I disagree. My money's on Cleveland. Weren't you a big believer in "best player usually wins" philosophy? Or do you think Lebron isn't the best player in that potential series?
Not exactly.
I'm a big believe in the "best team wins philosphy".
Frequently, but not always, that begins with having the best player.
Lebron might be the best player ina Boston/Cleveland matchup but Garnett is right up there with him, and Pierce and Allen are both bona fide stars, probably going to the HOF. In addition they have shown the ability and willingness to play as a team, which makes them very formidable.
The "best player" still needs to have enough support, Jordan learned it and so has Kobe. If all it took was to simply have the best player, then LeBron + 4 guys from Ultimate Knicks could win the championship.
Boston's achilles heel is depth. As we have seen, if they lose one of the "Big 3", especially Garnet, tehy are not nearly as good. But if they are healthy and all other situations are equal, I think Boston is the better team(As much as I hate to admit it.).
oohah