[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Brendan Haywood on Marbury....CLASSIC!
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
Page 3 of 6 ‹ Previous 1  2  3  4  5 Next ›Last »
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
orangeblobman
Posts: 27269
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/1/2009
Member: #2539
Nauru
8/18/2009  1:37 PM
Posted by Nalod:

Orange, this is the wrong place to argue about your personal views in the natural order of things.

Haywood was typical jock gay bashing but thats the typical jock way. Not very thought out. Pro athlete is a very macho animal.

Firefly is right to say the guy is off to make a comment, but Orange blob is way way off line to argue the validity of a gay persons rights.

You're right, this is no place for that. But you're also right in calling the athlete a very 'macho animal' and, by extension, sports fans are macho animals as well. This is why it's so weird to see gay-rights defenders here, at least to me. This is like an NBA locker room for the Everyman.

But I should have exercised better judgement, I GUESS, so I'm sorry.
WE AIN'T NOWHERE WITH THIS BUM CHOKER IN CARMELO. GIVE ME STARKS'S 2-21 ANY DAY OVER THIS LACKLUSTER CLUSTEREFF.
AUTOADVERT
firefly
Posts: 23226
Alba Posts: 17
Joined: 7/26/2004
Member: #721
United Kingdom
8/18/2009  1:44 PM
Screw that OBM, dont embarrass yourself by apologizing. What are you apologizing for exactly, because you chose the wrong place to air your sociopathic views, or for the views themselves.

I consider this forum my family, and my personal feelings are that views like the ones you profess to share do not belong here. Knowing M & A they wont need us to tell them to throw you out for those views, but just to show my strength of feeling, id like to ask them anyway.
Some men see things as they are and ask why. I dream things that never were and ask why not?
martin
Posts: 76300
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
8/18/2009  1:48 PM
Posted by orangeblobman:
Posted by Nalod:

Orange, this is the wrong place to argue about your personal views in the natural order of things.

Haywood was typical jock gay bashing but thats the typical jock way. Not very thought out. Pro athlete is a very macho animal.

Firefly is right to say the guy is off to make a comment, but Orange blob is way way off line to argue the validity of a gay persons rights.

You're right, this is no place for that. But you're also right in calling the athlete a very 'macho animal' and, by extension, sports fans are macho animals as well. This is why it's so weird to see gay-rights defenders here, at least to me. This is like an NBA locker room for the Everyman.

But I should have exercised better judgement, I GUESS, so I'm sorry.

"This is like an NBA locker room for the Everyman." Your assumption is way off.

"But I should have exercised better judgement, I GUESS, so I'm sorry." Why add "I GUESS"? Sounds like you really dont believe what you are typing.
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
8/18/2009  1:51 PM
Posted by SupremeCommander:
Posted by orangeblobman:
Posted by SupremeCommander:
Posted by orangeblobman:
Posted by SupremeCommander:
Posted by orangeblobman:
Posted by SupremeCommander:
Posted by orangeblobman:
Posted by SupremeCommander:
Posted by orangeblobman:
Posted by EnySpree:
Posted by arkrud:

guybury

disturbury

gaybury

$5 says you're a repressed conservative closet case

20$ says you're a self-loathing, brain-dead, bleeding-heart liberal. You are probably one of those people that thinks gayness is perfectly normal and that gays deserve some type of rights.

[Edited by - orangeblobman on 08-18-2009 1:02 PM]

I always knew you were off your rocker but that's just ridiculous. Yes, I happen to think "gays deserve some type of rights"

I'm curious to hear what you think of all minority groups

I'm curious as to why you rush to the defense of silly ideals. Aren't you a grown up? Aren't you too old to play this hipster-collegekid-potsmoke role?

I thought conservatives believed in some slogan of "all men are created equal" or something. You just implied gays are undeserving of rights. That's not an ideal, that's just basic decency and courtesy. An ideal would be me expecting everyone to get along and try to love on another... I place no such expectation on you or any other hatemonger.

It's not hate mongering.

It's a legit argument. Gayness is not natural, it's goes against our nature. Human nature. I don't know why you choose to defend a group of people that is so backwards, twisted, and HATEFUL against our normal, traditional society.

You really must hate your parents, grandparents.

I'm sorry implying certain people do not deserve rights is hateful

So, to you, serial killers and child rapists deserve rights too?

You do realize, don't you, that going down the path that you're on will eventually lead to the legalization of pedophillia and all sorts of other sick behaviors, right?? Don't you see this?

How am I supposed to argue with you when you assert homosexuality between two consenting adults is on par with serial killings, child rapings, and pedophilia

The line between good and bad, acceptable and unacceptable has nothing to do with gay/straight. It is between acceptance and violence.
Anything which is violent like serial killings, child raping for example is a crime.
Being gay or even pedophile is not a crime until you rape or abuse anybody in any way.
We have too many people on this planet already so the trend to have relationship with same gender and do not reproduce is natural.
Same happens with wild animals when they overpopulate and have nothing to eat.
Obviously in people society this natural trend is screwed but it is absolutely understandable







"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397
8/18/2009  1:51 PM
Posted by firefly:

Screw that OBM, dont embarrass yourself by apologizing. What are you apologizing for exactly, because you chose the wrong place to air your sociopathic views, or for the views themselves.

I consider this forum my family, and my personal feelings are that views like the ones you profess to share do not belong here. Knowing M & A they wont need us to tell them to throw you out for those views, but just to show my strength of feeling, id like to ask them anyway.


You are OD'ing....

Why are you turning what Haywood said and what Marbury did into a Gay rights war??? What Marbury did was SuperGay...Gay Lord'ish...

Like I said earlier, Haywood is wrong for saying peeps would be uncomfortable getting dressed around him. That mindset is wrong. He should apologize and his team should handle that internally.

Still doesn't change the fact that what Marbs did was Gay on an Epic scale....if anything Gay people should be upset Marbury is giving them a bad name. Word!
Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
8/18/2009  1:57 PM
Posted by EnySpree:
Posted by firefly:

Screw that OBM, dont embarrass yourself by apologizing. What are you apologizing for exactly, because you chose the wrong place to air your sociopathic views, or for the views themselves.

I consider this forum my family, and my personal feelings are that views like the ones you profess to share do not belong here. Knowing M & A they wont need us to tell them to throw you out for those views, but just to show my strength of feeling, id like to ask them anyway.


You are OD'ing....

Why are you turning what Haywood said and what Marbury did into a Gay rights war??? What Marbury did was SuperGay...Gay Lord'ish...

Like I said earlier, Haywood is wrong for saying peeps would be uncomfortable getting dressed around him. That mindset is wrong. He should apologize and his team should handle that internally.

Still doesn't change the fact that what Marbs did was Gay on an Epic scale....if anything Gay people should be upset Marbury is giving them a bad name. Word!

gaylordbury
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
firefly
Posts: 23226
Alba Posts: 17
Joined: 7/26/2004
Member: #721
United Kingdom
8/18/2009  2:00 PM
Posted by EnySpree:
Posted by firefly:

Screw that OBM, dont embarrass yourself by apologizing. What are you apologizing for exactly, because you chose the wrong place to air your sociopathic views, or for the views themselves.

I consider this forum my family, and my personal feelings are that views like the ones you profess to share do not belong here. Knowing M & A they wont need us to tell them to throw you out for those views, but just to show my strength of feeling, id like to ask them anyway.


You are OD'ing....

Why are you turning what Haywood said and what Marbury did into a Gay rights war??? What Marbury did was SuperGay...Gay Lord'ish...

Like I said earlier, Haywood is wrong for saying peeps would be uncomfortable getting dressed around him. That mindset is wrong. He should apologize and his team should handle that internally.

Still doesn't change the fact that what Marbs did was Gay on an Epic scale....if anything Gay people should be upset Marbury is giving them a bad name. Word!

No man, ive moved on from Haywood. I saw what you wrote and Im cool with that. My rant was all on OBM whose views im sure you dont share.
Some men see things as they are and ask why. I dream things that never were and ask why not?
BasketballJones
Posts: 31973
Alba Posts: 19
Joined: 7/16/2002
Member: #290
USA
8/18/2009  2:03 PM
See, this is what happens when there's no real basketball news to discuss. This is all Donnie "Sleepy" Walsh's fault.

As for OBM, it's kind of hard to take him seriously. I think he's basically being trollish. I mean, he may believe all that stuff, but it sounds to me more like he's aping the views of religious conservatives. In short, I think he's just messing with us.


https:// It's not so hard.
orangeblobman
Posts: 27269
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/1/2009
Member: #2539
Nauru
8/18/2009  2:07 PM
Posted by BasketballJones:

See, this is what happens when there's no real basketball news to discuss. This is all Donnie "Sleepy" Walsh's fault.

As for OBM, it's kind of hard to take him seriously. I think he's basically being trollish. I mean, he may believe all that stuff, but it sounds to me more like he's aping the views of religious conservatives. In short, I think he's just messing with us.

Look, it IS slow season, and it IS awfully boring being a Knick fan right now.

But I am not trying to troll, I do believe in what I say, and I am not religious at all but rather consider myself a secular humanist; I will do my best to avoid any discussions of this nature in the future.
WE AIN'T NOWHERE WITH THIS BUM CHOKER IN CARMELO. GIVE ME STARKS'S 2-21 ANY DAY OVER THIS LACKLUSTER CLUSTEREFF.
TheGame
Posts: 26637
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2006
Member: #1154
USA
8/18/2009  2:19 PM
Marbury needs real help. I hope someone close to him helps him before be shoots himself over the Internet.
Trust the Process
jimimou
Posts: 23517
Alba Posts: 36
Lame Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 6/6/2004
Member: #681
USA
8/18/2009  2:21 PM
Posted by orangeblobman:
Posted by BasketballJones:

See, this is what happens when there's no real basketball news to discuss. This is all Donnie "Sleepy" Walsh's fault.

As for OBM, it's kind of hard to take him seriously. I think he's basically being trollish. I mean, he may believe all that stuff, but it sounds to me more like he's aping the views of religious conservatives. In short, I think he's just messing with us.

Look, it IS slow season, and it IS awfully boring being a Knick fan right now.

But I am not trying to troll, I do believe in what I say, and I am not religious at all but rather consider myself a secular humanist; I will do my best to avoid any discussions of this nature in the future.

thats probably a good thing b/c w every keystroke, your iq drops another point....enjoy the silence homoboy, i mean homeboy....sorry, couldnt resist to add a 'gay' twist to this.....

personally, i think its attrocious to show such ignorance in this day and age as you do below. when have gay people been hateful enmasse? our 'normal natural traditional society'????wtf???? - homosexuality has been around as long as heterosexuality - only difference is that gay people feel more comfortable expressing themselves in recent history whereas they were totally ostracized in history....society in general is not normal. society is society - your interpetation of it is what makes it normal to you , everyone has their own opinion about what is normal and what constiutes abnormal. dont tell me about normal traditional society when you have everyone from several of this country's founding fathers, politicians, priests, athletes, fortune 500 ceo's, etc who are homosexuals. what's the big deal? what are you scared of? you know you cant get aids by huggin a gay person right?

oh and ps: some posters on this board probably have parents, grandparents and siblings who are gay - hopefully you dont meet up with them at the next get together....they may have an earful for ya.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It's not hate mongering.

It's a legit argument. Gayness is not natural, it's goes against our nature. Human nature. I don't know why you choose to defend a group of people that is so backwards, twisted, and HATEFUL against our normal, traditional society.

You really must hate your parents, grandparents.
Andrew
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #1
USA
8/18/2009  2:26 PM
Anyone else find it strange that OBM decided to post in the Alba thread just now?
PURE KNICKS LOVE
jimimou
Posts: 23517
Alba Posts: 36
Lame Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 6/6/2004
Member: #681
USA
8/18/2009  2:29 PM
Posted by Andrew:

Anyone else find it strange that OBM decided to post in the Alba thread just now?

but it was a unicyclist andrew!
orangeblobman
Posts: 27269
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/1/2009
Member: #2539
Nauru
8/18/2009  2:30 PM
Posted by Andrew:

Anyone else find it strange that OBM decided to post in the Alba thread just now?

LOL. Thanks, Andrew.

I was looking up unicycles (as I am bored of no-hands riding on my bicycle) and a list of 'noted unicyclists' appeared on Wiki. So, quite the coincidence, eh? One could say I am trying to affirm my heterosexualness by posting Leslie Mann photos.
WE AIN'T NOWHERE WITH THIS BUM CHOKER IN CARMELO. GIVE ME STARKS'S 2-21 ANY DAY OVER THIS LACKLUSTER CLUSTEREFF.
Nalod
Posts: 71209
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
8/18/2009  2:31 PM
Blob,

If you think "gayness" is not natural, then what is it? A deviation of the human spirit?

Then its a religious thing for you.

If its not, then you think its biological?

Which secular argument makes more sense for you?
firefly
Posts: 23226
Alba Posts: 17
Joined: 7/26/2004
Member: #721
United Kingdom
8/18/2009  2:32 PM
Posted by Andrew:

Anyone else find it strange that OBM decided to post in the Alba thread just now?

Overcompensating?
Some men see things as they are and ask why. I dream things that never were and ask why not?
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34060
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127
8/18/2009  2:35 PM
Posted by firefly:
Posted by Andrew:

Anyone else find it strange that OBM decided to post in the Alba thread just now?

Overcompensating?

Maintaining a place in normal, traditional society requires a whole lot of effort and energy
DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
orangeblobman
Posts: 27269
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/1/2009
Member: #2539
Nauru
8/18/2009  2:36 PM
Posted by Nalod:

Blob,

If you think "gayness" is not natural, then what is it? A deviation of the human spirit?

Then its a religious thing for you.

If its not, then you think its biological?

Which secular argument makes more sense for you?

Thank you, Nalod, for asking this question.

A secular argument, if you will--

In 'the wild', a Lion hunts and thrives. -- A GAY Lion (and they may exist) will NOT reproduce. If a gay lion will not reproduce than he is unfit for survival and therefore unworthy of any common rights within the lion community.

Now, a gay human might have some worth (he can baggage groceries, for example), but he cannot EVER fulfill his natural, BIOLOGICAL duty of reproduction.

Within the lion community, a gay lion might have no value, so he just dies out.


WE AIN'T NOWHERE WITH THIS BUM CHOKER IN CARMELO. GIVE ME STARKS'S 2-21 ANY DAY OVER THIS LACKLUSTER CLUSTEREFF.
Paladin55
Posts: 24321
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/6/2008
Member: #2098
8/18/2009  3:02 PM
Posted by orangeblobman:
Posted by Nalod:

Blob,

If you think "gayness" is not natural, then what is it? A deviation of the human spirit?

Then its a religious thing for you.

If its not, then you think its biological?

Which secular argument makes more sense for you?

Thank you, Nalod, for asking this question.

A secular argument, if you will--

In 'the wild', a Lion hunts and thrives. -- A GAY Lion (and they may exist) will NOT reproduce. If a gay lion will not reproduce than he is unfit for survival and therefore unworthy of any common rights within the lion community.

Now, a gay human might have some worth (he can baggage groceries, for example), but he cannot EVER fulfill his natural, BIOLOGICAL duty of reproduction.

Within the lion community, a gay lion might have no value, so he just dies out.

Unless he, or the lesbian lions, do a good job of getting some of their fellow lions and lionesses to switch teams.
No man is happy without a delusion of some kind. Delusions are as necessary to our happiness as realities- C.N. Bovee
fishmike
Posts: 53851
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
8/18/2009  3:13 PM
Posted by orangeblobman:
Posted by Nalod:

Blob,

If you think "gayness" is not natural, then what is it? A deviation of the human spirit?

Then its a religious thing for you.

If its not, then you think its biological?

Which secular argument makes more sense for you?

Thank you, Nalod, for asking this question.

A secular argument, if you will--

In 'the wild', a Lion hunts and thrives. -- A GAY Lion (and they may exist) will NOT reproduce. If a gay lion will not reproduce than he is unfit for survival and therefore unworthy of any common rights within the lion community.

Now, a gay human might have some worth (he can baggage groceries, for example), but he cannot EVER fulfill his natural, BIOLOGICAL duty of reproduction.

Within the lion community, a gay lion might have no value, so he just dies out.
So all hetero sexuals should reproduce because its their biological duty? If they dont are they less worthy? Should a woman that bears children have more rights or worth than a woman that chooses not to? Is the woman sitting at home spending your tax dollars collecting her welfare checks because she has 4 kids (she cant afford) and no job giving more to society than the gays earning normal livings in normal jobs? Your argument is beyond inane.

OGB, you posses the level of ignorance and hatred that can only be passed down from your previous generation and its sad you had to grow up in such an ugly environment. Its your parents fault more than your own, but never to late to change or see that views like this hurt humanity rather than help it. Good luck.


"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
Page 3 of 6 ‹ Previous 1  2  3  4  5 Next ›Last »
« Reply To Topic
Brendan Haywood on Marbury....CLASSIC!
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy