[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

I like the Wilcox trade but don't like the Huges trade after thinking about it
Author Thread
MS
Posts: 27064
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/28/2004
Member: #724
2/20/2009  10:32 AM
But at least his defense is ok. He has a terrible attitude, this trade wasn't necessary. I would have rather seen chandler play out of position at the 2 guard for the rest of the season instead of adding the contract. We didn't need to take time if Donnie would have just moved zach for the second rounder.

If we make the playoffs I can see the team being a tough out, but what's the upside? You can use hughes at the point a little here and there and give duhon so much needed rest. I think the wilcox deal is good just because we needed another body up front, but lateral move with hughes, unless we can get a pick for the guy at next year's deadline.
AUTOADVERT
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
2/24/2009  1:05 PM
Posted by BRIGGS:
Posted by Uptown:

Hughes is a better all around player than Q. Hughes can run the point for good stretches of the game (something Q cannot do), he's a better defender, ball handler and passer than Q. As King said, its been more mental than anything with Hughes.

Last time Hughes played in an uptempo system it was in 2000 with the warriors. Hughes averaged 23 pts 6rbs and 4ast.

In 2000 He was 9 years younger! We'll see---I have a feeling this will turn it to a hate parade quickly on this one.

HMMM
RIP Crushalot😞
I like the Wilcox trade but don't like the Huges trade after thinking about it

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy