[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Walsh: Name Jackson the coach already and stop playing games.......
Author Thread
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

5/4/2008  6:55 PM
Yeah but 50% of the time he's right everytime......gotta love those stats.
Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
AUTOADVERT
4949
Posts: 29378
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/25/2006
Member: #1126
USA
5/4/2008  8:12 PM
Posted by crzymdups:
Posted by 4949:

I would also like to remind everyone of something Walsh said early on. He made it clear that he intends to make the cap flexible. He cannot do that if he is going to start making crazy trades, because we can't get great deals in keeping our plan on the beat'n path if we are going to make it flex. So that means just one thing. He is saving to buy that big pink cadillac to show off to all of his friends.

And you know what that' means right?

v
v
v

In answer to the few that think 'no established coach would want to come here to coach zach or double cheeseburger - hold the fries' anyone knows that there is a bigger plan here that will start to take effect in about two more years. They know that a big change is coming and you just know that they are gonna want to coach that new team, even if it means putting up with suckbury for one year and zach and cheeseburger-hold the fries for a few more.

the idea that some coach is going to come here for two years and wait for the outside chance we might get lebron or anyone with cap room is crazy. good luck with that dream.

I'm wondering about my eye sight. I'm looking at your response and I'm getting the idea that you don't want us to have cap room, LeBron in New York or an established coach? Can anyone tell me what is wrong with this picture? I mean don't we have a president who has a plan in place? Not the same old bull crap about 'we will continue to improve this team and set it in the right direction' or 'we should be turning the corner soon' crap we been listening to for the last several years.

I mean come on Knickster's! 'Do we or do we not have a solid plan in place for the next two years, to meet those goals? Why would anyone even think of questioning this? crcy........ are you dissapointed that isiah did not succeed your expectations or something? I can't figure you out.
I'll never trust this' team again.
4949
Posts: 29378
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/25/2006
Member: #1126
USA
5/4/2008  8:15 PM
Posted by Uptown:
Posted by 4949:
Posted by Uptown:

4949-

Heres my point. With all the coaching candidates available, it seems as if Walsh' interest in them is luke-warm at best. Why does Avery Johnson's people have to reach out to Walsh instead of the other way around? Johnson has the best winning % of all available coaches and yet he's the one that has to call Walsh.

Carlise has been available all year. Knicks has one conversation while the Mavs, whose job became free just this week had a series of meetings with him then hired him.

We've seen coaches interview for jobs while there team was still in the playoffs (Brown, Riley) so why can't Walsh request an interview with Thibideau or at least send out feelers? Why not request an interview with Ewing?


The reason why I titled this thread: Name Jackson coach already....is because it seems as if regardless of who the candidates are, its seems as if Walsh intends on giving Jackson the job anyway.

This list seems like a charade. A show. To make the fans think he's doing his due diligence. At the end of all these interviews, Jackson most likely will emerge as the coach of the Knicks. So if thats Walsh's intentions to hire Jackson regardless, I say, cut the charade and just hire him already. If its not his intentionto hire Jackson, I would like Walsh to be more pro active in his search.

Hope that makes more sense.

You could have just as easily named it 'Make D'Antoni the coach already'.

Huh! Somehow my point continues to allude you. How about you change your name to 50/50. Sometimes you get it sometimes you don't

Why don't you change your name to 90/10. You don't get it most' of the time. about 90% of your conversation with me seems to be spent in dispute with me lately.
I'll never trust this' team again.
Uptown
Posts: 31378
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 4/1/2008
Member: #1883

5/4/2008  9:19 PM
Posted by 4949:
Posted by Uptown:
Posted by 4949:
Posted by Uptown:

4949-

Heres my point. With all the coaching candidates available, it seems as if Walsh' interest in them is luke-warm at best. Why does Avery Johnson's people have to reach out to Walsh instead of the other way around? Johnson has the best winning % of all available coaches and yet he's the one that has to call Walsh.

Carlise has been available all year. Knicks has one conversation while the Mavs, whose job became free just this week had a series of meetings with him then hired him.

We've seen coaches interview for jobs while there team was still in the playoffs (Brown, Riley) so why can't Walsh request an interview with Thibideau or at least send out feelers? Why not request an interview with Ewing?


The reason why I titled this thread: Name Jackson coach already....is because it seems as if regardless of who the candidates are, its seems as if Walsh intends on giving Jackson the job anyway.

This list seems like a charade. A show. To make the fans think he's doing his due diligence. At the end of all these interviews, Jackson most likely will emerge as the coach of the Knicks. So if thats Walsh's intentions to hire Jackson regardless, I say, cut the charade and just hire him already. If its not his intentionto hire Jackson, I would like Walsh to be more pro active in his search.

Hope that makes more sense.

You could have just as easily named it 'Make D'Antoni the coach already'.

Huh! Somehow my point continues to allude you. How about you change your name to 50/50. Sometimes you get it sometimes you don't

Why don't you change your name to 90/10. You don't get it most' of the time. about 90% of your conversation with me seems to be spent in dispute with me lately.

Hey, no hard feelings. I thought the smiley might help. Instead of saying dispute, how about we just call it good conversation. If everyone agreed on this board, it might get kind of boring. I look forward to disagreeing conversing with you in the near future

[Edited by - uptown on 05-04-2008 9:20 PM]
4949
Posts: 29378
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/25/2006
Member: #1126
USA
5/4/2008  10:51 PM
There's never any hard feelings from me. Although I now get the idea that I come off like that. I'm just aggressive. Can't help it. And sorry, I missed the smiley face.
I'll never trust this' team again.
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
5/4/2008  11:42 PM
Posted by 4949:


I'm wondering about my eye sight. I'm looking at your response and I'm getting the idea that you don't want us to have cap room, LeBron in New York or an established coach? Can anyone tell me what is wrong with this picture? I mean don't we have a president who has a plan in place? Not the same old bull crap about 'we will continue to improve this team and set it in the right direction' or 'we should be turning the corner soon' crap we been listening to for the last several years.

I mean come on Knickster's! 'Do we or do we not have a solid plan in place for the next two years, to meet those goals? Why would anyone even think of questioning this? crcy........ are you dissapointed that isiah did not succeed your expectations or something? I can't figure you out.

your plan is to get an established coach and have him sit on his hands for two years while we magically create cap room for lebron.

my plan is to bring in a inexperienced coach while we create cap room and use our assets to get young players.

you still haven't said what your plan is for the next two years while we wait for lebron. what is the experienced coach supposed to do?

i'm just saying it's not a quick fix. you seem to be saying it is a quick fix, we just have to wait two years.

can i blow your mind for a second here? what if lebron doesn't come?
¿ △ ?
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
5/4/2008  11:46 PM
Posted by 4949:

Well, I don't see how he'd have too many expectations, seeing that 'everyone' knows how screwed up this team is. How could' he or anyone have any' higher expectations for now? My point is about the future, starting in two more years. I just think we should establish someone who's proved he has the qualifications.

GM's and coaches rarely have a good relationship and that usually comes via winning, in which we have non of. I think if isiah was still in charge, then I just couldn't see someone like D'Anotoni wanting to deal with this ****.

The whole world' knows that Walsh is starting this team in the right direction. It's not like jax is the only one that knows about Walsh's plan and he ain't telling no one, because he wants to be the coach. The fact remains, Walsh has several candidates and jax isn't the only one on that list. I think Walsh will wait a little longer to make a good decision.

The way I see it, if Walsh really wanted jax, he would have signed him by now. Not a good sign for jax and his fans. I mean if Walsh was so heads over heels about jax, then why would he make him wait? Makes no sense at all.

So you know Walsh is thinking hard about who he wants and like I said, if Walsh doesn't get what he wants, then jax is the emergency back up and jax is clearly standing in line, waiting and hoping that Walsh will sign the sucker.

If I remember correctly, I do believe Riley left' because the Knicks wouldn't give him a front office job. A piece of the action from above, like he has in Miami. And JVG. The media didn't burn him out. It was the forseeable bull**** that was coming. The crap we now know that took place in the last several years. Plus, I think being smashed in the face by a big Camby right pretty much said it all.

It's bad enough that you want to bring jax in, but wanting to bring in someone like Ewing makes me ill. These guys ended up being losers, and never won a ring. I never was one for stance or intimidating looks. I have always been one for 'what have you done for me today'.

Obviously, you want people who are from here, or who had a career here. I just want someone who has already proven that they can coach and win games. I'll guarantee you, that if jax had D'Antoni's record, back ground then I'd be pushing for him to be our coach also.

so now D'Antoni is a winner and Patrick is a loser? At least Patrick and Mark Jackson made the Finals. Let me tell you something else - if I had Steve Nash, Joe Johnson, Shawn Marion and Amare Stoudamire I could have figured out how to lose to the Spurs, too.

Patrick coach Dwight Howard and Yao Ming. Both made great strides under him. Were they talented players anyway? Sure. Did they get better under Patrick? Yes.

I want guys who want to be here and Mark Jackson and Ewing both clearly do. Not for the money, not the prestige, but because it's home.

But you can keep praying for D'Antoni and Lebron. I bet I get my wish first. D'Antoni is going to Chicago.
¿ △ ?
Walsh: Name Jackson the coach already and stop playing games.......

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy