Respected Middle East expert and former BBC presenter Alan Hart has broken his silence on 9/11, by revealing that the world’s most prominent civil engineering company told him directly that the collapse of the twin towers was a controlled demolition.

Speaking on the Kevin Barrett show yesterday, Hart said he thought the 9/11 attack probably started as a Muslim operation headed up by Osama Bin Laden but that the plot was subsequently hijacked and carried out by Mossad agents in collusion with elements of the CIA, adding that since its formation, Israel has penetrated every Arab government and terrorist organization.

“My guess is that at an early point they said to the bad guys in the CIA – hey this operation’s running what do we do, and the zionists and the neo-cons said let’s use it,” said Hart, making reference to how top neo-cons like Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz and their fellow Project For a New American Century authors had called for a “catastrophic and catalyzing event––like a new Pearl Harbor,” the year before 9/11.

“The twin towers were brought down by a controlled ground explosion, not the planes,” said Hart, adding that this view was based on his close friendship with consultants who work with the world’s leading civil engineering and construction firm.

Hart asked the company to study the collapse of the twin towers, after which they told him directly, “There’s absolutely no doubt whatsoever that the towers were brought down by a controlled ground explosion.”

Hart then explained how the five dancing Israelis seen celebrating the attack on the World Trade Center in New Jersey as it unfolded, who turned out to be Mossad agents, proves at at a minimum Israel knew the attack was going to happen. Hart went further in speculating that the planes had been fitted with transponders and that the Israelis were guiding them in to the towers.

(ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW)

Top Construction Firm: WTC Destroyed By Controlled Demolition 150410banner1

Host Barrett pointed out that to carry out the successful controlled demolition of three of the biggest buildings in history, the conspirators would have to ensure that they were hit, making the use of remote controlled airliners a distinct possibility. In addition, Barrett mentioned the fact that he had interviewed numerous pilots who dismissed the chances of accurately guiding a huge commercial airliner into a building while flying at sea level at around 600 miles per hour, especially considering the alleged 9/11 hijackers struggled to even fly basic Cessna light aircraft.

“Sounding a chilling note, Hart added that the U.S. is in grave danger of an Israeli-instigated false-flag nuclear attack, perhaps using an American nuclear weapon stolen from Minot Air Force Base during the “loose nukes” rogue operation of August, 2007. The motive would be to trigger a U.S. war with Iran, and perhaps to finish the ethnic cleansing of Palestine under cover of war–which Hart is convinced the Zionists are planning to do as soon as the opportunity presents itself,” writes host Barratt.

Given his biography and standing, Hart’s comments are not to be taken lightly. Hart is a former Middle East Chief Correspondent for ITN News and has also presented for BBC Panorama specializing in the Middle East. He was also a war reporter in Vietnam and the first journalist to reach Suez Canal with the Israeli army in 1967. Over the decades, Hart has developed close relationships with numerous high profile political figures, including the Shah of Iran, Yasser Arafat and Shimon Peres.

Hart has been a successful author for years and has no reason to fabricate the fact that a top construction firm told him point blank that the towers were brought down in a controlled demolition.

In forwarding this information, Hart joins legions of other credible experts who to some extent or other have all publicly challenged the official 9/11 story, with many outright stating that the attacks were an inside job, people like 20-year decorated CIA veteran Robert Baer, who told a radio host that “the evidence points at” 9/11 having had aspects of being an inside job.

In addition, no less than 1198 architectural and engineering specialists have signed a petition demanding Congress re-open an official investigation into the 9/11 attack and the collapse of the twin towers.

He's probably afraid to walk outside his house because he thinks the government is monitoring his every move.

Why the government hasn't released a clear video of what entered into the Pentagon? And why were video tapes from every location within miles of the area itself seized by government officials from highways to nearby hotels?

I have yet to meet one person who can explain why the United States Government refuses to release the confiscated tapes from in and around the pentagon area which "they claim" was struck by an airplane. Common sense will tell anyone with a brain that a missile entered that building.

Those are intelligent questions. I expected an intelligent answer.

This picture shows the hole before the wall collapsed AT THE PENTAGON, now look even at the windows....is this the damage of a 757 or a Missle

Now look at a Missle hole that hit the USS Cole (DDG-67)

Another pic before the collapse ^ Notice the structure is still intact even where the wings should have smashed into the building

Here is the hole in the building - it's been reported by at least a dozen different sources (including conspiracy theory sites) to be a 16 to 20 foot hole. That is really interesting when you take into account the fact that the 757 body is 12 ft 4in wide and 13 ft 6in high. (Here is where I was mistaken in the past, like so very many others I was led astray by the HEIGHT of the aircraft, which is actually the measurement from the wheels-down to the tip of the tail. That measurement is for aircraft hangar clearance, not the SIZE of the aircraft.) The 757 is basically a cylinder that is 13 feet across. It then should not be surprising that it would create something around a thirteen foot hole in the side of the building.

Look at the nose-on view of a 757 - you can see the body is slightly less than 1/3 the size of the height of the aircraft. The tail certainly isn't going to punch a hole through a reinforced concrete wall; that is why there is no 40 foot hole in the front of the Pentagon in any photos. A 40 foot object didn't hit it, a 13 foot object did.

Nalod wrote:If oil companies and gov't are ripping us off, are we still not the wealthest country on the planet?

The democracy will always be challanged by douche bag right wings which is why we must vote proper and respect the values of others. Even those conservative deserve some respect. Its called the middle ground and its where we usually end up. The democracy will always need work to maintain the balance.

Ok Playa, take it further: if we did as you say we did, what and who profits by it?

But conspiricies have to be for a purpose. For example Bush Sr. leaves Saddam in power to leave a credible threat in the middle east

to give the Saudi's a reason for us to put a base there. We establish a foot hold because mounting an attact and perhaps occupation without a base is very expensive.

Conspricies keep us "Busy".......thats what they want man, keeping us busy man, real busy!

playa2 wrote:Wednesday, May 26, 2010

Respected Middle East expert and former BBC presenter Alan Hart has broken his silence on 9/11, by revealing that the world’s most prominent civil engineering company told him directly that the collapse of the twin towers was a controlled demolition.

Speaking on the Kevin Barrett show yesterday, Hart said he thought the 9/11 attack probably started as a Muslim operation headed up by Osama Bin Laden but that the plot was subsequently hijacked and carried out by Mossad agents in collusion with elements of the CIA, adding that since its formation, Israel has penetrated every Arab government and terrorist organization.

“My guess is that at an early point they said to the bad guys in the CIA – hey this operation’s running what do we do, and the zionists and the neo-cons said let’s use it,” said Hart, making reference to how top neo-cons like Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz and their fellow Project For a New American Century authors had called for a “catastrophic and catalyzing event––like a new Pearl Harbor,” the year before 9/11.

“The twin towers were brought down by a controlled ground explosion, not the planes,” said Hart, adding that this view was based on his close friendship with consultants who work with the world’s leading civil engineering and construction firm.

Hart asked the company to study the collapse of the twin towers, after which they told him directly, “There’s absolutely no doubt whatsoever that the towers were brought down by a controlled ground explosion.”

Hart then explained how the five dancing Israelis seen celebrating the attack on the World Trade Center in New Jersey as it unfolded, who turned out to be Mossad agents, proves at at a minimum Israel knew the attack was going to happen. Hart went further in speculating that the planes had been fitted with transponders and that the Israelis were guiding them in to the towers.

(ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW)

Top Construction Firm: WTC Destroyed By Controlled Demolition 150410banner1

Host Barrett pointed out that to carry out the successful controlled demolition of three of the biggest buildings in history, the conspirators would have to ensure that they were hit, making the use of remote controlled airliners a distinct possibility. In addition, Barrett mentioned the fact that he had interviewed numerous pilots who dismissed the chances of accurately guiding a huge commercial airliner into a building while flying at sea level at around 600 miles per hour, especially considering the alleged 9/11 hijackers struggled to even fly basic Cessna light aircraft.

“Sounding a chilling note, Hart added that the U.S. is in grave danger of an Israeli-instigated false-flag nuclear attack, perhaps using an American nuclear weapon stolen from Minot Air Force Base during the “loose nukes” rogue operation of August, 2007. The motive would be to trigger a U.S. war with Iran, and perhaps to finish the ethnic cleansing of Palestine under cover of war–which Hart is convinced the Zionists are planning to do as soon as the opportunity presents itself,” writes host Barratt.

Given his biography and standing, Hart’s comments are not to be taken lightly. Hart is a former Middle East Chief Correspondent for ITN News and has also presented for BBC Panorama specializing in the Middle East. He was also a war reporter in Vietnam and the first journalist to reach Suez Canal with the Israeli army in 1967. Over the decades, Hart has developed close relationships with numerous high profile political figures, including the Shah of Iran, Yasser Arafat and Shimon Peres.

Hart has been a successful author for years and has no reason to fabricate the fact that a top construction firm told him point blank that the towers were brought down in a controlled demolition.

In forwarding this information, Hart joins legions of other credible experts who to some extent or other have all publicly challenged the official 9/11 story, with many outright stating that the attacks were an inside job, people like 20-year decorated CIA veteran Robert Baer, who told a radio host that “the evidence points at” 9/11 having had aspects of being an inside job.

In addition, no less than 1198 architectural and engineering specialists have signed a petition demanding Congress re-open an official investigation into the 9/11 attack and the collapse of the twin towers.

Youre right. I admit. We did it. We were bored. We already had all the money, newspapers, Hollywood, power, bombs and we just needed something fresh to do. Can you blame a guy?!

The mere fact that anyone could claim that jews were celebrating after 9/11 is laughable by itself. Thousands of jews dies, and you think we were celebrating? I was in Little Lebanon in London when the bombs went off, and I saw with my own eyes the muslims celebrating their greatest "victory". It sickens me when anyone says my people would feel any kind of happiness for something like this and i am personally insulted you posted this embarasment of an article. Anyone who says jews had any involvement in 9/11 loses all credibility and you should be banned again just for the crime of believing this article.

firefly wrote:The mere fact that anyone could claim that jews were celebrating after 9/11 is laughable by itself. Thousands of jews dies, and you think we were celebrating? I was in Little Lebanon in London when the bombs went off, and I saw with my own eyes the muslims celebrating their greatest "victory". It sickens me when anyone says my people would feel any kind of happiness for something like this and i am personally insulted you posted this embarasment of an article. Anyone who says jews had any involvement in 9/11 loses all credibility and you should be banned again just for the crime of believing this article.

Should Christians around the world be offended by the entire nation of Israel every time a hasidic in Jerusalem spits on Christians? Stop calling for people to be banned off this forum when they post articles. It is not personal and it was not meant to be offensive to you or anyone else.

firefly wrote:First off, Hasidic jews in Jerusalem dont spit on Christians. Id like to hear one account of that happening please. And if they did, yeah you should be insulted and Ill go down there with you to stop it. Second, I do take it as a affront to the entire jewish community because it is blatantly untrue.

A few weeks ago, a senior Greek Orthodox clergyman in Israel attended a meeting at a government office in Jerusalem's Givat Shaul quarter. When he returned to his car, an elderly man wearing a skullcap came and knocked on the window. When the clergyman let the window down, the passerby spat in his face.

The clergyman prefered not to lodge a complaint with the police and told an acquaintance that he was used to being spat at by Jews. Many Jerusalem clergy have been subjected to abuse of this kind. For the most part, they ignore it but sometimes they cannot.

Five Mossad agents in NJ and they were seen celebrating?! Seriously? How did they know they were Mossad? Why would they be celebrating in public if they just blew up 2 huge office buildings? Why would they be in NJ? Youre asking me to refute it using another article? I would be amazing if anyone spent the energy writing an article to refute it!

Whether it was meant to be insulting or not, it is. Youre right about one thing tho Silver. I shouldnt take someone elses idiocity personally. Im reminded of a quote. "Never argue with someone who buys ink by the barrel".

Silverfuel wrote:

firefly wrote:First off, Hasidic jews in Jerusalem dont spit on Christians. Id like to hear one account of that happening please. And if they did, yeah you should be insulted and Ill go down there with you to stop it. Second, I do take it as a affront to the entire jewish community because it is blatantly untrue.

http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/christians-in-jerusalem-want-jews-to-stop-spitting-on-them-1.137099

A few weeks ago, a senior Greek Orthodox clergyman in Israel attended a meeting at a government office in Jerusalem's Givat Shaul quarter. When he returned to his car, an elderly man wearing a skullcap came and knocked on the window. When the clergyman let the window down, the passerby spat in his face.

The clergyman prefered not to lodge a complaint with the police and told an acquaintance that he was used to being spat at by Jews. Many Jerusalem clergy have been subjected to abuse of this kind. For the most part, they ignore it but sometimes they cannot.

I am surprised you did not know of this. It is very common from what I understand. One of my professors who was raised in Israel said it was a problem.

Five Mossad agents in NJ and they were seen celebrating?! Seriously? How did they know they were Mossad? Why would they be celebrating in public if they just blew up 2 huge office buildings? Why would they be in NJ? Youre asking me to refute it using another article? I would be amazing if anyone spent the energy writing an article to refute it!

If you think its BS then refute, don't say he should be banned! I have been insulted plenty of time before on this forum. People have taken a shot at me. No one was taking a shot at you! BTW, there were several articles saying muslims in NJ were celebrating but I don't see you coming to their aid.

Whether it was meant to be insulting or not, it is. Youre right about one thing tho Silver. I shouldnt take someone elses idiocity personally. Im reminded of a quote. "Never argue with someone who buys ink by the barrel".

See, thats the problem. You don't want to prove him wrong, you want to silence him!

Im honestly saddened about the spitting. As a jew whos been spat on MAAAANY times, it sickens me that other jews would do the same. Especially older people who should know better. Believe me when I say, had I been there, I would have stood up for the clergyman.

The banning comment was an overreaction, but thats what Playa tries to elicit in people. He doesnt care what he posts as long as its contreversial. He probably still thinks I have horns and hide them under my skullcap (like a little kid in a theme park asked his mom as I walked by). And youre right. I dont feel the need to prove someone like Playa wrong, no proof is required. And with someone like that, I doesnt matter to him whether hes right or wrong, he'll print it anyway. And thats not a good thing. I respect everyones right to free speech, but I have a right to come to my favourite website and not be subjected to his foolishness. I dont come here for that. And if your response to that will be "dont read it", Im concerned for the people who will read it and believe theres a shred of truth in anything he says. Im not going to spend my life refuting every wrong thing he says, but Id rather he find somewhere else to say it so that people who I know, like the other members of this forum dont assume what hes saying is correct and view me in a different light.

Silverfuel wrote:

firefly wrote:And if your response to that will be "dont read it", Im concerned for the people who will read it and believe theres a shred of truth in anything he says.

Its a forum and people have different points of view. How many people can you ask to ban? Lets say you succeed in getting playa banned. What happens tomorrow when someone else signs up and shares his point of view? You are gonna want them banned too?

Im not going to spend my life refuting every wrong thing he says, but Id rather he find somewhere else to say it so that people who I know, like the other members of this forum dont assume what hes saying is correct and view me in a different light.

I feel somewhat responsible for this thread. Earlier this week I came across a CNN video where they interviewed several people in WTC and I emailed it to playa. He posted it here (clearly not with the intention of being controversial) and got attacked by other people that post here. I cannot just stand by and watch while playa gets banned for something I made him aware of. Especially since a legit video from CNN!

7 WTC did not fall on its own.

Listen, this is a bball forum. The OT stuff is fun and informative but not the real reason we are here. I see the main guys here as friends. If they needed something Id be there, and Id assume vice versa too. If, when I first came to UK, I checked out the OT thread and there were a bunch of posters discussing the merits of gas over ovens, I wouldnt have joined. 99.9% of the poeple who see this forum do not believe in the Elders of Zion, do not believe that Jews run the world and want to kill everyone but themselves, do not believe that the holocaust is a myth, I could go on. If someone comes into our house and starts spreading his beliefs and those beliefs match the above sentance then yeah, you damn right I want them banned too.

Martin and Andrew have a choice to make. They can choose to have a moderate, slightly left-leaning group of users or an extremist, far-right group of users who believe that anyone not white, christians, American and gun-toting is the debil. I believe they have chosen the former and Im proud to be a part of that group. Ive got no problem with Playa posting his conspiracy theories sometimes, bu maybe he should read some of the stuff he posts first and consider how it makes him look.