[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

David Lee has earned the right to start and get 35-38 minutes
Author Thread
PresIke
Posts: 27671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/26/2001
Member: #33
USA
2/2/2008  3:56 PM
I haven't watched a lot of Miami, but I do think Lee is better than Haslem.
Forum Po Po and #33 for a reason...
AUTOADVERT
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
2/2/2008  4:35 PM
Posted by newyorknewyork:

Im can bet Haslem's solid defense the last 2 seasons has had a lot to do with Shaq & Mourning patroling the middle along side of him. Im sure David Lee's defense would all of a sudden look a lot better if he had Shaq & Mourning in 06 & 07. Averaging 4 blocks a game between them over the past 2 yrs not counting this season.

Not to mention a true superstar like Dwayne Wade. Shaq, Mourning, Wade easily have made Haslem better than he is. Switch Lee with Haslem and I can bet his defense doesn't look that good with Curry, Randolph as his fellow big men. I can also bet Lee would be looking close to allstar calibre with those calibre players covering for him.

Isiah Thomas wouldn't trade Lee for Haslem straight up salary wise or not.

You think Lee's defense would look as good as Haslem's has if he had Shaq and Mourning? I beg to differ because Haslem actually plays defense and Lee does not. maybe Lee wouldn't have been exposed as much. However, Shaq is no great defensive player especially in his time at Miami.

You think Haslem's defense wouldn't be better than Lee's if he was on the Knicks? I beg to differ because again, Haslem actually plays defense.

Superstar players can help a role player out, but they don't make Haslem play good defense and hit his 15 foot shot with regularity. Would Lee be money from 15 feet like Haslem if he played on Miami too?

I think that on Maimi, Lee would be the same player he is now, but with a better won-loss record for his career.

I think on New York, Haslem would average over 40 minutes per game and average more points, rebounds etc, than he has with Miami because he would have to pick up much more slack, take more shots and generally be relied on to do much more. And he would be able to do more because he has more than 2 skills. And haslem's defense wouldn't be swiss-cheese no matter if he had Shaq or Mourning or Curry and Randolph.

oohah
Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
King1
Posts: 22993
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/2/2005
Member: #998
USA
2/2/2008  5:40 PM
I think we they played each other earlier in the season they both guarded each other and they both had aboyt 14 points and 14 boards and Riley applauded both o them going at each other. How can Lee a bad offensive player have 14 against Haslem is he is such a good defender?
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
2/2/2008  7:53 PM
Posted by King1:

I think we they played each other earlier in the season they both guarded each other and they both had aboyt 14 points and 14 boards and Riley applauded both o them going at each other. How can Lee a bad offensive player have 14 against Haslem is he is such a good defender?

King, I am not saying that Haslem is twice as good as Lee or anything extreme like that. What I am saying is that Haslem is a more rounded player who can contribute in many different areas offensively as well as defensively, and that makes him a better player overall.

***

I have a totally unrelated question for you: If David Lee played with Karl Malone in his prime, who would be the right guy to start and get the majority of the minutes?

Personally, I think Malone should start. I think you would pick David Lee, am I wrong?


oohah
Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
2/2/2008  8:08 PM
Posted by oohah:
Posted by King1:

I think we they played each other earlier in the season they both guarded each other and they both had aboyt 14 points and 14 boards and Riley applauded both o them going at each other. How can Lee a bad offensive player have 14 against Haslem is he is such a good defender?

King, I am not saying that Haslem is twice as good as Lee or anything extreme like that. What I am saying is that Haslem is a more rounded player who can contribute in many different areas offensively as well as defensively, and that makes him a better player overall.

***

I have a totally unrelated question for you: If David Lee played with Karl Malone in his prime, who would be the right guy to start and get the majority of the minutes?

Personally, I think Malone should start. I think you would pick David Lee, am I wrong?


oohah
I'd start both, unless you had an excellent center (which I don't the Jazz ever had). Malone could guard any center in the league well enough to justify starting Lee. My guess is that most coaches would at least play Malone and Lee together for a huge chunk of the game (if not starting both).
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
2/2/2008  9:43 PM
Posted by oohah:
Posted by King1:

I think we they played each other earlier in the season they both guarded each other and they both had aboyt 14 points and 14 boards and Riley applauded both o them going at each other. How can Lee a bad offensive player have 14 against Haslem is he is such a good defender?

King, I am not saying that Haslem is twice as good as Lee or anything extreme like that. What I am saying is that Haslem is a more rounded player who can contribute in many different areas offensively as well as defensively, and that makes him a better player overall.

***

I have a totally unrelated question for you: If David Lee played with Karl Malone in his prime, who would be the right guy to start and get the majority of the minutes?

Personally, I think Malone should start. I think you would pick David Lee, am I wrong?


oohah

Sorry for jumping in but it is not fair to compare Lee and Haslem.
Pick somebody who is only 3 years in the league at PF position and compare with Lee.
When Lee will be 5 years in NBA we can compare what he did and what haslem din in first 5 years.
Player needs time to become well rounded. Especially big.







"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
2/2/2008  10:10 PM
I'd start both, unless you had an excellent center (which I don't the Jazz ever had). Malone could guard any center in the league well enough to justify starting Lee. My guess is that most coaches would at least play Malone and Lee together for a huge chunk of the game (if not starting both).

If you insist on obfuscating the question Bonn, let's assume that the center was Mark Eaton.

Now what is your answer?

oohah

Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
King1
Posts: 22993
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/2/2005
Member: #998
USA
2/2/2008  11:06 PM
Oohah you say Lee wasnt efective in the 4th quarter Randolph and Crawford took almost 80% of shots in the quarter turned the ball over and never attempted to pass the ball. Lee man never doubles and it drives me crazy when people say he does. He is always getting face guarded so he wont get an offensive rebound. I am a huge UD fan but I think if Lee played for a real coach and a real team he would shine.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
2/3/2008  7:00 AM
Posted by oohah:
I'd start both, unless you had an excellent center (which I don't the Jazz ever had). Malone could guard any center in the league well enough to justify starting Lee. My guess is that most coaches would at least play Malone and Lee together for a huge chunk of the game (if not starting both).

If you insist on obfuscating the question Bonn, let's assume that the center was Mark Eaton.

Now what is your answer?

oohah
Start both (like I already said)
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

2/3/2008  9:41 AM
The debate over Haslem and David Lee is overblown.

Knicks have their own debate with Zach/Lee. Personally, I love both players. If only one of them were 2 inches taller.

One might have to eventually leave, but I can see them go if that means the Knicks get better as a team.
Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
2/3/2008  11:56 AM
Posted by King1:

Oohah you say Lee wasnt efective in the A. 4th quarter Randolph and Crawford took almost 80% of shots in the quarter turned the ball over and never attempted to pass the ball. B. Lee man never doubles and it drives me crazy when people say he does. He is always getting face guarded so he wont get an offensive rebound. I am a huge UD fan but C. I think if Lee played for a real coach and a real team he would shine.

A. You mean you think Lee should be trying to create offense instead of Randolph or Crawford?

B. Lee's man double all the time. Especially when he steps 5 feet away from the basket.

C. You mean Lee isn't shining? I think he's playing pretty well. Do you mean if Lee played for a "real coach" he would al of a sudden start hitting J's and playing D?

I'm just wondering.

oohah





Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
2/3/2008  12:01 PM
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by oohah:
I'd start both, unless you had an excellent center (which I don't the Jazz ever had). Malone could guard any center in the league well enough to justify starting Lee. My guess is that most coaches would at least play Malone and Lee together for a huge chunk of the game (if not starting both).

If you insist on obfuscating the question Bonn, let's assume that the center was Mark Eaton.

Now what is your answer?

oohah
Start both (like I already said)

So you have Lee starting over accomplished small forwards played very good D and shot with range like Tyrone Corbin or Bryon Houston?

oohah

Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
2/3/2008  12:31 PM
Posted by oohah:
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by oohah:
I'd start both, unless you had an excellent center (which I don't the Jazz ever had). Malone could guard any center in the league well enough to justify starting Lee. My guess is that most coaches would at least play Malone and Lee together for a huge chunk of the game (if not starting both).

If you insist on obfuscating the question Bonn, let's assume that the center was Mark Eaton.

Now what is your answer?

oohah
Start both (like I already said)

So you have Lee starting over accomplished small forwards played very good D and shot with range like Tyrone Corbin or Bryon Houston?

oohah
Lee starts over Mark Eaton and Malone plays center. (See initial post.)
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30260
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
2/3/2008  12:35 PM
Posted by oohah:
Posted by newyorknewyork:

Haslem averaged 49fg% 68ft% 10pts 8rebs in 31mins last season.
Lee averaged 60fg% 81ft% 10pts 10rebs 29mins last season.

Haslem averages 47.5fg% 79ft%, 9rebs, 12pts in 37mins this season
Lee averagages 55fg%, 80ft%, 8rebs, 10pts in 27mins this season.

He averages 2 less pts, 1 less rebound in 10 less mins. Plus he comes off the bench behind Zach Randolph while Haslem is the starter on Miami. Plus the fact that Haslem has had the luxary of playing along side of Shaq.

Not only is Lee more productive per mins than Haslem. What really seperates him from Haslem is his intangibles. Then we could look at physical attributes. Lee is 6-9 249, Haslem is 6'8 230. Lee also has more athletism than Haslem. So Lee is basically bigger, more atheltic, and more intangible than Haslem. As well as more productive per mins than Haslem.

On a side note. If Randolph had a higher basketball IQ. Which would probably help him drastically in the team concept of basketball he would be a great player.

New York,

You're comparing numbers in a vacuum, you have to look at what they do, not just straight stats.

Haslem steps outside and routinely knocks down 15 footers which helps open up the floor for Wade and Shaq. The defense can't just leave Haslem like they do Lee. If Lee steps more than 5 feet from the basket he doesn't do much of anything. It's great that Lee stays within himself, but that accounts for Lee's high field goal percentage and the extra rebounds compared to Haslem. If Lee shoots 5 15-footers a game, that would be 5 more missed shots and a couple less rebounds per game. There goes the great rebound average and shooting percentage.

Intangibles: Haslem plays good D, Lee plays horrible defense. Haslem provides a viable alternative offensive threat so teams can't just leave him and double Shaq or Wade, Lee is not guarded a lot of the time. Both are known for making scrappy plays.

Athleticism: Lee is more athletic by a good margin, but it hasn't translated into anything but rebounds and dunks. Certainly not defense.

Wins: Haslem has been a starter on a championship team and has been on a winning team 4 out of his 5 years in the NBA. Is it luck? Partially. But the other part is that he has been able to contribute in many different ways: rebounding, shooting, defense, and hustle. At this point, Lee only contributes rebounding and (offensive) hustle.

I'll give you a good example.: By all accounts, Lee had a great game last night vs. the Blazers. But down the stretch he was ineffective. The Blazers double teamed Randolph and Crawford and totally shut down the Knicks' offense. If we had Haslem out there instead of Lee, Haslem would have feasted on 10-15 foot jumpers and he would have played some defense to boot.

oohah

Instead of Lee shooting 15fters he would be cutting to the basket when they double team Shaq with Lee's man. Shaq's passing out of the post is light years better than Curry & Randolph. Or if Lee got the ball open 15 feet from the basket. He would put the ball on the floor which he is solid at, and take it to the rack. Probably get fouled where he shoots 80% from the field. Or shoot a 7-5ft hook where he shoots 55-60% from the field. Or make the bigs commit and pass the ball which he is pretty damn good at for a big man. No he wouldn't be able to knock down the 15fters like Haslem can but that wouldn't render him useless. Especially with a skilled high IQ player like Shaq to play along side of. He hasn't been able to knock down 15fters in NY but he still seems to work well with either Curry or Randolph.

I think you are giving Haslem to much credit for the success of the Heat over the last few yrs. Shaq is only putting up 14pts 8rebs, Mourning is playing 16mins a game, Wade is dealing with injuries left and right and the Heat are the worst team in the NBA while Haslem is getting 37mins a game. He obviosly isn't impacting the game to much while Shaq & Mourning are a shell of themselves. The season before they got Shaq they had Wade, Caron Butler, Eddie Jones, Lamar Odom, Brian Grant, Alston & Haslem.

The way I see it, its product of environment. Haslem has had the luxary of playing with Superstars & proffessionals like Wade, Shaq, Mourning. And had the luxary of being coached by Pat Riley over the past few yrs. Lee has had the luxary of playing with Marbury, Crawford, Curry, Randolph. Lee has had the luxary of being coached by Isiah Thomas over the past few yrs. Haslem has been lucky enough to be on a Heat team that has had some of there best yrs. Lee has been lucky enough to be on a Knicks team that has had some of the worst yrs in the history of sports. Replace Lee with Haslem. Wade, Shaq, Mourning would cover his weaknesses and Riley would put him in a position to succeed and he would look like a star role player. While on the Knicks all of Haslems flaws would be exploited and he would be in a toxic basketball environment.
https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
Vmart
Posts: 31800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/23/2002
Member: #247
USA
2/3/2008  12:47 PM
For all the great things Lee does there is nothing more deflating than his jump shot. I haven't watched the Knicks much lately don't care to but Lee must improve his jumper to be significant in the NBA until then he is as insignificant as his team.
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30260
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
2/3/2008  12:51 PM
Posted by oohah:
Posted by newyorknewyork:

Im can bet Haslem's solid defense the last 2 seasons has had a lot to do with Shaq & Mourning patroling the middle along side of him. Im sure David Lee's defense would all of a sudden look a lot better if he had Shaq & Mourning in 06 & 07. Averaging 4 blocks a game between them over the past 2 yrs not counting this season.

Not to mention a true superstar like Dwayne Wade. Shaq, Mourning, Wade easily have made Haslem better than he is. Switch Lee with Haslem and I can bet his defense doesn't look that good with Curry, Randolph as his fellow big men. I can also bet Lee would be looking close to allstar calibre with those calibre players covering for him.

Isiah Thomas wouldn't trade Lee for Haslem straight up salary wise or not.

You think Lee's defense would look as good as Haslem's has if he had Shaq and Mourning? I beg to differ because Haslem actually plays defense and Lee does not. maybe Lee wouldn't have been exposed as much. However, Shaq is no great defensive player especially in his time at Miami.

You think Haslem's defense wouldn't be better than Lee's if he was on the Knicks? I beg to differ because again, Haslem actually plays defense.

Superstar players can help a role player out, but they don't make Haslem play good defense and hit his 15 foot shot with regularity. Would Lee be money from 15 feet like Haslem if he played on Miami too?

I think that on Maimi, Lee would be the same player he is now, but with a better won-loss record for his career.

I think on New York, Haslem would average over 40 minutes per game and average more points, rebounds etc, than he has with Miami because he would have to pick up much more slack, take more shots and generally be relied on to do much more. And he would be able to do more because he has more than 2 skills. And haslem's defense wouldn't be swiss-cheese no matter if he had Shaq or Mourning or Curry and Randolph.

oohah

There is no way, he averages 40mins on the Knicks with Randolph & Curry. He would average around the same mins Lee is averaging right now, 27-29. In Miami he is relied on to pick up more slack with all that has gone down over there this yr. Again he is averaging 37mins and is putting up 12pts 9rebs. While Shaq is putting up 14pts 8rebs. In 37mins Lee woudl be putting up 15pts 12rebs even without 15ft jumper. While Haslems defense is better than Lee's, he doesn't shut anyone down either. He has definatly feed off of the presence of Shaq & Mourning in the post on defense in the past.
https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
2/3/2008  12:57 PM
Lee starts over Mark Eaton and Malone plays center. (See initial post.)

Wow. So you have Lee starting at center over Mark Eaton, who was widely considered to be the best defensive center in the game for at least 5 years.

Now I done heard it all.

By the way, lee doesn't get the start over Osterfag either because Osterfag is a center and Lee is not.

oohah

Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
2/3/2008  1:24 PM
Posted by oohah:
Lee starts over Mark Eaton and Malone plays center. (See initial post.)

Wow. So you have Lee starting at center over Mark Eaton, who was widely considered to be the best defensive center in the game for at least 5 years.

Now I done heard it all.

By the way, lee doesn't get the start over Osterfag either because Osterfag is a center and Lee is not.

oohah
No. I have Malone starting at center. There must be some serious communication problem here. I'm sure Eaton would still get his career average of 28 mpg with me anyway.

[Edited by - bonn1997 on 02-03-2008 1:24 PM]
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
2/3/2008  2:21 PM
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by oohah:
Lee starts over Mark Eaton and Malone plays center. (See initial post.)

Wow. So you have Lee starting at center over Mark Eaton, who was widely considered to be the best defensive center in the game for at least 5 years.

Now I done heard it all.

By the way, lee doesn't get the start over Osterfag either because Osterfag is a center and Lee is not.

oohah
No. I have Malone starting at center. There must be some serious communication problem here. I'm sure Eaton would still get his career average of 28 mpg with me anyway.

[Edited by - bonn1997 on 02-03-2008 1:24 PM]

Yes, I guess the communication problem is where you have Malone playing center, which he did not do on a regular basis at all during his career, and you have Eaton coming off the bench so Lee can start PF.

It's just not getting through to me. I guess it is just too absurd to sink in.

oohah

Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
David Lee has earned the right to start and get 35-38 minutes

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy