Author | Thread |
AUTOADVERT |
majorleads
Posts: 20536 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 11/29/2006 Member: #1213 |
![]() Posted by TMS: Why is the evidence shaky? It wasn't shaky with regards to Pettitte. I haven't heard anything from Paul Lo Duca and the majority of players named. You'd think all these players would come out furiously denying they did roids and sue. Nope of course not because they are all guilty! Anyway, below is a link to a nice roundup from ESPN which links each player in the report to Radomski, McNamee and steroids. Although with some players there is not a paper trail, you would have to assume Radomski and McNamee are telling the truth because why in the hell would they rattle off players who they don't have a paper trail from? http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=3153646 http://majorleads.blogspot.com
|
TMS
Posts: 60684 Alba Posts: 617 Joined: 5/11/2004 Member: #674 USA |
![]() Posted by majorleads:Posted by TMS: last time i checked David Justice was vehemently denying the allegations the day they were made public. & if there's a paper trail let them be made public before we formulate final judgements... that is the only thing i'm asking for here... to base everything off hearsay testimony is not only irresponsible, it's also a very dangerous practice. if you've ever been falsely accused of something yourself & had to spend a night in jail because of it you'd know what i'm talking about... you have to get some real evidence before you come out public w/something like this... you're messing around w/people's families, reputations & livelihoods. After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
|