TMS wrote:

Juice wrote:

TMS wrote:

Juice wrote:Nahhhh you take Wesley Johnson

agree... personally i'd take Favors at 3 if i were the Nets but if they think Yi can do the job next year, then Wesley Johnson would be my pick.

Yi and Lee and or CDR and Harris will be on the trading block. I don't think the Nets are high on Yi anymore

personally i think the Nets would be better off signing D Lee to a contract & taking Wesley Johnson at #3... that would be their best case scenario to address both their needs.

Being that there will be 5 Top Free Agent Power Forwards this summer(Bosh/Boozer/Amar'e/Lee/Scola) and the Nets have hoards of money available uhhhhhh Yeah that would be the better route to choose. BPA with pick and try to strike big in Free Agency.

BRIGGS wrote:

Juice wrote:

EnySpree wrote:

Juice wrote:Nahhhh you take Wesley Johnson

Terence Williams emerged down the stretch of the season...he's their answer at SF. Briggs makes sense with the Monroe idea. Nets need a big man. It really depends on who they can sign....that person might very well be David Lee.

Holy shot....would the Nets trade that pick to get David Lee???

I wanted us to draft T-Will or Clark BTW

The same T-Will BRIGGS stated wouldn't amount to much in the NBA. T-Will is a facilitator, so much so the Nets may consider trading Harris as Thorn has already admitted

"We have been fielding calls on Devin, I'm not going to lie about it."

That being said You make T-Will become the point forward and slide Johnson over to the 3. Sign Free Agents to fill in other holes. I love how Kinck fans like to point out supposed redundancy on a team when look at the Lakers? Look at our very own Knicks.

WesJo is like Grant Hill and Shawn Marion rolled into one player. T-Will is like a poor man's Lebron/Vince Carter. Lebron and Grant Hill definitely could have played together.

You draft BPA if you are the Nets because for the most part they have positions filled.

I like Greg Monroe but like many have concerns over he's like a Paul Milsap type good player, nice skillset, adds depth to a team, but he isn't a player who looks to dominate or has enough of a mean streak to his game. I was high on him last year and still would take him but he didn't show enough growth from this year compared to last year.

Why would the Nets trade the pick when they can sign Lee outright if they want him?

T will had a great ending to what was a very porous start[on many teams he wouldve lost that opportunity]. I would tend to agree that he should be given the chance to stick and see if he can be consistent. I think however I was much closer to what I thought Steph Curry was than what you thought T will is.

I never said Curry wasn't a good player. I said he isn't what I call a point guard but is a happy go lucky volume shooting guard.