[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

If the Knicks Trade Hill for Cap Space...
Author Thread
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
2/16/2010  4:04 PM
http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/blog/ball_dont_lie/post/Video-Knicks-Rockets-backroom-trade-negotiat?urn=nba,219962
AUTOADVERT
jusnice
Posts: 20610
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 10/8/2009
Member: #2931
USA
2/16/2010  4:22 PM
TMS wrote:
jusnice wrote:watching that workout video from GS, i have to reiterate something i've said all along...his footwork is terrible! I'm fine if we include him in this deal, but I would be pissed if we included draft picks.

a workout video is not the best way to judge to see if a kid's footwork is horrible... has anyone seen him play at Arizona & see him put up some sweet up & under moves to get a basket? or a quick turnaround fadeaway in the post & knock down a shot in his man's face? doesn't it take good footwork to do these things?

One thing I do know is about post moves and basketball and even when he was sinking his turn around J and going up and under at Arizona, he looked really, really clumsy IMO doing it. I do like his ability to finish in transition, and he evidenced that well in college. Having said that, maybe there's a reason he hasn't gotten PT this year and maybe trading him now is an indication that we don't feel all that psyched about his ability to transition his college game to the pros. Maybe he turns into another Renaldo Balkman, maybe he turns into the next Amare. My bet is on the former. I agree we have limited insight into his pro game, I'm just pointing out what I see on the tapes. He's movement isn't fluid and I'm OK with trading him now given what I've seen. If trading him gives us greater flexibility and could help the team next year, so be it.

TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
2/16/2010  4:39 PM
jusnice wrote:
TMS wrote:
jusnice wrote:watching that workout video from GS, i have to reiterate something i've said all along...his footwork is terrible! I'm fine if we include him in this deal, but I would be pissed if we included draft picks.

a workout video is not the best way to judge to see if a kid's footwork is horrible... has anyone seen him play at Arizona & see him put up some sweet up & under moves to get a basket? or a quick turnaround fadeaway in the post & knock down a shot in his man's face? doesn't it take good footwork to do these things?

One thing I do know is about post moves and basketball and even when he was sinking his turn around J and going up and under at Arizona, he looked really, really clumsy IMO doing it. I do like his ability to finish in transition, and he evidenced that well in college. Having said that, maybe there's a reason he hasn't gotten PT this year and maybe trading him now is an indication that we don't feel all that psyched about his ability to transition his college game to the pros. Maybe he turns into another Renaldo Balkman, maybe he turns into the next Amare. My bet is on the former. I agree we have limited insight into his pro game, I'm just pointing out what I see on the tapes. He's movement isn't fluid and I'm OK with trading him now given what I've seen. If trading him gives us greater flexibility and could help the team next year, so be it.

trading Hill if u think he's not all that is your prerogative, i will respectfully disagree... but you're also talking about throwing in a 2012 pick & swap rights for 2011... are u guys serious with this?

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
jusnice
Posts: 20610
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 10/8/2009
Member: #2931
USA
2/16/2010  4:52 PM
I'm fine if we include him in this deal, but I would beWILL BE pissed if we included draft picks. I know they can't take on salary and are looking to have cap space too, so I don't think this deal gets done unless we include picks and I just don't want to do that, maybe a swap, but not a 1st round pick outright...
AnubisADL
Posts: 27382
Alba Posts: 13
Joined: 6/29/2009
Member: #2771
USA
2/16/2010  4:57 PM
TMS wrote:
jusnice wrote:
TMS wrote:
jusnice wrote:watching that workout video from GS, i have to reiterate something i've said all along...his footwork is terrible! I'm fine if we include him in this deal, but I would be pissed if we included draft picks.

a workout video is not the best way to judge to see if a kid's footwork is horrible... has anyone seen him play at Arizona & see him put up some sweet up & under moves to get a basket? or a quick turnaround fadeaway in the post & knock down a shot in his man's face? doesn't it take good footwork to do these things?

One thing I do know is about post moves and basketball and even when he was sinking his turn around J and going up and under at Arizona, he looked really, really clumsy IMO doing it. I do like his ability to finish in transition, and he evidenced that well in college. Having said that, maybe there's a reason he hasn't gotten PT this year and maybe trading him now is an indication that we don't feel all that psyched about his ability to transition his college game to the pros. Maybe he turns into another Renaldo Balkman, maybe he turns into the next Amare. My bet is on the former. I agree we have limited insight into his pro game, I'm just pointing out what I see on the tapes. He's movement isn't fluid and I'm OK with trading him now given what I've seen. If trading him gives us greater flexibility and could help the team next year, so be it.

trading Hill if u think he's not all that is your prerogative, i will respectfully disagree... but you're also talking about throwing in a 2012 pick & swap rights for 2011... are u guys serious with this?

Im not high on Hill but I feel giving him up just to move Jefferies is pretty short sighted, including those picks is just off the wall.

NY Knicks - Retirement home for players and GMs
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
2/16/2010  5:02 PM    LAST EDITED: 2/16/2010  5:03 PM
i agree... personally i would prefer to hold onto Hill & throw in a 2012 pick cuz it won't necessarily be a lottery pick... if we had taken Hill with a #20 pick i'd have much less of a problem including him in the package... he was a highly projected prospect coming into this draft & i just don't wanna see him blow up somewhere else because MDA was too damn shortsighted to give him a chance to show much of anything his rookie season.

give them Toney Douglas & a future lottery protected pick... leave Jordan Hill & the swap rights in 2011 out of it... to get $7 mil in cap space that's more than fair.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
2/16/2010  5:03 PM
TMS wrote:i agree... personally i would prefer to hold onto Hill & throw in a 2012 pick cuz it won't necessarily be a lottery pick... if we had taken Hill with a #20 pick i'd have much less of a problem including him in the package... he was a highly projected prospect coming into this draft & i just don't wanna see him blow up somewhere else because MDA was too damn shortsighted to give him a chance to show much of anything his rookie season.

if we hold onto hill we don't have enough space to make two max offers this summer.

if that weren't the case i'd want to hold onto him, for sure. but with the situation as it is, i'd rather gamble on cap space.

¿ △ ?
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
2/16/2010  5:06 PM
crzymdups wrote:
TMS wrote:i agree... personally i would prefer to hold onto Hill & throw in a 2012 pick cuz it won't necessarily be a lottery pick... if we had taken Hill with a #20 pick i'd have much less of a problem including him in the package... he was a highly projected prospect coming into this draft & i just don't wanna see him blow up somewhere else because MDA was too damn shortsighted to give him a chance to show much of anything his rookie season.

if we hold onto hill we don't have enough space to make two max offers this summer.

if that weren't the case i'd want to hold onto him, for sure. but with the situation as it is, i'd rather gamble on cap space.

then Donnie needs to make sure to get back a pick in exchange... u don't just throw in a #8 lottery pick as a filler piece to dump his contract... that's just assinine.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
2/16/2010  5:17 PM
TMS wrote:
crzymdups wrote:
TMS wrote:i agree... personally i would prefer to hold onto Hill & throw in a 2012 pick cuz it won't necessarily be a lottery pick... if we had taken Hill with a #20 pick i'd have much less of a problem including him in the package... he was a highly projected prospect coming into this draft & i just don't wanna see him blow up somewhere else because MDA was too damn shortsighted to give him a chance to show much of anything his rookie season.

if we hold onto hill we don't have enough space to make two max offers this summer.

if that weren't the case i'd want to hold onto him, for sure. but with the situation as it is, i'd rather gamble on cap space.

then Donnie needs to make sure to get back a pick in exchange... u don't just throw in a #8 lottery pick as a filler piece to dump his contract... that's just assinine.

we're throwing him in to get RID of HIS contract. this means they value Jordan Hill less than Chandler and Gallo. which i am fine with.

they need to clear hill's salary off the books just as much as jeffries to get to where they need to be to sign two max guys.

¿ △ ?
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
2/16/2010  5:19 PM
get a pick back or don't make this deal.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
2/16/2010  5:20 PM
TMS wrote:get a pick back or don't make this deal.

they came this far, flinching now means they are stuck with jordan hill instead two max guys? that's ridiculous. we should have just held onto crawford and zbo in that case.

¿ △ ?
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
2/16/2010  5:44 PM
please... we still have cap space to sign a max guy & another impact FA this summer... this is a panic move
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
2/16/2010  5:54 PM
The Ability to sign 2 Max Players trumps a #8 pick that hasn't done anything yet and a 2012 pick. I like Hill, but in this case we have to take a shot at bringing in still young top tier talent that we know can win. It's totally worth the risk. I'd prefer we didn't trade him or give up picks, but if there's no other way then get it done.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
2/16/2010  5:56 PM
would you mortgage your house to buy stock in an IPO in this current economy?
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Markji
Posts: 22753
Alba Posts: -4
Joined: 9/14/2007
Member: #1673
USA
2/16/2010  6:12 PM
nixluva wrote: I'd prefer we didn't trade him (Hill) or give up picks, but if there's no other way then get it done.
There are other ways to get it done. Just Hill + Jeffries for expiring contract from another team other than Houston.
The difference between fiction and reality? Fiction has to make sense. Tom Clancy - author
sebstar
Posts: 25698
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 6/2/2002
Member: #249
USA
2/16/2010  6:14 PM
TMS wrote:
sebstar wrote:
TMS wrote:
Pharzeone wrote:Didn't you get the memo, TMS. None of that matters now. Donnie wants to trade him so it's time to trash JHill. No matter how he was built up to excuse not getting a point guard. That was so last week. He's a bum now. He can't get minutes on this great team. Guys in the 2012 draft class, bums. Guys coming out next year, who cares. The plan is intact. This was the last piece for Lebron's needs. Getting rid of JHill and those future picks ensures it.

i have been high on Jordan Hill in the weeks leading up to the draft & nothing has changed my mind about him... the assumption that he's a busted pick simply because we're willing to trade him now is so flawed it's not even worth addressing... i guess that made Jermaine O'Neal a bust too since the Blazers traded him away before he ever got a real chance... or Kobe Bryant was a bust since the Hornets traded away his draft rights... gimme a break.

Those were completely different situations, bro. The Blazers were priming themselves for a championship run so they were looking for a veteran presence. Bad trade, but their mindset was different. Kobe refused to play for Charlotte. They had no choice.

Hill has largely looked awful in the limited minutes he's received, and he cant even get burn on an awful team and is behind Jared Jeffries on the depth chart. Ok, we're trying to pump up JJ's trade value, then how do you explain signing a completely broken down Bender when we have Hill sitting right there on the bench?

Again, do you see us making this deal if we had Brandon Jennings? Thats my point. The pick was pretty much a wasted one.

absolutely not, i agree w/u, there's no way we'd be talking this nonsense if we had picked Brandon Jennings... i'm not disagreeing w/u at all that Jennings has proven to be a better looking rookie prospect this season... but there were red flags around him that caused him not to be picked & i have a big suspicion MDA never wanted a PG like him to run this offense from the beginning.

that said, the way u guys around here have turned on Jordan Hill in the blink of an eye now all of a sudden he's a scrub & a bust & this is proof of it is assinine IMO, no offense bro... a week ago he looked promising & he just needed to get playing time to show what he could do... today we have the same guys talkin nonsense like we should toss him into a deal as a fillin on a hope & a prayer that Lebron & Wade are both going to sign here this summer... it's crazyness.

I'm viewing Hill through the lens and or/prism of management and D'Antoni. I'm theorizing that they have faced the truth that his upside is low or non-existent and they realize they've made a mistake. That explains, to me at least, why they are essentially giving him away and his complete lack of playing time.

My saliva and spit can split thread into fiber and bits/ So trust me I'm as live as it gets. --Royce Da 5'9 + DJ Premier = Hip Hop Utopia
Childs2Dudley
Posts: 23906
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 1/25/2010
Member: #3051
USA
2/16/2010  6:14 PM
TMS wrote:please... we still have cap space to sign a max guy & another impact FA this summer... this is a panic move

What max guy? Joe Johnson and some guy for a little above MLE money? No. I'd rather trade Hill and go for the gamble. We are in TOO DEEP to pull out of this now.

"Our attitude toward life determines life's attitude towards us." - Earl Nightingale
Markji
Posts: 22753
Alba Posts: -4
Joined: 9/14/2007
Member: #1673
USA
2/16/2010  6:20 PM
sebstar wrote:
TMS wrote:
sebstar wrote:
TMS wrote:
Pharzeone wrote:Didn't you get the memo, TMS. None of that matters now. Donnie wants to trade him so it's time to trash JHill. No matter how he was built up to excuse not getting a point guard. That was so last week. He's a bum now. He can't get minutes on this great team. Guys in the 2012 draft class, bums. Guys coming out next year, who cares. The plan is intact. This was the last piece for Lebron's needs. Getting rid of JHill and those future picks ensures it.

i have been high on Jordan Hill in the weeks leading up to the draft & nothing has changed my mind about him... the assumption that he's a busted pick simply because we're willing to trade him now is so flawed it's not even worth addressing... i guess that made Jermaine O'Neal a bust too since the Blazers traded him away before he ever got a real chance... or Kobe Bryant was a bust since the Hornets traded away his draft rights... gimme a break.

Those were completely different situations, bro. The Blazers were priming themselves for a championship run so they were looking for a veteran presence. Bad trade, but their mindset was different. Kobe refused to play for Charlotte. They had no choice.

Hill has largely looked awful in the limited minutes he's received, and he cant even get burn on an awful team and is behind Jared Jeffries on the depth chart. Ok, we're trying to pump up JJ's trade value, then how do you explain signing a completely broken down Bender when we have Hill sitting right there on the bench?

Again, do you see us making this deal if we had Brandon Jennings? Thats my point. The pick was pretty much a wasted one.

absolutely not, i agree w/u, there's no way we'd be talking this nonsense if we had picked Brandon Jennings... i'm not disagreeing w/u at all that Jennings has proven to be a better looking rookie prospect this season... but there were red flags around him that caused him not to be picked & i have a big suspicion MDA never wanted a PG like him to run this offense from the beginning.

that said, the way u guys around here have turned on Jordan Hill in the blink of an eye now all of a sudden he's a scrub & a bust & this is proof of it is assinine IMO, no offense bro... a week ago he looked promising & he just needed to get playing time to show what he could do... today we have the same guys talkin nonsense like we should toss him into a deal as a fillin on a hope & a prayer that Lebron & Wade are both going to sign here this summer... it's crazyness.

I'm viewing Hill through the lens and or/prism of management and D'Antoni. I'm theorizing that they have faced the truth that his upside is low or non-existent and they realize they've made a mistake. That explains, to me at least, why they are essentially giving him away and his complete lack of playing time.


If they trade Hill and Jeffries, we take off Hill's 2010 contract ($2.7 mil) and Jeffries 2010 contract ($6.88 mil). Then have enough cap room for 2 max contracts. That is why Hill is being shopped.

I am not opposed to this but I am opposed to including 1st round picks and swaps. Actually, we should get the other teams 1st round pick in return for Hill, if it is not a lottery pick.

The difference between fiction and reality? Fiction has to make sense. Tom Clancy - author
BigDaddyG
Posts: 40212
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049

2/16/2010  6:25 PM
Yeah, I'm hesitant to give up two additional picks. I understand that you need to gamble every once in awhile, but you also need some foresight. Worst case scenario if this deals go through is that we get none of the top free agents and we end up having to overpay to keep Lee and a bunch of other scrubs like Duhon to make up for the fact that we're missing half our roster.

It's Ok if we give up Hill. Even though I'm not thrilled with the idea, but I understand that you have to do what you have to do. But giving up the additional picks could severely hamper us from building up the rest of the roster. No thanks. I've lost my stomach for such risks after Isaiah's tenure.

Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
Uptown
Posts: 31359
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 4/1/2008
Member: #1883

2/16/2010  6:32 PM
TMS wrote:please... we still have cap space to sign a max guy & another impact FA this summer... this is a panic move

TMS, you have to know the ability to sign 2 max guys make us much more attractive. That 1 max guy could be Joe Johnson and you know this board would be up in arms if that happened.

If the Knicks Trade Hill for Cap Space...

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy