[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

If no LBJ
Author Thread
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
5/4/2010  11:02 PM
when we traded for Zach people around here were carrying on about how he & Curry would be a perfect tandem in our frontcourt... we were adding a 23 & 10 guy to our 20 & 8 C... we'd be a force to be reckoned with in the East... they scared now... people seem to have short term memory loss around these parts.

u can't succeed with 2 frontcourt players that play zero D... it's pretty basic... unless you have some elite talent playing on the perimeter, someone's gotta defend the paint for your team to be any good, it's been proven time & time again

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
AUTOADVERT
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
5/5/2010  1:46 AM
TMS wrote:when we traded for Zach people around here were carrying on about how he & Curry would be a perfect tandem in our frontcourt... we were adding a 23 & 10 guy to our 20 & 8 C... we'd be a force to be reckoned with in the East... they scared now... people seem to have short term memory loss around these parts.

u can't succeed with 2 frontcourt players that play zero D... it's pretty basic... unless you have some elite talent playing on the perimeter, someone's gotta defend the paint for your team to be any good, it's been proven time & time again

Curry & Zach was even more of an offensive mess than D. Curry had no midrange game and so he was lost out there when Zach was doing his thing. Then as you mentioned on the other end there was literally two Galapagos Tortoises out there and we would give up points all too easily.

I think DW's not even remotely interested in having a Pair of bigs that can't defend anymore. He comes from a solid defensive background and I think he wants to return some semblance of interior defense to this team this summer. I just don't expect to see some lumbering bigs out there. It's gonna be a quick and agile team with length. That's why Bosh is gonna be a prime target. People don't like his D, but I think he's the kind of player DW is gonna be looking at. He's gonna give MDA the kind of players he needs to play the way he wants to play.

How would a trio of Bosh PF/Barron C/Gallo SF work for you?

Panos
Posts: 30106
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/6/2004
Member: #520
5/5/2010  2:34 AM
nixluva wrote:
TMS wrote:when we traded for Zach people around here were carrying on about how he & Curry would be a perfect tandem in our frontcourt... we were adding a 23 & 10 guy to our 20 & 8 C... we'd be a force to be reckoned with in the East... they scared now... people seem to have short term memory loss around these parts.

u can't succeed with 2 frontcourt players that play zero D... it's pretty basic... unless you have some elite talent playing on the perimeter, someone's gotta defend the paint for your team to be any good, it's been proven time & time again

Curry & Zach was even more of an offensive mess than D. Curry had no midrange game and so he was lost out there when Zach was doing his thing. Then as you mentioned on the other end there was literally two Galapagos Tortoises out there and we would give up points all too easily.

I think DW's not even remotely interested in having a Pair of bigs that can't defend anymore. He comes from a solid defensive background and I think he wants to return some semblance of interior defense to this team this summer. I just don't expect to see some lumbering bigs out there. It's gonna be a quick and agile team with length. That's why Bosh is gonna be a prime target. People don't like his D, but I think he's the kind of player DW is gonna be looking at. He's gonna give MDA the kind of players he needs to play the way he wants to play.

How would a trio of Bosh PF/Barron C/Gallo SF work for you?


Why is it when something happens you explain how its the greatest thing since slice bread,
and when it fails you totally flip-flop and have all the excuses why it failed, and why
the new slice of bread is so much better and different and won't fail, until it does...?

TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
5/5/2010  4:01 AM
Panos wrote:
nixluva wrote:
TMS wrote:when we traded for Zach people around here were carrying on about how he & Curry would be a perfect tandem in our frontcourt... we were adding a 23 & 10 guy to our 20 & 8 C... we'd be a force to be reckoned with in the East... they scared now... people seem to have short term memory loss around these parts.

u can't succeed with 2 frontcourt players that play zero D... it's pretty basic... unless you have some elite talent playing on the perimeter, someone's gotta defend the paint for your team to be any good, it's been proven time & time again

Curry & Zach was even more of an offensive mess than D. Curry had no midrange game and so he was lost out there when Zach was doing his thing. Then as you mentioned on the other end there was literally two Galapagos Tortoises out there and we would give up points all too easily.

I think DW's not even remotely interested in having a Pair of bigs that can't defend anymore. He comes from a solid defensive background and I think he wants to return some semblance of interior defense to this team this summer. I just don't expect to see some lumbering bigs out there. It's gonna be a quick and agile team with length. That's why Bosh is gonna be a prime target. People don't like his D, but I think he's the kind of player DW is gonna be looking at. He's gonna give MDA the kind of players he needs to play the way he wants to play.

How would a trio of Bosh PF/Barron C/Gallo SF work for you?


Why is it when something happens you explain how its the greatest thing since slice bread,
and when it fails you totally flip-flop and have all the excuses why it failed, and why
the new slice of bread is so much better and different and won't fail, until it does...?

lol... seriously, the spin doctoring by some cats around here is impressive.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
5/5/2010  4:11 AM
nixluva wrote:How would a trio of Bosh PF/Barron C/Gallo SF work for you?

i am highly doubtful that we'll be getting Chris Bosh... why would he come to NY when a team like Chicago or Miami makes so much more sense for him? i see Bosh going to either Chicago to play with Derrick Rose or Miami to play with D Wade... both those teams are already playoff contenders & they both have great young stud perimeter players for him to feed off of... what do we have? Gallo's not a playmaker, he's a shooter... TD hasn't proven he can be a facilitator of a successful offense either... only way Bosh comes here is if Lebron decides to, & right now i don't get the feeling he's coming here either... the more i think about it, the more i think our biggest FA signing this summer is going to be David Lee.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
5/5/2010  8:19 AM
TMS wrote:
Panos wrote:
nixluva wrote:
TMS wrote:when we traded for Zach people around here were carrying on about how he & Curry would be a perfect tandem in our frontcourt... we were adding a 23 & 10 guy to our 20 & 8 C... we'd be a force to be reckoned with in the East... they scared now... people seem to have short term memory loss around these parts.

u can't succeed with 2 frontcourt players that play zero D... it's pretty basic... unless you have some elite talent playing on the perimeter, someone's gotta defend the paint for your team to be any good, it's been proven time & time again

Curry & Zach was even more of an offensive mess than D. Curry had no midrange game and so he was lost out there when Zach was doing his thing. Then as you mentioned on the other end there was literally two Galapagos Tortoises out there and we would give up points all too easily.

I think DW's not even remotely interested in having a Pair of bigs that can't defend anymore. He comes from a solid defensive background and I think he wants to return some semblance of interior defense to this team this summer. I just don't expect to see some lumbering bigs out there. It's gonna be a quick and agile team with length. That's why Bosh is gonna be a prime target. People don't like his D, but I think he's the kind of player DW is gonna be looking at. He's gonna give MDA the kind of players he needs to play the way he wants to play.

How would a trio of Bosh PF/Barron C/Gallo SF work for you?


Why is it when something happens you explain how its the greatest thing since slice bread,
and when it fails you totally flip-flop and have all the excuses why it failed, and why
the new slice of bread is so much better and different and won't fail, until it does...?

lol... seriously, the spin doctoring by some cats around here is impressive.

To further this thought, and its something I just realized.

We're a franchise that just won 29 games, and we're a franchise with major holes that is not bringing back hardly anyone from the current season, but instead hoping that somehow we can sign one or two major free agents, and then a whole bunch of minimum salary types to fill in the roster.

Unless we get Lebron, I think 2010/11 is going to be an ugly season.

AnubisADL
Posts: 27382
Alba Posts: 13
Joined: 6/29/2009
Member: #2771
USA
5/5/2010  11:52 AM
If no LBJ we should try to sign Joe Johnson and Resign David Lee.

An alternative less likely scenario would be trading Curry for Arenas. We then offer a team like Golden State salary relief to take Maggette, Turiaf(C), and Randolph(PF/SF) off their hands for Chandler and filler. Hopefully Lebron only signs a 3 yr deal and we try again.

NY Knicks - Retirement home for players and GMs
GodSaveTheKnicks
Posts: 23952
Alba Posts: 21
Joined: 11/21/2006
Member: #1207
USA
5/5/2010  11:55 AM
Livingston is worth looking at but I don't think there are people lining up to commit $17M to this guy. Where are you getting the # from Briggs?
Let's try to elevate the level of discourse in this byeetch. Please
iSergio
Posts: 21499
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/13/2010
Member: #3043
USA
5/5/2010  11:57 AM
Joe Johnson at the MAX and David Lee for $12M is a terrible offseason. We kill a lot of our cap space on two players who won't help us win many games.
sidsanders
Posts: 22541
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/17/2009
Member: #2426

5/5/2010  11:57 AM
AnubisADL wrote:If no LBJ we should try to sign Joe Johnson and Resign David Lee.

An alternative less likely scenario would be trading Curry for Arenas. We then offer a team like Golden State salary relief to take Maggette, Turiaf(C), and Randolph(PF/SF) off their hands for Chandler and filler. Hopefully Lebron only signs a 3 yr deal and we try again.

come on dude... why are you in love with joe? i hope the team has zero interest in him based on what he is gonna cost

GO TEAM VENTURE!!!!!
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
5/5/2010  12:04 PM
iSergio wrote:Joe Johnson at the MAX and David Lee for $12M is a terrible offseason. We kill a lot of our cap space on two players who won't help us win many games.

you will get a lot of spin doctors around here who will say that would be a very successful outcome after all the moves to clear salary, but you won't get any arguments from me... we better land a real superstar to build around this summer or else we would have been better off not making the T-Mac trade.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
AnubisADL
Posts: 27382
Alba Posts: 13
Joined: 6/29/2009
Member: #2771
USA
5/5/2010  12:13 PM    LAST EDITED: 5/5/2010  12:14 PM
sidsanders wrote:
AnubisADL wrote:If no LBJ we should try to sign Joe Johnson and Resign David Lee.

An alternative less likely scenario would be trading Curry for Arenas. We then offer a team like Golden State salary relief to take Maggette, Turiaf(C), and Randolph(PF/SF) off their hands for Chandler and filler. Hopefully Lebron only signs a 3 yr deal and we try again.

come on dude... why are you in love with joe? i hope the team has zero interest in him based on what he is gonna cost

I dont love Joe Johnson. I prefer Arenas because he has a shorter deal.

My issue is we dont own our pick next year. So if we suck Houston will benefit. Joe Johnson would at least make us playoff contenders. Hopefully Chandler and Gallo progress as well.

NY Knicks - Retirement home for players and GMs
sidsanders
Posts: 22541
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/17/2009
Member: #2426

5/5/2010  12:18 PM
AnubisADL wrote:
sidsanders wrote:
AnubisADL wrote:If no LBJ we should try to sign Joe Johnson and Resign David Lee.

An alternative less likely scenario would be trading Curry for Arenas. We then offer a team like Golden State salary relief to take Maggette, Turiaf(C), and Randolph(PF/SF) off their hands for Chandler and filler. Hopefully Lebron only signs a 3 yr deal and we try again.

come on dude... why are you in love with joe? i hope the team has zero interest in him based on what he is gonna cost

I dont love Joe Johnson. I prefer Arenas because he has a shorter deal.

My issue is we dont own our pick next year. So if we suck Houston will benefit. Joe Johnson would at least make us playoff contenders. Hopefully Chandler and Gallo progress as well.

arenas!!!! thats even worse. have we not had enough insane nutters on this team??? if he wasnt a nut job, was a real pg, i could live with picking him up. however if the 1st 2 parts there were true, do you think he would even be available? why do we need to be the team picking up garbage hoping this time, it will turn around?

GO TEAM VENTURE!!!!!
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
5/5/2010  12:31 PM
franco12 wrote:
TMS wrote:
Panos wrote:
nixluva wrote:
TMS wrote:when we traded for Zach people around here were carrying on about how he & Curry would be a perfect tandem in our frontcourt... we were adding a 23 & 10 guy to our 20 & 8 C... we'd be a force to be reckoned with in the East... they scared now... people seem to have short term memory loss around these parts.

u can't succeed with 2 frontcourt players that play zero D... it's pretty basic... unless you have some elite talent playing on the perimeter, someone's gotta defend the paint for your team to be any good, it's been proven time & time again

Curry & Zach was even more of an offensive mess than D. Curry had no midrange game and so he was lost out there when Zach was doing his thing. Then as you mentioned on the other end there was literally two Galapagos Tortoises out there and we would give up points all too easily.

I think DW's not even remotely interested in having a Pair of bigs that can't defend anymore. He comes from a solid defensive background and I think he wants to return some semblance of interior defense to this team this summer. I just don't expect to see some lumbering bigs out there. It's gonna be a quick and agile team with length. That's why Bosh is gonna be a prime target. People don't like his D, but I think he's the kind of player DW is gonna be looking at. He's gonna give MDA the kind of players he needs to play the way he wants to play.

How would a trio of Bosh PF/Barron C/Gallo SF work for you?


Why is it when something happens you explain how its the greatest thing since slice bread,
and when it fails you totally flip-flop and have all the excuses why it failed, and why
the new slice of bread is so much better and different and won't fail, until it does...?

lol... seriously, the spin doctoring by some cats around here is impressive.

I didn't put any spin on my observations about what happened when Curry n Zach actually played together. I stated a fact! When got Zach I looked at his skills and how he played and felt he could play with a C like Curry. Curry is the one that went into a shell. Defense was never going to be a strength with those two involved. I expected that we'd see a lot of minutes where Zach was in the game with Lee and not Curry and this shouldve given Curry a chance to play as he did before. It was a reasonable expectation.

Why should I be less optimistic about our future frontcourt which has a chance to include an All Star just cuz Zach and Curry didn't work? I'm not alone in being wrong about a prediction here. I'm just an easy target. I wasn't wrong about Lee or Gallo. I wasn't wrong about Q Rich being able to recover after his surgery. There are in fact many predictions I got blasted for that I got right but it's fashionable to only bring up the misses.

fishmike
Posts: 53863
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
5/5/2010  12:35 PM
TMS wrote:
iSergio wrote:Joe Johnson at the MAX and David Lee for $12M is a terrible offseason. We kill a lot of our cap space on two players who won't help us win many games.

you will get a lot of spin doctors around here who will say that would be a very successful outcome after all the moves to clear salary, but you won't get any arguments from me... we better land a real superstar to build around this summer or else we would have been better off not making the T-Mac trade.


thats arm chair QBing. Why stop with the JJ trade? If we dont get a star we should have kept Zach and Jamal. Jamal was scoring 20 a game and playing great under MDA. Lee and Zach were putting up good #s playing together and the Knicks were off to a good start at 6-5. Throw in a healthy Gallo, assume we still draft Douglas, maybe sign a guy like Livingston with the MLE and you have a solid team. CERTAINLY a playoff team:

PG Crawford/Douglas
SG Chandler/Livingston
SF Gallo/Walker
PF Zach
C Lee/Barron
There's your 9 man rotation. Pretty solid group. Lots of rebounding and fire power. That group is going to look pretty good rebounding the ball, pushing it up court and taking the first open look they can. You have Zach and Lee crashing the offensive boards and cleaning the glass.

the point is clearing all the big contracts and giving up stuff to do so has given us a chance to sign 2 max FAs in the best FA class ever. Its the same thing we talked about 7 years ago when Wade, Amare, Lebron, etc were in the best draft class ever. Lets firesell for a CHANCE at these guys. If we miss we miss, but shooting for a CHANCE for that kind of star is the right thing to do.

Either you believe this CHANCE is worth taking or you dont.

All this talk about Joe Johnson or what trades to make if we dont get a star is secondary. That isnt the plan. Thats what to you when what your trying for doesnt work. There are some desirable scenarios and some undesirable ones.

It doesnt really matter. It all comes down to whether or not you think this course of action was worth it.

TMS you were all for dumping Zach and Crawford's contracts. They were bad. But we werent getting a max star to come here with 3 other guys on the roster. We needed to either bring in a 2nd max guy or be able to bring back Lee and some semblance of a supporting cast. The Zach/Crawford/JJ trades all go hand in hand.

Every plan, no matter how good can fail. Its all risk reward. This plan can yield an amazing team and a star. It can yield 3-4 more years of frustration if the plan B isnt managed.

All I can say about Walsh so far is he's done what no other GM has done here in 10 years which is stick to a plan. For me he gets 3-4 years to build the team. He wants to do it through FA. OK, lets see what he gets. His moves have all been for a reason so far and really only one move has clearly been poor (Hill pick).

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
sidsanders
Posts: 22541
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/17/2009
Member: #2426

5/5/2010  12:51 PM
walsh probably should have dealt with lee in some manner prior to now -- trade him or get him a longer contract.
GO TEAM VENTURE!!!!!
AnubisADL
Posts: 27382
Alba Posts: 13
Joined: 6/29/2009
Member: #2771
USA
5/5/2010  12:54 PM
sidsanders wrote:arenas!!!! thats even worse. have we not had enough insane nutters on this team??? if he wasnt a nut job, was a real pg, i could live with picking him up. however if the 1st 2 parts there were true, do you think he would even be available? why do we need to be the team picking up garbage hoping this time, it will turn around?

Arenas can still shoot regardless. Plus now he has something to prove. Dolan isnt going to allow a natural rebuild through the draft so we might as well get used to a perpetual cycle of trading for guys.

The guy has 4 yrs left making max dollars with a suspect knee. Now Im assuming with the new Wizards owner we could get some other pieces in the Arenas trade.

Arenas and McGee plus a future first would be sweet. I dont see teams lining up to take that salary off their hands.

NY Knicks - Retirement home for players and GMs
sidsanders
Posts: 22541
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/17/2009
Member: #2426

5/5/2010  1:04 PM
AnubisADL wrote:
sidsanders wrote:arenas!!!! thats even worse. have we not had enough insane nutters on this team??? if he wasnt a nut job, was a real pg, i could live with picking him up. however if the 1st 2 parts there were true, do you think he would even be available? why do we need to be the team picking up garbage hoping this time, it will turn around?

Arenas can still shoot regardless. Plus now he has something to prove. Dolan isnt going to allow a natural rebuild through the draft so we might as well get used to a perpetual cycle of trading for guys.

The guy has 4 yrs left making max dollars with a suspect knee. Now Im assuming with the new Wizards owner we could get some other pieces in the Arenas trade.

Arenas and McGee plus a future first would be sweet. I dont see teams lining up to take that salary off their hands.

i sure hope walsh isnt considering this. free up space to get .... flippin mr poop shoe???

GO TEAM VENTURE!!!!!
AnubisADL
Posts: 27382
Alba Posts: 13
Joined: 6/29/2009
Member: #2771
USA
5/5/2010  1:21 PM
sidsanders wrote:
AnubisADL wrote:
sidsanders wrote:arenas!!!! thats even worse. have we not had enough insane nutters on this team??? if he wasnt a nut job, was a real pg, i could live with picking him up. however if the 1st 2 parts there were true, do you think he would even be available? why do we need to be the team picking up garbage hoping this time, it will turn around?

Arenas can still shoot regardless. Plus now he has something to prove. Dolan isnt going to allow a natural rebuild through the draft so we might as well get used to a perpetual cycle of trading for guys.

The guy has 4 yrs left making max dollars with a suspect knee. Now Im assuming with the new Wizards owner we could get some other pieces in the Arenas trade.

Arenas and McGee plus a future first would be sweet. I dont see teams lining up to take that salary off their hands.

i sure hope walsh isnt considering this. free up space to get .... flippin mr poop shoe???

Im open to better candidates at the SG position but I dont see any that may be available. Mike Miller is also high on my list.

NY Knicks - Retirement home for players and GMs
Juice
Posts: 21742
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/2/2009
Member: #2968

5/5/2010  1:27 PM
Joe Johnson isn't worth the Max

John Salmons is worth the Max


Alright go ahead and argue against these two statements.

If no LBJ

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy