[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

KNICKS WAIVE JORDAN, NICHOLS & WALKER
Author Thread
jaydh
Posts: 23181
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/16/2001
Member: #96
10/25/2007  12:22 PM
Posted by franco12:

In 2-3 years, I bet Nichols is a better 2g than crawford & freddy jones COMBINED

he is probably already better than crawful. i'm sure he shoots at a better clip, and JC really doesnt do anything else but shoot.
AUTOADVERT
Allanfan20
Posts: 36031
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
10/25/2007  12:30 PM
Nice going Isiah. Oohah, it's a big deal when you can keep Nichols, but crap ars players like Jared and Jerome are unmoveable. Oohah, how on Earth can you possibly say Matt Carroll is better when NOBODY here knows how good an NBA player Nichols can be. Tell me, do you think Wilson Chandler is better too cause we've barely seen much of him too.
“I couldn’t dunk it so I tried to, you know, just touched it.”- OG Anunoby
fishmike
Posts: 53903
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
10/25/2007  12:34 PM
Posted by Allanfan20:

Nice going Isiah. Oohah, it's a big deal when you can keep Nichols, but crap ars players like Jared and Jerome are unmoveable. Oohah, how on Earth can you possibly say Matt Carroll is better when NOBODY here knows how good an NBA player Nichols can be. Tell me, do you think Wilson Chandler is better too cause we've barely seen much of him too.
thats the Isiah regime.

rvhoss went on and on about how Jerome James made sense because "we NEEDED a center."

What we need is a young team of guys that play hard. What we need is talent. What we need is players that can improve and grow. Even if we dont have high picks we need to add players that have a shot at becoming a good NBA player. Jerome James represents none of those things.. yet here we are. Waiving young players because we have him taking up a roster space.

Are those guys going to get us to the playoffs? To a title? Probably not. But they are more examples of how this team and GM constantly makes mistakes and wastes resources.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
majorleads
Posts: 20536
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/29/2006
Member: #1213

10/25/2007  12:39 PM
Guess Dolan finally forced Isiah to be a real NBA general manager and not a fantasy leaguer. Richie Rich finally put his foot down and told Zeke he's not buying out losers like Jerome James. Just think how awful this team would be if Isiah actually had to be a real gm and not allowed to buy all those players and draft picks.
http://majorleads.blogspot.com
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
10/25/2007  12:39 PM
Posted by Allanfan20:

Nice going Isiah. Oohah, it's a big deal when you can keep Nichols, but crap ars players like Jared and Jerome are unmoveable. Oohah, how on Earth can you possibly say Matt Carroll is better when NOBODY here knows how good an NBA player Nichols can be. Tell me, do you think Wilson Chandler is better too cause we've barely seen much of him too.

I can say Carrol is better because I watched them both and I have seen what they can do. Yes, Chandler is better. I've seen him play. He can do many things and Nichols can do one thing.

oohah

Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
10/25/2007  12:40 PM
Posted by majorleads:

Guess Dolan finally forced Isiah to be a real NBA general manager and not a fantasy leaguer. Richie Rich finally put his foot down and told Zeke he's not buying out losers like Jerome James. Just think how awful this team would be if Isiah actually had to be a real gm and not allowed to buy all those players and draft picks.

He would have been forced to waive Balkman and Lee now, before they ever had a chance to prove they could do anything at this level. Just like Nichols.

Let's be serious. Isiah is, and never was, a real gm.
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
10/25/2007  12:43 PM
when carrol was in knicks camp he could shoot then and he can shoot now. Portlan cutting him means nothing because portland was basically a tire fire back then. The spurs? well I can see that, they were stocked.

Carrol is a good bench player on a bad team? year charlotte is bad, but no worse then us last year, that is for sure, and he is a legit contributor on that team, unless you think they gave him a multi year deal, near 30 mil, for just being a decent back up on a bad team. You can spin it how you want. Shooters in this league are at a premium, carrol can shoot, and nichols can shoot, plus he is 6'8 and showed the potential to be a good defender. We cut him, wasting a second round pick, and still keeping useless jerome james on this team. I really thought this team was trying to move forward... damn

I prefer Carrol to Crawford. The point is, we were unable to develop a player like him at that point and the same holds for a lot of other teams. So can be a good bench player for a bad Charlotte or a bad Knicks. Not much difference in result.

My point is this: It ain't no big deal. Everyone can get all wound up about it all they want. If nichols develops into a good bench player on a bad team in 3 years good for him, I could not care less.

oohah

Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
EnySpree
Posts: 44925
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

10/25/2007  12:44 PM
This sucks man. What was the point of picking both guys up? Id like to think he planned on keeping them but couldn't get a deal made.

Oh well. Nichols is gonna be a threat somewhere. Good luck to him.

Jordan looked uncomfortable. He might have had some nerves. He's gonna pop up somewhere.
Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
Bernard30
Posts: 20309
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/23/2005
Member: #973
10/25/2007  12:59 PM
I'm so pissed. I'm a Syracuse graduate and I watched Nichols get better and better by leaps and bounds every year he was at Syracuse. The kid is a good character guy, he would have immediately been our best 3-point shooter, he's a super hard worker and he even wants the ball when the game is on the line. He's got a ton of heart (where JJ1 has none). There were a couple of games last year for the Cuse where Nichols was so on fire the other teams were double teaming him and he was still rising up over them with his 6'8" frame and lighting them up. I know he probably wouldn't have seen any burn this year but he's the kind of guy who you can throw into the game for a few minutes late in a 3rd quarter where we're down by 17 to see if he's on and if he is the lead can be cut in half in minutes. The guy gets that hot. I'm just really bummed.

The fact that Jerome James still has a roster spot and Nichols doesn't has me infurtiated. What a freaking waste.
"It was good," Curry said. "I killed Malik, Jerome. The usual suspects. It felt good."
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
10/25/2007  1:04 PM
should've cut fred jones.

with mardy at 6'5 and able to defend and balkman coming back, we would've been fine without fred jones.
Elite
Posts: 26372
Alba Posts: 23
Joined: 12/30/2003
Member: #510

10/25/2007  1:11 PM
Posted by djsunyc:

should've cut fred jones.

with mardy at 6'5 and able to defend and balkman coming back, we would've been fine without fred jones.

I disagree... Fred Jones is ballin, playin great defense... why cut him??? Why would u cut someone who is actually producing and looks mad hungry over someone who hasent produced **** in the years he has been a Knick besides hunger towards the buffet
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
10/25/2007  1:12 PM
Posted by Elite:
Posted by djsunyc:

should've cut fred jones.

with mardy at 6'5 and able to defend and balkman coming back, we would've been fine without fred jones.

I disagree... Fred Jones is ballin, playin great defense... why cut him??? Why would u cut someone who is actually producing and looks mad hungry over someone who hasent produced **** in the years he has been a Knick besides hunger towards the buffet

b/c there are replacements for him in the roster. we don't have one sharpshooter.
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
10/25/2007  1:13 PM
btw, this is a direct result of isiah overpaying for his players. can't cut long term contracts whenever you want isiah...
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
10/25/2007  1:15 PM
Posted by djsunyc:

btw, this is a direct result of isiah overpaying for his players. can't cut long term contracts whenever you want isiah...

Well at least, not anymore.
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
Panos
Posts: 30714
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/6/2004
Member: #520
10/25/2007  1:54 PM
Not only can't cut, but when you overpay everyone on the roster, NO ONE WANTS YOUR CRAP. Trades are unlikely.
NineMike2Whiskey
Posts: 20381
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/10/2004
Member: #732
10/25/2007  2:20 PM
I guess this decision really boils down to Fred Jones and D-Nic. If Jones is balling, i guess in the short term i'd have no problems with this but in the long term it might hurt if D-Nic's potential is as good as some of the papers make him out to be. I'd really love to cut JJ fat's ass to keep Nichols though common sense means that you never trade a big body in your roster for a 2 guard but for JJ fat i'd do it. I'd even play Balkman undersized at the 5 when we're short than have JJ fat suit up, that is if he's fit enough to suit up.
joec32033
Posts: 30641
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
10/25/2007  2:33 PM
Posted by NineMike2Whiskey:

I guess this decision really boils down to Fred Jones and D-Nic. If Jones is balling, i guess in the short term i'd have no problems with this but in the long term it might hurt if D-Nic's potential is as good as some of the papers make him out to be. I'd really love to cut JJ fat's ass to keep Nichols though common sense means that you never trade a big body in your roster for a 2 guard but for JJ fat i'd do it. I'd even play Balkman undersized at the 5 when we're short than have JJ fat suit up, that is if he's fit enough to suit up.

I agree. Hell you can play Z-BO at the 5 in the East. He is a legit 6-9 with B-U-L-K. And you can also play Lee spot minutes there and STILL have Randolph Morris at center. We could have made do. All for a guy who has played roughy 50%(85 out of a possible 164 games) and is out for the whole season.


I know, I know, Isiah, his contract is a valuable trade commodity.
~You can't run from who you are.~
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
10/25/2007  2:34 PM
Posted by fishmike:
Posted by Allanfan20:

Nice going Isiah. Oohah, it's a big deal when you can keep Nichols, but crap ars players like Jared and Jerome are unmoveable. Oohah, how on Earth can you possibly say Matt Carroll is better when NOBODY here knows how good an NBA player Nichols can be. Tell me, do you think Wilson Chandler is better too cause we've barely seen much of him too.
thats the Isiah regime.

rvhoss went on and on about how Jerome James made sense because "we NEEDED a center."

What we need is a young team of guys that play hard. What we need is talent. What we need is players that can improve and grow. Even if we dont have high picks we need to add players that have a shot at becoming a good NBA player. Jerome James represents none of those things.. yet here we are. Waiving young players because we have him taking up a roster space.

Are those guys going to get us to the playoffs? To a title? Probably not. But they are more examples of how this team and GM constantly makes mistakes and wastes resources.


that is the point everyone seems to miss. It is not about nichols being a star or even a starter in this league. But it is about a kid who does have size and talent, and who has potential to be a good shooter in this league, something we need, and because of having to keep jerome james, we have to waive this kid.. It is ugly business no matter how you slice it...
Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
GodSaveTheKnicks
Posts: 23952
Alba Posts: 21
Joined: 11/21/2006
Member: #1207
USA
10/25/2007  2:35 PM
This just highlights one of the biggest problems Zeke has: admitting his mistakes.

Jerome James was a mistake. Instead of admitting it by cutting him, we keep his fat unmotivated butt on the team while we cut Nichols.

I think what oohah was trying to say was right. It's not the end of the world. Worse things have happened to the Knicks (like the Jerome James signing).

However..again..considering the fact that it looks like our offense will center on throwing the ball down low..wouldn't it help to have an outside shooter like Nichols?

I think Nate and Q can fill that role but a young cheap guy like Nichols would have been infinitely preferable to a waste of space like James.

I know it's been said 1,000 times already but I still can't wrap my mind around the fact that we're still giving a roster spot to Jerome Frikkin James
Let's try to elevate the level of discourse in this byeetch. Please
Marv
Posts: 35574
Alba Posts: 69
Joined: 9/2/2002
Member: #315
10/25/2007  2:39 PM
fine you creeps.

YOU look these kids in the eye and tell them you want to take away the one ray of sunshine in their lives!!!!!

KNICKS WAIVE JORDAN, NICHOLS & WALKER

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy