[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Sign Lee and Amare
Author Thread
Childs2Dudley
Posts: 23906
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 1/25/2010
Member: #3051
USA
7/3/2010  12:17 AM
oohah wrote:
Childs2Dudley wrote:
oohah wrote:
fishmike wrote:
Mray20 wrote:I love Gallo he's a good defender and I love his offensive game , I just really don't want David Lee back he's horrible on D and I feel his stats are empty . Amare I can deal with on D but not if he is paired with Lee.

how can a guy that score 55% have empty stats? how?

Perhaps you have heard of this player named Eddy Curry?

oohah

Eddy Curry had empty stats being force-fed the ball on a horrible team. Amare has played for winners.

Please re-read the post to see who was being referred to as having empty stats.

oohah

I apologize. I have not slept in a long time. Can I buy you a drink?

"Our attitude toward life determines life's attitude towards us." - Earl Nightingale
AUTOADVERT
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
7/3/2010  12:21 AM    LAST EDITED: 7/3/2010  12:22 AM
But childs2dudley, if you want to compare Lee's stats to Curry's you'll find that Curry's force-feed team won more games. Additionally, Lee was being "force-fed" in his own way in that he was the only guy playing center. Now add to that the inflated statistics of the "D'Antoni System".

David Lee: 11-12 points, 9-10 rebounds in 30 minutes = solid stats. Even more solid would be 25 minutes and 9-10 points and 8-9 rebounds.

David Lee: 21 points 12 rebounds in 38-39 minutes = inflated and empty.

oohah

Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
Childs2Dudley
Posts: 23906
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 1/25/2010
Member: #3051
USA
7/3/2010  12:28 AM
oohah wrote:But childs2dudley, if you want to compare Lee's stats to Curry's you'll find that Curry's force-feed team won more games. Additionally, Lee was being "force-fed" in his own way in that he was the only guy playing center. Now add to that the inflated statistics of the "D'Antoni System".

David Lee: 11-12 points, 9-10 rebounds in 30 minutes = solid stats. Even more solid would be 25 minutes and 9-10 points and 8-9 rebounds.

David Lee: 21 points 12 rebounds in 38-39 minutes = inflated and empty.

oohah

I'm not a David Lee fan in case you are wondering.

I am too tired to read through the thread but I assume you're making a case as to why Amare is better than Lee. Or at least I hope you are.

I agree with you in that case because Amare is a proven commodity. Players want to play with him. I haven't heard anything recruiting Lee to play together.

"Our attitude toward life determines life's attitude towards us." - Earl Nightingale
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
7/3/2010  1:46 AM
Childs2Dudley wrote:I'm not a David Lee fan in case you are wondering.

I am too tired to read through the thread but I assume you're making a case as to why Amare is better than Lee. Or at least I hope you are.

I agree with you in that case because Amare is a proven commodity. Players want to play with him. I haven't heard anything recruiting Lee to play together.

I am NOT being snarky, but:

I wasn't wondering if you are a Lee fan, and I wasn't making a case about Amare Stoudemire Vs. Lee (Anyone who needs to be convinced that Stoudemire is better than Lee has bigger problems than the Knicks).

And I am a fan of Lee. lunch-pail David Lee, not D'Antoni David Lee.

What I was doing was refuting fishmikes absurd statement that 55% shooting somehow indicates "un-empty" stats by any player. Because Eddy Curry shot a similar percentage and it doesn't get any more empty than Eddy Curry.

As a matter of fact, Lee's stats have never been empty at all until he hooked up with D'Antoni. And they are still not really empty. But they have a lot more air in them than his dense offensive stats from previous seasons.

oohah

Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
7/3/2010  12:24 PM
KnicksSince88 wrote:Its amazing to me people just think that guys who get their numbers on different teams, could produce the same numbers playing together.

don't you remember? the Zach Randolph, Eddy Curry & David Lee frontline was gonna take us to the promised land.

"you hear that Boston? they scared now."

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
JrZyHuStLa
Posts: 25677
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/5/2007
Member: #1241

7/3/2010  12:29 PM
TMS wrote:
KnicksSince88 wrote:Its amazing to me people just think that guys who get their numbers on different teams, could produce the same numbers playing together.

don't you remember? the Zach Randolph, Eddy Curry & David Lee frontline was gonna take us to the promised land.

"you hear that Boston? they scared now."

LOL, never gets old.

Solace
Posts: 30002
Alba Posts: 20
Joined: 10/30/2003
Member: #479
USA
7/3/2010  1:24 PM
JrZyHuStLa wrote:
TMS wrote:
KnicksSince88 wrote:Its amazing to me people just think that guys who get their numbers on different teams, could produce the same numbers playing together.

don't you remember? the Zach Randolph, Eddy Curry & David Lee frontline was gonna take us to the promised land.

"you hear that Boston? they scared now."

LOL, never gets old.

I concur. Every time I watch it, I get chills. Not the good kind, though.

Wishing everyone well. I enjoyed posting here for a while, but as I matured I realized this forum isn't for me. We all evolve. Thanks for the memories everyone.
tj23
Posts: 21851
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/20/2010
Member: #3119

7/3/2010  1:45 PM
I like Lee and Amare I just wish we could get a perimeter player. We all know NY's staple has become the pick and roll. A 2 man game with shooters to spread the floor. I just want a guard or small forward who can run it with Amare/Lee whatever really well because that is our main play. I do not want to see Ridnour or Douglas having to run it over and over. Douglas still needs to work on his passing and pg skills. Ideally, I wish he could come off the bench and play some defense, which is his biggest contribution. And he's shown he can hit some open shots and make an occasional play but I dont want him as the focal point of our offense. I'd rather spread the floor with guys like Douglas, Gallo, and Walker and have a more skilled player that's more adept with the pick and roll that can beat the defense in many ways(unlike Duhon). Also, the way we spread the floor, D'Antoni usually has a smaller 4 who can shoot threes(not that you cant space out with Amare and lee it's just not typical).
tj23
Posts: 21851
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/20/2010
Member: #3119

7/3/2010  3:32 PM
oohah wrote:
Childs2Dudley wrote:I'm not a David Lee fan in case you are wondering.

I am too tired to read through the thread but I assume you're making a case as to why Amare is better than Lee. Or at least I hope you are.

I agree with you in that case because Amare is a proven commodity. Players want to play with him. I haven't heard anything recruiting Lee to play together.

I am NOT being snarky, but:

I wasn't wondering if you are a Lee fan, and I wasn't making a case about Amare Stoudemire Vs. Lee (Anyone who needs to be convinced that Stoudemire is better than Lee has bigger problems than the Knicks).

And I am a fan of Lee. lunch-pail David Lee, not D'Antoni David Lee.

What I was doing was refuting fishmikes absurd statement that 55% shooting somehow indicates "un-empty" stats by any player. Because Eddy Curry shot a similar percentage and it doesn't get any more empty than Eddy Curry.

As a matter of fact, Lee's stats have never been empty at all until he hooked up with D'Antoni. And they are still not really empty. But they have a lot more air in them than his dense offensive stats from previous seasons.

oohah


yo forgive my stupidity but what do you mean by empty stats? I thought Lee was a good offensive player last year. He isolated against bigger, slower centers, played his face up game, and either pulled up or drove pretty well given his 20 per game and his %. Clearly Amare is better and Lee's defense is terrible but I'm trying to understand your point. Lee isn't a go to scorer but a pretty decent complement if you ask me. Not a Bosh/Amare/Dirk, but not so far off from say Boozer.
playa2
Posts: 34922
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 5/15/2003
Member: #407

7/3/2010  3:52 PM
TheSage wrote:
playa2 wrote:
TheSage wrote: The games is about having more points on the board at game's end and this trio can average 60 point a games-not equalled by many threesomes on a starting front line.

Use that line with the teams in the 2010 NBA finals (Boston- LA)and they would laugh you out of the gym.

# Game 1 @ LAL LAL 102, BOS 89


* Recap
* Box

# Game 2 @ LAL BOS 103, LAL 94

* Recap
* Box

# Game 3 @ BOS LAL 91, BOS 84

* Recap
* Box

# Game 4 @ BOS BOS 96, LAL 89

* Recap
* Box

# Game 5 @ BOS BOS 92, LAL 86

* Recap
* Box

# Game 6 @ LAL LAL 89, BOS 67

* Recap
* Box

# Game 7 @ LAL LAL 83, BOS 79

Notice the losing team never scored more than 94 points

Amazing-over 9000 posts and you still say nothing credible

What is it you don't understand ? Championship teams have guys who defend, losing teams have a problem making stops at crucial times in the game 4 qtr 2 min left. Trying to score more than your opponent may get you in the playoffs, but you will NEVER WIN A CHAMPIONSHIP with out playing better defense than your opponent.

JAMES DOLAN on Isiah : He's a good friend of mine and of the organization and I will continue to solicit his views. He will always have strong ties to me and the team.
FrenchKnicks
Posts: 21036
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 10/30/2001
Member: #147
France
7/4/2010  6:12 AM
At this point and based on everything we know, I have to agree that signing D Lee and Amare could be a solution for us.

Amare
D Lee
Gallo
Chandler
Douglas
+ room for a max FA next year.

Caseloads
Posts: 27725
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/29/2001
Member: #41
7/4/2010  6:40 AM
FrenchKnicks wrote:At this point and based on everything we know, I have to agree that signing D Lee and Amare could be a solution for us.

Amare
D Lee
Gallo
Chandler
Douglas
+ room for a max FA next year.

it wouldnt work like that...

misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
7/5/2010  2:52 PM
Lee and Amare are redundant. As much affection as there is for Lee, he is NOT a center. The Knicks need a center to anchor the defense.

The Atlanta Hawks have learned the hard way about playing guys who have redundant skill sets

once a knick always a knick
Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
7/5/2010  4:02 PM
I still don't think Lee had empty stats. You're right though. There's no way in hell he can be the best big man on the team, let alone the number one scoring option on the entire team. He's NOT that type of player. He's a very good player who could be your third best player, and would look GREAT next to an Amare or Bosh.

Get them both and you have a very good frontcourt.

“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
7/6/2010  3:57 PM
Are you sure the fact that he's a home-grown likable player isn't biasing your assessment (Briggs and others arguing for bringing back Lee)? If he had the exact same numbers but on some other (lottery) team, would you really say that we need to use most of our remaining cap space on Lee in order to pair him up with Amare? Last time I posted here regularly, Briggs was talking about how the best teams have tall, long defensive minded PF/Cs, and I think that's exactly what we saw in these finals with all four starting PF/Cs being about 7 foot tall and very good on defense. I wouldn't spend all the FA money on two PFs who both are far from that description.
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
7/6/2010  4:01 PM
misterearl wrote:Lee and Amare are redundant. As much affection as there is for Lee, he is NOT a center. The Knicks need a center to anchor the defense.

The Atlanta Hawks have learned the hard way about playing guys who have redundant skill sets

I kind of agree with this. I'd focus on getting a guy like Biedrins at this point.

¿ △ ?
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
7/6/2010  6:00 PM
crzymdups wrote:
misterearl wrote:Lee and Amare are redundant. As much affection as there is for Lee, he is NOT a center. The Knicks need a center to anchor the defense.

The Atlanta Hawks have learned the hard way about playing guys who have redundant skill sets

I kind of agree with this. I'd focus on getting a guy like Biedrins at this point.

myself as well... I would be open to Lee but lets face it... eventually one of them is going and Amare is the better player.

Biedrins is a risk also but you have to do that

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
mattshaw78
Posts: 20904
Alba Posts: 52
Joined: 6/23/2005
Member: #915
7/6/2010  8:14 PM
can we just have Earl Barron playing the center role and do something for a point guard with the likes of chips we have (expiring contract with curry, wilson chandler, and maybe a sign and trade with lee). We haven't had a decent point guard since derek harper.
BlueSeats "I like anyone who can make Lebron cry. Melo seems to do it a lot."
TheGame
Posts: 26647
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2006
Member: #1154
USA
7/7/2010  9:11 AM
BRIGGS wrote:Bottom line--removing Lee and adding Stuodemire is a wash in many ways. We CANNOT discount resigning Lee in fact if we dont get LBJ Wade or Bosh I think he should be next in line. Atleast a Gallo Lee Amare frontline will be tough to deal with removing Lee is a new zero if we just add amare and some parameter players

BRIGGS, do you think defensively this just would not work. Unless Amare is committed to coming here and playing center, which I doubt is the case, he is probably not going to be happy have to guard Shaq, Bynum, Ming, Howard, and all the other big centers in the league. Plus, Lee is the worst starting PF defender in the league and Amare is probably only 10-12 spots higher than him on the the worst PF defenders' list. They both would have to make a major committment to improving on D, and Amare would have to agree to play center pretty much full time to make it work. I just don't see it.

Trust the Process
TheGame
Posts: 26647
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2006
Member: #1154
USA
7/7/2010  9:24 AM
mattshaw78 wrote:can we just have Earl Barron playing the center role and do something for a point guard with the likes of chips we have (expiring contract with curry, wilson chandler, and maybe a sign and trade with lee). We haven't had a decent point guard since derek harper.

THat's my thoughts. Save our cap space. If we sign Lebron and Amare, fill the rest of the roster with cheap players on 1 year deals and try to sign a third max player next year. Barron and maybe a Jason Williams would fill out the roster just fine.

Trust the Process
Sign Lee and Amare

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy