[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

RealGM: Which Teams Stand In The Way Of The Knicks Keeping Lee?
Author Thread
King1
Posts: 22993
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/2/2005
Member: #998
USA
1/29/2009  2:18 PM
Lee is in a great position he is one of the top free agents in this class and they will get paid it is the lower free agents that will suffer. There are more teams with one trade can have space for the 2009 class. It will be interesting what the knicks willdo with Lee but one thing is for certain he is going to get a nice contract with the year he is having
AUTOADVERT
Andrew
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #1
USA
1/29/2009  2:20 PM
Wouldn't the Trailblazers need 11M in cap space to start Lee at 11M? Thats my question.

PURE KNICKS LOVE
GallOfFame
Posts: 20554
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 11/6/2008
Member: #2320
USA
1/29/2009  2:21 PM
Posted by martin:
Posted by GallOfFame:
Posted by Andrew:

Also...keep in mind that Portland would have to dump its players to free salary, then sign Lee without a guarantee that the Knicks would not match. Thats a risk.


In the example given it essentially would be


Outlaw, Frye, Diogu, 2009 2nd

4

Lee with a front loaded contract(reverse the escalating 8% raise) first yr salary over $11mil and a future 1rst


That's a no brainer if you ask me.


In theory this is very similar to what Atlanta did to get Joe Johnson from Phx

we give Lee to POR with a First round for caca?

No none of those players come our way. It was given as an example to show what Portland would let go in order to obtain Lee. Outlaw and the 2009 2nd goes to a team under the cap and Frye and Diogu become FA to sign wherever they choose Portland relinquishing their rights to match a deal due to not extending the QO's to them.
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
1/29/2009  2:21 PM
Would Lee sign with a team like Memphis for 12M a year? Would the Knicks match it?
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
GallOfFame
Posts: 20554
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 11/6/2008
Member: #2320
USA
1/29/2009  2:25 PM
Posted by Andrew:

Wouldn't the Trailblazers need 11M in cap space to start Lee at 11M? Thats my question.


Probably so, going back and forth between cap figures of $56 and $58
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
1/29/2009  2:29 PM
I'd rather have a 2nd all star go to guy and whatever they can get for Lee in a trade than re-sign Lee for 11M or close to it.
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30259
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
1/29/2009  2:32 PM
Posted by GallOfFame:
Posted by newyorknewyork:
Posted by GallOfFame:

Portland could easily trade Travis Outlaw and a second rounder on draft night for a future first to a team under the cap. Which would be $3.6mil in additional cap space putting them at about a little over $9mil in cap space($49.7-$3.6mil=$46.1). If they keep their first rounder add about $1.2mil= $47.3. If the Cap drops say $2mil to $56 they you have it. They could also front load Lee's first yr salary putting it over $11mil to start. Since Bayless looks like he can play point for stretches Blake becomes expendable an expiring they could easily be unloaded.

Shamsports.com proves to be a little more accurate when it comes to factoring team salary.

We can match what ever Portland offers. The only way they can get Lee from us is if we agree to sign and trade. So after they trade away assets and let assets walk just to get enough money to be able to sign Lee. They are going to have to trade away more assets to be able to sign and trade for him as well.

On a side note Carlos Boozer is also a free agent.


You would match giving Lee a contract starting first yr at $9-....11+mil if they were to frontload? You realize not only would that be Top Market value for Lee but he'd also make about $1-2mil extra in 2010 if he got a front loaded.

Me personally I would have no problem matching Lee's contract. Even with Lee we still would have enough money to sign 1 max free agent. Then after 2011 we would have enough money to sign another max free agent, and if there is no top free agents in 2011 we could save the money for 2012.

I also wouldn't mind matching, because I could always re trade him at next yrs deadline. There is no way I let Lee walk for nothing even if it ends up costing me 1-2mil more. He is to valuable as a piece on the team or as trade bait.
https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
GallOfFame
Posts: 20554
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 11/6/2008
Member: #2320
USA
1/29/2009  2:35 PM
Posted by newyorknewyork:
Posted by GallOfFame:
Posted by newyorknewyork:
Posted by GallOfFame:

Portland could easily trade Travis Outlaw and a second rounder on draft night for a future first to a team under the cap. Which would be $3.6mil in additional cap space putting them at about a little over $9mil in cap space($49.7-$3.6mil=$46.1). If they keep their first rounder add about $1.2mil= $47.3. If the Cap drops say $2mil to $56 they you have it. They could also front load Lee's first yr salary putting it over $11mil to start. Since Bayless looks like he can play point for stretches Blake becomes expendable an expiring they could easily be unloaded.

Shamsports.com proves to be a little more accurate when it comes to factoring team salary.

We can match what ever Portland offers. The only way they can get Lee from us is if we agree to sign and trade. So after they trade away assets and let assets walk just to get enough money to be able to sign Lee. They are going to have to trade away more assets to be able to sign and trade for him as well.

On a side note Carlos Boozer is also a free agent.


You would match giving Lee a contract starting first yr at $9-....11+mil if they were to frontload? You realize not only would that be Top Market value for Lee but he'd also make about $1-2mil extra in 2010 if he got a front loaded.

Me personally I would have no problem matching Lee's contract. Even with Lee we still would have enough money to sign 1 max free agent. Then after 2011 we would have enough money to sign another max free agent, and if there is no top free agents in 2011 we could save the money for 2012.

I also wouldn't mind matching, because I could always re trade him at next yrs deadline. There is no way I let Lee walk for nothing even if it ends up costing me 1-2mil more. He is to valuable as a piece on the team or as trade bait.

Not a good idea since he would be BYC. Because you're agreeing to give him 30-50% raise from his previous yr's salary his value in a Feb 2010 trade will be 50% of his salary. So for example if he's making $11mil in 2009-2010 his trade value Feb 2010 will be $5.5mil.

Oh and I also forgot what if Bartlestein request in Lee's new deal to get that Effriesesque 15% trade kicker?

Of course you don't let Lee Walk you trade him for assets that fit into the 2010 plan.

[Edited by - GallOfFame on 01-29-2009 2:37 PM]
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30259
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
1/29/2009  2:41 PM
See I don't know if anyone is going to offer us high draft picks and salary space knowing that Lee will be a free agent next yr.

So its easier to say we should just trade Lee then for it to be done. You can bet teams are trying to low ball the Knicks because of the fear that Lee will resign with them.

Last yr Lee should have been given a contract extension, not only would he have been cheaper probably making 8mil. But we would be able to trade him at higher value because of his production and contract.

Walsh didn't know exactly what he had in Lee though. Im sure he was scared to resign him then have Lee, Randolph, Curry, Jefferies, Crawford as guys ruining his 2010 cap space plan. Last yr he probably wasn't sure if Lee was worth resigning or if Lee was trade bait. If Lee put up these #s last season then the decision would have been easier trading him would have been easier as well. Since Lee didn't have that great of a yr last yr. Walsh didn't know which way Lee would work out.
https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
Andrew
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #1
USA
1/29/2009  2:43 PM
Base year status ends June 30.
PURE KNICKS LOVE
Andrew
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #1
USA
1/29/2009  2:47 PM
submitted too early...

Base year status ends June 30....so it would still not be all that bad. The player would still be tradeable.
PURE KNICKS LOVE
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30259
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
1/29/2009  2:56 PM
Posted by GallOfFame:
Posted by newyorknewyork:
Posted by GallOfFame:
Posted by newyorknewyork:
Posted by GallOfFame:

Portland could easily trade Travis Outlaw and a second rounder on draft night for a future first to a team under the cap. Which would be $3.6mil in additional cap space putting them at about a little over $9mil in cap space($49.7-$3.6mil=$46.1). If they keep their first rounder add about $1.2mil= $47.3. If the Cap drops say $2mil to $56 they you have it. They could also front load Lee's first yr salary putting it over $11mil to start. Since Bayless looks like he can play point for stretches Blake becomes expendable an expiring they could easily be unloaded.

Shamsports.com proves to be a little more accurate when it comes to factoring team salary.

We can match what ever Portland offers. The only way they can get Lee from us is if we agree to sign and trade. So after they trade away assets and let assets walk just to get enough money to be able to sign Lee. They are going to have to trade away more assets to be able to sign and trade for him as well.

On a side note Carlos Boozer is also a free agent.


You would match giving Lee a contract starting first yr at $9-....11+mil if they were to frontload? You realize not only would that be Top Market value for Lee but he'd also make about $1-2mil extra in 2010 if he got a front loaded.

Me personally I would have no problem matching Lee's contract. Even with Lee we still would have enough money to sign 1 max free agent. Then after 2011 we would have enough money to sign another max free agent, and if there is no top free agents in 2011 we could save the money for 2012.

I also wouldn't mind matching, because I could always re trade him at next yrs deadline. There is no way I let Lee walk for nothing even if it ends up costing me 1-2mil more. He is to valuable as a piece on the team or as trade bait.

Not a good idea since he would be BYC. Because you're agreeing to give him 30-50% raise from his previous yr's salary his value in a Feb 2010 trade will be 50% of his salary. So for example if he's making $11mil in 2009-2010 his trade value Feb 2010 will be $5.5mil.

Oh and I also forgot what if Bartlestein request in Lee's new deal to get that Effriesesque 15% trade kicker?

Of course you don't let Lee Walk you trade him for assets that fit into the 2010 plan.

[Edited by - GallOfFame on 01-29-2009 2:37 PM]

Then I keep him. If we don't get him we would still have like 40-50mil to spend between 2010 & 2011. With Lee at 11mil we would have 34mil salary cap. The projected cap is what 65mil. Then in 2011 when Curry and Jefferies 18mil come off the books we would have another 18mil to play with.

Between 2010 & 2011 we are going to have 49mil to play with. If we resign Lee at 11mil we are going to have 31mil(if the projected 65 is right) to spend in free agency in 2010.
https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
1/29/2009  3:02 PM
how can you justify trading a 26 year old that's getting better for a player you have no idea about (draft pick)?

would you have traded lee for the #6 pick in last year's draft?
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30259
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
1/29/2009  3:04 PM
Why trade Lee (unless its a great offer) when we can.

Sign Lee, sign 1 max free agent at 15-20mil, and still have 11+mil to spend, wait until 2011 and sign another max free agent at 15-20mil.

And if we don't land any superstars with our cap space. Then we buy a mass load of draft picks with our cap space. Buy a bunch of expiring or close to expiring scrub player contracts for multiple draft picks or high draft picks.

Continue to develop Duhon, Chandler, Lee, Gallo and our draft picks, Eventually the scrub contracts will run out and we can target free agents again.
https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
sebstar
Posts: 25698
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 6/2/2002
Member: #249
USA
1/29/2009  3:10 PM
Aldridge/Bayless and either Sergio or their pick

for

Lee/Nate/Jefferies

I dont do that salary stuff so they can throw in somebody to make it work or whatever, but that's the kind of package I'm looking for.
My saliva and spit can split thread into fiber and bits/ So trust me I'm as live as it gets. --Royce Da 5'9 + DJ Premier = Hip Hop Utopia
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30259
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
1/29/2009  3:19 PM
Posted by sebstar:

Aldridge/Bayless and either Sergio or their pick

for

Lee/Nate/Jefferies

I dont do that salary stuff so they can throw in somebody to make it work or whatever, but that's the kind of package I'm looking for.

Lee for Aldridge makes to much sense.
https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
eViL
Posts: 25412
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/21/2004
Member: #561
USA
1/29/2009  3:30 PM
Lee, Curry, Jeffries for Aldridge and LaFrentz
check out my latest hip hop project: https://soundcloud.com/michaelcro http://youtu.be/scNXshrpyZo
GallOfFame
Posts: 20554
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 11/6/2008
Member: #2320
USA
1/29/2009  3:32 PM
Posted by newyorknewyork:
Posted by GallOfFame:
Posted by newyorknewyork:
Posted by GallOfFame:
Posted by newyorknewyork:
Posted by GallOfFame:

Portland could easily trade Travis Outlaw and a second rounder on draft night for a future first to a team under the cap. Which would be $3.6mil in additional cap space putting them at about a little over $9mil in cap space($49.7-$3.6mil=$46.1). If they keep their first rounder add about $1.2mil= $47.3. If the Cap drops say $2mil to $56 they you have it. They could also front load Lee's first yr salary putting it over $11mil to start. Since Bayless looks like he can play point for stretches Blake becomes expendable an expiring they could easily be unloaded.

Shamsports.com proves to be a little more accurate when it comes to factoring team salary.

We can match what ever Portland offers. The only way they can get Lee from us is if we agree to sign and trade. So after they trade away assets and let assets walk just to get enough money to be able to sign Lee. They are going to have to trade away more assets to be able to sign and trade for him as well.

On a side note Carlos Boozer is also a free agent.


You would match giving Lee a contract starting first yr at $9-....11+mil if they were to frontload? You realize not only would that be Top Market value for Lee but he'd also make about $1-2mil extra in 2010 if he got a front loaded.

Me personally I would have no problem matching Lee's contract. Even with Lee we still would have enough money to sign 1 max free agent. Then after 2011 we would have enough money to sign another max free agent, and if there is no top free agents in 2011 we could save the money for 2012.

I also wouldn't mind matching, because I could always re trade him at next yrs deadline. There is no way I let Lee walk for nothing even if it ends up costing me 1-2mil more. He is to valuable as a piece on the team or as trade bait.

Not a good idea since he would be BYC. Because you're agreeing to give him 30-50% raise from his previous yr's salary his value in a Feb 2010 trade will be 50% of his salary. So for example if he's making $11mil in 2009-2010 his trade value Feb 2010 will be $5.5mil.

Oh and I also forgot what if Bartlestein request in Lee's new deal to get that Effriesesque 15% trade kicker?

Of course you don't let Lee Walk you trade him for assets that fit into the 2010 plan.

[Edited by - GallOfFame on 01-29-2009 2:37 PM]

Then I keep him. If we don't get him we would still have like 40-50mil to spend between 2010 & 2011. With Lee at 11mil we would have 34mil salary cap. The projected cap is what 65mil. Then in 2011 when Curry and Jefferies 18mil come off the books we would have another 18mil to play with.

Between 2010 & 2011 we are going to have 49mil to play with. If we resign Lee at 11mil we are going to have 31mil(if the projected 65 is right) to spend in free agency in 2010.


The projected cap will not be $65mil if media reports are true about NBA revenue going down this yr. If the economy was good sure it might be possible to achieve an NBA cap $65mil by 2011 but don't hold your breath. Besides we're concerned with 2009 and 2010 not 2011 because if your projecting that far out with intent to improve the team then why didn't we tank this yr and make sure we get the #1 pick. It's going to take just as long to go the route you prefer except you give yourself less flexibility to improve.
GallOfFame
Posts: 20554
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 11/6/2008
Member: #2320
USA
1/29/2009  3:34 PM
Posted by newyorknewyork:
Posted by sebstar:

Aldridge/Bayless and either Sergio or their pick

for

Lee/Nate/Jefferies

I dont do that salary stuff so they can throw in somebody to make it work or whatever, but that's the kind of package I'm looking for.

Lee for Aldridge makes to much sense.

Why would they do this since they are 1 trade away from having Lee and Aldridge? Especially when you consider Oden isn't the most durable of bigs in the game.
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30259
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
1/29/2009  3:36 PM
Posted by eViL:

Lee, Curry, Jeffries for Aldridge and LaFrentz

There is no way they do that. Lee is having the better yr but Aldridge still has mass potential.

Lee and Rose for Aldridge & filler.
https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
RealGM: Which Teams Stand In The Way Of The Knicks Keeping Lee?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy