[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Let's Put this Cap Nonsense to Rest
Author Thread
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
7/1/2007  2:59 PM
Posted by nixluva:
Posted by TMS:

to those who keep harping on the "name the last stud free agent that switched teams & won a championship" question, could you guys please name the last superstar stud to be obtained via trade that helped vault a team to a championship? i believe the answer to both questions would be Shaq... these types of deals don't go down everyday in either case, but it's always good to have the cap flexibility to at least entertain the thought of making an offer or being in the discussion i would think... but who cares, as long as we keep going after players like Stephon Marbury & Zach Randolph, i'm sure we're well on our way towards building a championship contender.

Well you don't really know what this team is gonna be able to accomplish now do you? You can't sit here and say right now that you KNOW FOR A FACT that adding Zach won't get us to the ECF's. I'm pretty darned confident that he'll help us get to the playoffs tho and right now that's really all we need is a shot to be in the playoffs and take it from there.

Do you really stop to consider just how close most teams in the NBA really are to each other? That's why adding one player can often make such a huge difference to teams. Now in our case we did more than add jsut one player and we've got other players who will factor into how improved we'll be next year and beyond. Or did you forget that this isn't the end of the matter? Yes we can do more to improve the team beyond just adding Zach. Honestly I don't know what to say about the negativity around here. We just added a 20-10 guy!!! TWENTY AND TEN!!! Do you think that's nothing? With the talent we already have all the good role players we have and you still aren't even a little bit optimistic about what this team can do? SHAME ON YOU and all of the fans around here that can't see what's going on with this team. Don't be a late rider on the bandwagon when they're winning games. Use some insight and just look at what we've been adding to this team and the possibilites of internal growth as well.

Not only did we add a stud, but we already have several young studs who are only gonna get better!!! Just imagine how much more effective Lee and Balkman will be with less attention being paid to them?


yeah really... shame on me for looking at the big picture of how this trade negatively effects our longterm flexibility to make the type of moves i think necessary to build a real championship contender & for not being as much of a blind homer such as you to follow along with just about everything & anything that Isiah Thomas does... i guess being a "true Knick fan" means you have to be a card carrying member of the blind homers club in your eyes... my bad.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
AUTOADVERT
TrueBlue
Posts: 29144
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 9/20/2006
Member: #1172

7/1/2007  3:01 PM
The Knicks have to have an impressive season showing in order for this to make any sense and for him to have any significant value. Fans just haven't grasped the dynamics of team chemistry, fiscal cap management, and player market value across the league.

First if Zach was traded for Frye and Francis that's an ultimate red flag, that apparently they didn't receive better offers for him.

Second his value has been set with Frye and Francis if Zach doesn't threaten to be an All-Star or creates another toxic atmosphere, no matter what his stats prove to be his trade value won't surpass his current established value.

Third if Zach is 20/10 and that's so hard to come be these days why did PDX let him go for .25ct on the $1.00? Why didn't PDX win more games? Why did the addition of Roy and Aldridge give the Blazers more hope than Zach's 20/10?

Fourth Zach plays less defense than Curry and that's Mission Impossibe.

Fifth Zach won't be 20/10 here and David Lee will no longer be a double double guy.

Sixth We've taken ourselves out of the running to land Lebron and Wade if they should so happen to go out on the open market in 3yrs.
LMFAO @ the Bio [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephon_Marbury[/url]
babyKnicks
Posts: 22486
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/31/2006
Member: #1191
USA
7/1/2007  3:25 PM
was miami under the cap when they got shaq? I don't remember.
Let's go Knicks. That's amare
BlueSeats
Posts: 27272
Alba Posts: 41
Joined: 11/6/2005
Member: #1024

7/1/2007  3:33 PM
Posted by babyKnicks:

was miami under the cap when they got shaq? I don't remember.

No, they traded Odom, Caron Butler and change.

The reason it worked for Miami was they were on Shaq's shortlist of acceptable destinations.

But the Lakers got Shaq from Orlando via free agency.



[Edited by - blueseats on 07-01-2007 3:34 PM]
babyKnicks
Posts: 22486
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/31/2006
Member: #1191
USA
7/1/2007  3:38 PM
What year did the lakers get Shaq?

Was that 2 CBA's ago? Before max contracts?

Curious.

Just seems like a different NBA from when shaq left orlando. And orlando has yet to recover...are they still under the cap?
Let's go Knicks. That's amare
BlueSeats
Posts: 27272
Alba Posts: 41
Joined: 11/6/2005
Member: #1024

7/1/2007  5:25 PM
Posted by babyKnicks:

What year did the lakers get Shaq?

Was that 2 CBA's ago? Before max contracts?

Curious.

Just seems like a different NBA from when shaq left orlando. And orlando has yet to recover...are they still under the cap?


Yes, they're still under the cap and they've yet to recover. They've had good luck and bad. Shaq and Howard were great pickups for them but loosing Shaq was devastating and the poor health of Penny, Hill and McGrady drove them down. That said, in the 11 seasons since Shaq left they've been to the playoffs 6 times, same as us, and made the playoffs last year when we didn't.
Vmart
Posts: 31800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/23/2002
Member: #247
USA
7/1/2007  6:58 PM
Posted by TMS:
Posted by Vmart:

Suppose if the KNicks got under the cap. What would the KNicks do they would look to get more talent via free agency. If that is the case they probably would have gone for players like LeBron, Kobe, Melo, KG, JO or Randolph. Whats the point of this getting under the cap if the players you want are available to them right now. There are enough peices there for the Knicks to get Kobe here it maybe slight but it would have been slight even if the Knicks were under the cap. And they already got Randolph. So if Isiah is getting this done without waiting two years in the pipeline I don't see what the problem is. I like what Isiah is doing and I think deep down a lot of people here like what he is doing but what I noticed about the Knicks fans is that they root for the individual players not the team.

i have no idea where you got that last observation from... everyone on this board roots for the team to succeed... we have differing views on how that success should be achieved though... just because i'm a Knicks fan doesn't mean i have to automatically sign off on this deal & be happy with adding a maxed out player who doesn't have maxed out value & doesn't address any of our biggest needs at this point... i personally think we would have found much better longterm success if we'd have just let Francis' contract expire rather than taking on Zach's deal... of course, this can all change IF Isiah makes another big splash move to get Kobe obviously, but unless that happens, i don't like this move because i think it follows right along on the same line of thinking that got Stephon Marbury & Steve Francis here to begin with, & history tells us neither of those moves have worked out in our favor... at some point, you have to learn from past mistakes, don't you?


Believe that people are hating on the Zach trade for two reason and only two reasons:
Forget the salary cap because once the KNicks got under it they were basically gonna add players very similar to Zach. The two resons is plain and very obvious to me, one I think people here don't want to see David Lee's minutes go down. I like most people love the game Lee brings but Lee won't be as good as Zach. Two, it has to do with Isiah making the deal some here do not want to like anything Isiah does. But thats just my opinion based on the posts that I read here. BUt I do not in anyway want to disrespect anyone in that reguard as I respect there thinking and it make for a better form.

Getting back to the salary cap I would love to have gotten under the cap too but I then realize its a good thing to be over the salary cap and it help that the Knicks are extremely over the cap. Just look at the Bulls they have been under the cap for quite sometime but damn man the best they did was an Aging Wallace. Look now and they can't even match salaries for a trade because it would cost them excess players and pretty much leave them with a shell of a team. The Knicks on the other hand can use these contract to their benefit and make numbers work in a most deals. My gut feeling says that Kobe will be a Knick by the first week of September. You know what it helps that the Bulls can't match salaries without losing their entire roster.

This ZBo trade was a great move by Isiah. Its a move in the right direction. Playoffs are going to be made and how far they go in the weak east. ECF might not be out of the question with the current roster.

Forget the salary cap for now if Kobe becomes a Knick it might be a great thing to be over the cap.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
7/1/2007  7:15 PM
V, there are 2 reasons why i don't like this trade & i think i've been clear on that from the very beginning:
1 - the cap ramifications & how it takes us out of the running for a true franchise player in '09
2 - it does not address our main needs this offseason, which were interior defense & perimeter shooting

if like i said before, Isiah manages to bring in Kobe on another trade, then fine, who cares about the cap because we'd have nabbed ourselves that franchise player i've been pining for... but if he doesn't, & this trade follows along with the Francis trade where we all expected another blockbuster trade to follow but it never came, then i don't see the point in taking on all that added salary just to be a mediocre team again... someone asked if i'd have been happier if we'd just stunk for the next 2 years & accumulated some cap space & draft picks to build with in '09, & the answer to that is yes if we can't get a franchise calibre talent in here via trade before that time.

just a note, appreciate the civil back & forth on this.

[Edited by - TMS on 07-01-2007 7:22 PM]
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
BlueSeats
Posts: 27272
Alba Posts: 41
Joined: 11/6/2005
Member: #1024

7/1/2007  7:37 PM
Posted by Vmart:
Believe that people are hating on the Zach trade for two reason and only two reasons:
Forget the salary cap because once the KNicks got under it they were basically gonna add players very similar to Zach. The two resons is plain and very obvious to me, one I think people here don't want to see David Lee's minutes go down. I like most people love the game Lee brings but Lee won't be as good as Zach. Two, it has to do with Isiah making the deal some here do not want to like anything Isiah does. But thats just my opinion based on the posts that I read here. BUt I do not in anyway want to disrespect anyone in that reguard as I respect there thinking and it make for a better form.



I think you're wrong on both counts, I think people's concerns on this deal were similar to those of the Francis trade: ongoing bad contracts, poor defense, a player many already disliked, and a difficult fit with with an existing teammate.

At the time you may have also felt that people's concerns over the Francis trade revolved around their feelings for Nate and Isiah.

I assure you, the people who can't quite wrap their heads around others concerns for this trade are at least as curious as the fact that some don't like it. No need to delve into duplicitous or subliminal motives both sides have valid reasons for their positions.
Vmart
Posts: 31800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/23/2002
Member: #247
USA
7/1/2007  7:45 PM
Posted by BlueSeats:
Posted by Vmart:
Believe that people are hating on the Zach trade for two reason and only two reasons:
Forget the salary cap because once the KNicks got under it they were basically gonna add players very similar to Zach. The two resons is plain and very obvious to me, one I think people here don't want to see David Lee's minutes go down. I like most people love the game Lee brings but Lee won't be as good as Zach. Two, it has to do with Isiah making the deal some here do not want to like anything Isiah does. But thats just my opinion based on the posts that I read here. BUt I do not in anyway want to disrespect anyone in that reguard as I respect there thinking and it make for a better form.



I think you're wrong on both counts, I think people's concerns on this deal were similar to those of the Francis trade: ongoing bad contracts, poor defense, a player many already disliked, and a difficult fit with with an existing teammate.

At the time you may have also felt that people's concerns over the Francis trade revolved around their feelings for Nate and Isiah.

I assure you, the people who can't quite wrap their heads around others concerns for this trade are at least as curious as the fact that some don't like it. No need to delve into duplicitous or subliminal motives both sides have valid reasons for their positions.

I agree we are all concerned because of the past. Only time will tell if this a good move.
Let's Put this Cap Nonsense to Rest

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy