[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

King 1 WTF?


Author Poll
EnySpree
Posts: 24919
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

If David Lee isn't resigned, what is the point of having King1 around???
Ban him if Lee isn't here next season
Ban him now
Leave him alone, let him stay
View Results


Author Thread
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
7/2/2009  10:18 PM
Posted by TMS:
Posted by fishmike:

I have been one of Lee's biggest fans and supporters over the years. I think his production is valuable. I think his passing is underrated and makes things easier on other players. I think he's got a great hands and runs the floor like a deer. I thought the Knicks should have looked to move him and Nate last Jan when their value was at its highest, or commit to keeping them.

I did sour on Lee some as the season went on. Losing takes its toll, I have played on losing teams and it changes your approach at times, thats just human nature. Many times we have seen career "losers" really change when they were in better siutations. Chris Webber comes to mind.

But Lee totally quit in the 2nd half last year, and I know the coaching staff took notice. Cant count the number of times I saw Dantoni throw his hands up in disgust because Lee just gave up on defense or didnt try.

Its one thing to be a poor defender. Allan Houston was a poor defender, but his effort was always there. Lee doesnt give that and thats a warning flag. I could see that changing as the team becomes better but if you asking for big money you need to put out big effort.

I think the 4 year $32mm number is perfect. Thats 6.5, 7.5, 8.5 and 9.5

If he wants to hold out for that 5 year $55mm deal get it somewhere else.

i'm with fish here... D Lee was 10 times more concerned about collecting his double doubles last year than he was on playing Defense, let's be honest... looked a whole lot to me like a player looking to cash in on a big payday after the season was over... i love the effort he showed on grabbing rebounds & scoring points, but he showed none of that effort when playing defense... u can say the same about many other players on this team but that doesn't excuse them from criticism.

Don't you think Lee's "intentional" luck of effort on D' will cost him big time in getting big contract?
He is not good at D' and he is working on it and will continue to work on it if he want to succeed as player in NBA.
You and Eny for some reason positive that DLee will never progress in anything he does or even regress...
What makes you think so?



"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
AUTOADVERT
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

7/2/2009  10:27 PM
Yo David Lee is a good player but he's not worth anything more than what Charlie V got...I personally think he should get less than Charlie V...but if he got an identical deal I would just deal with it...no freakin way should he get more.

Now the Knicks should learn from the Lakers like I said in the Artest thread...They told Ariza to kick rocks cuz he wanted too much and then go and sign a better player for the money Ariza shoulda taken when the Lakers offered it.

Knicks are playing it right...if David Lee is getting offers from teams? Then let him and his agent make a move!!! Sign and offer sheet or negociate a sign and trade with the Knicks....done deal. The Knicks will live on without this guy....he's just a top tier role player...he's not even a secondary scorer on a winning team. He's a 3rd/4th guy on offense if that on a good team.

Thats the bottom line for me...

[Edited by - enyspree on 02-07-2009 10:43 PM]
Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
McK1
Posts: 26527
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/16/2005
Member: #964
7/2/2009  10:31 PM
hitler salutes all who voted ban

the stop underrating David Lee movement 1. FIRE MIKE 2. HIRE MULLIN 3. PAY AVERY 4. FREE NATE!!!
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
7/2/2009  10:37 PM
Posted by McK1:

hitler salutes all who voted ban


hitler salutes onlu his fans...
Do we have some?
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
7/2/2009  11:05 PM
Posted by arkrud:
Posted by TMS:
Posted by fishmike:

I have been one of Lee's biggest fans and supporters over the years. I think his production is valuable. I think his passing is underrated and makes things easier on other players. I think he's got a great hands and runs the floor like a deer. I thought the Knicks should have looked to move him and Nate last Jan when their value was at its highest, or commit to keeping them.

I did sour on Lee some as the season went on. Losing takes its toll, I have played on losing teams and it changes your approach at times, thats just human nature. Many times we have seen career "losers" really change when they were in better siutations. Chris Webber comes to mind.

But Lee totally quit in the 2nd half last year, and I know the coaching staff took notice. Cant count the number of times I saw Dantoni throw his hands up in disgust because Lee just gave up on defense or didnt try.

Its one thing to be a poor defender. Allan Houston was a poor defender, but his effort was always there. Lee doesnt give that and thats a warning flag. I could see that changing as the team becomes better but if you asking for big money you need to put out big effort.

I think the 4 year $32mm number is perfect. Thats 6.5, 7.5, 8.5 and 9.5

If he wants to hold out for that 5 year $55mm deal get it somewhere else.

i'm with fish here... D Lee was 10 times more concerned about collecting his double doubles last year than he was on playing Defense, let's be honest... looked a whole lot to me like a player looking to cash in on a big payday after the season was over... i love the effort he showed on grabbing rebounds & scoring points, but he showed none of that effort when playing defense... u can say the same about many other players on this team but that doesn't excuse them from criticism.

Don't you think Lee's "intentional" luck of effort on D' will cost him big time in getting big contract?
He is not good at D' and he is working on it and will continue to work on it if he want to succeed as player in NBA.
You and Eny for some reason positive that DLee will never progress in anything he does or even regress...
What makes you think so?


& where do u draw those baseless assumptions from?
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
McK1
Posts: 26527
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/16/2005
Member: #964
7/2/2009  11:16 PM
Posted by arkrud:
Posted by McK1:

hitler salutes all who voted ban


hitler salutes onlu his fans...
Do we have some?

we must do. this poll is nazi.
the stop underrating David Lee movement 1. FIRE MIKE 2. HIRE MULLIN 3. PAY AVERY 4. FREE NATE!!!
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

7/2/2009  11:24 PM
Knick Nazi??? I think I got banned for saying that once, lol....not sure if that was here or RealGM.....
Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
Uptown
Posts: 31360
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 4/1/2008
Member: #1883

7/2/2009  11:56 PM
Posted by TMS:
Posted by fishmike:

^^ TMS and I'm looking to give anyone else on this squad a 5 year $50mm extension while letting Lee walk.

I love Nate's scoring and still wish we would look at him at PG for some sample of games but oh well. Either way his D sucked too and I'm not giving any of these guys big money till the effort matches

not so fast, i don't wanna let Lee walk for nothing... Walsh better find a suitable trading partner for Lee if he can't get him signed to a reasonable contract this offseason... if he walks & we don't get anything back for him i'm gonna be pissed.

I can understand being a little ticked if we dont get anything back for Lee, but as of right now, whats more valuable to you? Letting Lee walk and gaining cap space, or possibly overpaying and jeapardizing our possible cap relief?
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
7/3/2009  12:08 AM
Posted by Uptown:
Posted by TMS:
Posted by fishmike:

^^ TMS and I'm looking to give anyone else on this squad a 5 year $50mm extension while letting Lee walk.

I love Nate's scoring and still wish we would look at him at PG for some sample of games but oh well. Either way his D sucked too and I'm not giving any of these guys big money till the effort matches

not so fast, i don't wanna let Lee walk for nothing... Walsh better find a suitable trading partner for Lee if he can't get him signed to a reasonable contract this offseason... if he walks & we don't get anything back for him i'm gonna be pissed.

I can understand being a little ticked if we dont get anything back for Lee, but as of right now, whats more valuable to you? Letting Lee walk and gaining cap space, or possibly overpaying and jeapardizing our possible cap relief?

why can't we trade him for an expiring & a future pick? that nets us cap space & a future asset... this is what Donnie should have looked to do w/Lee from the very beginning instead of allowing it to get to this point... or he should use Lee to try & dump Curry or Fishlips' contracts... why is allowing Lee to walk or signing him to a longterm extension the only 2 options being considered here? that's ridiculous reasoning if u ask me... to allow Lee to walk w/o at least making some kind of move using him as a useful asset to clear some cap off our books or to gain a future asset is just irresponsible & stupid IMO.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Paladin55
Posts: 24321
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/6/2008
Member: #2098

7/3/2009  1:21 AM
Posted by TMS:


why can't we trade him for an expiring & a future pick? that nets us cap space & a future asset... this is what Donnie should have looked to do w/Lee from the very beginning instead of allowing it to get to this point... or he should use Lee to try & dump Curry or Fishlips' contracts... why is allowing Lee to walk or signing him to a longterm extension the only 2 options being considered here? that's ridiculous reasoning if u ask me... to allow Lee to walk w/o at least making some kind of move using him as a useful asset to clear some cap off our books or to gain a future asset is just irresponsible & stupid IMO.
OKC is one team allegedly interested in Lee. S&T Lee and our Denver acquired 2010 #2 (originally from the Clippers)for their #1 in 2010 and expiring contract(s) matching Lee's new contract. If they are hesitant because the 2010 draft is really that good we could keep our #2 and give them our #1 in 2012.

No man is happy without a delusion of some kind. Delusions are as necessary to our happiness as realities- C.N. Bovee
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
7/3/2009  7:13 AM
Posted by TMS:
Posted by arkrud:
Posted by TMS:
Posted by fishmike:

I have been one of Lee's biggest fans and supporters over the years. I think his production is valuable. I think his passing is underrated and makes things easier on other players. I think he's got a great hands and runs the floor like a deer. I thought the Knicks should have looked to move him and Nate last Jan when their value was at its highest, or commit to keeping them.

I did sour on Lee some as the season went on. Losing takes its toll, I have played on losing teams and it changes your approach at times, thats just human nature. Many times we have seen career "losers" really change when they were in better siutations. Chris Webber comes to mind.

But Lee totally quit in the 2nd half last year, and I know the coaching staff took notice. Cant count the number of times I saw Dantoni throw his hands up in disgust because Lee just gave up on defense or didnt try.

Its one thing to be a poor defender. Allan Houston was a poor defender, but his effort was always there. Lee doesnt give that and thats a warning flag. I could see that changing as the team becomes better but if you asking for big money you need to put out big effort.

I think the 4 year $32mm number is perfect. Thats 6.5, 7.5, 8.5 and 9.5

If he wants to hold out for that 5 year $55mm deal get it somewhere else.

i'm with fish here... D Lee was 10 times more concerned about collecting his double doubles last year than he was on playing Defense, let's be honest... looked a whole lot to me like a player looking to cash in on a big payday after the season was over... i love the effort he showed on grabbing rebounds & scoring points, but he showed none of that effort when playing defense... u can say the same about many other players on this team but that doesn't excuse them from criticism.

Don't you think Lee's "intentional" luck of effort on D' will cost him big time in getting big contract?
He is not good at D' and he is working on it and will continue to work on it if he want to succeed as player in NBA.
You and Eny for some reason positive that DLee will never progress in anything he does or even regress...
What makes you think so?


& where do u draw those baseless assumptions from?


If my assumptions are baseless and you also think that Lee will improve; why you want to get read of him for all cost just to get some questionable "value" or cap space, which can or cannot bring us anything useful? It is all about attitude not about common sense.

[Edited by - arkrud on 07-03-2009 07:13 AM]
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
Uptown
Posts: 31360
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 4/1/2008
Member: #1883

7/3/2009  11:00 AM
Posted by TMS:
Posted by Uptown:
Posted by TMS:
Posted by fishmike:

^^ TMS and I'm looking to give anyone else on this squad a 5 year $50mm extension while letting Lee walk.

I love Nate's scoring and still wish we would look at him at PG for some sample of games but oh well. Either way his D sucked too and I'm not giving any of these guys big money till the effort matches

not so fast, i don't wanna let Lee walk for nothing... Walsh better find a suitable trading partner for Lee if he can't get him signed to a reasonable contract this offseason... if he walks & we don't get anything back for him i'm gonna be pissed.

I can understand being a little ticked if we dont get anything back for Lee, but as of right now, whats more valuable to you? Letting Lee walk and gaining cap space, or possibly overpaying and jeapardizing our possible cap relief?

why can't we trade him for an expiring & a future pick? that nets us cap space & a future asset... this is what Donnie should have looked to do w/Lee from the very beginning instead of allowing it to get to this point... or he should use Lee to try & dump Curry or Fishlips' contracts... why is allowing Lee to walk or signing him to a longterm extension the only 2 options being considered here? that's ridiculous reasoning if u ask me... to allow Lee to walk w/o at least making some kind of move using him as a useful asset to clear some cap off our books or to gain a future asset is just irresponsible & stupid IMO.

I guess I didn't clarify myself. As I mentioned. I would be a little ticked aswell, if we didn't get something (a pick) back for Lee. Yes, there should be more than the two options I suggested, but for argument sake, and for the sake of the this thread, I just wanted to know if it boiled down to either letting him walk for cap space or signing him and jeapordaizing our space, which option would benefit the Knicks best?

Again I'd prefer to keep Lee just as long as it doesn't hurt our chances in the FA market on 2010 and beyond. But, if leeting him walk for nothing meant we would be a serious player in the FA market next year, I can deal with letting Lee walk.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
7/3/2009  1:27 PM
Posted by arkrud:
Posted by TMS:
Posted by arkrud:
Posted by TMS:
Posted by fishmike:

I have been one of Lee's biggest fans and supporters over the years. I think his production is valuable. I think his passing is underrated and makes things easier on other players. I think he's got a great hands and runs the floor like a deer. I thought the Knicks should have looked to move him and Nate last Jan when their value was at its highest, or commit to keeping them.

I did sour on Lee some as the season went on. Losing takes its toll, I have played on losing teams and it changes your approach at times, thats just human nature. Many times we have seen career "losers" really change when they were in better siutations. Chris Webber comes to mind.

But Lee totally quit in the 2nd half last year, and I know the coaching staff took notice. Cant count the number of times I saw Dantoni throw his hands up in disgust because Lee just gave up on defense or didnt try.

Its one thing to be a poor defender. Allan Houston was a poor defender, but his effort was always there. Lee doesnt give that and thats a warning flag. I could see that changing as the team becomes better but if you asking for big money you need to put out big effort.

I think the 4 year $32mm number is perfect. Thats 6.5, 7.5, 8.5 and 9.5

If he wants to hold out for that 5 year $55mm deal get it somewhere else.

i'm with fish here... D Lee was 10 times more concerned about collecting his double doubles last year than he was on playing Defense, let's be honest... looked a whole lot to me like a player looking to cash in on a big payday after the season was over... i love the effort he showed on grabbing rebounds & scoring points, but he showed none of that effort when playing defense... u can say the same about many other players on this team but that doesn't excuse them from criticism.

Don't you think Lee's "intentional" luck of effort on D' will cost him big time in getting big contract?
He is not good at D' and he is working on it and will continue to work on it if he want to succeed as player in NBA.
You and Eny for some reason positive that DLee will never progress in anything he does or even regress...
What makes you think so?


& where do u draw those baseless assumptions from?


If my assumptions are baseless and you also think that Lee will improve; why you want to get read of him for all cost just to get some questionable "value" or cap space, which can or cannot bring us anything useful? It is all about attitude not about common sense.

[Edited by - arkrud on 07-03-2009 07:13 AM]

read over my posts... i said trade him for expirings & draft picks... that nets us cap space AND future assets... last time i checked future assets & cap space are useful commodities, especially in the 2010 plan... it's all about reading comprehension, not attitude.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
7/3/2009  1:29 PM
Posted by Uptown:

I guess I didn't clarify myself. As I mentioned. I would be a little ticked aswell, if we didn't get something (a pick) back for Lee. Yes, there should be more than the two options I suggested, but for argument sake, and for the sake of the this thread, I just wanted to know if it boiled down to either letting him walk for cap space or signing him and jeapordaizing our space, which option would benefit the Knicks best?

Again I'd prefer to keep Lee just as long as it doesn't hurt our chances in the FA market on 2010 and beyond. But, if leeting him walk for nothing meant we would be a serious player in the FA market next year, I can deal with letting Lee walk.

just to entertain u, if i had to choose between signing Lee longterm or letting him walk, i'd actually choose signing Lee to a contract, because you can always pursue trade options for him at the trade deadline this year & still get back value for him... i've always thought letting him walk for nothing was the absolute worst possible outcome to this whole situation & nothing has changed my mind about that.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
BasketballJones
Posts: 31973
Alba Posts: 19
Joined: 7/16/2002
Member: #290
USA
7/3/2009  2:08 PM
I value King's presence here. Sometimes he provides us with useful, timely information.

Obviously he is more a David Lee advocate than a Knick fan, but we all know that, so what's the big deal?

https:// It's not so hard.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
7/3/2009  2:23 PM
Posted by BasketballJones:

I value King's presence here. Sometimes he provides us with useful, timely information.

Obviously he is more a David Lee advocate than a Knick fan, but we all know that, so what's the big deal?
Agreed but I doubt that continues if Lee is not on the team next year.

Paladin55
Posts: 24321
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/6/2008
Member: #2098

7/3/2009  3:05 PM
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by BasketballJones:

I value King's presence here. Sometimes he provides us with useful, timely information.

Obviously he is more a David Lee advocate than a Knick fan, but we all know that, so what's the big deal?
Agreed but I doubt that continues if Lee is not on the team next year.

To make everyone feel more comfortable having him around, he could be put on double secret probation. Rumor has it that there is a little known codicil in the UK charter that allows this to be done by an secret committee of UK "Guardians."

Just a thought.
No man is happy without a delusion of some kind. Delusions are as necessary to our happiness as realities- C.N. Bovee
BasketballJones
Posts: 31973
Alba Posts: 19
Joined: 7/16/2002
Member: #290
USA
7/3/2009  4:45 PM
Posted by Paladin55:
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by BasketballJones:

I value King's presence here. Sometimes he provides us with useful, timely information.

Obviously he is more a David Lee advocate than a Knick fan, but we all know that, so what's the big deal?
Agreed but I doubt that continues if Lee is not on the team next year.

To make everyone feel more comfortable having him around, he could be put on double secret probation. Rumor has it that there is a little known codicil in the UK charter that allows this to be done by an secret committee of UK "Guardians."

Just a thought.

Ssh! That's supposed to be secret!
https:// It's not so hard.
s3231
Posts: 23162
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #544
USA
7/3/2009  5:42 PM
Honestly, I don't see why King is being bashed so much.

Yes, he repeats himself often, which can get a little annoying, but you can't fault him for pointing out that he was right about the Lee situation. We all do the same thing when we are right about something.

The truth is Donnie most likely screwed up last summer (and this is coming from someone who loves Donnie Walsh and thinks we are very fortunate to have him). We had two options that would have given us the best return on David Lee. Those two options were A) trade Lee while he was still on his rookie contract for value or B) re-sign him to a reasonable extension. Walsh failed and didn't execute either one of those two options.

Now, you can make the point that we don't know what Donnie was offered or if Lee would have even signed a reasonable deal, but that doesn't matter. In the end, Walsh's job is to make this franchise better and making sure you get a good return on your best asset falls under that umbrella.

As a result, we are now in a position where some fans actually think its ok to let Lee walk for nothing. To me, that is not a viable option. We CANNOT let a young front-court player as good as Lee walk without getting something in return. This would be similar to what happened several years ago when the Cavs got screwed over by Boozer and saw him go to Utah without getting anything in return. Letting Lee walk would be a disaster. If we are lucky, we will get Lee back at a decent price (although it will still likely cost us more than it would have last summer). To a certain degree, we will also be fortunate if we sign and trade Lee for something of value (but again, we won't get good value at this point so this isn't a great outcome).

Walsh is a smart guy, I have faith in him but I really don't think he has handled this situation as well as it could have been handled. Lee is not a great player, but he is still a good player that has shown the ability to improve along with the work ethic to constantly get better. I hope we can keep him at a decent price. With that said, if someone signs him to an offer sheet for $50 million over 5 years, I would rather match it than let him walk for nothing at this point. If we at least threaten to match, we would be a in a position to possibly get something in return for him (kind of like the Nets did with K-Mart when they traded him to Denver). Letting Lee walk for nothing would be foolish.

[Edited by - s3231 on 07-03-2009 5:43 PM]
"This is a very cautious situation that we're in. You have to be conservative in terms of using your assets and using them wisely. We're building for the future." - Zeke (I guess not protecting a first round pick is being conservative)
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
7/3/2009  5:49 PM
Posted by TMS:
Posted by fishmike:

I have been one of Lee's biggest fans and supporters over the years. I think his production is valuable. I think his passing is underrated and makes things easier on other players. I think he's got a great hands and runs the floor like a deer. I thought the Knicks should have looked to move him and Nate last Jan when their value was at its highest, or commit to keeping them.

I did sour on Lee some as the season went on. Losing takes its toll, I have played on losing teams and it changes your approach at times, thats just human nature. Many times we have seen career "losers" really change when they were in better siutations. Chris Webber comes to mind.

But Lee totally quit in the 2nd half last year, and I know the coaching staff took notice. Cant count the number of times I saw Dantoni throw his hands up in disgust because Lee just gave up on defense or didnt try.

Its one thing to be a poor defender. Allan Houston was a poor defender, but his effort was always there. Lee doesnt give that and thats a warning flag. I could see that changing as the team becomes better but if you asking for big money you need to put out big effort.

I think the 4 year $32mm number is perfect. Thats 6.5, 7.5, 8.5 and 9.5

If he wants to hold out for that 5 year $55mm deal get it somewhere else.

i'm with fish here... D Lee was 10 times more concerned about collecting his double doubles last year than he was on playing Defense, let's be honest... looked a whole lot to me like a player looking to cash in on a big payday after the season was over... i love the effort he showed on grabbing rebounds & scoring points, but he showed none of that effort when playing defense... u can say the same about many other players on this team but that doesn't excuse them from criticism.

Thank You.

I want to add: I've been told I'm blindly harsh on Lee.

I look at it this way: We are looking to potentially invest big money in him. Given that, we know what he does well, otherwise we wouldn't be talking about retaining him. Now, when you're looking to spend big bucks on a player what is it you REALLY want to focus on?

HIS NEGATIVES.

Right?

Again, we're interested, which means we know what he does well.

Now, to seal the deal, what is it that he DOESNT do well and how bad is it? Well, it's pretty bad, and that's why he's not worth more than 6.5 or 7M starting. Even then, that's an awful lot for a player who would still be a borderline starter on a team without a dominant front court mate.
http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
King 1 WTF?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy