.

This is an interesting thought. AR does need to throw himself into the defensive fray. If he shows that he's a stopper on defense, then you can overlook some of his mental lapses. JJ used to throw up 3 pointers all the time, much to the dismay of everyone but the opponents. The more he can contribute on the defensive end, the longer he'll be on court. A few rebounds wouldn't hurt his cause either.

"We are playing a game. We are playing at not playing a game..."
Randolph OFFICIALLY in the Dog House

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy