[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Donnie needs to go and Now is the time...
Author Thread
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
7/9/2010  9:48 AM
holfresh wrote:


ok
According to SAS, Carmelo says he wants to play in NY...Carmelo was offered 65 mil over three years and turned it down...

Well after what we watched go on this early summer I'm more inclined to sit back and wait rather than expect the next big FA to be our big catch. I don't want to watch all year long praying for Melo in 11 as we all did the past TWO years hoping for TWO of these guys to join us this summer.

http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
AUTOADVERT
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
7/9/2010  9:55 AM    LAST EDITED: 7/9/2010  10:02 AM
Solace wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:He "cleaned up the mess" by giving up a lottery pick an 3 1st round draft picks (with the result so far being simply that we were in a position to offer $100 million to Amare). Does that really deserve so much credit?

I think you're conveniently ignoring some other steps in the cleanup process. That's not a very good summary of the actual results. That being said, I think it's fair to argue the Jordan Hill part. Look, that only happens if we were sure we had LeBron. Obviously, we were sure, but the information was bad. I don't fault him for going all out because of the confidence. The Jordan Hill trade obviously did not work out. In retrospect, I think everyone would like to undo that trade. On the flipside, Jordan Hill was traded because he's only going to be a marginal NBA player, unfortunately. I'm not going to advocate losing picks for nothing (except when they clear cap room like Miami did AND it actually works in getting a star player like LeBron). However, I think it's fair to say that Donnie did a lot more good than harm and so far, we're in great position for 2011. It's not plan A, but it's something relevant, because other Knicks GMs have completely folded when plan A didn't work.


My bad that I was off by a pick like Cosmic pointed out. Any other good that he's done--and I'll give credit for the Randolph trade--were not dependent on the 2010 cap space plan. They could have been done without the 2010 cap space plan. I was posting a summary of the 2010 cap space plan (not Walsh overall) and I don't see how it's inaccurate (with the exception of mistakenly adding a pick to what we gave up). I think it would have been fully accurate to say that the 2010 cap space plan has resulted in giving up a player we drafted in the lottery, 1 1st round pick outright, trading down in another 1st round for the benefit of the opportunity to offer Amare $100 mil. That may change if we add more. We may also get to sign someone like Mike Miller for $50 mil in which case that would have to be added to our half of the equation. It still doesn't look to me like the 2010 cap space plan worked out impressively.
TheSage
Posts: 21039
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 2/20/2003
Member: #386
7/9/2010  9:56 AM
holfresh wrote:
TheSage wrote:I see the bitching and moaning yet no answer to the question I raised

Compare today's roster with the roster Walsh took over. He now has two lottery picks from the Gallo draft, a five time all star up front, cap flexibility, one of the younger rosters in the league with tremendous upside potential vs the roster he took over Old, lazy, overpaid and strangling flexibility. Which one do you prefer the one he took over or the one we have now?????

The roster has developed we are in a better position today than when he took over. it is not perfect but is still a work in progress and is poised to improve from here. Again "Which one do you prefer the one he took over or the one we have now?????"

The same would have happened in 2011 if Donnie sat on his hands...We would have been here WITH our draft picks..

The same would have happened a year from now? and what would the building blocks have been next year? Who were the choices that would have been available to us? We would have had David Lee-a good guy, hard worker and fine player and fine player who is a good piece but hardly a difference maker? or Nate -an explosive midget who has two out of control games for every one in which he plays well? Channing Frye? Tell us what we would start building with next year.

GodSaveTheKnicks
Posts: 23952
Alba Posts: 21
Joined: 11/21/2006
Member: #1207
USA
7/9/2010  9:59 AM
holfresh wrote:If the Knicks misses this chance to land Carmelo after he said he wants to be here, it's unforgivable...Donnie failed in closing the deal...FAILED!!!, let's not forget that...

Dude..relax.

You seem like the same guy who'd be like

" Donnie Walsh should have done whatever it took to clear cap space for TWO max FAs not just ONE. He has failed."

I wouldn't mind him staying on as President and hiring Kevin Pritchard as GM. Only because Pritchard ain't bad at all (vs. grossly incompetent like a LOT of GMs in the league), he's available and he's young. DW is retiring soon anyway.

Let's try to elevate the level of discourse in this byeetch. Please
holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

7/9/2010  10:00 AM    LAST EDITED: 7/9/2010  10:04 AM
TheSage wrote:
holfresh wrote:
TheSage wrote:I see the bitching and moaning yet no answer to the question I raised

Compare today's roster with the roster Walsh took over. He now has two lottery picks from the Gallo draft, a five time all star up front, cap flexibility, one of the younger rosters in the league with tremendous upside potential vs the roster he took over Old, lazy, overpaid and strangling flexibility. Which one do you prefer the one he took over or the one we have now?????

The roster has developed we are in a better position today than when he took over. it is not perfect but is still a work in progress and is poised to improve from here. Again "Which one do you prefer the one he took over or the one we have now?????"

The same would have happened in 2011 if Donnie sat on his hands...We would have been here WITH our draft picks..

The same would have happened a year from now? and what would the building blocks have been next year? Who were the choices that would have been available to us? We would have had David Lee-a good guy, hard worker and fine player and fine player who is a good piece but hardly a difference maker? or Nate -an explosive midget who has two out of control games for every one in which he plays well? Channing Frye? Tell us what we would start building with next year.

I don't get it...We still not a playoff team...Are you talking abt Gallo and TD?...Really?...If Maimi stays together is a rout the next 8-10 years...His picks will be irreverent...In case you missed it...The two best players on the Knicks last year were Isiah's picks...

holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

7/9/2010  10:02 AM
GodSaveTheKnicks wrote:
holfresh wrote:If the Knicks misses this chance to land Carmelo after he said he wants to be here, it's unforgivable...Donnie failed in closing the deal...FAILED!!!, let's not forget that...

Dude..relax.

You seem like the same guy who'd be like

" Donnie Walsh should have done whatever it took to clear cap space for TWO max FAs not just ONE. He has failed."

I wouldn't mind him staying on as President and hiring Kevin Pritchard as GM. Only because Pritchard ain't bad at all (vs. grossly incompetent like a LOT of GMs in the league), he's available and he's young. DW is retiring soon anyway.

NO...People here know I was calling for Donnie's head after he traded the picks...

BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
7/9/2010  10:30 AM
Give the guy a break--he doesnt look healthy
RIP Crushalot😞
smackeddog
Posts: 38391
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/30/2005
Member: #883
7/9/2010  10:40 AM
I've been suspecting his health is a lot worse than they make out- why would someone who has refused to have a needed hip op for 2 years because it would hinder his work, suddenly have an op to remove bone spurs in his neck, which would leave him in a wheelchair whilst trying to recruit LBJ? I find this sudden criticism of Donnie pretty sickening- he worked his backside off to try and achieve what we all wanted- he's carried on working as hard as he can despite his health problems. Yep he's made mistakes, but ehn it looked like we might sign Lebron everyone was singing his praises. The truth is a 'young go getter' GM would not have got Lebron, because it's pretty obvious those 3 free agents had this hook up planned years ago- it's why they signed 3 year deals, it's why they had secret dinners before free agency began. Lebron had no intention of coming here- he just liked the attention- thats not Donnie's fault.

Yep, he's made some mistakes, but he is wise and knows what he's doing, and I think a lot of GM's around the league and players have a great deal of respect for him. Having said that I think it was his plan all along to leave after this free agency thing was over- I think he set his last task as being trying to save the Knicks and bring in Lebron, and then would retire and hand things over to a new GM (remember all the interviews he carried out last year?). It's a shame- I hope his health problems aren't serious, but come on some of you, have a bit of respect for him.

Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
7/9/2010  10:41 AM
In terms of a basketball mind, I have no problem letting Donnie Walsh stick around. He really showed me something with that David Lee trade (Thanks again Dlee!). However, the guy is not healthy and looks a little worse everyday. A top flight and stressful NBA job can't be helping matters, especially if his family is in Indiana? Eventually, he's going to need to hire a GM and eventually a president. Hopefully he'll hire a GM this Summer, or at least let Houston take over, and eventually let Pritchard come in as well.

Walsh has done a good job regardless. We officially have a good roster now. It still needs work, but it's getting there.

“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
Paladin55
Posts: 24321
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/6/2008
Member: #2098

7/9/2010  10:46 AM
holfresh wrote:If the Knicks misses this chance to land Carmelo after he said he wants to be here, it's unforgivable...Donnie failed in closing the deal...FAILED!!!, let's not forget that...

SAS a few days ago said he personally heard players say the would come to NY if Isiah was here...He said the players didn't blame Isiah for the Knicks debacle...Clearly, they want people they can relate to...Donnie went to the interview in a wheelchair...How does a 69 yr old community pick guy relate to today's players...Doesn't bode well for the virility of the Knicks does it...Carmelo is on deck can he close the deal...Dolan had others trying to close it for him...

There, I fixed your post.

James did what he did because he is a coward. The only way Walsh could have gotten him to NYC would have been to strip the team down even more than he did so we could offer max type contracts to all 3 players. The deciding factor was that Wade was in Miami and the Heat were willing to completely strip down their roster, in a way that I don't think any of us have ever seen before, in order to accommodate James, Wade, and Bosh.

This is a very troll-like thread, by the way. I don't recall seeing your name on any posts leading up to last night, or during last night. I don't think you have said a thing that is not regurgitated "info" that was put out a long time ago by certain people.

I think people would react differently to a well thought out thread on this topic, but I am afraid that you are not the kind of guy able to carry the weight of rational thought or argument when you write.

Walsh, for a guy who is temporarily in a wheelchair, has show some surprising agility during all of this. We picked up Amare, then made a deal to add more cap space and get a #2 pick for him, he immediately made a very good deal with GS after Princess James made his "decision," trading a guy, Lee, who was not going to be on our team, for 3 good players, one of whom has the kind of raw potential we have not seen around here for a long time, if at ever, has our cap situation set up so we are able to offer Anthony a good contract next year, and you know he is going to do more in the upcoming weeks to fill the team with players who can contribute.

If you hear Walsh talk, you know that he will be bringing someone else in to run the show within the next few years. He was brought in here to be a fixer with no thought to him being some 10 year fixture at the job.

We are in a better position as a team than when Walsh got here. Our oldest player is not even 28, we have cap space flexibility, and I think the feeling around the league is that we are in the conversation again when you talk about teams with a good future. I don't like everything Walsh has done, but I see a team that is going to improve this year, and be in the mix to get some major pieces that just may allow us to be players come playoff time.

Perhaps your "wheelchair" is you own mind. You have your own little issues, some axes to grind, and I'm sure some demons that are haunting you daily, and maybe this is why you would post this kind of drivel. Nothing you have said here gives me any indication that you understand how far the team has come in the last 2 years. There have been some bumps in the road, but if you cannot see the improvement, you have a problem with facing reality, and may need some kind of mental tune-up.

No man is happy without a delusion of some kind. Delusions are as necessary to our happiness as realities- C.N. Bovee
Solace
Posts: 30002
Alba Posts: 20
Joined: 10/30/2003
Member: #479
USA
7/9/2010  11:19 AM    LAST EDITED: 7/9/2010  11:20 AM
Bonn1997 wrote:
Solace wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:He "cleaned up the mess" by giving up a lottery pick an 3 1st round draft picks (with the result so far being simply that we were in a position to offer $100 million to Amare). Does that really deserve so much credit?

I think you're conveniently ignoring some other steps in the cleanup process. That's not a very good summary of the actual results. That being said, I think it's fair to argue the Jordan Hill part. Look, that only happens if we were sure we had LeBron. Obviously, we were sure, but the information was bad. I don't fault him for going all out because of the confidence. The Jordan Hill trade obviously did not work out. In retrospect, I think everyone would like to undo that trade. On the flipside, Jordan Hill was traded because he's only going to be a marginal NBA player, unfortunately. I'm not going to advocate losing picks for nothing (except when they clear cap room like Miami did AND it actually works in getting a star player like LeBron). However, I think it's fair to say that Donnie did a lot more good than harm and so far, we're in great position for 2011. It's not plan A, but it's something relevant, because other Knicks GMs have completely folded when plan A didn't work.


My bad that I was off by a pick like Cosmic pointed out. Any other good that he's done--and I'll give credit for the Randolph trade--were not dependent on the 2010 cap space plan. They could have been done without the 2010 cap space plan. I was posting a summary of the 2010 cap space plan (not Walsh overall) and I don't see how it's inaccurate (with the exception of mistakenly adding a pick to what we gave up). I think it would have been fully accurate to say that the 2010 cap space plan has resulted in giving up a player we drafted in the lottery, 1 1st round pick outright, trading down in another 1st round for the benefit of the opportunity to offer Amare $100 mil. That may change if we add more. We may also get to sign someone like Mike Miller for $50 mil in which case that would have to be added to our half of the equation. It still doesn't look to me like the 2010 cap space plan worked out impressively.

Well, as Cosmic pointed out, you were off by three, not one. Jordan Hill was a pick, but they traded for a player, not a pick. I seriously doubt if the Rockets had the #8 pick that they would've taken Jordan Hill. I could be wrong, but I doubt it. He's a player that a lot of people don't think all that highly of. So, take that for what it's worth. The second pick is a swap, and Cosmic has pointed out numerous times, there's a good chance that a swap won't even happen. If it does, okay, we won't be dropping very many slots. So, there's one pick that we're actually giving up, not three. I think the price of that trade is very overrated. If Jordan Hill was all he was cracked up to be, we wouldn't need to have added the swap and the pick.

That being said, would I like to undo the trade, since it effectively gave us little result? Sure. However, it was a high reward potential, relatively low risk trade. Let's not paint it like we mortgaged the entire franchise on it. The move itself was a failure, but not a colossal failure. This move in of itself, probably will be a blip on the radar and not a significant factor in how the Knicks do going forward.

As for the overall 2010 cap space plan, let's be fair for a moment. It worked out just fine. Amare is better than everything we gave up, combined. With Amare, we will have the best team we've had since Jeff Van Gundy was coaching. That's just a fact. The Jordan Hill trade did not work out, but it's hard to reasonably criticize too heavily for taking that risk when the stakes were as high as they were. We will move forward.

Wishing everyone well. I enjoyed posting here for a while, but as I matured I realized this forum isn't for me. We all evolve. Thanks for the memories everyone.
fishmike
Posts: 53858
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
7/9/2010  11:23 AM
smackeddog wrote:I've been suspecting his health is a lot worse than they make out- why would someone who has refused to have a needed hip op for 2 years because it would hinder his work, suddenly have an op to remove bone spurs in his neck, which would leave him in a wheelchair whilst trying to recruit LBJ? I find this sudden criticism of Donnie pretty sickening- he worked his backside off to try and achieve what we all wanted- he's carried on working as hard as he can despite his health problems. Yep he's made mistakes, but ehn it looked like we might sign Lebron everyone was singing his praises. The truth is a 'young go getter' GM would not have got Lebron, because it's pretty obvious those 3 free agents had this hook up planned years ago- it's why they signed 3 year deals, it's why they had secret dinners before free agency began. Lebron had no intention of coming here- he just liked the attention- thats not Donnie's fault.

Yep, he's made some mistakes, but he is wise and knows what he's doing, and I think a lot of GM's around the league and players have a great deal of respect for him. Having said that I think it was his plan all along to leave after this free agency thing was over- I think he set his last task as being trying to save the Knicks and bring in Lebron, and then would retire and hand things over to a new GM (remember all the interviews he carried out last year?). It's a shame- I hope his health problems aren't serious, but come on some of you, have a bit of respect for him.

very well said. Even after missing on Lebron he's building this team the right way. Size, skill and versatility up front. Turiaf, Amare, Gallo and Randolph. 4 guys (2 arent even 22 year) all 6'10, long, athletic skilled and can play multiple positions. Walsh's plan B is looking better than most people's plan A right now.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
Markji
Posts: 22753
Alba Posts: -4
Joined: 9/14/2007
Member: #1673
USA
7/9/2010  11:29 AM
This is from Earthmansurfer from another thread. Shows just how good Donnie is.

Earthmansurfer - We got Anthony F'n Randolph and two other players plus a 2nd rounder for our unrestricted free agent.

Toronto - Nada, Cleveland - Nada, Phoenix - Trade exception (or something like that), Utah - Nada

Hats off to Mr. Walsh. Seriously guys, we are REALLY lucky. If nothing else we got a BIG resource to perhaps trade for Melo during the season. And if Randolph is healthy, we may not want to. BIG TALENT (hope he stays healthy. hope the change of scenery helps his head).

I am really excited to watch this team play and we still have 11 million in cap space and Fatty (another 11 million) coming off the books. We are sitting very very good considering what LeCoward did. Curry might actually put together a decent season, though it will have to involve and act of God. Damn, we should be happy. Briggs - Did you come in your pants getting Randolph? (I'm happy we got your boy).

The difference between fiction and reality? Fiction has to make sense. Tom Clancy - author
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
7/9/2010  11:37 AM    LAST EDITED: 7/9/2010  11:40 AM
Solace wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
Solace wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:He "cleaned up the mess" by giving up a lottery pick an 3 1st round draft picks (with the result so far being simply that we were in a position to offer $100 million to Amare). Does that really deserve so much credit?

I think you're conveniently ignoring some other steps in the cleanup process. That's not a very good summary of the actual results. That being said, I think it's fair to argue the Jordan Hill part. Look, that only happens if we were sure we had LeBron. Obviously, we were sure, but the information was bad. I don't fault him for going all out because of the confidence. The Jordan Hill trade obviously did not work out. In retrospect, I think everyone would like to undo that trade. On the flipside, Jordan Hill was traded because he's only going to be a marginal NBA player, unfortunately. I'm not going to advocate losing picks for nothing (except when they clear cap room like Miami did AND it actually works in getting a star player like LeBron). However, I think it's fair to say that Donnie did a lot more good than harm and so far, we're in great position for 2011. It's not plan A, but it's something relevant, because other Knicks GMs have completely folded when plan A didn't work.


My bad that I was off by a pick like Cosmic pointed out. Any other good that he's done--and I'll give credit for the Randolph trade--were not dependent on the 2010 cap space plan. They could have been done without the 2010 cap space plan. I was posting a summary of the 2010 cap space plan (not Walsh overall) and I don't see how it's inaccurate (with the exception of mistakenly adding a pick to what we gave up). I think it would have been fully accurate to say that the 2010 cap space plan has resulted in giving up a player we drafted in the lottery, 1 1st round pick outright, trading down in another 1st round for the benefit of the opportunity to offer Amare $100 mil. That may change if we add more. We may also get to sign someone like Mike Miller for $50 mil in which case that would have to be added to our half of the equation. It still doesn't look to me like the 2010 cap space plan worked out impressively.

Well, as Cosmic pointed out, you were off by three, not one. Jordan Hill was a pick, but they traded for a player, not a pick. I seriously doubt if the Rockets had the #8 pick that they would've taken Jordan Hill. I could be wrong, but I doubt it. He's a player that a lot of people don't think all that highly of. So, take that for what it's worth. The second pick is a swap, and Cosmic has pointed out numerous times, there's a good chance that a swap won't even happen. If it does, okay, we won't be dropping very many slots. So, there's one pick that we're actually giving up, not three. I think the price of that trade is very overrated. If Jordan Hill was all he was cracked up to be, we wouldn't need to have added the swap and the pick.

That being said, would I like to undo the trade, since it effectively gave us little result? Sure. However, it was a high reward potential, relatively low risk trade. Let's not paint it like we mortgaged the entire franchise on it. The move itself was a failure, but not a colossal failure. This move in of itself, probably will be a blip on the radar and not a significant factor in how the Knicks do going forward.

As for the overall 2010 cap space plan, let's be fair for a moment. It worked out just fine. Amare is better than everything we gave up, combined. With Amare, we will have the best team we've had since Jeff Van Gundy was coaching. That's just a fact. The Jordan Hill trade did not work out, but it's hard to reasonably criticize too heavily for taking that risk when the stakes were as high as they were. We will move forward.

Three?! I was off by one. When you swap you ARE giving up a pick, and you get a lower one back. And Hill was Walsh's lottery pick. I think we have quite different views of Amare and Lee. I think Briggs is right, and the stat analyses that have been posted comparing Lee and Amare give a reasonable impression of both. I like Amare I don't think a team that needs to do serious long-term rebuilding should be giving him a $100 mil contract.

BlueSeats
Posts: 27272
Alba Posts: 41
Joined: 11/6/2005
Member: #1024

7/9/2010  11:41 AM
I get Holfresh's point. The Knicks have personality problems. Having to call on Isiah is the peak of desperation and shows little faith in your existing personnel to attract and inspire.

Donnie is a very good executive, but while we needed someone credible to protect us from our owner, Donnie is not currently a vital face. And while I thought MDA had good player cachet I'm not so sure anymore. To second tier players who want to have a lot of fun out there, yes, but at a championship level, no.

Allan Houston is graceful, but inexperienced and boring. Glen Grunwald? I have no idea, he's basically invisible.

Knicks really do need to come out of the gate on fire this year. Amare and Mike need to be on the same page, cant have finger pointing and bickering. Knicks gotta look like they're going places. Gotta win around 40 games. Need to look like a destination again.

martin
Posts: 76339
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
7/9/2010  11:46 AM
BlueSeats wrote:Having to call on Isiah is the peak of desperation and shows little faith in your existing personnel to attract and inspire.

I don't know how it exactly went down but I thought it was more like this:

donnie was frustrated that he couldn't get through to LeBron team about whether or not they were in the running. Nada, no return calls, etc. Isiah, who is close to one of the inner circle (not Lebron or Mav) offered to see if he could help out and contact. he couldn't either. end of story.

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
7/9/2010  11:50 AM    LAST EDITED: 7/9/2010  11:52 AM
I swear to god the posters on Ultimate Knicks are hilarious. You can't admit it is raining even though you are soaking wet. The Knicks are bad, at best mediocre. The plan to land LeBron failed. The Knicks don't have many assets to improve with going forward.

You guys remind me of George Bush while the economy is tanking: "I believe the economy is strong".

A) No, it wasn't strong! And B) the Knicks are not a good team. It did not work out. Trying to pretend it worked out, and pinning your hopes on D'Antoni, Gallinari, Stoudemire, Anthony Randolph, Toney Douglas (Who I really like), and whatever other players happen to sign is just silly.

The plan was to become a contender. Right now the Knicks, if all goes well, are at best the 7th best team in the East. Enjoy your plate of mediocrity! Yummy! That is what we suffered for?

***

Let me break it down for you so you can understand: It is all about wins. Just look at the wins. Past wins and prospective future wins. That is what LeBron and the other free agents who care about winning did. Stoudemire is all about the money and he simply took the best offer anyone was willing to give him.

***

You guys love to rag on Holfresh. But he is right time and again and you are wrong time and again. See then statements above by Holfresh? That is reality. I'm going to hang out with Holfresh in reality-land. Maybe you should take a break from fantasy-land and come join us over here? Or do you prefer to believe Gallinari and Stoudemire are going to tear up the NBA?

oohah

Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
BlueSeats
Posts: 27272
Alba Posts: 41
Joined: 11/6/2005
Member: #1024

7/9/2010  11:51 AM
martin wrote:
BlueSeats wrote:Having to call on Isiah is the peak of desperation and shows little faith in your existing personnel to attract and inspire.

I don't know how it exactly went down but I thought it was more like this:

donnie was frustrated that he couldn't get through to LeBron team about whether or not they were in the running. Nada, no return calls, etc. Isiah, who is close to one of the inner circle (not Lebron or Mav) offered to see if he could help out and contact. he couldn't either. end of story.

I wonder if Riley had Stand Van Gundy reaching out to LeBron too.

Solace
Posts: 30002
Alba Posts: 20
Joined: 10/30/2003
Member: #479
USA
7/9/2010  11:53 AM    LAST EDITED: 7/9/2010  11:54 AM
Bonn1997 wrote:
Solace wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
Solace wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:He "cleaned up the mess" by giving up a lottery pick an 3 1st round draft picks (with the result so far being simply that we were in a position to offer $100 million to Amare). Does that really deserve so much credit?

I think you're conveniently ignoring some other steps in the cleanup process. That's not a very good summary of the actual results. That being said, I think it's fair to argue the Jordan Hill part. Look, that only happens if we were sure we had LeBron. Obviously, we were sure, but the information was bad. I don't fault him for going all out because of the confidence. The Jordan Hill trade obviously did not work out. In retrospect, I think everyone would like to undo that trade. On the flipside, Jordan Hill was traded because he's only going to be a marginal NBA player, unfortunately. I'm not going to advocate losing picks for nothing (except when they clear cap room like Miami did AND it actually works in getting a star player like LeBron). However, I think it's fair to say that Donnie did a lot more good than harm and so far, we're in great position for 2011. It's not plan A, but it's something relevant, because other Knicks GMs have completely folded when plan A didn't work.


My bad that I was off by a pick like Cosmic pointed out. Any other good that he's done--and I'll give credit for the Randolph trade--were not dependent on the 2010 cap space plan. They could have been done without the 2010 cap space plan. I was posting a summary of the 2010 cap space plan (not Walsh overall) and I don't see how it's inaccurate (with the exception of mistakenly adding a pick to what we gave up). I think it would have been fully accurate to say that the 2010 cap space plan has resulted in giving up a player we drafted in the lottery, 1 1st round pick outright, trading down in another 1st round for the benefit of the opportunity to offer Amare $100 mil. That may change if we add more. We may also get to sign someone like Mike Miller for $50 mil in which case that would have to be added to our half of the equation. It still doesn't look to me like the 2010 cap space plan worked out impressively.

Well, as Cosmic pointed out, you were off by three, not one. Jordan Hill was a pick, but they traded for a player, not a pick. I seriously doubt if the Rockets had the #8 pick that they would've taken Jordan Hill. I could be wrong, but I doubt it. He's a player that a lot of people don't think all that highly of. So, take that for what it's worth. The second pick is a swap, and Cosmic has pointed out numerous times, there's a good chance that a swap won't even happen. If it does, okay, we won't be dropping very many slots. So, there's one pick that we're actually giving up, not three. I think the price of that trade is very overrated. If Jordan Hill was all he was cracked up to be, we wouldn't need to have added the swap and the pick.

That being said, would I like to undo the trade, since it effectively gave us little result? Sure. However, it was a high reward potential, relatively low risk trade. Let's not paint it like we mortgaged the entire franchise on it. The move itself was a failure, but not a colossal failure. This move in of itself, probably will be a blip on the radar and not a significant factor in how the Knicks do going forward.

As for the overall 2010 cap space plan, let's be fair for a moment. It worked out just fine. Amare is better than everything we gave up, combined. With Amare, we will have the best team we've had since Jeff Van Gundy was coaching. That's just a fact. The Jordan Hill trade did not work out, but it's hard to reasonably criticize too heavily for taking that risk when the stakes were as high as they were. We will move forward.

Three?! I was off by one. When you swap you ARE giving up a pick, and you get a lower one back. And Hill was Walsh's lottery pick. I think we have quite different views of Amare and Lee. I think Briggs is right, and the stat analyses that have been posted comparing Lee and Amare give a reasonable impression of both. I like Amare I don't think a team that needs to do serious long-term rebuilding should be giving him a $100 mil contract.

Well, I'm not going to argue semantics. Considering the fact that the swap might not happen, yet you've already written it off, what's the point of discussing? You ignore that if the swap happens, we also get a pick back. In the worst case, we swap the #16 pick (IMHO, Houston making the playoffs is a longshot, and the #8 seed is the best they will do) for the #11 pick. You ignore that Jordan Hill sucks. You don't think the Knicks with Amare Stoudemire are a playoff team? I think you're emphasizing the number in that manner to make it seem far more dramatic than it actually was. We can agree to disagree, but I think you're adding complexity to a situation that's relatively simple. We got the better player, we have a better team. I liked David Lee, but c'mon, compared to Amare Stoudemire? That's just silly. End of story.

On a side note, this is starting to remind me of the Bobo discussions that Allan Houston was better than Ray Allen.

Wishing everyone well. I enjoyed posting here for a while, but as I matured I realized this forum isn't for me. We all evolve. Thanks for the memories everyone.
martin
Posts: 76339
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
7/9/2010  11:53 AM
oohah wrote:I swear to god the posters on Ultimate Knicks are hilarious. You can't admit it is raining even though you are soaking wet. The Knicks are bad, at best mediocre. The plan to land LeBron failed. The Knicks don't have many assets to improve with going forward.

You guys remind me of George Bush while the economy is tanking: "I believe the economy is strong".

A) No, it wasn't strong! And B) the Knicks are not a good team. It did not work out. Trying to pretend it worked out, and pinning your hopes on D'Antoni, Gallinari, Stoudemire, Anthony Randolph, Toney Douglas (Who I really like), and whatever other players happen to sign is just silly.

The plan was to become a contender. Right now the Knicks, if all goes well, are at best the 7th best team in the East. Enjoy your plate of mediocrity! Yummy! That is what we suffered for?

***

Let me break it down for you so you can understand. It is all about wins. Just look at the wins. Past wins and prospective future wins. That is what LeBron and the other free agents who care about winning did. Stoudemire is all about the money and he simply took the best offer anyone was willing to give him.

***

You guys love to rag on Holfresh. But he is right time and again and you are wrong time and again. See then statements above by Holfresh? That is reality. I'm going to hang out with Holfresh in reality-land. Maybe you should take a break from fantasy-land and come join us over here? Or do you prefer to believe Gallinari and Stoudemire are going to tear up the NBA?

oohah

your underlying assumption is wrong. The plan was to build a contender by way of cap space and flexibility. The first target/goal of that plan was LeBron and a second max guy next to him.

We missed on LeBron and still have flexibility and cap space to build a contender.

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
Donnie needs to go and Now is the time...

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy