[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Chris Duhon is the best pure PG we've had since Mark Jackson
Author Thread
Uptown
Posts: 31375
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 4/1/2008
Member: #1883

11/30/2008  8:45 PM
Posted by TMS:

look i watched those Knicks teams just as religiously as you did i'm sure... we are free to disagree here but i personally feel that Duhon has displayed better orchestration skills as a pure PG than Harper ever did (as a Knick)... he may never be the defensive player or leader Harper was, who knows... i happen to think he's got those intangibles too... & i'm not taking away anything from Harper here when i make these comparisons btw... i realize he was a key component to the team's success, but like i said before, he had the luxury of playing alongside much better talent as well... it's easier to look good when u'r playing with a HOFer in his prime.

[Edited by - TMS on 11-30-2008 4:06 PM]


Your preaching to the choir here bro....Harp was steady and maintained the ship, but I dont remember Harper ever helping a player like Lee have a career game, like Duhon helped Lee last night. Duhon practically handed Lee more than half of his points and Lee didn't have to break a sweat to get those baskets. Again, not knocking Harper, but he was a different type of guard then Duhon.
AUTOADVERT
BlueSeats
Posts: 27272
Alba Posts: 41
Joined: 11/6/2005
Member: #1024

11/30/2008  8:48 PM
I didn't see the game, but looking at the clips from last night, it's true GS played no D, but I really like the way Duhon leads players to the rim with his passes. It's very promising for what he may be able to do after he really gets to know where players like the ball.

I keep hearing how Marbury is twice the player Duhon is, but I never found Marbury to be a good playmaker. The only player he's shown good on-court chemistry with since KVH (who he had traded) is Lee. Never with Jamal, Zach, Curry, Nate, Balkman, Ariza, TT. Marbury was never ahead of the offense, his style was always to lull both teams to sleep with dribbling, then catch them off guard. He could never run a motion offense, you need to be able to think 4 or 5 moves in advance and Marbury could never think more than one move at a time. His entire arsenal consisted of two one-move plays: pick n' roll, or drive n' dish.

Once upon a time Marbury was certainly a better scorer than Duhon, but he stifled the offense in the process. His offensive arsenal was even less diverse than his playmaking: dribble around at the top of the key until your opponent (an own team) grows bored and then drive down the right side of the lane for a layup or foul. At this stage ofthegame, when he's no longer allowed to dribble to his hearts content, and is no longer fast or has lift, I'm not even sure he's a better scorer than Duhon.

These last few years he's also suffered knee and ankle injuries, and that's at reduced minutes, so I'd expect him to be far less durable than Duhon with the rigors of this sytem and extended minutes.

Defensively Duhon is much more consistent. Under LB Marbury would play D every once in a while, but doing so burned his knees out by February '06 and we haven't seen much D since.

Leadership and coachability are incomparable as Duhon shows a lot and Marbury is negative. Marbury actually leads teams into the gutter.

Great promise shown by Duhon. At this stage of their careers Duhon is a better, more versatile and durable PG in every facet I can imagine.
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
11/30/2008  9:09 PM
Posted by BlueSeats:

I didn't see the game, but looking at the clips from last night, it's true GS played no D, but I really like the way Duhon leads players to the rim with his passes. It's very promising for what he may be able to do after he really gets to know where players like the ball.

I keep hearing how Marbury is twice the player Duhon is, but I never found Marbury to be a good playmaker. The only player he's shown good on-court chemistry with since KVH (who he had traded) is Lee. Never with Jamal, Zach, Curry, Nate, Balkman, Ariza, TT. Marbury was never ahead of the offense, his style was always to lull both teams to sleep with dribbling, then catch them off guard. He could never run a motion offense, you need to be able to think 4 or 5 moves in advance and Marbury could never think more than one move at a time. His entire arsenal consisted of two one-move plays: pick n' roll, or drive n' dish.

Once upon a time Marbury was certainly a better scorer than Duhon, but he stifled the offense in the process. His offensive arsenal was even less diverse than his playmaking: dribble around at the top of the key until your opponent (an own team) grows bored and then drive down the right side of the lane for a layup or foul. At this stage ofthegame, when he's no longer allowed to dribble to his hearts content, and is no longer fast or has lift, I'm not even sure he's a better scorer than Duhon.

These last few years he's also suffered knee and ankle injuries, and that's at reduced minutes, so I'd expect him to be far less durable than Duhon with the rigors of this sytem and extended minutes.

Defensively Duhon is much more consistent. Under LB Marbury would play D every once in a while, but doing so burned his knees out by February '06 and we haven't seen much D since.

Leadership and coachability are incomparable as Duhon shows a lot and Marbury is negative. Marbury actually leads teams into the gutter.

Great promise shown by Duhon. At this stage of their careers Duhon is a better, more versatile and durable PG in every facet I can imagine.

No... Steph is much more entertaining.
People!!! We can lose our favorite clown tomorrow.
So sad...
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
11/30/2008  9:31 PM
Posted by TMS:

in the 2.5 seasons Derek Harper was a NY Knick he averaged 12 & 5 as a fulltime starter... Duhon's already putting up 11 & 8 while learning a new system & he doesn't have the added luxury of having a guy like Patrick Ewing to dump the ball down to in the low post.

The luxuries that Duhon does enjoy, far outweigh any that Harper had under Riley's walk it up offense. 12 & 5 in that system would be comparable to 20 & 10 in D'Antoni's crazy system. Duhon also doesn't have to worry about playing tough nose defense for 18-20 seconds a possession on the other end.
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
11/30/2008  9:49 PM
Posted by islesfan:
Posted by TMS:

in the 2.5 seasons Derek Harper was a NY Knick he averaged 12 & 5 as a fulltime starter... Duhon's already putting up 11 & 8 while learning a new system & he doesn't have the added luxury of having a guy like Patrick Ewing to dump the ball down to in the low post.

The luxuries that Duhon does enjoy, far outweigh any that Harper had under Riley's walk it up offense. 12 & 5 in that system would be comparable to 20 & 10 in D'Antoni's crazy system. Duhon also doesn't have to worry about playing tough nose defense for 18-20 seconds a possession on the other end.

So what is better?
To have star PG without any system or system which makes players expendable?
I would think just win it and then everybody will be judged accordingly.




"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
11/30/2008  10:19 PM
Duhon also doesn't have to worry about playing tough nose defense for 18-20 seconds a possession on the other end.

the way games are officiated these days Duhon couldn't even try to play the same type of defense that Harper was allowed to play even if he wanted to... i personally feel he would have been just as good & probably better at orchestrating that team's offense & still been a hard nosed defender in the Riley image if he was on those teams back then... just look at how easily he was getting guys open looks off the pick & roll this year, & that's not just in last night's game... look at how guys like Zach Randolph were even flowing in the offense when we all thought he would be a horrible fit for MDA's system... u can't just discount these factors & say that any PG would have the same effect running this run & gun style.

Duhon's been a leader on this team from day one & he was coming to a franchise that had an established losing culture for several years & an incumbent loser of a PG at the head of it all & has played a big role in helping to turn that negative image into the much more team oriented vision that Walsh envisioned when he signed him to begin with... i think he deserves a lot of credit for that & so does Walsh... it's not all just the system that's making the guy look good IMO.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
TheGame
Posts: 26651
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2006
Member: #1154
USA
12/1/2008  3:10 AM
Duhon is an average pg. This offense makes any competent pg look better than they actually are on offense. He is a solid defensive pg. I would rate him as average in shooting, average in passing, and above-average in defense. Mark Jackson was a much better pure pg. Duhon is probably a very very small step above Charlie Ward/Chris Childs. He is not better than them in all aspects of the game, but his overall game and physical abilities are probably slightly better.

[Edited by - thegame on 01-12-2008 03:28]
Trust the Process
Elite
Posts: 26372
Alba Posts: 23
Joined: 12/30/2003
Member: #510

12/1/2008  11:43 AM
Duhan has been fantastic all year
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
12/1/2008  11:47 AM
Posted by fishmike:

Harper was Chauncy Billups.. only better at everything.

you're way underrating Billups. I'm sorry, Harper was very good and I loved him, but Billups is a far superior playmaker.

¿ △ ?
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
12/1/2008  11:49 AM
Duhon has been a great signing. I really wouldn't be surprised if he was here in 2010 and beyond. We need a team and Duhon will be a battle tested 28yrs old and right in his prime at that point.

something tells me it's more likely we re-sign a few guys and only get one superstar in 2010 as opposed to having two superstars and a skeleton crew. we'll see, i guess.
¿ △ ?
VDesai
Posts: 43301
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
12/1/2008  11:57 AM
We need to drop Curry and Jeffries and figure out a way to keep Lee, Nate and Duhon.

I love the Duhon/Nate combo at PG- really gives you two different looks, and the best part is they can also play in combination.
martin
Posts: 80008
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
12/1/2008  12:01 PM
Posted by VDesai:

We need to drop Curry and Jeffries and figure out a way to keep Lee, Nate and Duhon.

I love the Duhon/Nate combo at PG- really gives you two different looks, and the best part is they can also play in combination.

I'd like to see what we can get out of Jefferies before we make a judgement about him. I don't think it's way out of line to suggest that Jefferies was put into the wrong position (out on the perimeter with Randolph and Curry clogging up the middle) during the Isiah years. And at $6M+ per year is not too bad for a guy that can play the 4 and sometimes 5 position on a MDA team.
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
VDesai
Posts: 43301
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
12/1/2008  12:10 PM
I don't think Jeffries has enough skill, but I'm perfectly fine with giving him a chance. Perfectly fine with giving Curry a chance too. Either they prove themselves, play up to a tradable level or just flame out again, but there's enough upside to give them a chance.
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

12/1/2008  12:15 PM
Duhon is doing exactly what he's supposed to do and thats be the point guard. He's definately steady. Again though, he's about as good as the players around him cuz he's not very busy.

Nate off the bench definately fits perfect as VD said just now.

I will say that Duhon is like a poor mans Nash out there. He's doing everything like Nash....especially the way he calmly dribbles into the paint and its guys on the move....but Duhon isn't as busy/talented/efficient.....

I'm satisfied with him.....I'm just looking for Mobley to come in and solidify the 2 guard position. The back court would be solid as hell once Mobley comes in and then gets his legs underneath him/timing....
Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
martin
Posts: 80008
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
12/1/2008  12:18 PM
Posted by VDesai:

I don't think Jeffries has enough skill, but I'm perfectly fine with giving him a chance. Perfectly fine with giving Curry a chance too. Either they prove themselves, play up to a tradable level or just flame out again, but there's enough upside to give them a chance.

For me, Curry have been given enough chances, Jefferies has not.
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
12/1/2008  6:31 PM
Posted by martin:
Posted by VDesai:

I don't think Jeffries has enough skill, but I'm perfectly fine with giving him a chance. Perfectly fine with giving Curry a chance too. Either they prove themselves, play up to a tradable level or just flame out again, but there's enough upside to give them a chance.

For me, Curry have been given enough chances, Jefferies has not.

probably cuz he just plain sucks bro... sorry to sound like a hater but u know it's true... the guy can't hit an open J, he can't post up guys or defend guys in the post, he's not a particularly good rebounder or shotblocker... he's a 15-20 mpg guy who fills minutes here & there at different positions cuz he's got height & length & is mobile... i don't even think he would warrant a shot at anything other than the role he's been playing most of his career... his career best year in WAS he barely put up 7 & 5 in 26 mpg... i would guarantee u we could get better production than that out of any D Leaguer scrub we brought in here on a minimum level deal... hell i'd love to see Patrick Ewing Jr. be given those minutes & see what he could do than rely on Jefferies to make much of an impact.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
12/1/2008  6:32 PM
Posted by crzymdups:
Posted by fishmike:

Harper was Chauncy Billups.. only better at everything.

you're way underrating Billups. I'm sorry, Harper was very good and I loved him, but Billups is a far superior playmaker.

i agree, the Derek Harper we had those 2 years in NY was nowhere near the PG Billups is now.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Elite
Posts: 26372
Alba Posts: 23
Joined: 12/30/2003
Member: #510

12/2/2008  10:50 AM
Posted by TMS:
Posted by crzymdups:
Posted by fishmike:

Harper was Chauncy Billups.. only better at everything.

you're way underrating Billups. I'm sorry, Harper was very good and I loved him, but Billups is a far superior playmaker.

i agree, the Derek Harper we had those 2 years in NY was nowhere near the PG Billups is now.

this has to be a joke.... Harper was Billups????????????? LOL.. not in NY
Solace
Posts: 30002
Alba Posts: 20
Joined: 10/30/2003
Member: #479
USA
12/2/2008  11:23 AM
Concur. I really liked Harper, but he wasn't in Billups league in NY.
Wishing everyone well. I enjoyed posting here for a while, but as I matured I realized this forum isn't for me. We all evolve. Thanks for the memories everyone.
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
12/2/2008  11:43 AM
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by TMS:

in the 2.5 seasons Derek Harper was a NY Knick he averaged 12 & 5 as a fulltime starter... Duhon's already putting up 11 & 8 while learning a new system & he doesn't have the added luxury of having a guy like Patrick Ewing to dump the ball down to in the low post.

TMS- you realize that's why Harper's assist totals weren't very high either, right? I don't think 18 games is enough to say he was a better player for us than Harper- who was a tough leader that came right in and was a great fit for the personality of that team. Its shame we had him for only the tail end, but he was a key player when here.

harper was as tough as nails and was a competitor. when he came here, he fit in so well, he was the missing piece that made us a championship contender. As you said, we got him at the tail end of his career, but even then he was a difference maker, especially on defense..
Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
Chris Duhon is the best pure PG we've had since Mark Jackson

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy