Posted by Solace:
I can't see your point of view on this one. The Knicks are playing hard negotiating. $1 million is so close to worthless to the Knicks that they're willing to wait it out. Why should the Knicks help a competitor improve for a mere $1 million? You never answered this.
Not to mention that the guy refused to play twice.
I did answer that: We need not worry about where Marbury goes and what he does there.
As to 1M, while it was peanuts in October it now is a much larger percentage of what Marbury is still owed.
If he makes 21.9M that comes out to roughly 267K per game (how he got fined 398K for two games (199K a game) missed is beyond me do the math for yourself that would come out to a 16.3M salary for the year which is wrong so I'm going with the 267K figure here just for arguments sake)
We've played 30 games. That's already 8M paid to Marbury. So realistically in the final 52 games he's going to make 13.9M. When we bought out Taylor and Rose we took away I think 1M from taylor and 2M+ from Rose. So we're almost in the ballpark there of 1M to 2M in buyout. Asking him to give up 3M now is like asking him to give up nearly a quarter of his salary. Lets say it's a 10% buyout: that's about 1.4M.
So, as I said, as time goes on 1M is a much higher percentage of what is still owed. Pretty soon 1M off the remaining pay will be nearly the same as 3M off at the start of the year.
Again, if it comes to the point where we are going to have to pay him every cent anyways then there's no longer a financial incentive to keep him and you waive him.