[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Walsh having doubts about the TMac - JJ trade with Houston.
Author Thread
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
9/24/2010  3:09 AM
i give Donnie props for being man enough to admit he may have made a huge mistake in making that trade... making trades is not an easy business, no one ever said it was... but we're not being paid millions of dollars to make these types of decisions that will effect the future of the franchise for years to come... i think plenty of us felt that unless Donnie had some kind of guarantee that Lebron was going to come to NY that it was an ill advised trade to make... i hope he never repeats the same mistake & gambles aways future assets on a completely unknown outcome.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
AUTOADVERT
sidsanders
Posts: 22541
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/17/2009
Member: #2426

9/24/2010  4:05 AM
TMS wrote:i give Donnie props for being man enough to admit he may have made a huge mistake in making that trade... making trades is not an easy business, no one ever said it was... but we're not being paid millions of dollars to make these types of decisions that will effect the future of the franchise for years to come... i think plenty of us felt that unless Donnie had some kind of guarantee that Lebron was going to come to NY that it was an ill advised trade to make... i hope he never repeats the same mistake & gambles aways future assets on a completely unknown outcome.

u r just mad cuz they traded jc and hill and your all time fav jj!!!

i didnt like the deal either. at this point the FO made good on alt plans. they have some interesting decisions depending on how the new parts work out (resign chan, possible trade(s))...

GO TEAM VENTURE!!!!!
Markji
Posts: 22753
Alba Posts: -4
Joined: 9/14/2007
Member: #1673
USA
9/24/2010  6:26 AM
kam77 wrote:
Markji wrote:
kam77 wrote:Yeah its disappointing that we got bent over by HOUSTON and still did't get LeBron ...

But that was the price DW paid to get into the Lebron sweepstakes.

I didn't like it. But i understood it and ultimately we had to do it.

It didn't work out. Well Hello... that's life.

Nothing is guaranteed. But you gotta be in it to win it.


Yeah, but we paid $100 for a $1 ticket. That is the problem.

We knew that was was could happen going in. Our haul wasn't LeBron_Bosh $100 but Amare-Felton-AR aint just a dollar. (You gotta set the floor at at least $50 and then we could argue about something it between 50 and 100.)

When we lost the sweepstakes, we cashed in Lee for something, which we could not have done AND still gotten Felton had we not opened up the money. We didn't spend foolishly IMO. And we still have cap flex.


KAM, I agree totally with you about us needing to make cap room and go for LeBron + another max FA. It's the execution at the end was poor. I don't want to rehash the entire ten threads from the trade deadline, but in a nutshell:
1. We were "all in" for the max FA when we traded Jamal and Zack. JJ should have been traded earlier, not wait for the trade deadline.
2. Negotiation with Houston was done terribly. We didn't have to say "Yes" to all of Morey's demands. Negotiate, not "Yes sir, anything you want."
3. Which leads me and a few others to write that they feel the final Houston trade was negotiated by Dolan, and probably with input from Isiah.
The difference between fiction and reality? Fiction has to make sense. Tom Clancy - author
TheSage
Posts: 21039
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 2/20/2003
Member: #386
9/24/2010  8:55 AM
ENOUGH DW rolled the dice-he did not win but did not crap out either. He acquired one of the top PF's in the league, a solid PG who fits the system, a serviceable backup center, a 6-11 freak with unlimited potential and a SG who, if he gets healthy has tremendous skills. Unlike a certain unnamed predecessor he did not acquire over the hill, over hyped individuals who were flawed. Yes the results were not as hoped for but there is hope and huge upside to what he acquired.
Vmart
Posts: 31800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/23/2002
Member: #247
USA
9/24/2010  9:07 AM
TheSage wrote:ENOUGH DW rolled the dice-he did not win but did not crap out either. He acquired one of the top PF's in the league, a solid PG who fits the system, a serviceable backup center, a 6-11 freak with unlimited potential and a SG who, if he gets healthy has tremendous skills. Unlike a certain unnamed predecessor he did not acquire over the hill, over hyped individuals who were flawed. Yes the results were not as hoped for but there is hope and huge upside to what he acquired.

He did a good job with his plan B. But failed in Plan A but that was understandable because plan A already knew their destination nothing he could do about it. Big issue with T-Mac deal was loss of first round picks. If he could have saved a pick then Plan A would have still been attainable. Except it would have been for Melo in a trade. Walsh did a great job of creating cap space but a terrible job in the deal to create cap space. Regardless I don't think in his wildest imagination that he thought Melo would be available to the Knicks in a trade. He probably had it planned out that Melo would be available in Free Agency. On a side note Walsh should have bought into the first round this last draft.

fishmike
Posts: 53851
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
9/24/2010  9:26 AM
Vmart wrote:
TheSage wrote:ENOUGH DW rolled the dice-he did not win but did not crap out either. He acquired one of the top PF's in the league, a solid PG who fits the system, a serviceable backup center, a 6-11 freak with unlimited potential and a SG who, if he gets healthy has tremendous skills. Unlike a certain unnamed predecessor he did not acquire over the hill, over hyped individuals who were flawed. Yes the results were not as hoped for but there is hope and huge upside to what he acquired.

He did a good job with his plan B. But failed in Plan A but that was understandable because plan A already knew their destination nothing he could do about it. Big issue with T-Mac deal was loss of first round picks. If he could have saved a pick then Plan A would have still been attainable. Except it would have been for Melo in a trade. Walsh did a great job of creating cap space but a terrible job in the deal to create cap space. Regardless I don't think in his wildest imagination that he thought Melo would be available to the Knicks in a trade. He probably had it planned out that Melo would be available in Free Agency. On a side note Walsh should have bought into the first round this last draft.

I dont think it was a terrible job in the trade to create cap space.

Look at the other teams who did it and where those trades stack up:
Bulls traded Heinrich (who is actually a good player) and a first rounder to the Wiz for essentially nothig.
Heat trade Beasley, the #2 pick in the draft 2 years ago for 2nd round pick
Knicks trade first rounder, Hill and JJ for TMac

pretty much par for the course... if you wanted to clear space teams were going to make you pay

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
scoshin
Posts: 20584
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/23/2004
Member: #568
9/24/2010  10:22 AM
I wasn't in support of the trade then because you don't give up that much assets just to roll the dice. You give up that much when you KNOW the players is coming to your team. A lot of us even said back then that Donnie must know something about the LeBron situation to make an Isiah trade like this and give up control of 2 1st rounders.

Also, whoever said we couldn't have gotten Randolph, that's not exactly true. Don't forget the salary cap went up, and we would've been about $25-26M under the cap without the Jeffries/Hill trade. If we needed to clear more room, we probably could've dumped Hill for a future 2nd rounder or something. That was enough money to make the DLee trade, and then sign Amare. The real casualty (or benefit) of the TMac trade would've been Felton/Mozgov.

Nalod
Posts: 71208
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
9/24/2010  10:40 AM
The Moz is like a first round pick. How good will be determined but he is a prospect even if 24 yrs old. Say he negates Losing Jordan Hill.

We lost Dlee but lets just say we replaced him with Amare. Ok, and we get AR which to me is like getting another first round pick.

The open cap space gave us Amare and Dlees space gave us some good filler and AR which is like a first rounder.

Sure it could have been done without trading JJ Fishlips and Jhill, but it is what it is.

We still have a big expiring in Eddy and youthier assets on the rise. Gallo, Wilson, Moz and AR are somthing we have not had much of the last 10 years.

That alone makes the team interesting and worth watching. I don't need a title contender NOW. Lets be real, winning a chip is somthing most teams have not done. ITs the Celts and Lakers thing. We have the Yankees. Im content to turn the ship around and move in a positive direction and build on that.

THe Kool Aid is drinkable again!

Moonangie
Posts: 24766
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 7/9/2009
Member: #2788

9/24/2010  11:07 AM    LAST EDITED: 9/24/2010  11:13 AM
kam77 wrote:Yeah its disappointing that we got bent over by HOUSTON and still did't get LeBron ...

But that was the price DW paid to get into the Lebron sweepstakes.

I didn't like it. But i understood it and ultimately we had to do it.

It didn't work out. Well Hello... that's life.

Nothing is guaranteed. But you gotta be in it to win it.

Word. +1 to this post. It's not some average, run-of-the-mill all star we had targeted: IT WAS LEBRON JAMES, who is certainly a once-in-a-generation talent. We had to get into the game, and we missed. That was always a possibility. We still turned the team around with the moves we made, and we retain our cap space and flexibility moving forward. Now hopefully we don't blow t by offering too much for Melo, who is a great scorer, but not a great all-around player.

TMS wrote:i give Donnie props for being man enough to admit he may have made a huge mistake in making that trade... making trades is not an easy business, no one ever said it was... but we're not being paid millions of dollars to make these types of decisions that will effect the future of the franchise for years to come... i think plenty of us felt that unless Donnie had some kind of guarantee that Lebron was going to come to NY that it was an ill advised trade to make... i hope he never repeats the same mistake & gambles aways future assets on a completely unknown outcome.

I agree with you, TMS, for the most part. But when it comes to rolling the dice to land a player like Lebron James, I think the potential outcome is well-balanced with the risks. We had to do it or else be seen as non-players in the sweepstakes. We were essentially pushing our chips All In. We didn't win that hand, but we may finish in second place on the final table.

alau53
Posts: 20324
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/6/2006
Member: #1147

9/24/2010  11:23 PM
why couldnt donnie done just what reilly did to get lebron..he traded his assets when a deal with lebron was about to be made..not during mid season like donnie did..even donnie admits this to be a mistake..but many of you guys stil think the jhil/tmac trade was good and you'd do it again..reily could have traded beasley in mid season to open up cap space for another max fa..but he was smart and waited to make that deal after the season when he knew he was able to get lebron and bosch..why couldnt donnie just wait and do what reily did and open space by trading 1st rd picks, j hil and expiring jeffries contract when he has a deal with lebron/bosch in place..this way even if lebron went elsewhwere the knicks would stil have the valuable aforementioned assets for a trade down the road for withcarmello or paul etc..with some of the posts im reading from many knick fans i completely disagree that ny has the most astute sport fans in the usa..just read this thread and listen to wfan and you'll agree that ny does not have the smartest fans of all..
martin
Posts: 76300
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
9/25/2010  12:24 AM
alau53 wrote:why couldnt donnie done just what reilly did to get lebron..he traded his assets when a deal with lebron was about to be made..not during mid season like donnie did..even donnie admits this to be a mistake..but many of you guys stil think the jhil/tmac trade was good and you'd do it again..reily could have traded beasley in mid season to open up cap space for another max fa..but he was smart and waited to make that deal after the season when he knew he was able to get lebron and bosch..why couldnt donnie just wait and do what reily did and open space by trading 1st rd picks, j hil and expiring jeffries contract when he has a deal with lebron/bosch in place..this way even if lebron went elsewhwere the knicks would stil have the valuable aforementioned assets for a trade down the road for withcarmello or paul etc..with some of the posts im reading from many knick fans i completely disagree that ny has the most astute sport fans in the usa..just read this thread and listen to wfan and you'll agree that ny does not have the smartest fans of all..

cause donnie would have had to find a team that had ~$10M in cap space that would want to absorb Jefferson and Hill AND without taking anything back. How many teams are there? None. Beasely was the #2 pick and was $5M, much easier.

Oh, and recall, Miami didn't have to trade Beasley to make room for LeBron... Beasely was trade to make room for Mike Miller, etc AFTER LeBron, Bosh was added.

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
alau53
Posts: 20324
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/6/2006
Member: #1147

9/25/2010  12:52 AM
many teams would have taken an expiring jeffries and j hill and the knicks 2012 1st rd pick for nothing back at end of year instead of mid season..if the knicks stil had these assets they could proly get the carmelo deal done..too many knick shills on this board
martin
Posts: 76300
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
9/25/2010  1:30 AM
alau53 wrote:many teams would have taken an expiring jeffries and j hill and the knicks 2012 1st rd pick for nothing back at end of year instead of mid season..if the knicks stil had these assets they could proly get the carmelo deal done..too many knick shills on this board

you missed my point. Who are the teams that had $10M in cap space? I don't think there were any.

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
9/25/2010  2:03 AM
Man Walsh is pulling the Media's collective leg. He doesn't want Melo IMO. I think he doesn't want to break up what he's put together this summer. He would prefer to get Melo next summer while keeping most of the guys he's brought in.

Just think about this tho., Felton, Chan 6'8", Amar'e 6'10", Gallo 6'11" and Timo 7'1" OH BABY!!! Who cares about Melo when you've got that kind of size? Then you still have TD, AR 6'11", Turiaf 6'10"! This isn't just lame size either. All those guys can play and are fast, long and athletic.

TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
9/25/2010  3:51 AM
alau53 wrote:many teams would have taken an expiring jeffries and j hill and the knicks 2012 1st rd pick for nothing back at end of year instead of mid season..if the knicks stil had these assets they could proly get the carmelo deal done..too many knick shills on this board

the sad irony of all this is that we gave up the assets to go after Lebron & didn't land him, & because we gave up those assets we will likely miss out on Melo too... but hey, at least we got Ray Felton with the extra cap space.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
earthmansurfer
Posts: 24005
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2005
Member: #858
Germany
9/25/2010  4:12 AM    LAST EDITED: 9/25/2010  4:13 AM
TMS wrote:
alau53 wrote:many teams would have taken an expiring jeffries and j hill and the knicks 2012 1st rd pick for nothing back at end of year instead of mid season..if the knicks stil had these assets they could proly get the carmelo deal done..too many knick shills on this board

the sad irony of all this is that we gave up the assets to go after Lebron & didn't land him, & because we gave up those assets we will likely miss out on Melo too... but hey, at least we got Ray Felton with the extra cap space.


But we wouldn't have been far enough under the cap to S&T (or resign) David Lee. So, we wouldn't have A. Randolph right now as an asset. And if that is true that means we'd probably have to part with Gallo. What assets would we have besides Jordan Hill and our almost 2 draft picks to go after Carmello? Chandler?

We would have ourselves one gutted team and a Carmello who doesn't play defense and perhaps Gallo and Chandler would be gone who do.

The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift. Albert Einstein
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
9/25/2010  4:57 AM
earthmansurfer wrote:
TMS wrote:
alau53 wrote:many teams would have taken an expiring jeffries and j hill and the knicks 2012 1st rd pick for nothing back at end of year instead of mid season..if the knicks stil had these assets they could proly get the carmelo deal done..too many knick shills on this board

the sad irony of all this is that we gave up the assets to go after Lebron & didn't land him, & because we gave up those assets we will likely miss out on Melo too... but hey, at least we got Ray Felton with the extra cap space.


But we wouldn't have been far enough under the cap to S&T (or resign) David Lee. So, we wouldn't have A. Randolph right now as an asset. And if that is true that means we'd probably have to part with Gallo. What assets would we have besides Jordan Hill and our almost 2 draft picks to go after Carmello? Chandler?

We would have ourselves one gutted team and a Carmello who doesn't play defense and perhaps Gallo and Chandler would be gone who do.

why would we have to part with Gallo in your scenario but he's not an available asset to use in a Melo deal? you're not making any sense... Gallo, Hill & 2 future 1st round picks doesn't stack up to what NJ is offering? DEN wouldn't have been interested in a D Lee + future draft picks deal for Melo? there were all sorts of options available to us had we not rushed to push in our chips before the summer even hit & we even knew what Lebron's intentions were.

i've gone through the numbers many times already... the salary cap this year is set to $58M... that means we would have had $29.8M in cap space had DW not made the T-Mac trade, enough to easily sign Amare to his contract & more than enough flexibility leftover to swing a D Lee S&T... after making that trade we not only missed out on Lebron, Wade & Bosh, but now because we made that trade, we also may have lost out on Melo too.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
9/25/2010  5:17 AM
TMS wrote:
alau53 wrote:many teams would have taken an expiring jeffries and j hill and the knicks 2012 1st rd pick for nothing back at end of year instead of mid season..if the knicks stil had these assets they could proly get the carmelo deal done..too many knick shills on this board

the sad irony of all this is that we gave up the assets to go after Lebron & didn't land him, & because we gave up those assets we will likely miss out on Melo too... but hey, at least we got Ray Felton with the extra cap space.


You forgot Roger Mason. As a fan I almost broke my arm patting myself on the back with the cap space available to make that signing. Its all about shooting and the pick and roll.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
9/25/2010  5:22 AM
CrushAlot wrote:
TMS wrote:
alau53 wrote:many teams would have taken an expiring jeffries and j hill and the knicks 2012 1st rd pick for nothing back at end of year instead of mid season..if the knicks stil had these assets they could proly get the carmelo deal done..too many knick shills on this board

the sad irony of all this is that we gave up the assets to go after Lebron & didn't land him, & because we gave up those assets we will likely miss out on Melo too... but hey, at least we got Ray Felton with the extra cap space.


You forgot Roger Mason. As a fan I almost broke my arm patting myself on the back with the cap space available to make that signing. Its all about shooting and the pick and roll.

Plan B my friend.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
earthmansurfer
Posts: 24005
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2005
Member: #858
Germany
9/25/2010  7:55 AM
TMS wrote:
earthmansurfer wrote:
TMS wrote:
alau53 wrote:many teams would have taken an expiring jeffries and j hill and the knicks 2012 1st rd pick for nothing back at end of year instead of mid season..if the knicks stil had these assets they could proly get the carmelo deal done..too many knick shills on this board

the sad irony of all this is that we gave up the assets to go after Lebron & didn't land him, & because we gave up those assets we will likely miss out on Melo too... but hey, at least we got Ray Felton with the extra cap space.


But we wouldn't have been far enough under the cap to S&T (or resign) David Lee. So, we wouldn't have A. Randolph right now as an asset. And if that is true that means we'd probably have to part with Gallo. What assets would we have besides Jordan Hill and our almost 2 draft picks to go after Carmello? Chandler?

We would have ourselves one gutted team and a Carmello who doesn't play defense and perhaps Gallo and Chandler would be gone who do.

why would we have to part with Gallo in your scenario but he's not an available asset to use in a Melo deal? you're not making any sense... Gallo, Hill & 2 future 1st round picks doesn't stack up to what NJ is offering? DEN wouldn't have been interested in a D Lee + future draft picks deal for Melo? there were all sorts of options available to us had we not rushed to push in our chips before the summer even hit & we even knew what Lebron's intentions were.

i've gone through the numbers many times already... the salary cap this year is set to $58M... that means we would have had $29.8M in cap space had DW not made the T-Mac trade, enough to easily sign Amare to his contract & more than enough flexibility leftover to swing a D Lee S&T... after making that trade we not only missed out on Lebron, Wade & Bosh, but now because we made that trade, we also may have lost out on Melo too.

David Lee had a 10.5 mill cap hold, right? (His salary this year is 10.8 mill though) We still would have had to clear an additional 2-3 million in order to S&T Lee. This was gone into into detail on realgm, I don't have the exact figures.

So, we would have essentially lost Lee for nothing, no Randolph here to trade for Melo (which I don't want to do anyway.)
In my (current) scenario giving up Curry, Gallo, Chandler, picks and probably more would leave us gutted. (I gave two scenarios in my last post and wasn't clear on that)

I am just worried, as many are, that Melo doesn't make those around him better nor play defense. Now, Gallo is clearly not at Melo's level but he plays much better D and has more BBIQ. Melo was on a stacked team and couldn't get by an undermanned Utah team.

The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift. Albert Einstein
Walsh having doubts about the TMac - JJ trade with Houston.

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy