[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Walsh: "Talent-wise, I felt [Randolph] was the best player in the draft."
Author Thread
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
9/29/2010  5:05 PM
bernard wrote:To clarify, I'm not criticizing Donnie for hyping his players. That's part of being a GM. I'm just remarking on how he does it with a quiet, clever style that gives him added credibility. And also pointing out that he's doing it.

Sure, AR may blow up and turn into a perennial all-star. Sure he's got tremendous upside. Maybe he'll be a 20/10/5/2.5/1.5 guy (Has ANYONE ever done that -- maybe Bird or Magic?). Maybe Rose and Westbrook will be 25/10 guys. Who knows? And I hope as much as all of us that it happens for AR. But if we're dispassionate, we have to agree that he hasn't accomplsihed as much or shown himself to be more talented than those 4 -- all of whom have started their careers very impressively -- and all of whom are pretty sick athletes in their own rights.

Nah AR is just behind those guys in terms of his development, but he's shown the signs of being the kind of player we're talking about. Rose and Gordon are not likely to ever be 20/10 guys at their position. I will say that AR has that rare blend of size, agility, speed, length and skill to be an elite player one day. We've got to at least allow him a chance to grow into that. He was showing good signs last year before he went down. I'm sure he's been working hard since before the trade and even more after to be ready to show what he can do. Rose is a very talented player more along the lines of other great combo guards. Gordon is a short SG and I don't see him having the same kind of impact AR could have over his career. Let's just hope AR develops while with us.

AUTOADVERT
martin
Posts: 76300
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
9/29/2010  5:07 PM
Per 36 Minutes


Westbrook
Season G GS MP FG FGA FG% 3P 3PA 3P% FT FTA FT% ORB DRB TRB AST STL BLK TOV PF PTS
2008-09 82 65 2668 5.9 14.8 0.398 0.5 1.7 0.271 4.7 5.8 0.815 2.4 3 5.4 5.9 1.5 0.2 3.7 2.6 16.9
2009-10 82 82 2813 6.2 14.8 0.418 0.3 1.3 0.221 4.2 5.4 0.78 1.8 3.3 5.1 8.3 1.4 0.4 3.4 2.6 16.9
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Career 164 147 5481 6 14.8 0.408 0.4 1.5 0.249 4.5 5.6 0.798 2.1 3.1 5.3 7.1 1.4 0.3 3.6 2.6 16.9

Rose
Season G GS MP FG FGA FG% 3P 3PA 3P% FT FTA FT% ORB DRB TRB AST STL BLK TOV PF PTS
2008-09 81 80 3000 6.9 14.5 0.475 0.2 0.9 0.222 2.4 3 0.788 1.2 2.7 3.8 6.1 0.8 0.2 2.4 1.5 16.3
2009-10 78 78 2871 8.4 17.2 0.489 0.2 0.8 0.267 3.2 4.2 0.766 0.8 2.9 3.7 5.9 0.7 0.3 2.7 1.2 20.3
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Career 159 158 5871 7.6 15.8 0.483 0.2 0.8 0.242 2.8 3.6 0.776 1 2.8 3.7 6 0.8 0.3 2.6 1.4 18.3

Gordon
Season G GS MP FG FGA FG% 3P 3PA 3P% FT FTA FT% ORB DRB TRB AST STL BLK TOV PF PTS
2008-09 78 65 2677 5.5 12.1 0.456 1.8 4.5 0.389 4 4.7 0.854 0.6 2.1 2.7 2.9 1 0.5 2.2 2.3 16.8
2009-10 62 60 2229 5.7 12.7 0.449 1.9 5.2 0.371 3.6 4.8 0.742 0.4 2.2 2.6 3 1.1 0.2 2.3 1.6 16.9
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Career 140 125 4906 5.6 12.4 0.453 1.8 4.8 0.38 3.8 4.8 0.803 0.5 2.1 2.6 2.9 1.1 0.4 2.3 2 16.9

Mayo
Season G GS MP FG FGA FG% 3P 3PA 3P% FT FTA FT% ORB DRB TRB AST STL BLK TOV PF PTS
2008-09 82 82 3120 6.5 14.8 0.438 1.7 4.4 0.384 2.8 3.2 0.879 0.6 2.9 3.6 3 1 0.1 2.6 2.4 17.5
2009-10 82 82 3113 6.3 13.7 0.458 1.6 4.1 0.383 2.5 3 0.809 0.7 2.9 3.6 2.8 1.1 0.2 2 2 16.6
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Career 164 164 6233 6.4 14.2 0.448 1.6 4.2 0.383 2.7 3.1 0.845 0.7 2.9 3.6 2.9 1.1 0.2 2.3 2.2 17

Gallo
Season G GS MP FG FGA FG% 3P 3PA 3P% FT FTA FT% ORB DRB TRB AST STL BLK TOV PF PTS
2008-09 28 2 412 4.9 10.9 0.448 2.8 6.3 0.444 2.3 2.4 0.963 1.1 3.7 4.8 1.3 1.2 0.3 1.3 4.2 14.9
2009-10 81 74 2747 5.1 12.1 0.423 2.4 6.4 0.381 3.3 4 0.818 0.9 4.4 5.2 1.8 1 0.8 1.4 2.5 16
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Career 109 76 3159 5.1 12 0.426 2.5 6.4 0.389 3.2 3.8 0.829 0.9 4.3 5.2 1.7 1 0.7 1.4 2.7 15.9

AR
Season G GS MP FG FGA FG% 3P 3PA 3P% FT FTA FT% ORB DRB TRB AST STL BLK TOV PF PTS
2008-09 63 22 1129 6.3 13.7 0.462 0 0.1 0 3.2 4.5 0.716 4.1 7.5 11.6 1.6 1.3 2.4 2.6 4.5 15.9
2009-10 33 8 749 6.6 14.9 0.443 0 0.2 0.2 5.2 6.5 0.801 3.5 6.8 10.3 2 1.3 2.5 2.4 4.4 18.5
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Career 96 30 1878 6.4 14.2 0.454 0 0.2 0.111 4 5.3 0.758 3.9 7.2 11.1 1.7 1.3 2.4 2.5 4.5 16.9

Different positions, different teammates, different roles.

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
scoshin
Posts: 20584
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/23/2004
Member: #568
9/29/2010  5:31 PM
nixluva wrote:I can understand some of the doubt about the Knicks chances of being a good team. This is a new team and people just don't know what to expect. These are all just best guesses, but in looking at the talent as I always do it's a good collection. The difference this year is that the intangibles are great too! Usually we can't speak much about the intangibles except to hope like last year, that the vets on last year contracts wouldn't play selfish, which they did. Guys like "Al i'm gonna pass more Harrington" killed our chances. I get killed for my positive predictions, but in most cases there was enough talent to reach .500, but that really depended upon the players buying in and sacrificing, which they paid lip service to, but never did.

This year we see Amar'e, Felton leading by example and vocally. We see young talent like AR, coming in early to work together and just a better working attitude. We've had players with talent before, but this time the talent is matched with the work ethic and wanting to be team players and winners.

The biggest ? for me is still rebounding and defense. Sure, on paper, we should be improved in these areas because of our size and length, but after nearly 5-6 seasons of awful Knick defense, I won't believe it until I see it on the court.

loweyecue
Posts: 27468
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 11/20/2005
Member: #1037

9/29/2010  5:35 PM
SupremeCommander wrote:
nixluva wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:
bernard wrote:More talented than Rose, Mayo, Westbrook, Gordon? Donnie seems so sane and reasonable, hangin' in his wheelchair, but he's got a lot of hype in him.

agreed... anyone would've taken Rose first overall, and I'm fairly certain he would have taken Westbrook if he had the second pick


AR has higher potential than Rose IMO. That doesn't mean he'll realize all of that potential, but as Fishmike brought out, what if he gets to the point of 20ppg - 10rebs - 2 blks plus 4 assists - that would prove Donnie right. He has the potential to be a more impactful player. Guys like Rose and Gordon are great scorers, but that doesn't make them better talents.

I'm not arguing about AR's talent level--I'm excited to have him on the team. But come on, you're telling me you would have drafted AR over Rose if you had the first overall pick? Rose was guaranteed impact player, simple as that. Huge upside and minimal downside. Maybe AR will be a better player in the long run and I certainly hope that that's the case. But as Walsh said, Little Stick Boy might break. Put down the KoolAid and do yourself a favor and quit believing your propaganda

Walsh never said he would have drafted AR ahead of those guys. You need to understand what he said and compare it with what he did. He said AR was the best talent not the best draft choice. He drafted Gallo ahead of AR.

TKF on Melo ::....he is a punk, a jerk, a self absorbed out of shape, self aggrandizing, unprofessional, volume chucking coach killing playoff loser!!
loweyecue
Posts: 27468
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 11/20/2005
Member: #1037

9/29/2010  5:38 PM
nixluva wrote:I can understand some of the doubt about the Knicks chances of being a good team. This is a new team and people just don't know what to expect. These are all just best guesses, but in looking at the talent as I always do it's a good collection. The difference this year is that the intangibles are great too! Usually we can't speak much about the intangibles except to hope like last year, that the vets on last year contracts wouldn't play selfish, which they did. Guys like "Al i'm gonna pass more Harrington" killed our chances. I get killed for my positive predictions, but in most cases there was enough talent to reach .500, but that really depended upon the players buying in and sacrificing, which they paid lip service to, but never did.

This year we see Amar'e, Felton leading by example and vocally. We see young talent like AR, coming in early to work together and just a better working attitude. We've had players with talent before, but this time the talent is matched with the work ethic and wanting to be team players and winners.

Good call hommie, I have typically been amused by your optimism with our past teams, but this time I am right there with you.

TKF on Melo ::....he is a punk, a jerk, a self absorbed out of shape, self aggrandizing, unprofessional, volume chucking coach killing playoff loser!!
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
9/29/2010  5:39 PM
great post with the per 36 minutes stats, martin.
¿ △ ?
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
9/29/2010  5:47 PM
If nightmare walking has Randolph jacking up threes with the talent he has I will be pissed.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
9/29/2010  5:47 PM
loweyecue wrote:
nixluva wrote:I can understand some of the doubt about the Knicks chances of being a good team. This is a new team and people just don't know what to expect. These are all just best guesses, but in looking at the talent as I always do it's a good collection. The difference this year is that the intangibles are great too! Usually we can't speak much about the intangibles except to hope like last year, that the vets on last year contracts wouldn't play selfish, which they did. Guys like "Al i'm gonna pass more Harrington" killed our chances. I get killed for my positive predictions, but in most cases there was enough talent to reach .500, but that really depended upon the players buying in and sacrificing, which they paid lip service to, but never did.

This year we see Amar'e, Felton leading by example and vocally. We see young talent like AR, coming in early to work together and just a better working attitude. We've had players with talent before, but this time the talent is matched with the work ethic and wanting to be team players and winners.

Good call hommie, I have typically been amused by your optimism with our past teams, but this time I am right there with you.


I realize that it seems like i've been crazy but most of the time my comments on the team have been about the talent and what they SHOULD be able to do, but you can't really account for the intangibles. This time the intangibles are so strong that a case can be made that this has a higher % of chance to work well than not. I mean we had to rely on Steph as the leader of our team and then after him even less qualified players. It's tough. Things could've worked out if we kept Zach and Jamal, but that was with the idea of just being a team capable of making the playoffs, but not a real title contender, now we really are trying to reach a higher level than just making the playoffs. We want to start with the playoffs and keep building from there.

In the last few years we've had .500 talent, but .300 intangibles. Now I think we have above .500 talent and above. 500 intangibles. It's a great recipe for success.

Panos
Posts: 30089
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/6/2004
Member: #520
9/29/2010  5:56 PM
martin wrote:Per 36 Minutes

																			
AR
Season G GS MP FG FGA FG% 3P 3PA 3P% FT FTA FT% ORB DRB TRB AST STL BLK TOV PF PTS
2008-09 63 22 1129 6.3 13.7 0.462 0 0.1 0 3.2 4.5 0.716 4.1 7.5 11.6 1.6 1.3 2.4 2.6 4.5 15.9
2009-10 33 8 749 6.6 14.9 0.443 0 0.2 0.2 5.2 6.5 0.801 3.5 6.8 10.3 2 1.3 2.5 2.4 4.4 18.5
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Career 96 30 1878 6.4 14.2 0.454 0 0.2 0.111 4 5.3 0.758 3.9 7.2 11.1 1.7 1.3 2.4 2.5 4.5 16.9

Different positions, different teammates, different roles.


18.5 pts, 10 rbs, 2.5 blocks, 2 assts in his second year. How anyone can look at those numbers and not be excited, I have no idea.

sidsanders
Posts: 22541
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/17/2009
Member: #2426

9/29/2010  6:31 PM    LAST EDITED: 9/29/2010  6:31 PM
Panos wrote:
martin wrote:Per 36 Minutes

																			
AR
Season G GS MP FG FGA FG% 3P 3PA 3P% FT FTA FT% ORB DRB TRB AST STL BLK TOV PF PTS
2008-09 63 22 1129 6.3 13.7 0.462 0 0.1 0 3.2 4.5 0.716 4.1 7.5 11.6 1.6 1.3 2.4 2.6 4.5 15.9
2009-10 33 8 749 6.6 14.9 0.443 0 0.2 0.2 5.2 6.5 0.801 3.5 6.8 10.3 2 1.3 2.5 2.4 4.4 18.5
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Career 96 30 1878 6.4 14.2 0.454 0 0.2 0.111 4 5.3 0.758 3.9 7.2 11.1 1.7 1.3 2.4 2.5 4.5 16.9

Different positions, different teammates, different roles.

18.5 pts, 10 rbs, 2.5 blocks, 2 assts in his second year. How anyone can look at those numbers and not be excited, I have no idea.


thats per 36 stats (you may have already known that). nelson had him in 33 games, and avg 22 mins last year. he was hurt a bit, plus nelson was a nut.

GO TEAM VENTURE!!!!!
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
9/29/2010  6:46 PM
sidsanders wrote:
Panos wrote:
martin wrote:Per 36 Minutes

																			
AR
Season G GS MP FG FGA FG% 3P 3PA 3P% FT FTA FT% ORB DRB TRB AST STL BLK TOV PF PTS
2008-09 63 22 1129 6.3 13.7 0.462 0 0.1 0 3.2 4.5 0.716 4.1 7.5 11.6 1.6 1.3 2.4 2.6 4.5 15.9
2009-10 33 8 749 6.6 14.9 0.443 0 0.2 0.2 5.2 6.5 0.801 3.5 6.8 10.3 2 1.3 2.5 2.4 4.4 18.5
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Career 96 30 1878 6.4 14.2 0.454 0 0.2 0.111 4 5.3 0.758 3.9 7.2 11.1 1.7 1.3 2.4 2.5 4.5 16.9

Different positions, different teammates, different roles.

18.5 pts, 10 rbs, 2.5 blocks, 2 assts in his second year. How anyone can look at those numbers and not be excited, I have no idea.

He also averaged just under 3 fouls for 22 minutes which may or may not be significant but could put him on the bench some if he is getting starters minutes.


thats per 36 stats (you may have already known that). nelson had him in 33 games, and avg 22 mins last year. he was hurt a bit, plus nelson was a nut.

I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
iSergio
Posts: 21499
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/13/2010
Member: #3043
USA
9/29/2010  7:14 PM
It's a new year and training camp and I honestly don't mean to rain any your parade. I'm a diehard New York Knicks fan too. I just can't believe some of you think Danilo Gallinari can compare to Larry Bird and Anthony Randolph has more talent and potential then Derrick Rose. I mean, that's over the line and extreme "homerism" but whatever guys. LOL Hopefully you all are right and I'm wrong about these two.
Nalod
Posts: 71208
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
9/29/2010  7:35 PM
Reading is fundamental.
TheSage
Posts: 21039
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 2/20/2003
Member: #386
9/29/2010  8:08 PM
fishmike wrote:At Gallo's current age Larry was a Junior in college. At the end of next year we will be able to compare

Amen and the the only thing Bird really showed in college was a great outside shot. gee that sounds like Gallo when when he cam into the league-equivalent to Bird's soph or jr years

GodSaveTheKnicks
Posts: 23952
Alba Posts: 21
Joined: 11/21/2006
Member: #1207
USA
9/30/2010  12:32 AM
Panos wrote:
martin wrote:Per 36 Minutes

																			
AR
Season G GS MP FG FGA FG% 3P 3PA 3P% FT FTA FT% ORB DRB TRB AST STL BLK TOV PF PTS
2008-09 63 22 1129 6.3 13.7 0.462 0 0.1 0 3.2 4.5 0.716 4.1 7.5 11.6 1.6 1.3 2.4 2.6 4.5 15.9
2009-10 33 8 749 6.6 14.9 0.443 0 0.2 0.2 5.2 6.5 0.801 3.5 6.8 10.3 2 1.3 2.5 2.4 4.4 18.5
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Career 96 30 1878 6.4 14.2 0.454 0 0.2 0.111 4 5.3 0.758 3.9 7.2 11.1 1.7 1.3 2.4 2.5 4.5 16.9

Different positions, different teammates, different roles.


18.5 pts, 10 rbs, 2.5 blocks, 2 assts in his second year. How anyone can look at those numbers and not be excited, I have no idea.

Panos I don't think you got iSergio's memo. Clearly the statistics show the Randolph's absolute ceiling is a role player. A dime a dozen. He's traveled into the future with his Delorean and come back to school everyone on this board.

Let's try to elevate the level of discourse in this byeetch. Please
Panos
Posts: 30089
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/6/2004
Member: #520
9/30/2010  3:06 AM
Comparison with Star players of comparable style of play
per 36 mins in 2nd year:


Name Pts RBs BLK AST STL Act-MPG
A Randolph 18.5 10.0 2.5 2.0 1.3 22
Camby 16.8 8.4 4.1 2.0 1.2 31.8
J O'Neal 12.0 9.1 2.7 0.8 0.5 13.5
Garnett 15.7 7.4 1.9 2.9 1.3 38.9
Amare 20.1 8.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 36.9
Odom 16.6 7.5 1.5 5.0 1.0 37.2
D Howard 15.5 12.2 1.4 1.5 0.8 36.8
Josh Smith 12.7 7.4 2.9 2.7 0.9 32.0

If these per 36 numbers can be trusted, I'd say he stacks up quite well against some of the cream of the crop:
2nd in Pts
2nd in RBs
4th in Blks (and Howard, Camby, and Smith were first, third and fifth in the league last year)
5th in Assts
tied 1st in steals

fishmike
Posts: 53851
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
9/30/2010  8:32 AM
TheSage wrote:
fishmike wrote:At Gallo's current age Larry was a Junior in college. At the end of next year we will be able to compare

Amen and the the only thing Bird really showed in college was a great outside shot. gee that sounds like Gallo when when he cam into the league-equivalent to Bird's soph or jr years


Dude... Larry Bird was one of the most dominant college players. EVER. I only say vids, but go look up his stats.

I'm not a big fan of the per 36 minute type stats in general. I think its just as important to learn how to stay on the floor and play at that level as it is to be that productive. Still it certainly shows that he's got a big impact (statistically) while on the floor.

AR is an impossible player to gauge from a stat perspective. You just have to watch him play, see the skills and athleticism and hope like hell he can harness that game and stay on the floor. If he can he will fill out the stat sheet and be a big time player.

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
Walsh: "Talent-wise, I felt [Randolph] was the best player in the draft."

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy