orangeblobman wrote:fishmike wrote:orangeblobman wrote:Alright mike, fish. mr., I had a bunch of exams, probably very stressed out. Plus, I was obviously wrong in how serious it was. That's all. Is not so serious I guess. Whatever, man. But that doesn't change any of the arguments in this thread. You threw me what we call a 'red herring'. Shameful, I didn't expect that from you.
if you want to have real discussions around here try avoid things like "because he's awesome" or "its obvious" or "anyone can see" or "you cant argue" as the main reasoning backing up whatever statement your making.Just say what you see, and why you think you see it.
Point is you have been dead wrong in the past, and I think people are pretty much over your observations because of how you back them up (or dont back them up). That being said you post a LOT here. Thats cool. This forum is great because of the diversity of personalities.
Think of it as friendly advice. If you see something state your opinion. Stating facts (based on your opinions) is a put off and gets old. Except when I do, then its cool.
I backed it up plenty, and again, red herring on the 'wrong in the past'. Give me a break, bro. Did you even read anything I said in this thread???
He's a leader, plain and simple.
fact based on... your opinion
I could go on, but the fact is that he's awesome
based on... your opinion
I am just ecstatic that we have a future superstar on our hands.
but 3 months ago his career was over
I don't have a stat of choice, man. I know a winner when I see one. I guess there is no 'real' debate here.
right.. who can debate facts? (especially ones based on your opinions)
Red herring (logical fallacy), a deliberate attempt to change a subject or divert an argument
Seems to me that you are the thrower of many red herrings. People keeps asking you why you have come to the opions your sharing, but you dont elaborate. Instead you just say "because I said so" simplification of your above quotes.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs