TMS wrote:fishmike wrote:TMS wrote:& the reason your argument sucks is because you think Melo is an overrated player but hold Kevin Durant in a completely different regard... go compare their numbers this year & tell me again how Durant is in a different class... u have some obvious bias against Melo, i'm just going off the stats he's put up over his career... where did i say i believe Melo is as good as KG was 4 years ago? i pointed out the flaw in your OWN argument that because Melo never was able to get his team to advance in the playoffs that he can't make us an elite team, meanwhile you're pining for role player guys like OJ Mayo & Marreese Speights... please.... get a grip... you're the one not looking at the facts... adding 2 role players is not going to have the same impact that adding an elite scorer to this team will.
Who is talkin about Durant? How about sticking to the arguement at hand.
tell the Celtics how KG could never have made them into an elite team because he was only able to get his T'Wolves team to advance once in the playoffs.
thats you saying Den/Minn were similar situations. They werent. KG = MVP.As for Mayo and Speights? Those represent two things this team NEEDS. Another big banger upfront and a true shooter aside from Gallo who can also make plays and setup others for easy shots and most likely those guys wont cost us 3-4 rotation players.
I have ZERO non bias towards Melo. He's a great scorer. Something we HAVE ZERO PROBLEMS WITH. As I have mentioned the Knicks have 4 proven scorers who can drop 30 on you on any night and will. Amare/Felton/Gallo/Chandler have shown you cannot stick an average defender on them because they WILL light you up. But you ignore that and like to bring up some obscure point that has nothing to do with this discussion like Kevin Durant.
Your like Isiah wanting Melo. More talent + more scoring MUST = more wins right? WRONG
We have scoring, and that scoring is only going to get better with more experience.
If this was 1990 I would have traded EVERY PLAYER to have Carmello next to Ewing. I would have been happy to sign MLE players and use my crappy picks to put guys around those two. For 10 years those teams needed a guy like Melo, my god he would have been perfect.
These KNicks dont need Melo. They need size, playmaking, better shooting of the 3 and time to simply develop and improve.
i bring up Durant because you're always telling me how Melo isn't in the same league... the numbers he's putting up this year don't do much for your argument, but if you wanna avoid that topic, that's fine.
as for wanting Melo on this team, i'm stating my reasons just like you're stating yours for not wanting him... you spout off like your opinion is fact... meanwhile you're telling me guys like Speights & Mayo would fill our needs & won't cost us 3-4 rotation players... so exactly what do u think it would take for us to acquire those guys? neither one of those guys are FA's this summer, so you're looking at having to trade away guys like Wilson, Gallo or AR to get your hands on them... so in your eyes, it's worth trading away our assets for them, but not for Melo... to me that's a whole lotta nonsense, but that's your opinion & you're entitled to it.
I have discussed what those guys would cost. Someone like Speights might be cheap, like a 2nd rounder and $3mm in cash to with someone like Bill Walker. Notice I say *might* be cheap. OJ Mayo I have said would be costly, and admitted it would probably cost us something like AR+Fields and that would be VERY tough to swallow, and ended with saying I'm not sure I could do that and am glad I dont have to make that call.
As for my opinion vs facts? The fact is scoring is NOT a problem for the Knicks. Thats a fact. Knicks are #4 in points scored, and spare me your fast pace arguement, because the Knicks are #2 in the NBA in points per possession.
That is a fact. That cannot be disputed. The Knicks are the 2nd best team in the league in scoring points for every possession (ironically Miami is #1). That tells you EVERYTHING you need to know about the Knicks.
So again.
Sticking with the facts.
What's going to make the Knicks better? Swapping out our balanced and the 2nd most effective scoring attack in the NBA (this is a FACT) for a guy who's first, second and third contributions are going to be scoring, scoring and them some scoring? Thats your solution to making the Knicks better?
Sorry dude... you can tell me to get a grip, and tell me to try to follow along till the bukkake dries on your floor but this team does not need a more potent scorer, no matter how big a star you think he is.
Knicks need help in rebounding, opposing FG%, opposing PPS.
Just watch the games man... we need stoppers and glass cleaners.
Facts: Knicks #2 in PPS (points per possession). When we have the ball we score points. Knicks are #4 in the NBA in FT attempts. We dont just chuck 3's, we kill you in the paint and draw fouls.
Pretty obvious what we need. Melo aint it.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs