[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Deng gives Bulls deadline; Knicks monitoring [blog article]
Author Thread
BasketballJones
Posts: 31973
Alba Posts: 19
Joined: 7/16/2002
Member: #290
USA
7/24/2008  12:42 PM
Ladies and Gentlemen..... Your New York Bulls!
https:// It's not so hard.
AUTOADVERT
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
7/24/2008  12:47 PM
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by tkf:


great point.. I love when people throw age into it as a deciding factor... I mean it is not like josh howard is 34. The guy at 28 still has his best years ahead of him.. I loved when people used to say, "lebron is only 19" as if he is going to be 3x better by time he is 26...LOL.. some players peak early, I do see some growth in deng, but maybe his upside is josh howard.. and that is not a bad thing at all!

TKF, I never said age was a deciding factor, to me it's an added bonus. How can Deng's upside be Josh Howard when he already puts up Josh Howard numbers at 5 years less of age?

Besides, Martin made a good point earlier. Anytime we can get an asset like Deng, it's a good thing. We can always trade Deng (or keep him) in 2010, but it would be nice to have a option that can traded to the rest of the league, instead of the rut we're in.

And another thing, Howard is NOT much cheaper than Deng. Howard is going to make 10 mill this year and 11 mill next year. Deng is going to get around the same exact money.


I understand your point. Maybe I should have been more clear.. I really wasn't directing that towards you per say....
Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
7/24/2008  12:48 PM
Posted by tkf:
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by tkf:


great point.. I love when people throw age into it as a deciding factor... I mean it is not like josh howard is 34. The guy at 28 still has his best years ahead of him.. I loved when people used to say, "lebron is only 19" as if he is going to be 3x better by time he is 26...LOL.. some players peak early, I do see some growth in deng, but maybe his upside is josh howard.. and that is not a bad thing at all!

TKF, I never said age was a deciding factor, to me it's an added bonus. How can Deng's upside be Josh Howard when he already puts up Josh Howard numbers at 5 years less of age?

Besides, Martin made a good point earlier. Anytime we can get an asset like Deng, it's a good thing. We can always trade Deng (or keep him) in 2010, but it would be nice to have a option that can traded to the rest of the league, instead of the rut we're in.

And another thing, Howard is NOT much cheaper than Deng. Howard is going to make 10 mill this year and 11 mill next year. Deng is going to get around the same exact money.


I understand your point. Maybe I should have been more clear.. I really wasn't directing that towards you per say....

"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
7/24/2008  12:49 PM
Posted by Cosmic:
I agree, deng just got greedy.. as you said, josh howard is a better player and making a lot less, the same with ron artest... These inflated salaries are going to hurt the league.. How are you going to put out a good product when you pay guys like deng 12 mil a year? how?

The League is a joke with their cap/lux tax thresholds. However, that shouldn't stop us from pursuing a good player.

As to the league: In my opinion the allowance on contract sizes far outweighs to overall roster allowance in terms of the cap.

How do you fix that? The cap should be raised a LARGE amount since you can never tell these guys "oops, thats it, max contracts are 5M per year now!".

A team has 15 players?

Fine.

3 Max Contracts (any great team has 3 max guys)
9 MLE Contracts
3 Min Contracts.

No, I'm not talking matching up player to player (9 guys all making MLE), I'm talking in total.

Whatever the total of 3 max, 9 mle, and 3 min comes to? That should be the cap. That way teams aren't bent over by the cap.

************************
************************
Separate:

To those still looking at 2010, LeBron, etc. Hey, those are pipe dreams, you don't pass on a good player to HOPE you land a great one 2 years later. Just ask the Orlando Magic and John Gabriel. That clown disposed of player after player looking to land Tim Duncan in 2000. Then proceeded to pass on deal after deal to maintain his hope that in 2003 Duncan would finally come. Duncan never did and the Magic were a big pile of garbage all those years as a DIRECT RESULT of the "get cap space, get lebron" type idea. You can't operate like that.


That is fine cosmic. I can go with that.. MY idea is to shorted the length of these contracts. I understand teams want to lock up good players, but now they are trying to lock them up at lesser amount and the players are not having it.. Lets say, I want amare.. and he wants 15 mil a year.. well 15 mil a year for amare may be fine, but why should I be locked in for 7 years? Shorten the deals, make less years guaranteed and give the team and player options to extend the deal based on a variety of factors.. just a thought...
Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34074
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127

7/24/2008  2:03 PM
I'd trade Curry + Lee for Deng... replace Curry's absurd contract with Deng, who I'd rather have at that salary.

But here's the thing: I like Chandler, I like Gallo, I like Deng. Maybe the positions wouldn't be ideal, but all three are versatile players and I firmly believe all three could play substantial minutes on the floor at the same time.

If the Knicks can draft a legitimate point guard and then make a play for someone like Chris Bosh, our team will be amazing.
DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
7/24/2008  3:05 PM
Posted by tkf:
Posted by Cosmic:
I agree, deng just got greedy.. as you said, josh howard is a better player and making a lot less, the same with ron artest... These inflated salaries are going to hurt the league.. How are you going to put out a good product when you pay guys like deng 12 mil a year? how?

The League is a joke with their cap/lux tax thresholds. However, that shouldn't stop us from pursuing a good player.

As to the league: In my opinion the allowance on contract sizes far outweighs to overall roster allowance in terms of the cap.

How do you fix that? The cap should be raised a LARGE amount since you can never tell these guys "oops, thats it, max contracts are 5M per year now!".

A team has 15 players?

Fine.

3 Max Contracts (any great team has 3 max guys)
9 MLE Contracts
3 Min Contracts.

No, I'm not talking matching up player to player (9 guys all making MLE), I'm talking in total.

Whatever the total of 3 max, 9 mle, and 3 min comes to? That should be the cap. That way teams aren't bent over by the cap.

************************
************************
Separate:

To those still looking at 2010, LeBron, etc. Hey, those are pipe dreams, you don't pass on a good player to HOPE you land a great one 2 years later. Just ask the Orlando Magic and John Gabriel. That clown disposed of player after player looking to land Tim Duncan in 2000. Then proceeded to pass on deal after deal to maintain his hope that in 2003 Duncan would finally come. Duncan never did and the Magic were a big pile of garbage all those years as a DIRECT RESULT of the "get cap space, get lebron" type idea. You can't operate like that.


That is fine cosmic. I can go with that.. MY idea is to shorted the length of these contracts. I understand teams want to lock up good players, but now they are trying to lock them up at lesser amount and the players are not having it.. Lets say, I want amare.. and he wants 15 mil a year.. well 15 mil a year for amare may be fine, but why should I be locked in for 7 years? Shorten the deals, make less years guaranteed and give the team and player options to extend the deal based on a variety of factors.. just a thought...

Yeah, and they kinda did shorten them, but they fell short of doing the right thing.

No more 7 year deals, just 6...and just 5 for the offer sheets correct? Or is that still 7/6 (lol i cant remember been so busy)

What it should be is 5 year max, 4 year offer sheet (just to keep the incentive to stay with a team intact)
All extensions should be 3 years.

As to guaranteed? Well, full strike if they try to change that. There certainly should be a certain goal that must be met to keep a contract guaranteed. Look at Jerome James for instance.

I think personally you drop down to the 5 year max, 4 year max offer sheet, 3 year max extensions on current contracts --- and then what... 2 years guaranteed? Maybe 3 fully guaranteed then others NOT guaranteed unless you meet a set criteria each season leading up to the non-guaranteed year(s)?

It sure would help a lot. It would prevent teams from getting screwed. That combined with a relaxtion on this whole bird rights crap, raising the cap to what I suggest, and you'd see a whole new revitalization of the league because teams would again have FLEXIBILITY. Be it on the sending or receiving end.

http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
7/24/2008  3:20 PM
Posted by Cosmic:
Posted by tkf:
Posted by Cosmic:
I agree, deng just got greedy.. as you said, josh howard is a better player and making a lot less, the same with ron artest... These inflated salaries are going to hurt the league.. How are you going to put out a good product when you pay guys like deng 12 mil a year? how?

The League is a joke with their cap/lux tax thresholds. However, that shouldn't stop us from pursuing a good player.

As to the league: In my opinion the allowance on contract sizes far outweighs to overall roster allowance in terms of the cap.

How do you fix that? The cap should be raised a LARGE amount since you can never tell these guys "oops, thats it, max contracts are 5M per year now!".

A team has 15 players?

Fine.

3 Max Contracts (any great team has 3 max guys)
9 MLE Contracts
3 Min Contracts.

No, I'm not talking matching up player to player (9 guys all making MLE), I'm talking in total.

Whatever the total of 3 max, 9 mle, and 3 min comes to? That should be the cap. That way teams aren't bent over by the cap.

************************
************************
Separate:

To those still looking at 2010, LeBron, etc. Hey, those are pipe dreams, you don't pass on a good player to HOPE you land a great one 2 years later. Just ask the Orlando Magic and John Gabriel. That clown disposed of player after player looking to land Tim Duncan in 2000. Then proceeded to pass on deal after deal to maintain his hope that in 2003 Duncan would finally come. Duncan never did and the Magic were a big pile of garbage all those years as a DIRECT RESULT of the "get cap space, get lebron" type idea. You can't operate like that.


That is fine cosmic. I can go with that.. MY idea is to shorted the length of these contracts. I understand teams want to lock up good players, but now they are trying to lock them up at lesser amount and the players are not having it.. Lets say, I want amare.. and he wants 15 mil a year.. well 15 mil a year for amare may be fine, but why should I be locked in for 7 years? Shorten the deals, make less years guaranteed and give the team and player options to extend the deal based on a variety of factors.. just a thought...

Yeah, and they kinda did shorten them, but they fell short of doing the right thing.

No more 7 year deals, just 6...and just 5 for the offer sheets correct? Or is that still 7/6 (lol i cant remember been so busy)

What it should be is 5 year max, 4 year offer sheet (just to keep the incentive to stay with a team intact)
All extensions should be 3 years.

As to guaranteed? Well, full strike if they try to change that. There certainly should be a certain goal that must be met to keep a contract guaranteed. Look at Jerome James for instance.

I think personally you drop down to the 5 year max, 4 year max offer sheet, 3 year max extensions on current contracts --- and then what... 2 years guaranteed? Maybe 3 fully guaranteed then others NOT guaranteed unless you meet a set criteria each season leading up to the non-guaranteed year(s)?

It sure would help a lot. It would prevent teams from getting screwed. That combined with a relaxtion on this whole bird rights crap, raising the cap to what I suggest, and you'd see a whole new revitalization of the league because teams would again have FLEXIBILITY. Be it on the sending or receiving end.

I agree, 5/4 makes sense. I am just not a fan of these long deals, they seem to hurt teams more than they help and they reward a lot of unworthy players. we have a few of them... I do think teams need more flexibility, and we need to address the salary cap, but not so that we can overpay for the likes of Brian cardinal and even josh smith, but we want teams to be able to have flexibility with the next level of talent. guys who are not stars but just a notch or two below....
Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
4949
Posts: 29378
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/25/2006
Member: #1126
USA
7/24/2008  4:58 PM
Wait a minute! Deng turned down a 57.5 mil offer? Then what does that mean? We pick him up after next year for five year 60 mil contract?? NO WAY! That puts a serious damper on our 'free the cap campaign' for our two to three year plan.

Forget it, no way, nada omego, hell no.

isiah would have made that deal in a heart beat. Nope, uhn, uhn!
I'll never trust this' team again.
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
7/24/2008  5:40 PM
Posted by Cosmic:
Posted by tkf:




he would still be overpaid..... If we get deng, we will have to grossly overpay...

Who isn't? I think Deng wanted 70M, Bulls offered 50M. (Gordon wanted 75, bulls offered 57).

Is Crawford worth the contract he got? No, he's overpaid. Chris Wilcox? No. Curry? No. etc etc etc... but, it's what they're getting.

If Crawford got a brand new deal starting today with his present salary it'd be 8.6, 9.4, 10.2, 11.8, 12.5.

I think Luol Deng would be worth that. He's a solid all-around high character player. He's exactly what I'd want as a starting SF.

I know that cosmic. I was just responding to your comment.. Yes, deng won't be fat, he won't be crappy, but he will still be overpaid.. that won't change.. LOL.. thats all..
Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
7/24/2008  7:47 PM
Posted by fishmike:

Deng is realy good but he's not Shawn Marion.. what Chi offered his was fair

thank you... Deng is severely overrated on this forum.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
sebstar
Posts: 25698
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 6/2/2002
Member: #249
USA
7/24/2008  7:49 PM
I'm sorry, I just cant fathom bringing in another x-Bull. Amazing.
My saliva and spit can split thread into fiber and bits/ So trust me I'm as live as it gets. --Royce Da 5'9 + DJ Premier = Hip Hop Utopia
4949
Posts: 29378
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/25/2006
Member: #1126
USA
7/24/2008  7:50 PM
Posted by sebstar:

I'm sorry, I just cant fathom bringing in another x-Bull. Amazing.

Yeah, that too. What is it with that anyway?
I'll never trust this' team again.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
7/24/2008  7:57 PM
i think Chandler can give us 14 & 7 type #'s this year easy... not that far off from Deng's totals from last year, & he's 2 years younger & not going to command no $12 mil per salary.

if u can get Deng in a trade package that includes Curry, Zach or Jamal, well then it's obvious you do it, but that will never ever happen... to get our hands on Deng ur looking at giving up every 1 of our desirable young pieces, Gallo, D Lee & likely Chandler to boot, & then paying him an exorbitant salary to add to an already fugged up cap situation... just can't justify doing that unless ur getting ur hands on a franchise calibre talent, which Deng is not IMHO.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
sebstar
Posts: 25698
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 6/2/2002
Member: #249
USA
7/24/2008  8:04 PM
Posted by 4949:
Posted by sebstar:

I'm sorry, I just cant fathom bringing in another x-Bull. Amazing.

Yeah, that too. What is it with that anyway?

Its creepy. We are truly becoming the Baby Bulls
My saliva and spit can split thread into fiber and bits/ So trust me I'm as live as it gets. --Royce Da 5'9 + DJ Premier = Hip Hop Utopia
Vmart
Posts: 31800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/23/2002
Member: #247
USA
7/24/2008  11:11 PM
Posted by Cosmic:
Posted by EnySpree:

Nonsense.......again if Deng is being discussed what the hell we draft Gallo for?

Also, what's the difference between Zach and Deng? It might be that Zach is better.

Deng plays defense, is a great team player, a high character guy.
Zach is one dimensional, is selfish and arrogant and disruptive.

People really need to get beyond the whole "23/10" thing with Zach and understand he's a terrible TEAM BASKETBALL player. Just terrible.

You sure know how to kill trade value.

Anji
Posts: 25523
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 4/14/2006
Member: #1122
USA
7/25/2008  5:57 AM
Posted by TMS:

i think Chandler can give us 14 & 7 type #'s this year easy... not that far off from Deng's totals from last year, & he's 2 years younger & not going to command no $12 mil per salary.

if u can get Deng in a trade package that includes Curry, Zach or Jamal, well then it's obvious you do it, but that will never ever happen... to get our hands on Deng ur looking at giving up every 1 of our desirable young pieces, Gallo, D Lee & likely Chandler to boot, & then paying him an exorbitant salary to add to an already fugged up cap situation... just can't justify doing that unless ur getting ur hands on a franchise calibre talent, which Deng is not IMHO.
What happens when he is likely putting up the 9 and 6 alot of these late round small forwards seem to do???


Deng is already an established player at 23 years, those are the kind of players the knicks should be looking to sign. Danillo is the future finesse power forward so Lee is out the door. Deng is probably a better player right now the chandler is with what ever wide eyed improvements knicks fans would add to his game off of two good summer league games. Deng and Danllio going into the future would be a big step for Walsh.
"Really, all Americans want is a cold beer, warm p***y, and some place to s**t with a door on it." - Mr. Ford
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
7/25/2008  6:00 AM
how do u propose we get Deng? u think D Lee, Chandler & salary filler is gonna get it done?
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Anji
Posts: 25523
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 4/14/2006
Member: #1122
USA
7/25/2008  6:19 AM
I don't know how they would get Deng, they are hoping contract talks turn nasty for that reason the most.

Hopefully Zach and Chandler would get it done, best bet would probably be to get a player they would want in a three way with Lee, Chandler and Filler..... even if it is a long shot.
"Really, all Americans want is a cold beer, warm p***y, and some place to s**t with a door on it." - Mr. Ford
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
7/25/2008  6:22 AM
Posted by EnySpree:

Nonsense.......again if Deng is being discussed what the hell we draft Gallo for?

Also, what's the difference between Zach and Deng? It might be that Zach is better.

Zach hurts his teams. Deng doesn't.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
7/25/2008  7:41 AM
Posted by Anji:

I don't know how they would get Deng, they are hoping contract talks turn nasty for that reason the most.

Hopefully Zach and Chandler would get it done, best bet would probably be to get a player they would want in a three way with Lee, Chandler and Filler..... even if it is a long shot.

i don't see why CHI would wanna do that tho when they could just sign Deng to an offer sheet & try to trade him at some point during the season if it comes down to that.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Deng gives Bulls deadline; Knicks monitoring [blog article]

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy