[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Optimism for a change - How do you move forward?
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
Page 3 of 3 ‹ Previous 1  2  3 
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
JohnWallace44
Posts: 25119
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 6/14/2005
Member: #910
USA
11/3/2009  4:38 PM
TMS wrote:
JohnWallace44 wrote:It seems like Washington and the Knicks could help each other a lot with trades.

Blatche/Crittendon/Mike James
for
Chandler/Jeffries/Hill

Crit is a big combo guard to play opposite Hughes, James gives us shooting guard depth, and Blatche can play the 3/4/5 spots and spread the floor even more.

Chandler and Jeffries give them more balanced play from the forward spots and Hill is a nice chip for them. They aren't in position for a 2010 FA anyway, so they are a perfect team to absorb Jeffries.

Gives us more cap room, clearing about half of Jeffries salary, which would give us more of a shot at getting two players at near Max dollars.


i don't think WAS is trading Blatche for that package, they're high on him down here in DC & he's been playing well of late... they have no need for Chandler either w/Caron Butler in the fold... i do like Crittenton tho, i've been proposing trade ideas to get him for a while now... i would be fine with offering up our 2nd round pick for him along w/some cash considerations.

That's probably true. They didn't even extend Crittendon so you'd think you could get him for next to nothing though.

Alan Hahn: Nate Robinson has been on a ridonkulous scoring tear lately (remember when he couldn't hit Jerome James with a Big Mac in early January?)
AUTOADVERT
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
11/3/2009  4:55 PM
i think the second rounder would be enough for Crittenton at this point but if it takes some cash to sweeten it, that's fine by me... i would even offer up Nate to WAS for Oberto & Crittenton if they were interested in that instead cuz i much prefer Toney Douglas' team oriented style of play over Nate's flash & dash antics to be our backup PG.

Crittenton's still mad young at 21 so u know he's got room to grow as a basketball player... when i watched him on the Lakers he showed some promise in small spurts... he can defend his position & is really big for a PG... having him & Hughes as our backcourt would look pretty good for now until Wilson gets his act together.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
JohnWallace44
Posts: 25119
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 6/14/2005
Member: #910
USA
11/3/2009  10:05 PM
TMS wrote:i think the second rounder would be enough for Crittenton at this point but if it takes some cash to sweeten it, that's fine by me... i would even offer up Nate to WAS for Oberto & Crittenton if they were interested in that instead cuz i much prefer Toney Douglas' team oriented style of play over Nate's flash & dash antics to be our backup PG.

Crittenton's still mad young at 21 so u know he's got room to grow as a basketball player... when i watched him on the Lakers he showed some promise in small spurts... he can defend his position & is really big for a PG... having him & Hughes as our backcourt would look pretty good for now until Wilson gets his act together.

We need that 2nd round pick in a deep draft next year. I wonder if we could trade Landry and cash for him since they don't want him.

Alan Hahn: Nate Robinson has been on a ridonkulous scoring tear lately (remember when he couldn't hit Jerome James with a Big Mac in early January?)
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
11/3/2009  10:49 PM
if WAS would somehow take back Fishlips, Nate, our 2nd round pick & cash for Mike James, Crittenton & Oberto i'd do that in a heartbeat.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
JohnWallace44
Posts: 25119
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 6/14/2005
Member: #910
USA
11/4/2009  11:54 AM
Detroit would be an interesting trade partner. If we moved Chandler/Nate/Jeffries for Prince/Bynum then we'd still have room for a max player in 2010, would still clear room for another Max player in 2011. Detroit would clear half of Prince's 2010 money. (Prince has been rumored in trades recently)

Hughes-Gallo-Prince-Al Jr-Lee

with a bench of

Hill-Darko-Douglas-Duhon-Bynum

Not too bad. Prince can score better on his own than Wilson can. You'd have a team where everyone is basically the same height so they could switch to their heart's content. All of them can handle the ball to some extent.

Alan Hahn: Nate Robinson has been on a ridonkulous scoring tear lately (remember when he couldn't hit Jerome James with a Big Mac in early January?)
kingofelpaso
Posts: 20270
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/3/2009
Member: #2542
11/4/2009  12:25 PM
I think I really like the idea of looking to trade for Prince too. Offensively, the is not the most dynamic scorer, but he would bring a great defensive presence to the team and help to attract 2010 talent
Page 3 of 3 ‹ Previous 1  2  3 
« Reply To Topic
Optimism for a change - How do you move forward?
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy