|
TheGame
Posts: 26652
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2006
Member: #1154 USA
|
I agree with the concept because this team needs to do alot of addition by subtraction. If this team did not have Marbury, Curry, Randolph, Q, or Rose and we gave those minutes to Balkman, Chandler, Morris, Collins, with Nate starting at pg, I honestly believe we would have won 10 more games than where we are at. I think Randolph can stay if he learns to stop holding the ball so much, but every other "veteran" needs to go. A team of Nate, Crawford, Balkman, Randolph, and Morris, with Lee, Chandler, and Collins coming off the bench would be good for 35 wins. Morris is already a better defender and rebounder than Curry and he has a decent post game. Balkman will provide more energy than Q and he won't take as many shots. Nate has shown that he has developed into the best pg this team has and though he is a knuckle head sometimes, he plays with heart and determination. Collins, Lee, and Chandler give us good solid players to man the second unit. And guess what, the total payroll of that team is about $50-55 million (includnig Big Snacks (who might actually have a role on the team if we get rid of Curry) and fumbling Jeffries).
Trust the Process
|