Posted by TrueBlue:
Posted by crzymdups:
anji, good run down. that's why I think we can't accept the options on balkman, collins and maybe even chandler. unless they develop into something special or at the least a top 8 rotation guy on the team, let them expire - sign a free for league minimum to take their spots. that would cut 5 to 10 million off the cap for summer 2010.
Actually there are few errors/unknowns in Anji's breakdown.
First of all our Cap number the start of 2008-2009 will be over $90mil once you include the pick if we move no one in the off-season. Anji meant to say at the end of the 2008-2009 season our cap number could look closer to $65mil all things unchanged with exception to what he cited.
Second of all we have no idea what DW's true intentions are for the MLE. He sounded like in the press conference he may not use it but in order to fill out the roster if he starts dumping contracts, he just might have too. Just because it's more advantageous for a player to sign a contract for 3ys or more does not mean we won't sign anyone to an MLE deal or for a good portion of the MLE. Nor does it mean DW will let it sit dormant for 2yrs(actually it would 3 considering we didn't use it this past season). Don't fool ourselves into thinking we'll sign someone like Ron Artest to a 2yr MLE contract is the main point. Take for instance Matt Barnes will be a Free Agent this summer, a player like him may want to sign an MLE deal say 2yrs at $4mil/yr. Theoretically we could(not to saying we will or should) use our MLE to sign someone of his caliber if DW were to dump some dead weight and young talent such as Jeffries/Chandler and/or Balkman/Q. Our Cap figure could increase over the next 2 seasons from trades, draft picks, and Contract Exemptions exercised. That's ok as long as when we hit the 3rd yr the greater majority comes off.
Third, come on, no way Nate signs for considerably less than the MLE. $4mil/yr for Nate are you kidding me. Marcus Banks got that and he's absolute garbage. 4yrs/$16mil would mean Nate's first yr salary would be less than $4mil. Keep on thinking we can low ball our own players and retain them. And I'm called a hater good grief. Nate would have to suffer a major injury keeping him out next yr for this to happen and even then it's doubtful. The MLE will be closer to $6mil than it will be $4mil.
Fourth at the end of the 2009-2010 season our cap number will not be $48mil more like $54-55mil all things unchanged with exception to draft picks, and Nate's low ball $4mil deal
[Edited by - TrueBlue on 04-08-2008 1:03 PM]
Yeah when I said the Cap next season it's for the year coming or beneath the the total before rookie options and increases in salary. I when threw it acouple of times, it's a rough estimate, but it is in the ball park.
Nate is a good 6th man, I gave him 4million per and averaged out to 4million per year. Barbosa is the best 6th man in the game and he got a deal that was 6.6 per, 4 million for Nate is a very reasonable deal IMO. But even if he got Banks or Barbosas deals, it is only a couple on million more per season. Not enough to effect if we can sign a max player assuming we did pretty much nothing but cut our rookies and trade enough of the 4 salaries on the books for 2 seasons.
And if walsh really wants to get under the cap the, we can not use the MLE for the next two seasons. It's just that simple. He is going he to use the LLE or sign vets to the minmium, but he can't add salary for those years because it's going to be hard enough to move the 15 million or so in space we need. Signing guys to the MLE only makes that number go up.
And the 2009 cap is 65, the 2010 is 59 which is were the cap should be in two years. 49 million is a typo.
"Really, all Americans want is a cold beer, warm p***y, and some place to s**t with a door on it." - Mr. Ford