[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

We still have a chance to dump Zach
Author Thread
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
7/17/2008  9:36 AM
That's what I don't get. You gave up Frye to get him basically. It was a salary dump. Now Walsh thinks he can get back assets for him after what he himself describe as a poor season. That says more about Frye then it does Randolph.
I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
AUTOADVERT
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
7/17/2008  12:47 PM
I actually think that Detroit is the best place for Zach. He's from Michigan and he fits in with the whole "bad boy" mantra that they've had going on over there for years.

Now with that said, would Dumars ever trade for him? I don't think so.
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
7/17/2008  12:55 PM
Posted by Uptown:

Face it...Walsh blew it big time. Any other pontential trade involving Zach is going to cause us to take on someone else's garbage. We had a shot to dump him for a nothing.

I agree 100%. I like Walsh being patient and all but this was a golden opportunity that Walsh just plain SHAT on and screwed us with Zach - OR - dumping Zach for a whole lot of garbage in return.

This was a big mistake IMO a big mistake.

I mean...to be able to buy out Marbury and drop Zach for nothing except a 2nd round pick - would have been a VERY VERY VERY good summer and a GIGANTIC step in the right direction all at once.

Face it, Zach Fans, all he is is a box score. On the court he is an colossal failure that damages the game of everyone around him.

I could have stomached the Crawful-Curry show for one more year - if that's all it was - but throw Zach in there and it's just horrible.

Frustrated to see this happen to say the least but myself and everyone who was on board with that Zach-for-2nd rounder trade could just smell it coming: The Clippers would look elsewhere.


NOW A DOSE OF LIKELY REALITY

Camby is a superior player to Zach Randolph. If a team had a choice between Zach and Camby.......and they went for Zach...they're morons.
http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
7/17/2008  1:02 PM
Posted by Cosmic:
Posted by Uptown:

Face it...Walsh blew it big time. Any other pontential trade involving Zach is going to cause us to take on someone else's garbage. We had a shot to dump him for a nothing.

I agree 100%. I like Walsh being patient and all but this was a golden opportunity that Walsh just plain SHAT on and screwed us with Zach - OR - dumping Zach for a whole lot of garbage in return.

This was a big mistake IMO a big mistake.

I mean...to be able to buy out Marbury and drop Zach for nothing except a 2nd round pick - would have been a VERY VERY VERY good summer and a GIGANTIC step in the right direction all at once.

Face it, Zach Fans, all he is is a box score. On the court he is an colossal failure that damages the game of everyone around him.

I could have stomached the Crawful-Curry show for one more year - if that's all it was - but throw Zach in there and it's just horrible.

Frustrated to see this happen to say the least but myself and everyone who was on board with that Zach-for-2nd rounder trade could just smell it coming: The Clippers would look elsewhere.


NOW A DOSE OF LIKELY REALITY

Camby is a superior player to Zach Randolph. If a team had a choice between Zach and Camby.......and they went for Zach...they're morons.

superior defensively, but offensively zach is even more superior than camby is over him defensively... on the boards, they are about the same.. But the key is that zach gives or would have given the clippers offense another real weapon and dimension. Camby is a good player, but he is surely on the downside. Zach is just reaching his prime... It was a typical clipper move, a dumb, rushed move... I may be wrong, but does camby really make that front line a threat? Unlike zach and curry, kaman and zach would have worked, kaman hits the boards and goes for blocks, plus kaman doesn't need to be plastered on the box to be effective....

Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
7/17/2008  1:05 PM
Posted by tkf:




superior defensively, but offensively zach is even more superior than camby is over him defensively... on the boards, they are about the same.. But the key is that zach gives or would have given the clippers offense another real weapon and dimension. Camby is a good player, but he is surely on the downside. Zach is just reaching his prime... It was a typical clipper move, a dumb, rushed move... I may be wrong, but does camby really make that front line a threat? Unlike zach and curry, kaman and zach would have worked, kaman hits the boards and goes for blocks, plus kaman doesn't need to be plastered on the box to be effective....

Yeah, this is true, but as we've witnessed, Camby is a superior teammate and I think that is much more important in the long run. I think the end result of Kaman-Camby is better than Kaman-Zach just because of how Zach plays out there. He's pretty darn good at nullifying his own teammates whereas Camby makes others around him better or at the very least never cramps their games.


http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
7/17/2008  1:08 PM
If you think keeping Zach is a good thing, then either you think Zach & Curry can co exist, or you are hoping that Curry gets moved instead.

And, you somehow believe we are within three years of being competitive & play off bound.

This talk about 2010 is nice- it gives fans hope.

But, I honestly believe we are 5 years out from having a solid foundation.

Lets give the time to the rookies (Lee, Nate, Chandler, Gallo, Collins) who might be around to be part of that five year re tooled team.
4949
Posts: 29378
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/25/2006
Member: #1126
USA
7/17/2008  1:27 PM
Here's a question I have about cap relief. 'Why do we need it now for'? It makes more sense to have something like that two to three years from now.
I'll never trust this' team again.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
7/17/2008  8:34 PM
Posted by misterearl:
Walsh could've relented and taken back the salary-dump, bargain-basement value for Randolph. He could've made a serious play for Camby, too. Neither would've been the right move for the future.

If Walsh can't get an unconditional draft pick and/or young asset for Randolph now, then he should do exactly what he's doing. Wait it out. The buyers will come to him.

ROFL... Ken Berger must be 1 of you shmoz incognito if he actually believes this is ever gonna happen.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
bitty41
Posts: 22316
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 12/3/2006
Member: #1215

7/17/2008  9:35 PM
Posted by Cosmic:
Posted by tkf:




superior defensively, but offensively zach is even more superior than camby is over him defensively... on the boards, they are about the same.. But the key is that zach gives or would have given the clippers offense another real weapon and dimension. Camby is a good player, but he is surely on the downside. Zach is just reaching his prime... It was a typical clipper move, a dumb, rushed move... I may be wrong, but does camby really make that front line a threat? Unlike zach and curry, kaman and zach would have worked, kaman hits the boards and goes for blocks, plus kaman doesn't need to be plastered on the box to be effective....

Yeah, this is true, but as we've witnessed, Camby is a superior teammate and I think that is much more important in the long run. I think the end result of Kaman-Camby is better than Kaman-Zach just because of how Zach plays out there. He's pretty darn good at nullifying his own teammates whereas Camby makes others around him better or at the very least never cramps their games.

Camby is very talented defensive player particularly help defender but the guy has pulled disappearing acts at key times on his teams.

Furthermore Camby is another player that loves being on the IR list and right now he's not exactly a spring chicken so it will be interesting to see how this revamped Clippers team plays out.

Not that it matters since they are cursed until the end of eternity.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
7/17/2008  9:43 PM
Posted by bitty41:
Posted by Cosmic:
Posted by tkf:




superior defensively, but offensively zach is even more superior than camby is over him defensively... on the boards, they are about the same.. But the key is that zach gives or would have given the clippers offense another real weapon and dimension. Camby is a good player, but he is surely on the downside. Zach is just reaching his prime... It was a typical clipper move, a dumb, rushed move... I may be wrong, but does camby really make that front line a threat? Unlike zach and curry, kaman and zach would have worked, kaman hits the boards and goes for blocks, plus kaman doesn't need to be plastered on the box to be effective....

Yeah, this is true, but as we've witnessed, Camby is a superior teammate and I think that is much more important in the long run. I think the end result of Kaman-Camby is better than Kaman-Zach just because of how Zach plays out there. He's pretty darn good at nullifying his own teammates whereas Camby makes others around him better or at the very least never cramps their games.

Camby is very talented defensive player particularly help defender but the guy has pulled disappearing acts at key times on his teams.

Furthermore Camby is another player that loves being on the IR list and right now he's not exactly a spring chicken so it will be interesting to see how this revamped Clippers team plays out.

Not that it matters since they are cursed until the end of eternity.

Zach missed thirteen games this year and Camby missed three
bitty41
Posts: 22316
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 12/3/2006
Member: #1215

7/17/2008  9:56 PM
Zach missed thirteen games this year and Camby missed three

Camby has had only 3 seasons out his 11 in which he played at least 70 games so please do not try to make the point that Camby is not injury prone.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
7/17/2008  10:36 PM
Posted by bitty41:
Zach missed thirteen games this year and Camby missed three

Camby has had only 3 seasons out his 11 in which he played at least 70 games so please do not try to make the point that Camby is not injury prone.

And Zach's had 70 in only 3 out of 7. What's your point?

[Edited by - bonn1997 on 07-17-2008 10:37 PM]
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
7/17/2008  11:25 PM
Are we really trying to say that Camby isn't injury prone? In 12 seasons, he's played in 65+ games only 4 times. That's pathetic. The Clippers will find out pretty quick what they are in for, especially since Camby already doesn't want to be there. I predict he plays 58 games this year.
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
7/17/2008  11:41 PM
i dunno about anyone else but i'd take 58 games from Camby over 70 from Zach without a doubt.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
7/17/2008  11:45 PM
Posted by TMS:

i dunno about anyone else but i'd take 58 games from Camby over 70 from Zach without a doubt.

Of course you would. I'm just saying, I don't think Camby is the answer for LAC.
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
bitty41
Posts: 22316
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 12/3/2006
Member: #1215

7/18/2008  3:46 AM
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by bitty41:
Zach missed thirteen games this year and Camby missed three

Camby has had only 3 seasons out his 11 in which he played at least 70 games so please do not try to make the point that Camby is not injury prone.

And Zach's had 70 in only 3 out of 7. What's your point?

[Edited by - bonn1997 on 07-17-2008 10:37 PM]

Nice try Bonn no here is even talking about Zach but for some reason whenever I mention another player it' somehow turns into a debate about Zach. But yea Camby is injury has been his entire career.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
7/18/2008  6:43 AM
this is a thread about trade ideas for Zach Randolph.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
bitty41
Posts: 22316
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 12/3/2006
Member: #1215

7/18/2008  8:00 AM
Thank you for informing me of that but this thread like so many others has become about something entirely different then the original topic.

But if it makes you feel better Zach is complimentary to Chris Kaman's game for the simple fact that neither one would be required to play out of position whereas Camby and Kaman are both rebounding shot-blocking centers.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
7/18/2008  8:00 AM
Posted by TMS:

this is a thread about trade ideas for Zach Randolph.

Yeah, but apparently no one here is talking about Zach!
TheGame
Posts: 26652
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2006
Member: #1154
USA
7/18/2008  8:50 AM
I said before I think he blew it, but at the same time, I do agree that as Zach's contract gets shorter, teams will be more willing to trade for him. The question is whether we can make that trade before 2010. This was a great opportunity. I would have asked the Clippers for Jordan and been done with it. We then could have cut JJ1 and moved this team $16 mill closer to being under the cap.

[Edited by - thegame on 18-07-2008 08:51]
Trust the Process
We still have a chance to dump Zach

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy