Curry has enough trade value to get more back. That's why I'd explore many other deals first. Nevertheless, I'm sure we'd win far more games with a Zach/Camby front court than a Zach/Eddy front court so long as Camby stayed about as healthy as he's been the last few years.
Man, didn't they just tell you in another thread that Camby is 33 years old and has been injured every year for the last 3 years? What....are you talking about?
Help me to try to understand.
Camby playing 80 to 90% of the games is better than anything lazy Eddy gives.
Stop it NOW!
Let's go Knicks. That's amare
babyKnicks Posts: 22486
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/31/2006
Member: #1191 USA
we could use camby to complete our frontcourt but under no circumstance should we swap camby for curry
"Like they always say, New York is the Mecca of basketball,"I read that in Michael Jordan books my whole life and I played here in the Big East tournament, so it's always fun to play in the Mecca of basketball."---Rip Hamilton
newyorknewyork Posts: 30367
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
I don't like the deal proposed. Camby would make us more balanced which would = more wins but there is to much of an age difference. Camby and 2 draft picks I would do though. But I doubt Denver would do it.
Also Camby was one of if not the #1 reason that we made it to the finals in 99. So give him his proper respect.
