[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

The Lee story was true !!! Bastard !!!
Author Thread
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

7/14/2008  11:13 AM
Posted by BasketballJones:
Posted by djsunyc:

all these rumors and stories don't mean anything.

actions are what matters. so far, the knicks have walsh as a gm, d'antoni as the coach, drafted gallinari and signed duhon. everything else said or written about means jack.

Stop trying to be so reasonable. David Lee destroyed the Knicks. He's worse than Isiah.

Nobody is saying that psycho.

911 was an inside job!
Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
AUTOADVERT
4949
Posts: 29378
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/25/2006
Member: #1126
USA
7/14/2008  11:31 AM
Posted by EnySpree:
Posted by 4949:
Posted by EnySpree:

I'm not inclined to pay Lee millions to be a bench player.

Yeah, but at the same time we pay jerome 6 million to do just that!

If we want to get rid of someone, buy that fat ass out and give the six mil to Lee! That's one solution right there.

That's not a good arguement.
Jerome is gonna get paid regardless if he's waived or not and his contract counts against the cap for the remainder of the deal.

Jerome again is someone stupid ass Isiah brought in. To Donnie and D'antoni they are not looking at him more than a contract. He probably will be bought out before the end of the summer if a roster spot is needed or something. His contract is still a chip to be played.

Again....this is a new regime. I don't mind keeping David Lee, but if this new management sees Chandler and Gallo as the future and presently cheaper alternative to signing David Lee to what would probably be a Isiahesque deal then you gotta make the right move......trade David Lee(AND Zach just not in the same trade, curry too if at all possible) for someone that fits the Knicks going forward.

This has nothing to do with race, btw. I see you trying to suggest that above. No freakin way. David Lee is still a good player regardless of whatever, but its not about him. Its about getting the right mix of players here.

Isiah's mess is Donnie's to fix. That's why donnie is here. Again let this Isiah's fault **** go. Some kids in central africa are sitting in a hut with flies in their noses, no water, electricity or food and they still probably would know the Knicks are screwed up cuz of Isiah. Its a world known fact. Let it go.

Eny ma man, I respect your opinions and all, but dude, there is no' right move. We mainly agree for the most part. I just want to say keep Lee. At least for now. If there is a move for him, then it would have to be in about two years.
I'll never trust this' team again.
4949
Posts: 29378
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/25/2006
Member: #1126
USA
7/14/2008  11:33 AM
Posted by djsunyc:

all these rumors and stories don't mean anything.

actions are what matters. so far, the knicks have walsh as a gm, d'antoni as the coach, drafted gallinari and signed duhon. everything else said or written about means jack.

Public opinion matters. Public opinion is what got isaid-diot fired and eventually Donnie hired. So what we say about Lee now could matter one way or the other later. Sometimes it leads to action.
I'll never trust this' team again.
4949
Posts: 29378
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/25/2006
Member: #1126
USA
7/14/2008  11:34 AM
Posted by BasketballJones:
Posted by djsunyc:

all these rumors and stories don't mean anything.

actions are what matters. so far, the knicks have walsh as a gm, d'antoni as the coach, drafted gallinari and signed duhon. everything else said or written about means jack.

Stop trying to be so reasonable. David Lee destroyed the Knicks. He's worse than Isiah.

maybe we should take him out back and beat the **** out of him.
I'll never trust this' team again.
4949
Posts: 29378
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/25/2006
Member: #1126
USA
7/14/2008  11:42 AM
Posted by EnySpree:



4949.....

You still aren't saying anything. Yeah the Knicks aint **** till the contracts roll off the cap....duh....must of them will in wake of 2010.

The Knicks have assets in David Lee and Zach. Knicks have options with these guys. Will it be trading for change? Yeah....we hope. The plan is to make moves to reduce cap by 2010 while still remaining compeditive and rebuilding.

Duh. There is nothing else behind it.

But that would mean that 'another' team would be willing to 'buyout' zach's contract for us instead? Is that what I'm seeing here? And their biggest get back would be Lee? I don't think he's worth that kind of a buyout. Why would another team want to take on a part of our cap problem? Explain please? I'm trying to understand what your getting at. It's interesting. I want to see if you have a valued point to this.

I'll never trust this' team again.
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

7/14/2008  11:49 AM
4949......david lee is a free agent after this season...we don't have 2 years to decide on him.

Btw, we are in agreement for the most part, except for Lee. Lee is a good player but not one player is gonna have any power of the Knicks.

As of right now, I'd rather trade Lee and try to get some other guys on rookie contracts and roll with Wilson and Gallo......lottery? Probably.....but isn't that what the majority wants?
Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
4949
Posts: 29378
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/25/2006
Member: #1126
USA
7/14/2008  11:54 AM
Olay, let's say I'm the Memphis GM and let's say 'I'm really stupid'! Okay, now I trade a #5 round draft pick to the Knicks (the New York Knicks that is) and I take on zach's average 16 million dollar contract, that ends in three years, and I get Lee as part of the deal, who I know doesn't really want to be here.

What am I left with?

I just helped the Knicks unload some of it's major salary, which I am now stuck with, got Lee probably for one year and that's it.

if this correct scenario, then how does this work for Memphis?
I'll never trust this' team again.
Uptown
Posts: 31375
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 4/1/2008
Member: #1883

7/14/2008  11:57 AM
Posted by 4949:

Olay, let's say I'm the Memphis GM and let's say 'I'm really stupid'! Okay, now I trade a #5 round draft pick to the Knicks (the New York Knicks that is) and I take on zach's average 16 million dollar contract, that ends in three years, and I get Lee as part of the deal, who I know doesn't really want to be here.

What am I left with?

I just helped the Knicks unload some of it's major salary, which I am now stuck with, got Lee probably for one year and that's it.

if this correct scenario, then how does this work for Memphis?

Zach wasn't apart of the original deal. The main principles were Lee and the 5th pick and perhaps a salary dump from Memphis' end (Cardinal?). I like Lee but F*** him and his agent if this is true. I'm a Knick fan first.
4949
Posts: 29378
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/25/2006
Member: #1126
USA
7/14/2008  12:03 PM
Posted by Uptown:
Posted by 4949:

Olay, let's say I'm the Memphis GM and let's say 'I'm really stupid'! Okay, now I trade a #5 round draft pick to the Knicks (the New York Knicks that is) and I take on zach's average 16 million dollar contract, that ends in three years, and I get Lee as part of the deal, who I know doesn't really want to be here.

What am I left with?

I just helped the Knicks unload some of it's major salary, which I am now stuck with, got Lee probably for one year and that's it.

if this correct scenario, then how does this work for Memphis?

Zach wasn't apart of the original deal. The main principles were Lee and the 5th pick and perhaps a salary dump from Memphis' end (Cardinal?). I like Lee but F*** him and his agent if this is true. I'm a Knick fan first.

Oh boy. What's all of this Lee-zach crap about then? And I thought David Lee was a Knick fan first also!

Fuck it! I hope Lee does go. NY doesn't deserve him.
I'll never trust this' team again.
GKFv2
Posts: 26752
Alba Posts: 114
Joined: 1/16/2007
Member: #1259
USA
7/14/2008  12:11 PM
Posted by 4949:
Posted by Uptown:
Posted by 4949:

Olay, let's say I'm the Memphis GM and let's say 'I'm really stupid'! Okay, now I trade a #5 round draft pick to the Knicks (the New York Knicks that is) and I take on zach's average 16 million dollar contract, that ends in three years, and I get Lee as part of the deal, who I know doesn't really want to be here.

What am I left with?

I just helped the Knicks unload some of it's major salary, which I am now stuck with, got Lee probably for one year and that's it.

if this correct scenario, then how does this work for Memphis?

Zach wasn't apart of the original deal. The main principles were Lee and the 5th pick and perhaps a salary dump from Memphis' end (Cardinal?). I like Lee but F*** him and his agent if this is true. I'm a Knick fan first.

Oh boy. What's all of this Lee-zach crap about then? And I thought David Lee was a Knick fan first also!

Fuck it! I hope Lee does go. NY doesn't deserve him.

If we trade Lee, can you include yourself in that package and become a fan of whatever team Lee plays for? Ultimateclippers.com is waiting for you.
Thank you, Rick Brunson.
Swishfm3
Posts: 23343
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/28/2003
Member: #392
7/14/2008  12:43 PM
whoooooo caaarrrrrreeeeeeeeessssssss
4949
Posts: 29378
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/25/2006
Member: #1126
USA
7/14/2008  12:46 PM
Posted by GKFv2:
Posted by 4949:
Posted by Uptown:
Posted by 4949:

Olay, let's say I'm the Memphis GM and let's say 'I'm really stupid'! Okay, now I trade a #5 round draft pick to the Knicks (the New York Knicks that is) and I take on zach's average 16 million dollar contract, that ends in three years, and I get Lee as part of the deal, who I know doesn't really want to be here.

What am I left with?

I just helped the Knicks unload some of it's major salary, which I am now stuck with, got Lee probably for one year and that's it.

if this correct scenario, then how does this work for Memphis?

Zach wasn't apart of the original deal. The main principles were Lee and the 5th pick and perhaps a salary dump from Memphis' end (Cardinal?). I like Lee but F*** him and his agent if this is true. I'm a Knick fan first.

Oh boy. What's all of this Lee-zach crap about then? And I thought David Lee was a Knick fan first also!

Fuck it! I hope Lee does go. NY doesn't deserve him.

If we trade Lee, can you include yourself in that package and become a fan of whatever team Lee plays for? Ultimateclippers.com is waiting for you.

Your a funny man.
I'll never trust this' team again.
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

7/14/2008  1:12 PM
Ok I'm convinced you are a crazy man 4949.....

Who said anything about trading zach and lee with the thought of that team buying out Zach for us......come on man that's gotta be the dumbest thing that nobody here is saying except you........where did you read that someone was saying that?

Come on man. I like debating this topic but don't make up ****.

Bottom line:

Zach is and asset by himself and so is Lee. Not together. Toogether nobody will trade for them cuz they play the same position.

Again the Knicks come before any player.

Aaaaaaaaannnnnnnnnndddddd that's all she wrote.

Fin.
Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
bitty41
Posts: 22316
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 12/3/2006
Member: #1215

7/14/2008  1:23 PM
I think its a bad idea to trade both Curry/Lee or Lee/Randolph in one single deal. For this season at least I think you have to go with either Randolph/Lee or Curry/Lee lineup. Everyone speaks about the money ramifications but what about the actual on-court impact these potential moves could cause. Lee is okay but by himself with a developing rookie or a scrub can only worsen problems for the Knicks on the court and cap space is great and all if you have a solid base for an elite player to come to but if it's just a bunch of scubs and undeveloped young players that imo isn't a very desirable path. Definetly won't be winning Championships in the near future.
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
7/14/2008  1:32 PM
Unless it's an unsuual deal I really dont want to trade Lee. I still think Leestill has untapped potential and is a necessary brick and mortar player. I don't like the stability issues with Randolph and Curry and if we can get him signed to a fair deal+there is no unusual offer for him--it's in the NY Knicks best interets to keep him. I think he will help Gallinari much more than those other two.
RIP Crushalot😞
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
7/14/2008  4:30 PM
Posted by joec32033:
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by joec32033:

Lee cost us Mayo.

It's not Lee's job to get us Mayo. That's Walsh's and Dolan's. If my empoloyer wanted to shift me to a place I didn't want to go to, I'd do everything I could to get out of it too.

Who said it was his job? Not me. I said he cost us Mayo. There's a difference.

As per you doing everything you can to get out of a relocation, how well do you think you're bosses would react to that-if they decide to keep you around after fighting them?
I guess I'm not sure what you mean by "cost" then. Just about anyone on the roster who wasn't intentionally losing games by shooting airballs cost us Mayo. Walsh and Dolan cost us Mayo by not having a backup plan once Lee's agent talked to Memphis. It was their job to have a backup plan.

As to the 2nd part, that depends on how much leverage my employer had over me. The Knicks have virtually none over Lee because there are 29 other teams that would love to have him somewhere on their roster. If you're willing to quit your job (as I would be if forced to transfer to a place I wouldn't want to), then your employer has no leverage over you.


[Edited by - bonn1997 on 07-14-2008 4:32 PM]
sebstar
Posts: 25698
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 6/2/2002
Member: #249
USA
7/14/2008  6:15 PM
I agree, its not as if Mayo couldnt have been had if the Knicks would have gotten creative. We're talking about moving up a slot.

Dont blame Zeke for this one.

Lee was wrong for rejecting the deal. It doesnt mean he's the worst person in the world, but he was wrong and we'll see in the coming years just how much of an impact his block will have. It's ok, you're not going to get thrown in prison for taking Lee to task for something.

God, people will defend someone on anything if they like said person.

[Edited by - sebstar on 07-14-2008 7:01 PM]
My saliva and spit can split thread into fiber and bits/ So trust me I'm as live as it gets. --Royce Da 5'9 + DJ Premier = Hip Hop Utopia
loweyecue
Posts: 27468
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 11/20/2005
Member: #1037

7/14/2008  6:51 PM
Posted by joec32033:

Lee cost us Mayo. Only way he wins back my support is if he proves to be a better player(that means more than the one dimensional hustle player he currently is) and he resigns with us for a discount to prove that he really wants to play here.

So far there have been two instances where he has acte like a primadonna.

First was the whole Larry Brown is stealing our joy crap and now this. I am really starting to sour on him.

I just hope he realizes the repurcussions of his actions. He alienated himself from new management that will be here long term. That is never good. I am curious if this was an unolicted thing his agent did or if Memphis wanted him resigned as soon as he got there and then his agent did it. There is a difference to me.

I also don't buy that his agent was doing his own thing. Agents work for players. He had to know. That is something that had to be run by Lee first. I think that part is an out and out lie about him not knowing.


How did he alienate himself with the management? He didnt oppose the trade did he? His "agent" said he wouldn't continue playing for a sorry *** team. Good for him.

And how did he cost us Mayo? Mayo went @3, Lee would have gotten us he 5th pick at best.
TKF on Melo ::....he is a punk, a jerk, a self absorbed out of shape, self aggrandizing, unprofessional, volume chucking coach killing playoff loser!!
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
7/14/2008  7:11 PM
Posted by sebstar:

I agree, its not as if Mayo couldnt have been had if the Knicks would have gotten creative. We're talking about moving up a slot.

Dont blame Zeke for this one.

Lee was wrong for rejecting the deal. It doesnt mean he's the worst person in the world, but he was wrong and we'll see in the coming years just how much of an impact his block will have. It's ok, you're not going to get thrown in prison for taking Lee to task for something.

God, people will defend someone on anything if they like said person.

[Edited by - sebstar on 07-14-2008 7:01 PM]
Why was Lee wrong? Perhaps Memphis appreciates his honesty. Lee put his own interests ahead of the Knicks organization's interests, but why should he be more loyal to the Knicks than to himself? Do you value your employer more than you value yourself?
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
7/14/2008  7:12 PM
Posted by loweyecue:
Posted by joec32033:

Lee cost us Mayo. Only way he wins back my support is if he proves to be a better player(that means more than the one dimensional hustle player he currently is) and he resigns with us for a discount to prove that he really wants to play here.

So far there have been two instances where he has acte like a primadonna.

First was the whole Larry Brown is stealing our joy crap and now this. I am really starting to sour on him.

I just hope he realizes the repurcussions of his actions. He alienated himself from new management that will be here long term. That is never good. I am curious if this was an unolicted thing his agent did or if Memphis wanted him resigned as soon as he got there and then his agent did it. There is a difference to me.

I also don't buy that his agent was doing his own thing. Agents work for players. He had to know. That is something that had to be run by Lee first. I think that part is an out and out lie about him not knowing.


How did he alienate himself with the management? He didnt oppose the trade did he? His "agent" said he wouldn't continue playing for a sorry *** team. Good for him.

And how did he cost us Mayo? Mayo went @3, Lee would have gotten us he 5th pick at best.

Now there's a good question!
The Lee story was true !!! Bastard !!!

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy