|
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
|
I think the problem here is that a lot of us liked bayless before the draft... I know I did, a lot.. but I also knew that it would be redundant to get him knowing we have guys like crawford, nate and marbury still on board.. Nevertheless, I wanted him, because I thought at the very least he would be the best talent available. After doing some research on gallinari and understanding why walsh took him, it makes sense for me now... the problem I have is that now, becuase we didn't pick bayless, all of a sudden we are doomed, because he is going to be some superstar in the NBA because of a few SL games... I don't think there is one person on this site that ever said this kid could not score.. we all knew he could do that.. we all knew that!!!! no one is saying he won't be a good player. I think a lot of us doubt that he will be what we need, as a piece to build with, considering we have several pieces like that... Gallo gives us something we haven't had. Young, tall, skilled, good character and a load of potential.. we just never had that on this team... I can understand passing on bayless!! If NY fans want something "new" that does the same thing, lets just overpay for Ben gordon in a sign and trade..
Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser...............
TKF
|