Saying you would have drafted Bynum over Frye is like yelling at the TV for your football team to go for it on 4th down all the time.

Its nice to say you'll take the biggest risk when you're not the GM.

Not really again the simple fact of the matter was we were not a playoff team, not close to being one. If you are going to move Kurt Thomas you draft the kid, if not you take Granger. There was little risk in drafting Granger, Bynum I will agree with you, however I would have done it because the Knicks needed to hit a home run and develop a project.

And the point of this thread is that the Knicks are still conducting business like they did last summer. When they should handled the Anucha problem ahead of time before it snow balled. We drafted a player that plays the same position as our best two young players. The Knicks are worried about resolving the Marbury situation now instead of worrying about the season.

You don't gamble when it comes down to dollars, you don't take on 21 million dollars in order to sign Jamal Crawford to an extension no one would have given him. Every move this organization has made in the past seven years has been a disaster. Even getting Lee cost the team 7 million dollars over three years to get two late lottery selections. There is a way of conducting business and this organization has failed miserably.

Walsh and D'Antoni are the first signs of positive movement and then the same situation, the same player, the same problems are already underway three games into the season.

No matter how much people know we suck, they still hold out hope that we will be good. Then when we suck, they forget that they thought we would suck. This really sucks for them.

Posted by Bippity10:

No matter how much people know we suck, they still hold out hope that we will be good. Then when we suck, they forget that they thought we would suck. This really sucks for them.

We don't suck! We blow.

Consider yourself corrected.

oohah