Posted by BRIGGS:
Bayless and Evans are way two different players--that shouldnt even be explored.
[Edited by - BRIGGS on 06-23-2009 06:05 AM]
Disagree big time- has to do with the PG/combo/SG issue. On the Clippers, Bayless could have had an all rookie type year, because they might have let him play as a small SG like Gordon. On the Blazers they have no space for him at SG with Roy, Fernandez, and others, but they have a need for a PG, a position many, including Portland, thought Bayless could play. Unfortunately Bayless cannot step in to play PG because he cannot play PG, so he ends up his season riding the bench.
The Knicks (unless they are posturing for some reason) seem to think that Evans can be a PG, so I assume that MDA has given Evans his blessing, but there was nothing that I saw when watching him this year which indicated he could play PG like a Rubio, Flynn, or Lawson.
Luckily, he could be a SG, but what if the Knicks are banking on him being their young PG of the future and he can't perform up to MDA's standard at the position. What if a Curry, Flynn, or god forbid, Rubio, turn out of the PG's who can actually run a team and not just score? What if Evans can't make it as a PG in a system which depends so much on a PG to make the right decisions? What if he turns out to be a Bayless, but is saved because we also have room for him as a SG?
You are looking at opportunity costs here, and for a team that has no pick next year, the Knicks may feel this is their best chance to pick up a young PG who can grow with the team and lead them to better things in the future. Deciding whether Evans is that PG, and not just a scorer, is a big decision for this team.
No man is happy without a delusion of some kind. Delusions are as necessary to our happiness as realities- C.N. Bovee