[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

I would mix up the starting lineup
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
Page 3 of 4 ‹ Previous 1  2  3  4 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
1/13/2008  9:10 PM
Posted by bitty41:
Unless you have three very good big man, you could use a good power forward.

So it would make sense for a very good team like SA for example to bring in Zach to play behind Tim Duncan? This was just another lame attempt by King to take a shot at Zach.

Good teams are good teams because they are not in need of core players duh

Or in the Blazers case you become a good team when you trade your stat-whote PF.
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
AUTOADVERT
SlimPack
Posts: 23588
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/14/2005
Member: #1009
USA
1/13/2008  9:10 PM
Oh well, it looks like Zach Randolph's ball hogging antics served him well tonight. But it's mostly because the Pistons are still in Charlotte.
BlueSeats
Posts: 27272
Alba Posts: 41
Joined: 11/6/2005
Member: #1024
1/13/2008  9:11 PM
Posted by bitty41:
Posted by King1:

Bitty you really think a good team would trade for Zach? We gave up nothing for him there is a reason. Enyspree I was trying to tell you who was starting tonight just having a little fun

Name a good team in need of a power forward.

The Magic, Pistons. Lakers, Nuggets, Hornets, Rockets come to mind.
bitty41
Posts: 22316
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 12/3/2006
Member: #1215
1/13/2008  9:13 PM
Blue

I said good team not pretenders and the Pistons though tonight they got housed are not in need of a power forward.


Good teams if you weren't aware Dallas, Phoenix, SA, Boston, Detroit those are the good teams.
BlueSeats
Posts: 27272
Alba Posts: 41
Joined: 11/6/2005
Member: #1024
1/13/2008  9:17 PM
Posted by bitty41:

Blue

I said good team not pretenders and the Pistons though tonight they got housed are not in need of a power forward.


Good teams if you weren't aware Dallas, Phoenix, SA, Boston, Detroit those are the good teams.


All the teams I mentioned are over .500, and the Pistons don't have a PF of Zach's "caliber".

But what was your point in asking? The real question is, who'd be willing to give up a good package for Zach. What do you come up with?
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397
1/13/2008  9:17 PM
Bitty and king - could you guys have this fight wearing bikinis? Oh yeah mud or baby oil? I'll let you guys decide.
Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
martin
Posts: 80255
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
1/13/2008  9:19 PM
^ Jello!
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
SlimPack
Posts: 23588
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/14/2005
Member: #1009
USA
1/13/2008  9:19 PM
Posted by EnySpree:

Bitty and king - could you guys have this fight wearing bikinis? Oh yeah mud or baby oil? I'll let you guys decide.

I'm going to have to give a thumbs down to seeing King1 in a bikini

[Edited by - Slimpack on 01-13-2008 9:19 PM]
bitty41
Posts: 22316
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 12/3/2006
Member: #1215
1/13/2008  9:19 PM
Posted by BlueSeats:
Posted by bitty41:

Blue

I said good team not pretenders and the Pistons though tonight they got housed are not in need of a power forward.


Good teams if you weren't aware Dallas, Phoenix, SA, Boston, Detroit those are the good teams.


All the teams I mentioned are over .500, and the Pistons don't have a PF of Zach's "caliber".

But what was your point in asking? The real question is, who'd be willing to give up a good package for Zach. What do you come up with?


I have no idea same as everyone else on this board seeing that no one here myself included is a NBA GM


We go through almost on a monthly basis NO ONE WANTS ZACH BLAH BLAH who the hell cares at this point focus on the most important issue which is getting Isiah and Marbury out of NY.
King1
Posts: 22993
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/2/2005
Member: #998
USA
1/13/2008  9:23 PM
Bitty any GM or coach will get rid of Steph, Zach, and Quentin and instantly be a better team.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
1/13/2008  9:25 PM
Why limit the discussion to good teams? Why do average teams not want Zach? Why do bad teams also not want Zach? Why does no one on the planet other than Isiah and Bitty want Zach?
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
1/13/2008  9:27 PM
Posted by bitty41:
Unless you have three very good big man, you could use a good power forward.

So it would make sense for a very good team like SA for example to bring in Zach to play behind Tim Duncan? This was just another lame attempt by King to take a shot at Zach.
[Edited by - bitty41 on 01-13-2008 9:10 PM]
If Dallas could get a solid, 2 way PF cheaply, they would. If, for example, they could get Boozer or even David West for just an expiring contract, you know they would. Duncan would just play more min at center. They wouldn't touch Zach with a ten foot pole though.


[Edited by - bonn1997 on 01-13-2008 9:27 PM]
SlimPack
Posts: 23588
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/14/2005
Member: #1009
USA
1/13/2008  9:27 PM
I think there's a chance some GM will take Zach because he can put up flashy numbers. Despite tonight's game I still want him traded, they looked good because they mostly went in but it still doesn't change the fact that Zach is a ball hog.
bitty41
Posts: 22316
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 12/3/2006
Member: #1215
1/13/2008  9:32 PM
Posted by EnySpree:

Bitty and king - could you guys have this fight wearing bikinis? Oh yeah mud or baby oil? I'll let you guys decide.

Do you guys really want to see King and his side kick Bonn

SlimPack
Posts: 23588
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/14/2005
Member: #1009
USA
1/13/2008  9:33 PM
^ U was definately happier before I saw that.
bitty41
Posts: 22316
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 12/3/2006
Member: #1215
1/13/2008  9:34 PM
Posted by King1:

Bitty any GM or coach will get rid of Steph, Zach, and Quentin and instantly be a better team.

So keep Jared Jefferies, Jerome James, Malik Rose b/c you know those guys contribute a lot to the roster or better yet lets keep building around a career 4 rebound average center. Yup sounds like a good plan to me.
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397
1/13/2008  9:35 PM
Hey king - just bustin your chops man. Keep on keepin us guessin.....its annoyin but fun.
Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
bitty41
Posts: 22316
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 12/3/2006
Member: #1215
1/13/2008  9:35 PM
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by bitty41:
Unless you have three very good big man, you could use a good power forward.

So it would make sense for a very good team like SA for example to bring in Zach to play behind Tim Duncan? This was just another lame attempt by King to take a shot at Zach.
[Edited by - bitty41 on 01-13-2008 9:10 PM]
If Dallas could get a solid, 2 way PF cheaply, they would. If, for example, they could get Boozer or even David West for just an expiring contract, you know they would. Duncan would just play more min at center. They wouldn't touch Zach with a ten foot pole though.


[Edited by - bonn1997 on 01-13-2008 9:27 PM]

Bonn just stop please STOP your talking complete nonesense.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
1/13/2008  9:39 PM
Posted by bitty41:
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by bitty41:
Unless you have three very good big man, you could use a good power forward.

So it would make sense for a very good team like SA for example to bring in Zach to play behind Tim Duncan? This was just another lame attempt by King to take a shot at Zach.
[Edited by - bitty41 on 01-13-2008 9:10 PM]
If Dallas could get a solid, 2 way PF cheaply, they would. If, for example, they could get Boozer or even David West for just an expiring contract, you know they would. Duncan would just play more min at center. They wouldn't touch Zach with a ten foot pole though.


[Edited by - bonn1997 on 01-13-2008 9:27 PM]

Bonn just stop please STOP your talking complete nonesense.
Sorry the truth hurts
bitty41
Posts: 22316
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 12/3/2006
Member: #1215
1/13/2008  9:43 PM
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by bitty41:
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by bitty41:
Unless you have three very good big man, you could use a good power forward.

So it would make sense for a very good team like SA for example to bring in Zach to play behind Tim Duncan? This was just another lame attempt by King to take a shot at Zach.
[Edited by - bitty41 on 01-13-2008 9:10 PM]
If Dallas could get a solid, 2 way PF cheaply, they would. If, for example, they could get Boozer or even David West for just an expiring contract, you know they would. Duncan would just play more min at center. They wouldn't touch Zach with a ten foot pole though.


[Edited by - bonn1997 on 01-13-2008 9:27 PM]

Bonn just stop please STOP your talking complete nonesense.
Sorry the truth hurts


More like utter fantasy b/c there's a chance NO or Utah is giving up either of those guys for expiring contracts thats why I called it nonesense.
Page 3 of 4 ‹ Previous 1  2  3  4 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
I would mix up the starting lineup
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy