[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Author Thread
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
10/28/2008  1:42 AM
To go more on my point, the Celtics often went back on owners agreements. Check out the history between the ABA and the NBA and you will see what I am talking about.
I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
AUTOADVERT
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
10/28/2008  1:47 AM
Posted by SupremeCommander:
Posted by Pharzeone:
Posted by SupremeCommander:
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by CrushAlot:

They did with Ernie Grunfeld. That was how they were able to get Houston, Childs, and take on LJ's monster contract.

I believe the cap rules were waaaaaaaaaay different back in 96.

There was no cap in 1996.

Dude, the NBA has had a salary cap since its inception.

Well, I was wrong, but so are you:
The NBA had a salary cap in the mid-1940s, but it was abolished after only one season. The League continued to play without such a cap until 1984-85, when the current incarnation of the salary cap was instituted in an attempt to level the playing field among all of the NBA's teams and ensure competitive balance for the League in the future. Before the cap was reinstated, teams could spend whatever amount of money they wanted on players, but in the first season under the new cap, teams were limited to $3.6 million in total payroll.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NBA_Salary_Cap

Anyway, I guess I always thought there was no cap because MJ made a bajillion dollars, so did Ewing... I guess they changed it so every team could only spend X dollars on a players, because the bigger markets held an advantage.

[Edited by - supremecommander on 10-28-2008 01:39 AM]

There was no dollar amount ever specify but an agreement that no team would go over a certain amount. The Celtics often went back on the owners agreement without any penalty.
I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
10/28/2008  8:18 AM
However, championship teams win because of their defense and because they play hard at both ends of the court.

People say this all the time and it isn't true. Any exploration of the past 30 years and you will find that Championship teams have one guy who the other team cannot stop. Of course they play exceptional defense and rebound well etc. But the most common thread is an offensive player who cannot be stopped down the stretch of a game.

oohah

Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
10/28/2008  8:19 AM
Posted by Cookdcokehop:

However if PEJ was 6'10 or taller he would be a lottery pick.

Ban this poster!

oohah


Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
Elite
Posts: 26372
Alba Posts: 23
Joined: 12/30/2003
Member: #510

10/28/2008  9:38 AM
Posted by nyk4ever:

I think it's pretty obvious that Walsh has a plan to get under the cap in 2010. That's the only plan that's necessary right now and you can't trade these terrible contracts overnight. Jesus, give the man some time. All we do as Knick fans is whine about how things don't happen fast enough. Give the man some damn time.

Im sick of letting people **** up and just "giving them time" thats what i kept hearing with Isiah.. Every move he made was baffling but peple were just like "give it some time, he has a plan" etc etc.. A bad move is a bad move and its easy to see a mile away.

Trading Balkman and releasing PEJ... 2 horrible moves.

Signing Dantoni and Duhan, drafting GAllo... 3 questionable moves at best
BlueSeats
Posts: 27272
Alba Posts: 41
Joined: 11/6/2005
Member: #1024

10/28/2008  10:20 AM
Posted by Elite:
Posted by nyk4ever:

I think it's pretty obvious that Walsh has a plan to get under the cap in 2010. That's the only plan that's necessary right now and you can't trade these terrible contracts overnight. Jesus, give the man some time. All we do as Knick fans is whine about how things don't happen fast enough. Give the man some damn time.

Im sick of letting people **** up and just "giving them time" thats what i kept hearing with Isiah.. Every move he made was baffling but peple were just like "give it some time, he has a plan" etc etc.. A bad move is a bad move and its easy to see a mile away.

Trading Balkman and releasing PEJ... 2 horrible moves.

Signing Dantoni and Duhan, drafting GAllo... 3 questionable moves at best

I don't dispute your larger point. But with regard to Balk and PEJ, those type of guys are so much easier to get and replace than a shooter. Ariza, Balk, PEJ, JJ-lips, to a certain extent Lee...there's always a hustle guy to be found. But since Allan Houston, when have we had a shooter?

K22
Posts: 25143
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/18/2006
Member: #1182
USA
10/28/2008  10:40 AM
Though I have to wonder why he even brought Jr. in in the first place. Didn't DW realize that the fans would get attached to him?
-- the preceding post was brought to you by the letter K and the number 22.
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
10/28/2008  10:44 AM
Posted by K22:

Though I have to wonder why he even brought Jr. in in the first place. Didn't DW realize that the fans would get attached to him?

Don't ever discount good PR. A disappointing off season after saying that you will have a good one and you need good spin.
I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
Vmart
Posts: 31800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/23/2002
Member: #247
USA
10/28/2008  10:53 AM
You know what is funny. The Knicks organization played the fan base to basically increase ticket sales. For those that don't know the majority of tickets especially plans are sold in preseason. Thats why you see the infomercials on Fox TV. Look at what the Knicks did to sell the team. Bring in D'Antoni, who brings exciting brand of basketball. Bring in H20 from retirement with no intention of him even making the team. Bring in Grunfeld for the fans of the eighties era those that grew up with BK and Erinie Grunfeld. Then they bring in Pat Ewing Jr to win over the fans of the 90 era. See the pattern here to sell tickets. They didn't keep one of them except the one with the guarnateed contract D'Antoni.

Thats why you have to be wary with these guys they have some of the greatest selling minds working for them in the organization. I feel bad for the fans with this Pat Ewing Jr thing because we know he would have given a better effort than Jerome James night in and night out. Thats the sad part of this whole thing. Jerome is still a memeber of the team and guys like Marbury who have been know to destruct teams is still around to do more harm than good for the team. It was very short sighted by Walsh to give Roberson a contract based on summer league performace he simply isn't needed like Pat ewing was needed. Not so much for team morale but altleast for the fans morale lets face it he is the only one that we Knicks fans can relate to winning even if it was his old man that did the winning.

I'm not gonna say fire Walsh or anything like that, its just very sad that his decision lacked thought process. Ewing jr was a need for this team he over looked a need for a bad contract. Who is to say that he doesn't pull this cheap card when he is in line to ask LeBron what he wants. Walsh may be patient now he is patient and cheap. There is no LeBron coming here not with Walsh being so cheap. I can see Walsh walk away from LeBron once he puts his price tag on the table.
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34074
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127

10/28/2008  11:15 AM
Posted by Vmart:

You know what is funny. The Knicks organization played the fan base to basically increase ticket sales. For those that don't know the majority of tickets especially plans are sold in preseason. Thats why you see the infomercials on Fox TV. Look at what the Knicks did to sell the team. Bring in D'Antoni, who brings exciting brand of basketball. Bring in H20 from retirement with no intention of him even making the team. Bring in Grunfeld for the fans of the eighties era those that grew up with BK and Erinie Grunfeld. Then they bring in Pat Ewing Jr to win over the fans of the 90 era. See the pattern here to sell tickets. They didn't keep one of them except the one with the guarnateed contract D'Antoni.

Thats why you have to be wary with these guys they have some of the greatest selling minds working for them in the organization. I feel bad for the fans with this Pat Ewing Jr thing because we know he would have given a better effort than Jerome James night in and night out. Thats the sad part of this whole thing. Jerome is still a memeber of the team and guys like Marbury who have been know to destruct teams is still around to do more harm than good for the team. It was very short sighted by Walsh to give Roberson a contract based on summer league performace he simply isn't needed like Pat ewing was needed. Not so much for team morale but altleast for the fans morale lets face it he is the only one that we Knicks fans can relate to winning even if it was his old man that did the winning.

I'm not gonna say fire Walsh or anything like that, its just very sad that his decision lacked thought process. Ewing jr was a need for this team he over looked a need for a bad contract. Who is to say that he doesn't pull this cheap card when he is in line to ask LeBron what he wants. Walsh may be patient now he is patient and cheap. There is no LeBron coming here not with Walsh being so cheap. I can see Walsh walk away from LeBron once he puts his price tag on the table.

Great post. Never thought about it that way... makes 110% sense.
DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
10/28/2008  5:53 PM
Posted by BlueSeats:
Posted by Elite:
Posted by nyk4ever:

I think it's pretty obvious that Walsh has a plan to get under the cap in 2010. That's the only plan that's necessary right now and you can't trade these terrible contracts overnight. Jesus, give the man some time. All we do as Knick fans is whine about how things don't happen fast enough. Give the man some damn time.

Im sick of letting people **** up and just "giving them time" thats what i kept hearing with Isiah.. Every move he made was baffling but peple were just like "give it some time, he has a plan" etc etc.. A bad move is a bad move and its easy to see a mile away.

Trading Balkman and releasing PEJ... 2 horrible moves.

Signing Dantoni and Duhan, drafting GAllo... 3 questionable moves at best

I don't dispute your larger point. But with regard to Balk and PEJ, those type of guys are so much easier to get and replace than a shooter. Ariza, Balk, PEJ, JJ-lips, to a certain extent Lee...there's always a hustle guy to be found. But since Allan Houston, when have we had a shooter?

u wanna make sense of the Roberson signing, then trade Jamal or Nate... if he's that good of a shooter he needs to be seeing playing time... otherwise a shooter that's not gonna get on the court behind 4 other G's who are higher up than him on the depth chart makes no sense to me, it's not like we're talking about having Allan Houston on the roster for sentimental reasons... Ewing Jr. could have at least filled a few minutes here & there to make up for the absence of Fishlips & Gallo the first few weeks... again, someone explain to me the reasoning behind the Roberson signing cuz i just don't see any. (& this is not me bashing on Walsh... let's not get back to the same ol' crap where people aren't allowed to question moves w/o being called hatters on this forum)
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
10/28/2008  6:00 PM
Posted by nyk4ever:

Pharz, I don't have a whole lot reasons to expect the Knicks to get LeBron in 2010. There's not a whole lot of history either way saying the Knicks will or won't. It's really a pipedream. With that said, right now what kind of moves can our GM make? We got teams offering capspace for Zach, which right now is the best it's gonna get. No one wants Curry for anything, you won't get a ton for Crawford. What is the GM supposed to do with such limited resources?

if the main goal is to get cap flexibility in 2010 then getting cap space for Zach seems like a pretty logical plan of action... u can also probably get cap space for either Curry or Jamal for that matter & still get at least 1 usable young asset out of those 2 in the form of a young player or a pick... u keep saying Walsh's main goal is obvious but how have his moves shown that to you? just curious.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
10/28/2008  6:03 PM
Posted by TMS:
Posted by nyk4ever:

Pharz, I don't have a whole lot reasons to expect the Knicks to get LeBron in 2010. There's not a whole lot of history either way saying the Knicks will or won't. It's really a pipedream. With that said, right now what kind of moves can our GM make? We got teams offering capspace for Zach, which right now is the best it's gonna get. No one wants Curry for anything, you won't get a ton for Crawford. What is the GM supposed to do with such limited resources?

if the main goal is to get cap flexibility in 2010 then getting cap space for Zach seems like a pretty logical plan of action... u can also probably get cap space for either Curry or Jamal for that matter & still get at least 1 usable young asset out of those 2 in the form of a young player or a pick... u keep saying Walsh's main goal is obvious but how have his moves shown that to you? just curious.

Walsh has said his goal is to get cap room for 2010. I believe him.

With that being said, why does he have to take the first trade that opens up cap space for 2010? Why can he not wait until next summer to trade Zach? If it accomplishes cap space for 2010 then it's mission accomplished. Why does it have to be done now? Wait it out and take the best deal. The trades that were available for Zach this past summer will always be there, maybe not the with the same team but a different team. Zach's contract gets easier to trade the more time goes by anyway.
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
10/28/2008  6:09 PM
Roberson played in Istanbul last year. While this does not pass judgement on his talent, it is not Europe and it is not the NBADL. I don't think he will see minutes and he isn't a superstars best friend so I am not quite sure why he made the team. The summer leagues are always a place where guards put up gaudy numbers. I think management may have been trying to find another guard because they ignored all of the talent available to them in the draft and realized that D'Antoni's system needs shooters. I have not seen Roberson play enough to critique him but his resume to this point is that of a journey man,end of the bench guy at best on an nba roster. I think you can find those guys during the season if you need to fill a spot with a sixth guard on your roster. I don't think you have the opportunity to get a young, athletic guy with tremendous character, work ethic, heart, that is linked to the franchises past success.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
10/28/2008  7:10 PM
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by TMS:
Posted by nyk4ever:

Pharz, I don't have a whole lot reasons to expect the Knicks to get LeBron in 2010. There's not a whole lot of history either way saying the Knicks will or won't. It's really a pipedream. With that said, right now what kind of moves can our GM make? We got teams offering capspace for Zach, which right now is the best it's gonna get. No one wants Curry for anything, you won't get a ton for Crawford. What is the GM supposed to do with such limited resources?

if the main goal is to get cap flexibility in 2010 then getting cap space for Zach seems like a pretty logical plan of action... u can also probably get cap space for either Curry or Jamal for that matter & still get at least 1 usable young asset out of those 2 in the form of a young player or a pick... u keep saying Walsh's main goal is obvious but how have his moves shown that to you? just curious.

Walsh has said his goal is to get cap room for 2010. I believe him.

With that being said, why does he have to take the first trade that opens up cap space for 2010? Why can he not wait until next summer to trade Zach? If it accomplishes cap space for 2010 then it's mission accomplished. Why does it have to be done now? Wait it out and take the best deal. The trades that were available for Zach this past summer will always be there, maybe not the with the same team but a different team. Zach's contract gets easier to trade the more time goes by anyway.

i didn't say he had to take the first trade that opened up, but there were multiple chances he had to dump Zach's deal & he chose not to... if the main goal coming in was getting under the cap in 2010 then his moves or lack thereof aren't doing much to reinforce my confidence in that stated mission statement... this latest move that makes no sense to me just reeks of more of the same we've been witness to for the past decade... i'm just looking for a logical plan of action & i wanna see that plan of action implemented... if he's waiting to glean more value outta Zach, fine i'll be patient & give him the benefit of the doubt & hope he's right... i just don't see any logic in keeping Roberson on this team.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
4949
Posts: 29378
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/25/2006
Member: #1126
USA
10/28/2008  8:22 PM
Posted by CrushAlot:

I am finding myself again questioning Walsh and 'the new era'. Getting rid of Ewing just does not make sense with Roberson and James both practical options for different reasons. I also have been wondering what the thinking is with David Lee. I do not think Gallinari will live up to his draft status and I think that pick was a huge one for the franchise. The 2010 philosophy/mantra actually seems very simplistic, short sighted and not based entirely in reality. I think there is a real risk of throwing away a reality based future in hopes of achieving a fantasy future. There are alot of teams who have set the same goal and most are much farther along in the process. The other task that Walsh has is rebuilding the reputation of the franchise after it was destroyed by Isiah Thomas. Step one should have been to fire Isiah. This did not happen and he continues to be linked to the franchise. Step two should have been to embrace some aspect of the past. Mark Jackson or Patrick Ewing on the bench or in the front office, keeping Junior, something to get the fans excited. Step three should have been to hire a defensive minded coach. I have been pleased and surprised with how well D'Antoni has done with the dysfunctional cast of characters he inherited. I think even the most basic coaching, structure, and expectations of professionalism and team goals was missing last year. D'Antoni has brought that back to the team. However, championship teams win because of their defense and because they play hard at both ends of the court.

The Knicks didn't lose any money and they weren't sure enough about his ability. So we lost no money, made no major commitments to questionable people, we got it down to 15 and we'll have to live with what we have. The only thing new is the system. But let's see what happens first.

[Edited by - 4949 on 10-28-2008 8:23 PM]
I'll never trust this' team again.
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
10/28/2008  9:08 PM
Walsh is doing the right thing. He knows that he has no reason whatsoever to rush and make a move that could destroy the chances of eventually making this a championship team. Some of us wanted Zach out of here for a bag of balls and now he looks like he'll play very well in this system and increase his value. In addition to his contract getting smaller and easier to move as well. I think it's shortsighted to bash the man after one summer.

We've got to allow him time to see how the players we have will respond and to see what the market will do once teams play and things unfold. You never know what team will have an injury, do well or do poorly and want to make a deal. It's best to wait and see then just take the 1st deal someone throws at you.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
10/28/2008  9:18 PM
nix, even if Zach plays like an Allstar this year (which he is likely to do) i'd still want him outta here for a bag o balls... if u don't understand why then u totally miss the point why people want his contract off the books to begin with.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
10/28/2008  9:33 PM
Walsh needs to get that Ferry on the phone and keep pushing Z-Bo for Wallace deal.
I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
4949
Posts: 29378
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/25/2006
Member: #1126
USA
10/28/2008  9:43 PM
Posted by TMS:

nix, even if Zach plays like an Allstar this year (which he is likely to do) i'd still want him outta here for a bag o balls... if u don't understand why then u totally miss the point why people want his contract off the books to begin with.

In time my good friend, in time.
I'll never trust this' team again.

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy