fishmike wrote:cheers wrote:fishmike wrote:tkf wrote:fishmike wrote:You dont think Lee could fit here? One of the best passing bigs in the league, shoots 55%, great mid range and rebounds? The D is weak but as I mentioned in another thread its tough to guard 5 guys. Pretty sure Lee could do a lot of good things.I dont focus on the past though... Lee did everything you can ask. Drafted last his hard work got him all the way into the all star game and before he got hurt he was part of the Warriors resurrgance
Agree on Amare, but the losing streak still hit 6 and was close to killing our coach in November.
Hey.. I said Knicks would win 45 games. Thats like a 5th seed in the East and I stick by that. I figured if we could work out enough kinks through the first 40-50 games we could start winning at a higher clip later in the year.
Im very happy the team right now all things considered. ATL is a big test. They are a big deep proven team
fish, I miss lee as much as the next guy, but where would he fit here and we still be .500? I said this before, turiaf impacts the game much bigger than his numbers.. He gives hard fouls, he hits the boards, he blocks shots, and changes a lot more...HE protects the paint.. something lee never did... protect the lane.. at some point it goes beyond stats.. lee would get 20/10 while the other team had a party in the paint, I mean a real house party.. at what point does that 20/10 really impacts the game? especially when the other team is having their way on the other end..
100% yes... Lee NEVER had the benefit of playing on a team with any kind of defensive mentality. Forget the trade, if you add Lee to this group we are like 12-4. You have a scoring rebounding center/backup PF for 30 minutes a game. Bring Turiaf off then bench, or Lee off the bench behind Amare... you need to rotate bigs up front.Turiaf did EXACTLY the same things for GS that he's doing for the Knicks, and those GS teams were TERRIBLE. Turiaf looks great because he's playing with a higher caliber talent. Who is the best player Lee played with? Marbury? Harrington?
You get high % scoring with Lee, you get rebounding and you get superior ball movement, all things the Knicks have struggled with when losing this year.
I do not regret the Lee trade. I wanted him back for 6 years $70mm (starting at $9) at the most. He got lots more from GS so happy trails. He earned that contract, and GS was off to a GREAT start. I'm happy for the guy. He was a class Knick and worked his way from a hustle garbage pick 30 guy to an all star.
And moving forward I could certainly see an elite title caliber team with Lee in the rotation as the first PF/C off the bench getting 30 mpg getting his 15ppg 10rebs 4assists and shooting 55%. I could see that for sure.
Its water under the bridge, I just dont see the reason people feel the need to trash the guy. He was probably the only bright spot in the last 5 years. It would have been nice if he could have been part of turning this franchise around but it was bad timing, thus is life
lee's goal in ny was to be a yet another overpaid loser on the knicks. lee knew what old man walsh team plans were/are. lee passed on signing long with the knicks and walsh was even good about and gave lee that one season to reconsider. it was lee's call he made it, i dont blame him but i dont miss him. we dont need that mindset in ny anymore. you pay to win in ny. i already got my david lee plus more in landry fields-- every fan loves the hustle player, but hustle for your team, dont try to hustle your team.
dude.. what are you talking about? What extension did Lee turn down? It never happened. Ever. Lee always wanted to be here, and Walsh could have signed him cheaper 2 years ago. Instead he gave Lee a nice 1 one year deal, Lee continued to do what he did, get better, improve, etc he makes the all star team and GS offers him a ton of money.Lee played the Knicks? Cant get much more ignorant. Dude went to Barnett's funeral. He was all Knicks. He wanted to be here + he loved this city.
Hopefully Landry Fields doesnt become *too* good and want to get paid, then the fans will all hate him
lee signed a $80 mil deal, i think that was most on his mind, which is a good, it should. but that was a check ny clearly could not sign, he knew it. he could have signed for less, he didnt it. no one lost here.
the big check needed to go to a legit franchise player who would change the mindset of the knicks. lee was here for how long? he wasnt changing any minds, he was laughing on the sidelines when the knicks were losing.
the fans (me) didnt hate lee, hated losing. how it look to sign lee $80mil which is just $20m less than what ny pays its new franchise player. come`on, ny signs lee like that, amar'e would want $120mil. throughout the years overpaying has had a negative ripple effect on the knicks.