[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Chris Sheridan: Walsh could have had pick 5 for Hughes and Chandler
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
Page 3 of 3 ‹ Previous 1  2  3 
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
Paladin55
Posts: 24321
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/6/2008
Member: #2098
6/26/2009  9:28 PM
Posted by TheGame:

I don't think we have anything GS wants for Curry, unless they like DG, which I doubt. Curry is a pipe dream right now but we can still get Rubio. If we offer Chandler, cash, and maybe a future pick, I would have to think that Minny would consider it. They need a SF bad. Brewer has been a bust and they just traded Mike Miller. Chandler is still young and would move right into their starting lineup. They would have Flynn, McCants, Chandler, Love, and Harrington. They would still suck, but they at least would have a competent SF.

Rubio, Hughes, Harrington, Lee, and Curry, with Hill and Nate and DG on the bench is a pretty solid team.

GS would want Hill or some kind of S&T deal for Lee. They had promised Hill they would take him if he was still available when they picked, but supposedly the Amare offer sidetracked that deal.
No man is happy without a delusion of some kind. Delusions are as necessary to our happiness as realities- C.N. Bovee
AUTOADVERT
Paladin55
Posts: 24321
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/6/2008
Member: #2098
6/26/2009  9:30 PM
Posted by Paladin55:
Posted by TheGame:

I don't think we have anything GS wants for Curry, unless they like DG, which I doubt. Curry is a pipe dream right now but we can still get Rubio. If we offer Chandler, cash, and maybe a future pick, I would have to think that Minny would consider it. They need a SF bad. Brewer has been a bust and they just traded Mike Miller. Chandler is still young and would move right into their starting lineup. They would have Flynn, McCants, Chandler, Love, and Harrington. They would still suck, but they at least would have a competent SF.

Rubio, Hughes, Harrington, Lee, and Curry, with Hill and Nate and DG on the bench is a pretty solid team.

GS would want Hill or some kind of S&T deal for Lee (assuming they want him). They had promised Hill they would take him if he was still available when they picked, but supposedly the Amare offer sidetracked that deal.

No man is happy without a delusion of some kind. Delusions are as necessary to our happiness as realities- C.N. Bovee
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397
6/26/2009  10:31 PM
Bull****...even if it is true. F this guy.Somebody always wants to hurt the Knick and depress the fanbase.
Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
6/26/2009  10:44 PM
I think Hill will have a better career then Curry. I also think you always take big over small unless the small's talent dwarfs the bigs and I don't see that with Curry. I think Hill will be one of the top 5 guys from this draft when all is said and done.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397
6/27/2009  12:28 AM
Posted by CrushAlot:

I think Hill will have a better career then Curry. I also think you always take big over small unless the small's talent dwarfs the bigs and I don't see that with Curry. I think Hill will be one of the top 5 guys from this draft when all is said and done.

I agree....

Knicks can still improve at guard...tons of point guards out there to chose from
Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
technomaster
Posts: 23353
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/30/2003
Member: #426
USA
6/27/2009  7:59 AM
Wow. It appears as if people are foregoing the Shawn Marion potential in Chandler.
“That was two, two from the heart.” - John Starks
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
6/27/2009  9:02 AM
I would have done that deal if I were Walsh. Chandler is a small price to pay for the #5. I don't know if I select Rubio at 5 though I think I go for Curry and let Minny take Rubio at 6.

Now, that's a lot of what if - but if it happened....

Now think this: We do the Wizard deal and take a risk on Curry.
We then consummate a Rubio deal - something that Rubio and Walsh are trying hard to accomplish.

Darko
Hill
Gallo
Curry
Rubio

....yep

http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
6/27/2009  9:54 AM
Lack of reasonable risk taking cost us Curry--there is no other way around it. A major major blunder.
RIP Crushalot😞
sebstar
Posts: 25698
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 6/2/2002
Member: #249
USA
6/27/2009  10:33 AM
Posted by technomaster:

Wow. It appears as if people are foregoing the Shawn Marion potential in Chandler.

Yeah, I dont get it...I thought Chandler was a 21 y/o up and coming young talent. Oh well, he plays for us, so he has to be expendable.
My saliva and spit can split thread into fiber and bits/ So trust me I'm as live as it gets. --Royce Da 5'9 + DJ Premier = Hip Hop Utopia
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34071
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127
6/27/2009  10:39 AM
Posted by sebstar:
Posted by technomaster:

Wow. It appears as if people are foregoing the Shawn Marion potential in Chandler.

Yeah, I dont get it...I thought Chandler was a 21 y/o up and coming young talent. Oh well, he plays for us, so he has to be expendable.

If you want to go that route, Rubio is an 18 year old with once in a generation passing ability. I like Chandler for what he could potentially become. I will say that Chandler would be significantly easier to replace than Rubio though
DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
sebstar
Posts: 25698
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 6/2/2002
Member: #249
USA
6/27/2009  11:44 AM
Posted by SupremeCommander:
Posted by sebstar:
Posted by technomaster:

Wow. It appears as if people are foregoing the Shawn Marion potential in Chandler.

Yeah, I dont get it...I thought Chandler was a 21 y/o up and coming young talent. Oh well, he plays for us, so he has to be expendable.

If you want to go that route, Rubio is an 18 year old with once in a generation passing ability. I like Chandler for what he could potentially become. I will say that Chandler would be significantly easier to replace than Rubio though

See this is that hype that Jennings was talking about. Rubio is very limited on offense, and I have questions about whether he can physically withstand the NBA...but all it takes is a few youtube clips of his And-1 passes, and cats are ready to give up the world just for the opportunity to draft him. Chandler is a rising talent in the league, but that seemingly means nothing.

And I agree with Phar...the media is totally giving him a pass over his diva behavior, when players that have done less have been ridiculed.
My saliva and spit can split thread into fiber and bits/ So trust me I'm as live as it gets. --Royce Da 5'9 + DJ Premier = Hip Hop Utopia
Page 3 of 3 ‹ Previous 1  2  3 
« Reply To Topic
Chris Sheridan: Walsh could have had pick 5 for Hughes and Chandler
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy