[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Playing Jordan Hill
Author Thread
martin
Posts: 78490
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
11/24/2009  6:24 PM
Cosmic wrote:
martin wrote:

to showcase you also need to win some. And that has been too far and too few for the Knicks. So before the coaching staff can integrate a new guy, yes, you do have to make sure your other regulars are doing what they are supposed to. And then Curry just returned.

And to make things worse, Harrington, Duhon, Wilson all started shooting the ball like 25% for the first 8 games.

And then it's about combinations of players that work together. You just don't cut 2 minutes here and 3 minutes there. These are players, not robots.

Well, yes, we need to win in order to showcase, but all the same there are GMs that eye one player and think "Hey, if I take that guy and plug him in here, in this situation, in a role I envision, he's going to be good for us, so who cares if the Knicks are 3-79!" (you know?)

As to players shooting terribly the first 8 games, well, every years it takes about 10 regular season games before most players shake the rust off. Well, we're beyond that now and the players are waking up so it's not an issue from here on out. I think scouts understand that as well when looking at players to trade for.

As to cutting minutes, well, I don't see how cutting Duhon from 46 to 44 minutes is going to hurt much. Same with the other vets who play 35+ minutes per game. 1 or 2 minutes shouldn't mean much should it? Yet, you take 5 guys and do that and you can give them to our lotto pick to get out there.

At worst what has Jordan Hill looked like? TO me even at his worst he's done what Jerome James did when he came into a game. It might not have been pretty but he changed the game for the better for us. So...I don't see the problem in doing it.

As to combinations, yep, combos are essential. Yet with the players we have we don't have many combos that work do we.

Lee-Chandler-Gallo-Hughes-Duhon is our best combo. I'd even say if you swapped Duhon for Douglas it might even be better.

Other than that every other combo is a DISASTER at best except for the occasional spurt here or there.

So, again, plugging Hill into any combo? I don't see an issue given all that is going on (the big picture if you will, from our record, to the fact we really only have one GOOD lineup that produces)

Eh, well, what can we do but watch.

But, hey, I won't be doing that until the Orlando game.

hey, i'd like to see hill more too.

What's to say they aren't putting him through some Curry-like drills at practice when we aren't watching? who knows what's going on. Long season.

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
AUTOADVERT
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
11/24/2009  6:50 PM
martin wrote:

hey, i'd like to see hill more too.

What's to say they aren't putting him through some Curry-like drills at practice when we aren't watching? who knows what's going on. Long season.

Well, nothing. We don't know. I'd assume he practices in 5 on 5. I would hope so.

I do recall Mike suggesting about a week into the season that he doesn't play Hill because he is worried about his defense. When you see Hill come in and get 2 blocks, get crapped on 4 times, and then foul 4 times, well, sure....it makes sense.

But again I come back to our record, our situation, etc. And the big picture would say there is no reason no to see two 5-minute stints of Jordan Hill every game.

But, hey, that's why I am a fan and not a coach I suppose.

*shrug*

http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
11/24/2009  6:52 PM
I will say one parting bit here (and then I will catch you all on the flip side)

Given our upcoming schedule, it's quite rough, and we could easily be 4-20 or 5-19 after the fact. By then, we damn sure better be seeing 10-15 minutes of Jordan Hill and Toney Douglas.

Would anyone disagree with THAT?

http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
11/24/2009  6:56 PM
Cosmic wrote:I will say one parting bit here (and then I will catch you all on the flip side)

Given our upcoming schedule, it's quite rough, and we could easily be 4-20 or 5-19 after the fact. By then, we damn sure better be seeing 10-15 minutes of Jordan Hill and Toney Douglas.

Would anyone disagree with THAT?

i think curry and jeffries will continue to see heavy minutes up until the trade deadline. that's just the way it is. walsh has to try to trade them. i think we'll see hill play a lot more in march and april.

¿ △ ?
martin
Posts: 78490
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
11/24/2009  7:13 PM
Cos, right up until the trade deadline, the Knicks main focus is 2-fold: win games and try to highlight any of: Lee, Harrington, JJ, Hughes, Duhon, Darko, Curry. And mostly JJ and Curry.

You already see Douglas playing some, so we know it's prob just a matter of minutes (or lack thereof to go around) for Hill.

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
11/24/2009  8:07 PM
http://www.nba.com/knicks/features/jordan_hill111309.html


Hill Knows His Time Will Come
by Chris Creed

At about 6 p.m. on Nov. 6, fans started filing in to The Garden to watch the Knicks take on LeBron James, Shaquille O’Neal and the Cleveland Cavaliers. With nearly an hour and half before tipoff, rookie Jordan Hill was the lone player on the court working with assistant coach Dan D’Antoni.

Groups of young fans began lining the court trying to get the attention of Hill for either an autograph or a simple wave.

The Knicks rookie was more than willing to oblige as it was not that long ago that he was one of those young autographic seekers looking to get a few precious moments with his NBA heroes.

“I was in the same situation growing up watching Kevin Garnett, Amar’e Stoudemire and other players I wanted to meet when I was a kid,” said the 22-year-old Hill. “I want to show everyone that I care and I’m a down-to-earth guy. I’m humble and love what I do.”

Unfortunately for Hill he never got to meet KG or Stoudemire as a youngster but did have the opportunity to meet one of the greats of the game.

“I met Karl Malone when I was little. It was crazy to simply be in his presence,” Hill remembers. “When I was young I would watch the pros to see how they interacted with fans. They were just normal people and I’m going to do the same thing.

“That’s just how I am. Just because I’m a pro basketball player doesn’t change the fact that I care for and respect other people.”

Hill is certainly a regular guy but has already experienced some extraordinary moments in his freshman campaign. One came in the Cleveland game when he found himself defending the 7-foot-1, 325-pound Shaquille O’Neal.

“He is a monster,” Hill said with a huge grin as he looked back on that moment with Shaq. “I just tried to hold my own but I did get him to travel. I don’t know if it was my defense or he just lost it. But he was about to go crazy on me so I’m glad he did travel.

“I was thinking, ‘is Shaq really backing me down?’,” Hill continued. “I never thought I would be in that position. And I had a chance to guard LeBron as well. But then I finally realized I came here to play basketball and it doesn’t matter if they are an MVP or someone trying to get minutes like me, I’m going to go out there and give it my all.”

Hill has done just that in the limited minutes he’s played thus far in the season. That night against the Cavaliers, he netted six points in five minutes of action while the very next day against the Milwaukee Bucks, Hill played 13 minutes and scored seven points and grabbed six rebounds.

But more importantly, his play over the two-game span got the attention of his head coach.

“It’s time I have to start playing him some,” Mike D’Antoni said following the Cavs game. “We have to start developing him little by little.”

With a number of veteran “bigs” ahead of him on Coach D’Antoni’s depth chart, Hill understands he must be patient and absorb as much about the game as he can until his number gets called.

“I have to wait my turn and keep working,” he said. “I might get two minutes one game and 15 the next. I just have to stay ready and be prepared.”

The Jordan Hill story has only begun to be written and time will tell whether it becomes a best seller. But the person most instrumental in deciding the length of that story, to this point, feels there is enough character development to keep reading.

“He showed some promise and he’s very athletic,” said D’Antoni. “He’s got a ways to go, but I do think it’s something we need to look at and keep developing.”

Hill’s career in New York has spanned just a handful of games so far in the young 2009-10 NBA season, but in his brief tenure he has a clear understanding of what he needs to do and is willing to put in the time to get there.

“To get on the floor and help my team out as much as possible,” he said of his goals for the season. “Give it my all and play my game. I love to play basketball. I have to keep working hard and I know my time will come.”

seems to me Jordan Hill isn't the problem here... he's working hard & produces whenever he's given minutes... anyone who's watched the games & seen him play will attest to that.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
11/24/2009  8:28 PM    LAST EDITED: 11/24/2009  8:34 PM
Cosmic wrote:
Bippity10 wrote:
Cosmic wrote:Supreme: I feel you. It's a bogus argument. It's not tough to scratch up 10-12 minutes for your lotto pick.

EMS: Five years? Okay, still it's tough not to be wary of these guys who pick the game up late in their lives. Yet I had read 3 so I guess that was wrong.

Paladin: As I said above, that's no excuse to not be paying attention and trying to learn. Some day he might be in the game in an exact same instant. That go around you want him to say to himself "Hey, I know this, I remember watching the guys do this very play one game."

Bip: Where did I change the topic? I have been talking about Jordan Hill. Both talking about how we should easily find minutes for him and talking about how his attitude, one that is out there for all to see, might be one reason he's not getting burn, because he doesn't seem to be all that serious about anything, and maybe that is how he is all the time.

I told you where you changed the subject. Your original post talked about how he was probably getting benched because of his "lazy and disinterested demeanor". I posed the possibility that you are incorrect and jumping to conclusions. I can't tell you how many times fans have complained about one of my players being "disinterested" when in fact teammates and coaches admired him for his work ethic. YOu don't now this stuff until you are in practice. I know as fans we like to take video snippets and extrapolate all types of things from them, but this isn't reality. Now, Jordan Hill very much could be benched because he has an attitude problem, or he could be benched because he's just not ready yet. From what I've heard and seen so far on the court, effort does not appear to be a problem. What we've heard from a coach and GM that have been nothing but possibly too up front with their assessments have said nothing but good things about his work ethic. So until I see or hear otherwise I personally am not going to get bent out of shape over a 12th man laughing on the bench.

Summary: 1st conversation between us was clearly about Hill either playing or not playign because he was "lazy and disinterested".

Then you changed it to:

Bip: He has played okay when on the court. Let's not say well because on the one hand he had a few good scores - but - they were on trash players. On the other hand he got burnt a few times and fouled a few times out of desperation, again, against some trash players. So we can't really say he's looked good based on that.

If you can't se ehow you changed the subject then I can't help you.


You're reaching way too far into my posts for something that isn't even there. For what reason? To blindly defend Jordan Hill's lack of success (thus far).? To what end?

I suggested MAYBE he was not getting time because MAYBE the lazy demeanor we see during games is MAYBE going on during practices MAYBE leading Mike to not feel comfortable playing him. There is no subject change here. I don't know what you're talking about, Bip, Honestly.

I am not incorrect: How am I incorrect? This is not an isolated incident this is how he conducts himself throughout games every game. It is om game film time and again. I'm not inventing it. We're watching live film of Jordan Hill acting like this. So where you're going with that I have no clue. I guess Breen, Clyde, Trautwig, and Kenny Albert, and a couple of other fans on here, are also all incorrect for pointing it out as well over time?

Why have you changed the topic from "Why can't Jordan Hill get minutes" And "Maybe he isn't getting minutes because he has a lazy and disinterested attitude and maybe that is happening in practice as well." to... chopping my post apart into "where I changed the subject" which I never did?

What are you even talking about?

In his limited action he had a couple of decent scoring opportunities but he also got torched on the other end a few times, had a couple of nice blocks, but also had a couple of ridiculous fouls as well. Overall I'd call that a mediocre showing at best.

That part of the convo was directed at his time on the court. So again where you get this "changing the subject" bit...and what you're trying to make of it I haven't a clue. As if my talking about two parts of Jordan Hill (his bench demeanor and his on-court showing) somehow invalidates what I have to say about him....

All I am doing is stating what I see of Jordan Hill and I am CERTAINLY not alone.

Cosmic where have you seen me blindly defend anyone on this team? I dare you to find it. HOw have I even defended Hill. I'm just being fair to the guy. lI know on this site if you don't bash a guy it means you are blindly defending so I should be used to this nonsense by now. I will say again he has done nothing to deserve any credit. If anything he deserves criticism. But to say the guy has a lazy and disinterested demeanor and may not play because of it, is just your interpretation of what you see on video snippets. We do that with actors and actresses to. We catch snippets of the guy on film and then determine what we want them to mean. I personally don't do that.

I have been to 100+ NBA games. I have sat right behind the bench at Knicks games during the Ewing, Oakley, Starks era. I have seen John Starks talk to fans during crucial portions of games. I have seen Ewing laugh at teammates who tripped over themselves during important stretches. Now again, Hill may have a problem, but he also may not. Until D'Antoni determines this is a problem, or you see it manifests itself on the court why get whipped up into a frenzy over your perception?

As a coach I am a disciplinarian. I tolerate nothing. I demand that every player pays attention to everything I say. But if my 12th man is not 100% interested in what I'm saying during a timeout when he knows he isn't getting into the game I'm not getting bent out of shape over it. Ill stab him if he is about to play and he isn't listening, but I know these players are human and understand that being on teh bench is tough. I am willing to bet my life that players on San Antonio, LA, Boston, Golden State, New Jersey, Minnesota, Atlanta are all doing the same thing. It's only focused on when your team stinks. Otherwise nobody cares.

In summary: I think Hill doesn't play because he simply is not ready. Will he ever be? I have no idea. I hope so.(sorry for defending the guy so vigorously). All I know is regardless of the game, time of game or competition he has worked hard on the court. He's attempted to block shots, he's rebounded, he's run the floor. He had not given me any indication at this point of being lazy and disinterested. When he does, trust me, I'll be right there with you. Right now, some snippets of film in which a guy smiles or stares at a scoreboard does nothing for me.

I just hope that people will like me
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
11/25/2009  9:05 AM
After last nights game I'm still seeing no evidence that Hill is lazy and disinterested.
I just hope that people will like me
TheGame
Posts: 26647
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2006
Member: #1154
USA
11/25/2009  10:31 AM
The more I see Hill play, the more I start to believe that this kid can be a solid PF in this league. He still gets lost at times, but he is a solid shot-blocker, has good post moves, and is an above-average shooter for a PF. Once this kid learns where to be on the court and adds about 15 lbs of muscle, he is going to be a beast. Walsh needs to move Lee for a draft pick and a young prospect and let Hill take over next year.
Trust the Process
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
11/25/2009  11:53 AM
Hill was defending the post well for a guy who's seen such limited action this year... he made Bynum have to work hard for his shots & for positioning downlow... earlier on he was having his way in the paint against Lee, Harrington & Jeffries... i can't believe MDA continues to play Fishlips over this kid, i seriously can't... 19 minutes & 0 production? wow... that's pretty ridiculous.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
martin
Posts: 78490
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
11/25/2009  11:55 AM
TMS wrote:Hill was defending the post well for a guy who's seen such limited action this year... he made Bynum have to work hard for his shots & for positioning downlow... earlier on he was having his way in the paint against Lee, Harrington & Jeffries...

noticed. he did look good defending the post.

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
11/25/2009  1:01 PM
martin wrote:
TMS wrote:Hill was defending the post well for a guy who's seen such limited action this year... he made Bynum have to work hard for his shots & for positioning downlow... earlier on he was having his way in the paint against Lee, Harrington & Jeffries...

noticed. he did look good defending the post.

Agreed. Got to be honest, the kid has looked good each time he's gotten on the court. I'm guessing that he steals minutes pretty soon.

I just hope that people will like me
Playing Jordan Hill

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy