nixluva wrote:Pharzeone wrote:nixluva wrote:IS There an actual quote from MDA that has him saying any of this stuff about Al?
Yeah, that's a problem too but you know how MDA likes to operate in the shadows like he is the goddamn Batman when it comes to these things. But I agree no quotes used at all in the article. The only quotes I seen from him today was the bizarre quote about the rookies messing with people's lives.
This is part of my problem with the criticism of this coach. We know that this team hasn't done anything in a long time and has chewed up coaches for years. We get a guy that has a sterling record and rep around the league (and no I don't recall any other coaches not liking him except for Del Negro who knifed him in the back in PHX). Remember how George Karl came out with the statements about MDA having to coach knowing he wasn't gonna get any help for two years? Coach K loves him and overall i've only read positive things about the guy and of course the guy won a lot before he got here. Sure he had talent, but what top coach gets bashed for how they coach talent? I'd rather have a guy that knows how to coach talent ie Phil Jackson, than a guy that seems to only do well with scrub teams but never seems to be able to deal with big talent. Some coaches are like that.
MDA isn't perfect no coach is, but he was able to come up with a system that maximized the talents of a decent but not great team. Tell me that it wasn't impressive to win 62 games his 1st full season in PHX and then win 54 without Joe Johnson or Amare, but with Bell, Diaw and KT instead. People wanna take all the credit away from the guy and give it to Nash, but how do you do that without then saying the same thing about every other great coach that has had the top players? Magic, Bird, MJ, Kobe etc.
i think this is a very fair post nix.
theres alot of factors here with this group and of course miked is not absolved of any negative criticism, i just think all the factors have to be taken into account. as you said nix, guys like lenny wilkens and larry brown (HOF coaches) have been run out of town here and here we have miked, who (love him or hate him) has/had a great rep around this league, whether it was coaches, players or executives. miked was brought here to coach in 2010, it just happens he was available in 2008 and if this is the guy that walsh wanted, he either had to get him then or let him go and he chose to get him then and just hope for the best until 2010. whether you like that plan or not, it's the way it is.
currently, this team has a mishmash of young and old, short contracts and long contracts and players who miked envisions in his system and some that he doesn't. i agree that miked should be playing TD and hill more and he why he isn't, im not really sure, but what do you expect the guy to do? it seems to me that there is a different agenda for every player on this team and a different agenda for this coach, this clearly isn't going to lead to anything positive and im sure walsh knew this coming into the season - it was either going to work in the beginning and the team was going to win games and the players would fall in line or they wouldn't and you would get what you have now, which is beginning to turn into a circus. it was a risk, but in reality, the goal was 2010 anyway so if it failed, theres always the summer and hopefully some players under our july christmas tree.
i'm not saying lets not all pile-on miked right now, you have the right to do it, but i think it's only fair to give him a fair shot next year when this team should actually have some stability when it comes to player personnel and hopefully some guys that really fit into miked's vision of a basketball team. after that, it's upto miked to get results.