[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Number 1 priority last 30---develop Jordan Hill
Author Thread
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
2/8/2010  10:01 PM
Andrew wrote:
TMS wrote:we both are in agreement on this... developing the youth really should have been our #1 priority coming into the season, playoffs be damned.

While I like the idea of developing the youth, I think Walsh and MDA owe the 2 guys they convinced to take playoff related bonuses an honest effort to get the team into the playoffs.

I think they owe the fans first--the direction and future of the team. On top of it--the formula they have used is not successful. If we are vying for the playoffs--so are 14 teams in the east. When you are 12 games under .500--even if you're 5 games out---that's not realistic talk. Time to play Jordan Hill 30 minutes consistently to see if he can help the team play better. I think the message is pretty simple--we haven't won with he players they have used--time to give other people a shot--

RIP Crushalot😞
AUTOADVERT
Juice
Posts: 21742
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/2/2009
Member: #2968

2/8/2010  10:10 PM
TMS wrote:
sidsanders wrote:if it was a borderline playoff team with the young guys (not just dg/wc) playing critical mins, i would agree it shows the team is on the rise. as it stands now, the push this team was making was with mainly a vet crew who a vast majority probably wont be back. any momentum gained by a playoff run goes out the window if lee/nate/jj/duhon/hughes/harrington/etc are gone. this isnt saying those guys are great, those are they guys who get tons o mins (as you know )... in some cases they wont be gone unless traded (jj/curry, pleeeeease get them outta here). 2 young guys (dg/wc) get mins and both still have improvements i think we all hope they can make.

im not convinced a playoff run would mean much with the current guys getting the main focus, unless many of the guys are reupped and thats a non starter for me as a fan. i do think a playoff run woulda been more of the same that layden/thomas tried. mix in vets with a few young guys, and hope for the best rather than blow this bastage up and start over. we have seen that flick and it ends the same. note, im not suggesting you are saying this... i just really see very little upside to a playoff run with this teams makeup and playing time distro.

we both are in agreement on this... developing the youth really should have been our #1 priority coming into the season, playoffs be damned.

If we would have maximized on both drafts we could have accomplished great things in way of developing. The Rockets walked into the 2009 draft with no picks and walked out with 3 between 32-44. Spent about $6mil total on all of them, one of which has been in their rotation(Chase Buddinger) since day 1 of the season and they signed some Fly Fisherman Looking Free Agent rookie who has cracked the rotation ditto. Now the Rockets are a playoff team and have been almost all season in a tougher Conference and Division.... so you could argue why are these players getting any minutes on their team.... but since they are, they can boast saying they have been a key reason as to why they are a playoff team. Meanwhile we spent $3mil, plus his 2009-2010 salary, plus his lux tax dollars on his salary for being over the cap and we're having trouble dusting him off(D'AnToney Douglas) and the other who was dubbed BPA(Jordan Buffet Of Goodness Hill) in the draft @ pick 8 fighting to stay in the rotation over a no knees stiff and we aren't anywhere close to a playoff team.

^^^^^^

You couldn't create a more irrational environment as this even if you tried.

Juice
Posts: 21742
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/2/2009
Member: #2968

2/8/2010  10:12 PM
Andrew wrote:
TMS wrote:we both are in agreement on this... developing the youth really should have been our #1 priority coming into the season, playoffs be damned.

While I like the idea of developing the youth, I think Walsh and MDA owe the 2 guys they convinced to take playoff related bonuses an honest effort to get the team into the playoffs.


We probably had a stronger chance to get in if we played the kids more minutes from the get go. What difference would it make to Lee or Nate as to how we get in? As long as they are on the roster they get paid regardless.

TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
2/8/2010  10:16 PM
Juice wrote:
TMS wrote:
sidsanders wrote:if it was a borderline playoff team with the young guys (not just dg/wc) playing critical mins, i would agree it shows the team is on the rise. as it stands now, the push this team was making was with mainly a vet crew who a vast majority probably wont be back. any momentum gained by a playoff run goes out the window if lee/nate/jj/duhon/hughes/harrington/etc are gone. this isnt saying those guys are great, those are they guys who get tons o mins (as you know )... in some cases they wont be gone unless traded (jj/curry, pleeeeease get them outta here). 2 young guys (dg/wc) get mins and both still have improvements i think we all hope they can make.

im not convinced a playoff run would mean much with the current guys getting the main focus, unless many of the guys are reupped and thats a non starter for me as a fan. i do think a playoff run woulda been more of the same that layden/thomas tried. mix in vets with a few young guys, and hope for the best rather than blow this bastage up and start over. we have seen that flick and it ends the same. note, im not suggesting you are saying this... i just really see very little upside to a playoff run with this teams makeup and playing time distro.

we both are in agreement on this... developing the youth really should have been our #1 priority coming into the season, playoffs be damned.

If we would have maximized on both drafts we could have accomplished great things in way of developing. The Rockets walked into the 2009 draft with no picks and walked out with 3 between 32-44. Spent about $6mil total on all of them, one of which has been in their rotation(Chase Buddinger) since day 1 of the season and they signed some Fly Fisherman Looking Free Agent rookie who has cracked the rotation ditto. Now the Rockets are a playoff team and have been almost all season in a tougher Conference and Division.... so you could argue why are these players getting any minutes on their team.... but since they are, they can boast saying they have been a key reason as to why they are a playoff team. Meanwhile we spent $3mil, plus his 2009-2010 salary, plus his lux tax dollars on his salary for being over the cap and we're having trouble dusting him off(D'AnToney Douglas) and the other who was dubbed BPA(Jordan Buffet Of Goodness Hill) in the draft @ pick 8 fighting to stay in the rotation over a no knees stiff and we aren't anywhere close to a playoff team.

^^^^^^

You couldn't create a more irrational environment as this even if you tried.

nope, you can't write this stuff... the crap the Knicks' fanbase has had to put up with over the past decade is something i couldn't even think up even if i tried.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Andrew
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #1
USA
2/8/2010  10:19 PM
TMS wrote:
Andrew wrote:
TMS wrote:we both are in agreement on this... developing the youth really should have been our #1 priority coming into the season, playoffs be damned.

While I like the idea of developing the youth, I think Walsh and MDA owe the 2 guys they convinced to take playoff related bonuses an honest effort to get the team into the playoffs.

i think they did give them an honest show of faith this season & they failed to deliver... it's time to consider other options... the playoffs is no longer a viable goal for this team... we need to go 22W-10L the rest of the way to have any realistic shot at making the postseason Andrew... it's not gonna happen... at some point u need to know when to cut your losses & salvage whatever u can out of another failed season... right now, developing the young guys & featuring guys we want to try & trade at the deadline is really the only things we can lay our hats on.

I agree that the Knicks are probably past the point where playoffs is an option. I wasn't really talking about now. My response was to your post about playing the young guys from the begining...."playoffs be damned"

PURE KNICKS LOVE
Juice
Posts: 21742
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/2/2009
Member: #2968

2/8/2010  10:27 PM    LAST EDITED: 2/8/2010  10:28 PM
TMS wrote:
Juice wrote:
TMS wrote:
sidsanders wrote:if it was a borderline playoff team with the young guys (not just dg/wc) playing critical mins, i would agree it shows the team is on the rise. as it stands now, the push this team was making was with mainly a vet crew who a vast majority probably wont be back. any momentum gained by a playoff run goes out the window if lee/nate/jj/duhon/hughes/harrington/etc are gone. this isnt saying those guys are great, those are they guys who get tons o mins (as you know )... in some cases they wont be gone unless traded (jj/curry, pleeeeease get them outta here). 2 young guys (dg/wc) get mins and both still have improvements i think we all hope they can make.

im not convinced a playoff run would mean much with the current guys getting the main focus, unless many of the guys are reupped and thats a non starter for me as a fan. i do think a playoff run woulda been more of the same that layden/thomas tried. mix in vets with a few young guys, and hope for the best rather than blow this bastage up and start over. we have seen that flick and it ends the same. note, im not suggesting you are saying this... i just really see very little upside to a playoff run with this teams makeup and playing time distro.

we both are in agreement on this... developing the youth really should have been our #1 priority coming into the season, playoffs be damned.

If we would have maximized on both drafts we could have accomplished great things in way of developing. The Rockets walked into the 2009 draft with no picks and walked out with 3 between 32-44. Spent about $6mil total on all of them, one of which has been in their rotation(Chase Buddinger) since day 1 of the season and they signed some Fly Fisherman Looking Free Agent rookie who has cracked the rotation ditto. Now the Rockets are a playoff team and have been almost all season in a tougher Conference and Division.... so you could argue why are these players getting any minutes on their team.... but since they are, they can boast saying they have been a key reason as to why they are a playoff team. Meanwhile we spent $3mil, plus his 2009-2010 salary, plus his lux tax dollars on his salary for being over the cap and we're having trouble dusting him off(D'AnToney Douglas) and the other who was dubbed BPA(Jordan Buffet Of Goodness Hill) in the draft @ pick 8 fighting to stay in the rotation over a no knees stiff and we aren't anywhere close to a playoff team.

^^^^^^

You couldn't create a more irrational environment as this even if you tried.

nope, you can't write this stuff... the crap the Knicks' fanbase has had to put up with over the past decade is something i couldn't even think up even if i tried.

You know what's even more ridiculous? If we approached this season and was told our #8 pick and #29 pick would receive almost no minutes well past the halfway mark of the season while most fans felt we weren't too much better than a 30win team because remember it's Blasphemy to blame Pringles when it comes to the W-L column what do you think the fans would have said? Ok now add in the fact the fans feelings about the team was true we aren't too much better than a 30win team. Heads would have rolled. Ok now add in the fact one of our young players has to take a back seat to a comeback project not after a yr layoff but yrs of layoff and temporarily took a back seat to a fat lard who lost 30lbs of bacteria colon fat lard and couldn't stay on the court because of it?

TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
2/8/2010  11:08 PM
Andrew wrote:
TMS wrote:
Andrew wrote:
TMS wrote:we both are in agreement on this... developing the youth really should have been our #1 priority coming into the season, playoffs be damned.

While I like the idea of developing the youth, I think Walsh and MDA owe the 2 guys they convinced to take playoff related bonuses an honest effort to get the team into the playoffs.

i think they did give them an honest show of faith this season & they failed to deliver... it's time to consider other options... the playoffs is no longer a viable goal for this team... we need to go 22W-10L the rest of the way to have any realistic shot at making the postseason Andrew... it's not gonna happen... at some point u need to know when to cut your losses & salvage whatever u can out of another failed season... right now, developing the young guys & featuring guys we want to try & trade at the deadline is really the only things we can lay our hats on.

I agree that the Knicks are probably past the point where playoffs is an option. I wasn't really talking about now. My response was to your post about playing the young guys from the begining...."playoffs be damned"

like i said in my prior post, i understood why people might want this team to make a run at the playoffs this year even w/a weak roster & i'm not blaming MDA for not packing it in this year before the season ever started... that personally wasn't my preference but i can understand the reasoning... to me tho, it became obvious a while ago this team wasn't going anywhere this season w/what he was going with & i don't see any point in going back to Duhon at this stage in the game, & i definitely don't see any reason for J Hill not to have a real role in the rotation for the rest of the year... we need to see if he can be the longterm solution at the C position cuz that's going to dictate some of what we do in terms of roster moves this summer.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
2/8/2010  11:12 PM
Juice wrote:You know what's even more ridiculous? If we approached this season and was told our #8 pick and #29 pick would receive almost no minutes well past the halfway mark of the season while most fans felt we weren't too much better than a 30win team because remember it's Blasphemy to blame Pringles when it comes to the W-L column what do you think the fans would have said? Ok now add in the fact the fans feelings about the team was true we aren't too much better than a 30win team. Heads would have rolled. Ok now add in the fact one of our young players has to take a back seat to a comeback project not after a yr layoff but yrs of layoff and temporarily took a back seat to a fat lard who lost 30lbs of bacteria colon fat lard and couldn't stay on the court because of it?

u get used to it dude... i been posting here a few years now & the same pattern happens every year... anytime u question anything the GM or head coach does, you get labelled a hatter with an agenda... no matter how objective u try to be there's always going to be people who accuse you of having a personal bias against a certain coach or player if you dare to criticize in any way.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
kam77
Posts: 27664
Alba Posts: 25
Joined: 3/17/2004
Member: #634
2/9/2010  1:28 AM
Nalod wrote:
"Jordan Hill" is like two great baskeball names all in one. Got your "michael Jordan" and your "grant hill" all there. This kid can't miss!!!!

More like Jordan Farmar and George Hill.

lol @ being BANNED by Martin since 11/07/10 (for asking if Mr. Earl had a point). Really, Martin? C'mon. This is the internet. I've seen much worse on this site. By Earl himself. Drop the hypocrisy.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
2/9/2010  4:17 AM
nah, we don't need players like this seeing minutes in this rotation.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Marv
Posts: 35540
Alba Posts: 69
Joined: 9/2/2002
Member: #315
2/9/2010  7:33 AM
kam77 wrote:
Nalod wrote:
"Jordan Hill" is like two great baskeball names all in one. Got your "michael Jordan" and your "grant hill" all there. This kid can't miss!!!!

More like Jordan Farmar and George Hill.

Markji
Posts: 22753
Alba Posts: -4
Joined: 9/14/2007
Member: #1673
USA
2/9/2010  9:19 AM
TMS wrote:nah, we don't need players like this seeing minutes in this rotation.


Nice mix. Jordan H looks more coordinated in college hoops than he did in Summer League and at the beginning of the season. I think he has regained that level plus some, and should be playing. Come on Mike...open up!
The difference between fiction and reality? Fiction has to make sense. Tom Clancy - author
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
2/9/2010  9:52 AM
#1 Jordan Hill is NOT a bad draft choice or a bust. It has been a very BAD decision not to get him more involved especially since we are such a small team. I really believe MDA does not want to play two BIGS because he feels they will clog the middle[although we have no drivers anyway] and likes the flexibility of Gallinari and Jefferies. Problem is it doesnt work in the NBA--you pretty much have to play with two bigs unless Dwight Howard is on your team. The one good thing for Jordan is that he did a really good job of containing Lebron in the 4th--that may sway MDA to believe that he can defend more thna just the 5 position and that maybe there is some flexibility there. Jordan Hill was raw as a freshmen at AZ--and by the time he was a junior had a full time green light. He gets up here and basically he has to take a step back from the way he is playing--perhaps showing some rawness that he was not allowed to play through. The guy needs playing time--he needs to go through the growing pains--he will ahve some highs and some lows but with 30 games left--when do you start the process?
RIP Crushalot😞
Uptown
Posts: 31359
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 4/1/2008
Member: #1883

2/9/2010  10:28 AM
Hate it or love it but I believe Hill will get sinificant mminutes after the trade deadline or the Knicks are basically mathematically out of the playoff race. Not saying I agree, but coaches coach to win ball games regardless if fans or even GM's would like the team to pack-it-in. You cant tell a coach not to try an win ball games. And if the coach is really trying to win, they are going to play the guys they trust and believe can help them win. MDA didn't trust Hill in novemeber and december while the team was still in it. Maybe Hill wasn't perfoming well in practice, none of know for sure. Easy for us to say just throw him in there, but if Jared Jeffries and Harrington and the like were outplaying him in practice, it wouldn't be fair to those guys. As fan, we dont care. But its something different in the lockerroom.

We've started to slide down the pack, players weren't playing aswell and now Hill has worked himself into the rotation. Hill either has to play better than the guys in front of him to get a significant bump in minutes or like i said the Knicks have to really be out of it.

TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
2/9/2010  10:42 AM
Markji wrote:
TMS wrote:nah, we don't need players like this seeing minutes in this rotation.


Nice mix. Jordan H looks more coordinated in college hoops than he did in Summer League and at the beginning of the season. I think he has regained that level plus some, and should be playing. Come on Mike...open up!

he definitely looked more confident & assertive in college... a lot of that had to do with the fact he was playing w/a PG in Nic Wise who actually looked to get him the ball downlow & could push the tempo & feed him on the fastbreak for finishing dunks... Duhon has not done any of that for Jordan Hill in the games he's seen whatever minutes he's been able to squeeze so far & neither has Nate... get this kid minutes & let him grow comfortable playing w/guys like Toney Douglas, who will actually be here past this season... i think we need to have him featured more in the offense instead of feeding D Lee on every possession off the P&R... everyone knows Lee is a nice offensive player at this point... this season is shot, time to feature Jordan Hill now & see what he's got before the summer comes around.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
2/9/2010  10:45 AM
TMS wrote:nah, we don't need players like this seeing minutes in this rotation.

He gave cole aldrich the business in that kansas game. I remember that game...look at the 1:58 mark. He left Aldrich in cement shoes....

Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
Markji
Posts: 22753
Alba Posts: -4
Joined: 9/14/2007
Member: #1673
USA
2/9/2010  10:46 AM    LAST EDITED: 2/9/2010  10:53 AM
Uptown wrote:Hate it or love it but I believe Hill will get sinificant mminutes after the trade deadline or the Knicks are basically mathematically out of the playoff race. Not saying I agree, but coaches coach to win ball games regardless if fans or even GM's would like the team to pack-it-in. You cant tell a coach not to try an win ball games. And if the coach is really trying to win, they are going to play the guys they trust and believe can help them win. MDA didn't trust Hill in novemeber and december while the team was still in it. Maybe Hill wasn't perfoming well in practice, none of know for sure.

I agree, Hill wasn't playing well in Oct, Nov, Dec. He was raw and wasn't ready to play. I was knocking Hill's ability as were many on the board. It was probably a blessing to Hill to not have to play at that time, and lose confidence if/when he played poorly.

But now, Hill has improved his game and has shown he can play.

To say that when Hill goes into the game, we are giving up and have a lesser chance of winning the game is totally wrong. If we give Hill 15 to 20 min per game over Bender, etc, we have a much BETTER chance of winning!

The difference between fiction and reality? Fiction has to make sense. Tom Clancy - author
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
2/9/2010  10:49 AM
BRIGGS wrote:I really believe MDA does not want to play two BIGS because he feels they will clog the middle[although we have no drivers anyway] and likes the flexibility of Gallinari and Jefferies.

if Donnie Walsh pulls off some major trade at the deadline involving D Lee & Fishlips, then i'll be able to see the method behind alot of MDA's madness this year... that would also explain the patience he showed for Duhon all year long since he was effectively feeding the ball to D Lee if nothing else... of course that's an unlikely scenario but who knows, Donnie's shocked me before by pulling off the Zach Randolph & Jamal trades.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
2/9/2010  10:49 AM
BRIGGS wrote:#1 Jordan Hill is NOT a bad draft choice or a bust. It has been a very BAD decision not to get him more involved especially since we are such a small team. I really believe MDA does not want to play two BIGS because he feels they will clog the middle[although we have no drivers anyway] and likes the flexibility of Gallinari and Jefferies. Problem is it doesnt work in the NBA--you pretty much have to play with two bigs unless Dwight Howard is on your team. The one good thing for Jordan is that he did a really good job of containing Lebron in the 4th--that may sway MDA to believe that he can defend more thna just the 5 position and that maybe there is some flexibility there. Jordan Hill was raw as a freshmen at AZ--and by the time he was a junior had a full time green light. He gets up here and basically he has to take a step back from the way he is playing--perhaps showing some rawness that he was not allowed to play through. The guy needs playing time--he needs to go through the growing pains--he will ahve some highs and some lows but with 30 games left--when do you start the process?


Although we do have a good slasher who is not being utilized properly and that is chandler. I like when he dives to the hoop for his baskets, instead of dribbling and trying these fadeway spin shots with defenders on him.... this offense almost doesn't allow time for cutters to develop.. it is come down, lee pick, lee quick jumper.. If lee is covered the next guy is tossing up a shot.... no rhythm whatsoever most of the times...

I do agree you have to go with two bigs. We had antwan jamison get 11 offensive boards vs us.. that is completely unacceptable....

Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
2/9/2010  10:51 AM
tkf wrote:
TMS wrote:nah, we don't need players like this seeing minutes in this rotation.

He gave cole aldrich the business in that kansas game. I remember that game...look at the 1:58 mark. He left Aldrich in cement shoes....

yup, he made Aldrich look bad that game... this kid has explosive athleticism that Knick fans haven't really been able to see yet this season cuz we don't have a PG that can push the pace & dish off penetration.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Number 1 priority last 30---develop Jordan Hill

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy