[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Source says Knicks Trading Rose for Miller
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
Page 3 of 5 ‹ Previous 1  2  3  4  5 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
Panos
Posts: 30548
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/6/2004
Member: #520
2/16/2009  10:03 PM
Posted by BasketballJones:

I thought it was gonna be Malik Rose for Andre Miller.

I thought it was going to be Jalen for Reggie
AUTOADVERT
4949
Posts: 29378
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/25/2006
Member: #1126
USA
2/16/2009  10:09 PM
Miller is not coming to NY.
I'll never trust this' team again.
eViL
Posts: 25412
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/21/2004
Member: #561
USA
2/16/2009  10:11 PM
Posted by Panos:
Posted by BasketballJones:

I thought it was gonna be Malik Rose for Andre Miller.

I thought it was going to be Jalen for Reggie

I thought it was gonna be Axl for Steve.
check out my latest hip hop project: https://soundcloud.com/michaelcro http://youtu.be/scNXshrpyZo
Panos
Posts: 30548
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/6/2004
Member: #520
2/17/2009  1:34 AM
Posted by eViL:
Posted by Panos:
Posted by BasketballJones:

I thought it was gonna be Malik Rose for Andre Miller.

I thought it was going to be Jalen for Reggie

I thought it was gonna be Axl for Steve.

HA HA HA!
jazz74
Posts: 22318
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 12/24/2002
Member: #371
2/17/2009  8:46 AM
man, i haven't heard anything about miller in like 4 years. thought he played his way out of the league. i remembered that he was good awhile back. however, if it is a salry dump, then i am all for it. to get rid of either jeffries or curry would be ideal.
NYK3
Posts: 23572
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 7/30/2004
Member: #725
USA
2/18/2009  3:04 PM
Jeffries and Rose for Miller?

http://basketball.realgm.com/src_wiretap_archives/57351/20090218/knicks_could_include_jeffries_in_sacramento_deal/

[Edited by - NYK3 on 02-18-2009 3:08 PM]
I wasn't born with enough middle fingers!!!
GKFv2
Posts: 26752
Alba Posts: 114
Joined: 1/16/2007
Member: #1259
USA
2/18/2009  3:09 PM
Posted by NYK3:

Jeffries and Rose for Miller?

http://basketball.realgm.com/src_wiretap_archives/57351/20090218/knicks_could_include_jeffries_in_sacramento_deal/

[Edited by - NYK3 on 02-18-2009 3:08 PM]

Genius if Donnie pulls it off but the Kings are looking to shed salary.
Thank you, Rick Brunson.
VDesai
Posts: 43301
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
2/18/2009  3:17 PM
Realgm is saying that its Jefferies that might be included but the Kings want Nate- I say no deal on that.
GKFv2
Posts: 26752
Alba Posts: 114
Joined: 1/16/2007
Member: #1259
USA
2/18/2009  3:22 PM
I say deal. Nobody is taking Jeffries in any trade unless we give something up.
Thank you, Rick Brunson.
Rookie
Posts: 27322
Alba Posts: 28
Joined: 10/15/2008
Member: #2274
2/18/2009  3:24 PM
Posted by GKFv2:

I say deal. Nobody is taking Jeffries in any trade unless we give something up.

I say double deal on that. Nate's loyalty is with the $$$, let him go and test the market. If he helps us move JJ2, I say deal
PresIke
Posts: 27671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/26/2001
Member: #33
USA
2/18/2009  3:33 PM
I can't imagine us at all doing Nate + Malik for Miller.

how about this instead?

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=d7kjc5

[Edited by - PresIke on 02-18-2009 3:33 PM]
Forum Po Po and #33 for a reason...
Rookie
Posts: 27322
Alba Posts: 28
Joined: 10/15/2008
Member: #2274
2/18/2009  3:34 PM
BTW - if you add N8 to the deal, it either means the Kings send us cash or Salmons is in the deal. I like Salmons, but not sure if Walsh would want his contract expiring in 2011. One thing certain, we can trade him next year easier than JJ2
PresIke
Posts: 27671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/26/2001
Member: #33
USA
2/18/2009  3:36 PM
I'd prefer not to get Salmons because his deal goes past 2010, even if it includes Jeffries, although he is more tradable.

I offered the other deal because after Miller's deal expires next year, we could still keep young guys like Garcia and Greene to ward off losing Nate and not kill us capwise.

Garcia is signed for 5 years on the cheap, and he can shoot. As a backup guard for D'Antoni he fits well, no?

[Edited by - PresIke on 02-18-2009 3:37 PM]
Forum Po Po and #33 for a reason...
sebstar
Posts: 25698
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 6/2/2002
Member: #249
USA
2/18/2009  3:38 PM
If we are giving up Nate, then KMart is coming back. Bottom line.
My saliva and spit can split thread into fiber and bits/ So trust me I'm as live as it gets. --Royce Da 5'9 + DJ Premier = Hip Hop Utopia
PresIke
Posts: 27671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/26/2001
Member: #33
USA
2/18/2009  3:39 PM
In other words, if we want to move Jeffries (which has to be part of the deal then), the point is to get his $$$ off the books for 2010.

Trading for Salmons won't help us there, but he would be easier to move next year.
Forum Po Po and #33 for a reason...
PresIke
Posts: 27671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/26/2001
Member: #33
USA
2/18/2009  3:40 PM
I dunno about that. No way is Sac-Town giving up Martin with Nate involved, unless they are getting something more than that.

If we can get them to take Jeffries, then I'd be cool with grabbing some of their young cheap players (who are in the deal I offered...Garcia and Greene).
Forum Po Po and #33 for a reason...
martin
Posts: 79930
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
2/18/2009  3:48 PM
Posted by PresIke:

In other words, if we want to move Jeffries (which has to be part of the deal then), the point is to get his $$$ off the books for 2010.

Trading for Salmons won't help us there, but he would be easier to move next year.

I don't know what the overall proposed deal is, but anything involving JJ and Salmons is good in my books, even at the cost of Nate.

First, Salmons is $1M less in the 2010 season than JJ. Second, he actually has value on the court - he shoots from downtown VERY well and defends 1-on-1 like a maniac.
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
Rookie
Posts: 27322
Alba Posts: 28
Joined: 10/15/2008
Member: #2274
2/18/2009  3:48 PM
Not for nothing, and I'm not saying that it's possible, but>>>>>

if you can move N8 and JJ2 to Sac

AND

Lee and Curry to Portland

we'd be sitting fairly nicely in 2010 even if we pick up a contract or two. In that scenario, Salmons would be a nice piece now and in 2010.



[Edited by - Rookie on 02-18-2009 3:49 PM]
PresIke
Posts: 27671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/26/2001
Member: #33
USA
2/18/2009  3:50 PM
I just realized that Garcia's deal gets much BIGGER next year, although it drops a bit for 2010, and then back up again in 2011.

Maybe you can substitute Hawes for Garcia instead, although I prefer Garcia as a player for us.

[Edited by - PresIke on 02-18-2009 3:50 PM]
Forum Po Po and #33 for a reason...
VDesai
Posts: 43301
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
2/18/2009  3:52 PM
I'd take Hawes, but I'd love to get Jason THompson
Page 3 of 5 ‹ Previous 1  2  3  4  5 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
Source says Knicks Trading Rose for Miller
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy