|
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
|
Posted by Cosmic:
Posted by tkf:
Posted by Cosmic:
I agree, deng just got greedy.. as you said, josh howard is a better player and making a lot less, the same with ron artest... These inflated salaries are going to hurt the league.. How are you going to put out a good product when you pay guys like deng 12 mil a year? how? The League is a joke with their cap/lux tax thresholds. However, that shouldn't stop us from pursuing a good player.
As to the league: In my opinion the allowance on contract sizes far outweighs to overall roster allowance in terms of the cap.
How do you fix that? The cap should be raised a LARGE amount since you can never tell these guys "oops, thats it, max contracts are 5M per year now!".
A team has 15 players?
Fine.
3 Max Contracts (any great team has 3 max guys) 9 MLE Contracts 3 Min Contracts.
No, I'm not talking matching up player to player (9 guys all making MLE), I'm talking in total.
Whatever the total of 3 max, 9 mle, and 3 min comes to? That should be the cap. That way teams aren't bent over by the cap.
************************ ************************ Separate:
To those still looking at 2010, LeBron, etc. Hey, those are pipe dreams, you don't pass on a good player to HOPE you land a great one 2 years later. Just ask the Orlando Magic and John Gabriel. That clown disposed of player after player looking to land Tim Duncan in 2000. Then proceeded to pass on deal after deal to maintain his hope that in 2003 Duncan would finally come. Duncan never did and the Magic were a big pile of garbage all those years as a DIRECT RESULT of the "get cap space, get lebron" type idea. You can't operate like that.
That is fine cosmic. I can go with that.. MY idea is to shorted the length of these contracts. I understand teams want to lock up good players, but now they are trying to lock them up at lesser amount and the players are not having it.. Lets say, I want amare.. and he wants 15 mil a year.. well 15 mil a year for amare may be fine, but why should I be locked in for 7 years? Shorten the deals, make less years guaranteed and give the team and player options to extend the deal based on a variety of factors.. just a thought...
Yeah, and they kinda did shorten them, but they fell short of doing the right thing.
No more 7 year deals, just 6...and just 5 for the offer sheets correct? Or is that still 7/6 (lol i cant remember been so busy)
What it should be is 5 year max, 4 year offer sheet (just to keep the incentive to stay with a team intact) All extensions should be 3 years.
As to guaranteed? Well, full strike if they try to change that. There certainly should be a certain goal that must be met to keep a contract guaranteed. Look at Jerome James for instance.
I think personally you drop down to the 5 year max, 4 year max offer sheet, 3 year max extensions on current contracts --- and then what... 2 years guaranteed? Maybe 3 fully guaranteed then others NOT guaranteed unless you meet a set criteria each season leading up to the non-guaranteed year(s)?
It sure would help a lot. It would prevent teams from getting screwed. That combined with a relaxtion on this whole bird rights crap, raising the cap to what I suggest, and you'd see a whole new revitalization of the league because teams would again have FLEXIBILITY. Be it on the sending or receiving end.
I agree, 5/4 makes sense. I am just not a fan of these long deals, they seem to hurt teams more than they help and they reward a lot of unworthy players. we have a few of them... I do think teams need more flexibility, and we need to address the salary cap, but not so that we can overpay for the likes of Brian cardinal and even josh smith, but we want teams to be able to have flexibility with the next level of talent. guys who are not stars but just a notch or two below....
Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser...............
TKF
|