[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

I dont see how we are going to pay Lee Nate + possiby Crawford and retain cap space
Author Thread
TrueBlue
Posts: 29144
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 9/20/2006
Member: #1172

4/9/2008  12:46 AM
Posted by Anji:
Posted by crzymdups:

anji, good run down. that's why I think we can't accept the options on balkman, collins and maybe even chandler. unless they develop into something special or at the least a top 8 rotation guy on the team, let them expire - sign a free for league minimum to take their spots. that would cut 5 to 10 million off the cap for summer 2010.

Basically we can't use MLE unless we subtract another one of the four(JC,JJ, JJ2, Zach) that are on the books in 10/11


Yes we can if necessary. We don't need to offer anything more than 2yrs. If we feel there's a player or players out there who can help us be competitive for the next 2yrs then we could offer the MLE or split it amongst those players.
LMFAO @ the Bio [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephon_Marbury[/url]
AUTOADVERT
Anji
Posts: 25523
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 4/14/2006
Member: #1122
USA
4/9/2008  12:48 AM
Posted by TrueBlue:
Posted by crzymdups:

anji, good run down. that's why I think we can't accept the options on balkman, collins and maybe even chandler. unless they develop into something special or at the least a top 8 rotation guy on the team, let them expire - sign a free for league minimum to take their spots. that would cut 5 to 10 million off the cap for summer 2010.

Actually there are few errors/unknowns in Anji's breakdown.

First of all our Cap number the start of 2008-2009 will be over $90mil once you include the pick if we move no one in the off-season. Anji meant to say at the end of the 2008-2009 season our cap number could look closer to $65mil all things unchanged with exception to what he cited.

Second of all we have no idea what DW's true intentions are for the MLE. He sounded like in the press conference he may not use it but in order to fill out the roster if he starts dumping contracts, he just might have too. Just because it's more advantageous for a player to sign a contract for 3ys or more does not mean we won't sign anyone to an MLE deal or for a good portion of the MLE. Nor does it mean DW will let it sit dormant for 2yrs(actually it would 3 considering we didn't use it this past season). Don't fool ourselves into thinking we'll sign someone like Ron Artest to a 2yr MLE contract is the main point. Take for instance Matt Barnes will be a Free Agent this summer, a player like him may want to sign an MLE deal say 2yrs at $4mil/yr. Theoretically we could(not to saying we will or should) use our MLE to sign someone of his caliber if DW were to dump some dead weight and young talent such as Jeffries/Chandler and/or Balkman/Q. Our Cap figure could increase over the next 2 seasons from trades, draft picks, and Contract Exemptions exercised. That's ok as long as when we hit the 3rd yr the greater majority comes off.

Third, come on, no way Nate signs for considerably less than the MLE. $4mil/yr for Nate are you kidding me. Marcus Banks got that and he's absolute garbage. 4yrs/$16mil would mean Nate's first yr salary would be less than $4mil. Keep on thinking we can low ball our own players and retain them. And I'm called a hater good grief. Nate would have to suffer a major injury keeping him out next yr for this to happen and even then it's doubtful. The MLE will be closer to $6mil than it will be $4mil.

Fourth at the end of the 2009-2010 season our cap number will not be $48mil more like $54-55mil all things unchanged with exception to draft picks, and Nate's low ball $4mil deal



[Edited by - TrueBlue on 04-08-2008 1:03 PM]
Yeah when I said the Cap next season it's for the year coming or beneath the the total before rookie options and increases in salary. I when threw it acouple of times, it's a rough estimate, but it is in the ball park.

Nate is a good 6th man, I gave him 4million per and averaged out to 4million per year. Barbosa is the best 6th man in the game and he got a deal that was 6.6 per, 4 million for Nate is a very reasonable deal IMO. But even if he got Banks or Barbosas deals, it is only a couple on million more per season. Not enough to effect if we can sign a max player assuming we did pretty much nothing but cut our rookies and trade enough of the 4 salaries on the books for 2 seasons.

And if walsh really wants to get under the cap the, we can not use the MLE for the next two seasons. It's just that simple. He is going he to use the LLE or sign vets to the minmium, but he can't add salary for those years because it's going to be hard enough to move the 15 million or so in space we need. Signing guys to the MLE only makes that number go up.

And the 2009 cap is 65, the 2010 is 59 which is were the cap should be in two years. 49 million is a typo.
"Really, all Americans want is a cold beer, warm p***y, and some place to s**t with a door on it." - Mr. Ford
Anji
Posts: 25523
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 4/14/2006
Member: #1122
USA
4/9/2008  12:58 AM
Posted by TrueBlue:
Posted by Anji:
Posted by crzymdups:

anji, good run down. that's why I think we can't accept the options on balkman, collins and maybe even chandler. unless they develop into something special or at the least a top 8 rotation guy on the team, let them expire - sign a free for league minimum to take their spots. that would cut 5 to 10 million off the cap for summer 2010.

Basically we can't use MLE unless we subtract another one of the four(JC,JJ, JJ2, Zach) that are on the books in 10/11


Yes we can if necessary. We don't need to offer anything more than 2yrs. If we feel there's a player or players out there who can help us be competitive for the next 2yrs then we could offer the MLE or split it amongst those players.
I am of the understanding that you can't sign a player for anything shorter then 3 years when you use the MLE. That is besides the point, he can't sign anybody for longer then the 2010 season if he can use it for one year.



[Edited by - anji on 04-09-2008 12:59 AM]
"Really, all Americans want is a cold beer, warm p***y, and some place to s**t with a door on it." - Mr. Ford
TrueBlue
Posts: 29144
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 9/20/2006
Member: #1172

4/9/2008  1:01 AM
Anji do you understand how the MLE works? You do know you can sign someone to a 1yr MLE deal correct? You can sign a player on an MLE deal 1-5yrs.
MID-LEVEL SALARY EXCEPTION -- This exception allows a team to sign any free agent to a contract equal to the average salary, even if they are over the cap (see question number 24 for the definition of "average salary." Also note that for 2005-06 they used a defined figure of $5 million). This exception may be split and given to multiple players. It may be used for contracts of up to five years in length, and raises are limited to 8% of the salary in the first year of the contract. Signing a player to a multi-year contract does not affect a team's ability to use this exception every year. For example, a team can sign a player to a five-year contract using this exception and still use the exception the following year to sign another player. Also see question number 20 for more information on the availability and use of this exception.

If the player is a restricted free agent with one or two years of service and receives an offer sheet from a new team, the player's prior team may use the Mid-Level exception to match the offer sheet (see question number 36 for restricted free agency).

Here are the actual values of this exception for each season. Note that since this exception is based on the average player salary, the actual value of this exception is not determined until the start of the free agent signing period.


It's really a matter if we'll want to and if there are any interested FA who'll come here for short deals.
LMFAO @ the Bio [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephon_Marbury[/url]
Siar617
Posts: 21459
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/15/2007
Member: #1742
USA
4/9/2008  1:41 AM
after jr smith no free agents interest me
so i say if we dont get him save your money
dont bring in ron unless you want to put the mayor at the 2 and jc at the point
if that happen it would probly meen we didn't get rose
jesus617 walks
I dont see how we are going to pay Lee Nate + possiby Crawford and retain cap space

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy