[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

You Guys Do Realize Realistically We Need to Blow This Up?
Author Thread
MS
Posts: 27065
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/28/2004
Member: #724
7/24/2007  9:28 AM
I really I am encourage by some of the young talent that is coming along but we have guys that you can't move because Isiah is in over his head and locks guys up like crawford, richardson, jefferies and james long term......

I think last years draft is very underated. And a player that I think flew under the radar a little is Randy Foye. I would do everything in my power to get this kid, he is a finisher can't be stopped when he drives is great off the dribble has a ton of heart and will make the big play.

Incoming Players
Randy Foye
6-3 PG from Villanova
10.2 ppg, 2.7 rpg, 2.8 apg in 22.9 minutes
Ricky Davis
6-7 SG from Iowa
17.0 ppg, 3.9 rpg, 4.8 apg in 37.3 minutes
Outgoing Players
Randolph Morris
6-11 C from Kentucky
0.8 ppg, 1.8 rpg, 0.2 apg in 8.6 minutes
Nate Robinson
5-9 PG from Washington
10.1 ppg, 2.4 rpg, 1.4 apg in 21.2 minutes
Jamal Crawford
6-5 SG from Michigan
17.6 ppg, 3.2 rpg, 4.4 apg in 37.3 minutes


This clears Crawford off the books gives Minny a great scoring guard combo and a promising big, not sure if they do it, but foye and collins would be a good defensive backcourt and both have play making abilities........
AUTOADVERT
Solace
Posts: 30004
Alba Posts: 20
Joined: 10/30/2003
Member: #479
USA
7/24/2007  9:29 AM
Posted by nixluva:

Solace I'm not disagreeing with you on Oden. I said he "may be the only lock" in this group. The chances of geting an Oden are slim and you need a lot of luck. At most you have a few others who truly stand out from the crowd and have the kind of singular impact that an elite player has. This is really what people mean when they talk about building thru the draft. We're not just talking about a player that can be a very good player in this league. We're talking about players that lift their teams to deep playoff runs every year.

In regards to the players we do have, I think we have managed to not only draft very good players but to add youing studs like Curry and Zach. Many here want to downgrade what kind of players these guys can be, but I think they are going to have a big impact on the success of this team. You say we're only setup for the playoffs but not an NBA Title. I don't think you're being fair to this team. We have yet to see how good some of these guys are gonna get. They don't all have to be Superstars in order for them to help us rise to the top of the East.

Just use your minds eye to look down the road and see us playing with guys like Chandler and Nichols in there? They already show the promise of being the kind of 2 way players with skill, size and athleiticism we need. Lee, Balk and Mardy are guys that already show they can help this team. Imagine them as they move along and improve. I don't think we take a back seat to any of the young teams in terms of depth and quality of talent.

Well, like has been mentioned many other times, there are other teams in the league with lots of good youth and most of them aren't going anywhere, because unfortunately, you don't get wins just because you have the younger team. I also think a lot of those teams youth compare favorably or equally to ours. That being said, I think there are a few young pieces that are nice: Lee, Balkman, Nichols (ok, you caught me; I like the kid) and Collins. I honestly don't know where Nate and Chandler fit in, but on some teams they might be pieces too. So, here's the thing. if you told me that our core was Lee, Balkman, Nichols, Collins, Nate and Chandler and we had no huge vet contracts on the team, I would be ecstatic. Ecstatic. Did you hear me? Ecstatic. But we have huge deals in Zack, Curry, Marbury, Craw, Q, JJ1, JJ2, JJ3 (ok maybe not).

I'd even be okay with listing Curry in our core (as much as I hate his defense), so make that: Curry, Lee, Balkman, Chandler, Nichols, Collins, Nate. Off the top of my head that's around $18-$20 million guaranteed. If we ran that team out there every night, we had the cap room and not the vets, I'd be very satisfied. The problem I see is the vets we do have prevent the kids from fully developing, and because we're not under the cap while we have all these kids on rookie contracts, we miss our one major shot to get a major player via free agency. And that's it... the downside to the Zach Randolph trade (and every other Isiah trade). We may have had to let Lee go via free agency, but like it or not... we may have had a shot at LeBron, Wade, etc... which would be a much more powerful piece than Cancerbury and Zach. That's why I'm disappointed with the team. I think our team is one piece away. Unfortunately, I feel that that piece is LeBron James and I don't see how to acquire the piece except by high draft picks and cap room.

At the end of the day, when the Marburys and Zachs expire years down the road, even if Isiah doesn't add more expensive pieces, we'll have guys like Lee on the $10 million contracts. So, in the end, we'll be back to the same cycle... the same cycle that has proven to be a failure for multiple GMs and was a similar trap that the previous GM fell into.

So, I dunno. I like the youth, so that gets some points with me. I don't like the vets and their huge contracts are going to be the reason why we hit a wall. Now we haven't neared that wall yet, so there's some excitement, but I see us peaking around 45-48 wins in 2-3 years. Some would be incredibly happy with 48 wins. Not me. I want a championship. The fact remains, the odds are against any one of our young guys becoming a franchise player. Very against. Just about everyone you put in the list earlier (with the exception of a few guys like Frye) has a better chance of becoming a franchise player than any kid on our roster. And that's not hating. That's just how it is
The Knicks 2026 NBA Champions!
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
7/24/2007  9:39 AM
Solace you really are discounting the fact that Zach and Curry are the franchise players on this team now. We've drafted very well IMO. The talent level of the guys we have is the equal of many of the teams in the league. There are a few exceptional guys out there, but i'm not concerned with them. Our youth talent level is very good.

In terms of Zach messing up our chances, I think you have to understand what Isiah decided to do is not put everything into the hopes that we can convince one of the FA's to leave his team, but to be able to make a fair trade for a guy down the line. With the added safety net that if we can't get one of those guys we'll STILL have a good team. You can't guarantee that by simply having cap space. Right now we can build this team and it's status in the East. Win games and make the payoffs for the next 2 years and that will raise the trade value of our players. Hopefully we won't even feel the need to make a deal. Who knows how good we can get with the players we have. We got Chandler young and before he could fully develop. He may turnout to be a stud.
COSSUCKS
Posts: 20984
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/15/2007
Member: #1569

7/24/2007  9:52 AM
This team has already been replaced. The core group of 27 and younger players has as much talent as any group of 27 and under in the nba.
MS
Posts: 27065
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/28/2004
Member: #724
7/24/2007  10:15 AM
Not even close are you on drugs? As much talent as any group under 27 in the nba?

1. Roy, Alridgre, Oden, Jack, etc
2. Joe Johnson, Josh Smith, Josh Childress, Marvin and Shelden Williams, Acie Law, Al Horford
3. Conley Jr, Lowry, Warrick, Gay, Darko
4. Paul, West, Chandler, Julian Wright
5. Boozer, Deron Williams, Almond
6. Deng, Hinrich, Gordon, Ty Thomas, Noah, Thebo
7. Gerald Wallace, Felton, Okafur, May, Dudley
8. Ellis, Biedrins, Pietrus, Belinelli,
9. Howard, Reddick, Ariza, Nelson
10. Jefferson, Rondo, Allen, Green

Curry, Lee, Balkman, Collins, Nicholas, Chandler, Nate, Morris you can make the case that they don't have the talent of those listed above
COSSUCKS
Posts: 20984
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/15/2007
Member: #1569

7/24/2007  10:30 AM
Posted by MS:

Not even close are you on drugs? As much talent as any group under 27 in the nba?

1. Roy, Alridgre, Oden, Jack, etc
2. Joe Johnson, Josh Smith, Josh Childress, Marvin and Shelden Williams, Acie Law, Al Horford
3. Conley Jr, Lowry, Warrick, Gay, Darko
4. Paul, West, Chandler, Julian Wright
5. Boozer, Deron Williams, Almond
6. Deng, Hinrich, Gordon, Ty Thomas, Noah, Thebo
7. Gerald Wallace, Felton, Okafur, May, Dudley
8. Ellis, Biedrins, Pietrus, Belinelli,
9. Howard, Reddick, Ariza, Nelson
10. Jefferson, Rondo, Allen, Green

Curry, Lee, Balkman, Collins, Nicholas, Chandler, Nate, Morris you can make the case that they don't have the talent of those listed above

You left off Zach Randolph, Jamal Crawford, Q Richardson, and Jared Jeffries.

Yes their group of 27 and younger can compete with any of the groups you listed.
MS
Posts: 27065
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/28/2004
Member: #724
7/24/2007  10:44 AM
add zack those other players really don't bring anything to the table, to date no one in the knicks young core has made an allstar team, so i am wondering how many of the above you would trade places with
Solace
Posts: 30004
Alba Posts: 20
Joined: 10/30/2003
Member: #479
USA
7/24/2007  10:47 AM
Posted by MS:

Not even close are you on drugs? As much talent as any group under 27 in the nba?

1. Roy, Alridgre, Oden, Jack, etc
2. Joe Johnson, Josh Smith, Josh Childress, Marvin and Shelden Williams, Acie Law, Al Horford
3. Conley Jr, Lowry, Warrick, Gay, Darko
4. Paul, West, Chandler, Julian Wright
5. Boozer, Deron Williams, Almond
6. Deng, Hinrich, Gordon, Ty Thomas, Noah, Thebo
7. Gerald Wallace, Felton, Okafur, May, Dudley
8. Ellis, Biedrins, Pietrus, Belinelli,
9. Howard, Reddick, Ariza, Nelson
10. Jefferson, Rondo, Allen, Green

Curry, Lee, Balkman, Collins, Nicholas, Chandler, Nate, Morris you can make the case that they don't have the talent of those listed above

I agree. I think our youth ranks somewhere in the high teens among the NBA. Quality over quantity, sorry Nix.
The Knicks 2026 NBA Champions!
COSSUCKS
Posts: 20984
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/15/2007
Member: #1569

7/24/2007  10:51 AM
Posted by MS:

add zack those other players really don't bring anything to the table, to date no one in the knicks young core has made an allstar team, so i am wondering how many of the above you would trade places with

I think your whole list only had 3 all stars on it.

Thats your opinion that Zach, Crawford and Qrich dont bring anything to the table. I find it doubtful that NBA players would share that opinion.
I prefer our group to all of them outside of Portland and maybe Charlotte.

If most of those guys were Knicks you would be bashing them probably.
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
7/24/2007  11:04 AM
Posted by MS:

Not even close are you on drugs? As much talent as any group under 27 in the nba?

1. Roy, Alridgre, Oden, Jack, etc
2. Joe Johnson, Josh Smith, Josh Childress, Marvin and Shelden Williams, Acie Law, Al Horford
3. Conley Jr, Lowry, Warrick, Gay, Darko
4. Paul, West, Chandler, Julian Wright
5. Boozer, Deron Williams, Almond
6. Deng, Hinrich, Gordon, Ty Thomas, Noah, Thebo
7. Gerald Wallace, Felton, Okafur, May, Dudley
8. Ellis, Biedrins, Pietrus, Belinelli,
9. Howard, Reddick, Ariza, Nelson
10. Jefferson, Rondo, Allen, Green

Curry, Lee, Balkman, Collins, Nicholas, Chandler, Nate, Morris you can make the case that they don't have the talent of those listed above

I think you severely discredit the Knicks talent if you don't think we're right there with many of those teams in terms of young talent. The difference is in the Name Recognition of some of the guys on those teams. Since many of those guys were higher draft picks.

Zach, Curry, Lee, Balkman, Nate, Mardy, Chandler, Nichols etc. are just as talented as any of the groups you have up top. This is perfect evidence of how Knick fans underrate their own players. Just in the top 3 young guys we have you have a 23/10, 20/7 and 10/10 guy. That's not a shabby group in the least. Zach just turned 26, Curry will be 25 in Dec. and Lee is 24. I think we're in great shape in that regard. For all the heat Nate takes, the guy has talent. He shot 43% and 39% and scored 10 ppg in 21 mpg. He's not perfect but he can really play. Balk and Mardy look like very solid role players and I think Nichols can develop into one as well. Chandler may just end up being a real stud. Why is it that so many seem to think we don't have the talent to really win over the next 5 years?
MS
Posts: 27065
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/28/2004
Member: #724
7/24/2007  11:06 AM
You prefer our group over the bulls? Thats just plain laughable?

The Hawks have better young talent Joe Johnson is better than anyone we have and smith is one of the more talented young players in the league, i can understand if your skeptical with them because of the culture but if that team had a pg they would blow us off the floor.

Crawford has never won more than 34 games in 7 season that has to tell you something, anyone can do one thing well and neglect other part of the game......Q has value if he is healthy but he isn't

You wouldn't take Utah who has two allstars a top 5 pg, i would put him in the top 4 and boozer who might be top 4 at his position and an allstar. That team would have came out of the east......

New Orleans has Chris Paul, who I would take over any player on the knicks as would any exec in basketball, he nearly put his team in the playoffs the last two years and missed a ton of time this year.....

Everyone around here is jerking off about Currys progress

David West 18.3pts 8.2rbs 2.2ass 0.7blks 1.88tos
Eddy Curry 19.5pts 7.0rbs 0.8ass 0.5blks 3.64tos

I only bash players that don't give effort, would i like to have a lot of those guys yes. Okafur is better than Curry plain and simple.
COSSUCKS
Posts: 20984
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/15/2007
Member: #1569

7/24/2007  11:16 AM
Posted by MS:

You prefer our group over the bulls? Thats just plain laughable?

The Hawks have better young talent Joe Johnson is better than anyone we have and smith is one of the more talented young players in the league, i can understand if your skeptical with them because of the culture but if that team had a pg they would blow us off the floor.

Crawford has never won more than 34 games in 7 season that has to tell you something, anyone can do one thing well and neglect other part of the game......Q has value if he is healthy but he isn't

You wouldn't take Utah who has two allstars a top 5 pg, i would put him in the top 4 and boozer who might be top 4 at his position and an allstar. That team would have came out of the east......

New Orleans has Chris Paul, who I would take over any player on the knicks as would any exec in basketball, he nearly put his team in the playoffs the last two years and missed a ton of time this year.....

Seems you give every other teams players the benefit of the doubt while bashing our own.

Joe Johnson is great but 1 player doesnt make his group better than ours. If they are why did they not show it? Curry/Zach/Jcraw/Dlee over Atlanta

Chris Paul is a very good player but that doesnt make his group better than ours.

Yes I prefer our group over the Bulls. I have high respect for Deng and Gordon but find the rest of their group to be way over rated.

MS
Posts: 27065
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/28/2004
Member: #724
7/24/2007  11:22 AM
You can actually trade people in the group as opposed to ours. Why would I give anyone the benefit of the doubt besides lee and balkman.

And in the Western Conference the year before Paul Came

2004-2005 18-64
Enter Paul
2005-2006 38-44
2006-2007 39-43 (Injures to west, paul, jackson, peja, chandler, mason) they got hit worse than us and won 39 games in the west.......If you don't think he makes his group better i think there is a reason you are so optimistic about the knicks.....

Would you take Josh Smith over David Lee or Balkman? Would you take Horford the our last two drafts?


MS
Posts: 27065
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/28/2004
Member: #724
7/24/2007  11:28 AM
Its not that we don't have the talent to win, it's the fact that the roster has way to many players on it.....If take away Zach for Lamar Odom I would take our team over most of the ones I have mentioned.....

When you have two bigs that are turnover prone, play no defense, can't block shots and haven't been on winning teams and you but them in the fold with crawford and marbury who haven't really enjoyed winning seasons its hard to be optimistic.....

Curry hasn't shown the passion on desire to be the player he should be, nate has a terrible attitude. Nicholas and Chandler have talent but there are question marks i think they can both mature into nice talents.

But when I look at the knicks roster i see a great collection of bench players that would be. I extremely high on David lee but he is not getting the credit from a lot of people he deserves, people around here just few him as a role player. Which is the role he is going to be in.

If you could move, Nate and Jamal and open up minutes for controlled player i think we have the makings of a good team.
COSSUCKS
Posts: 20984
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/15/2007
Member: #1569

7/24/2007  11:28 AM
Posted by MS:

You can actually trade people in the group as opposed to ours. Why would I give anyone the benefit of the doubt besides lee and balkman.

And in the Western Conference the year before Paul Came

2004-2005 18-64
Enter Paul
2005-2006 38-44
2006-2007 39-43 (Injures to west, paul, jackson, peja, chandler, mason) they got hit worse than us and won 39 games in the west.......If you don't think he makes his group better i think there is a reason you are so optimistic about the knicks.....

Would you take Josh Smith over David Lee or Balkman? Would you take Horford the our last two drafts?
You keep wanting to make this about individuals instead of groups.
Pretty much everyone on our 27 and under list has value. Charlotte reportedly offered their lottery pick for Dlee and Jcraw and WE REFUSED!

Any player that leads the NBA in points in the paint while making 8 mill has value

Any player who can average a double double off the bench while shooting 60% has value

Any player that is one of only 5 to put up 20-10 has value

No I wouldnt take Josh Smith over David Lee.

I would take Horford over any single player in our last 2 drafts but I would not take him over Balk, Mardy, Chandler, Nichols and Morris.

COSSUCKS
Posts: 20984
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/15/2007
Member: #1569

7/24/2007  11:32 AM
Posted by MS:

Its not that we don't have the talent to win, it's the fact that the roster has way to many players on it.....If take away Zach for Lamar Odom I would take our team over most of the ones I have mentioned.....

When you have two bigs that are turnover prone, play no defense, can't block shots and haven't been on winning teams and you but them in the fold with crawford and marbury who haven't really enjoyed winning seasons its hard to be optimistic.....

Curry hasn't shown the passion on desire to be the player he should be, nate has a terrible attitude. Nicholas and Chandler have talent but there are question marks i think they can both mature into nice talents.

But when I look at the knicks roster i see a great collection of bench players that would be. I extremely high on David lee but he is not getting the credit from a lot of people he deserves, people around here just few him as a role player. Which is the role he is going to be in.

If you could move, Nate and Jamal and open up minutes for controlled player i think we have the makings of a good team.

I have no problem trading some quantity for quality but thats what you do with the guys at the bottom of the group not at the top. Curry/Zach/Dlee/Craw will be just fine if they get a real ball distributing PG that can knock down the outside shot. .

I like Odom as well but his injuries and other factors dont put him above Zach. I would have liked Jermaine Oneil but once again injuries are a factor.
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
7/24/2007  11:32 AM
Posted by MS:

Everyone around here is jerking off about Currys progress

David West 18.3pts 8.2rbs 2.2ass 0.7blks 1.88tos
Eddy Curry 19.5pts 7.0rbs 0.8ass 0.5blks 3.64tos

I only bash players that don't give effort, would i like to have a lot of those guys yes. Okafur is better than Curry plain and simple.

So what you're really saying is that Curry is on par with a guy you like. Let's remember that West doesn't warp a defense like Curry. Double & Triple teams aren't there everytime he touches the ball. Don't just look at the numbers and assume that they mean the same thing no matter how the player scores them. This kind of thing just proves your not being fair in your assessment of our talent.

Okafor is a fine player. I have nothing against him, but I think Curry's got a game that is more damaging to an opposing team. Okafor avg'd about 4 FTA's a game, while Curry is up around 8. He's a greater force on the floor offensively and Okafor defensively.

islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
7/24/2007  11:36 AM
Posted by COSSUCKS:

I would take Horford over any single player in our last 2 drafts but I would not take him over Balk, Mardy, Chandler, Nichols and Morris.

If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
COSSUCKS
Posts: 20984
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/15/2007
Member: #1569

7/24/2007  11:40 AM
Posted by islesfan:
Posted by COSSUCKS:

I would take Horford over any single player in our last 2 drafts but I would not take him over Balk, Mardy, Chandler, Nichols and Morris.


Over 1 not all combined
COSSUCKS
Posts: 20984
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/15/2007
Member: #1569

7/24/2007  11:42 AM
Okafor is great. One of my favorite nba players but he is really a Pf height and thats why Charlotte usually plays him with a center.

Head to Head

Curry-36.2mpg-20.5ppg-53%FG-2.8orb-6.7rpg-.3bpg
E Oak-37.5mpg-12.0ppg-43%FG-2.7orb-10.2rpg-2.7bpg
You Guys Do Realize Realistically We Need to Blow This Up?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy