[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Are Knicks fans so beat down.........
Author Thread
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
6/26/2007  10:20 AM
Posted by Bonn1997:
The plan is and always was to build a winning team.
That's not a plan. That's a goal. What the Knicks have failed to realize is that you need a plan to reach your goal.

[Edited by - bonn1997 on 26-06-2007 08:12 AM]

That has to be one of the best things you've ever posted. Absolutely hysterical.
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
AUTOADVERT
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
6/26/2007  12:05 PM
I still maintain that it's very hard to give the look of a team that has a "plan" when you don't have a Tim Duncan to make all your moves look good. Even when you do have a stud, it can be a crap shoot trying to add that supporting talent. Now if you're Chi or Det and you don't have a singular superstar, but you have a philosophy of the kind of players you want to draft or acquire then you can say they have exectued their plan, but really it's not so much a plan as "goal" to start with. When a key player like Rasheed or Ben Wallace becomes available then all of a sudden it looks like you had a plan you've been executing all along, when really you are just hoping that you can get your hands on a player like that. There's no guarantee that Phx gets Nash to lead their team when they cleared out Steph and Penny. They just caught a break. What you can commend them for is being in a position to take advantage of that opening. Just like Riley in Miami getting Shaq. He didn't have a "plan" for that but he took advantage of the opportunity.

In as much as any other GM has a "plan", I believe that Isiah has been implementing his "plan" and we have yet to see it fully realized, but a lot of that is left to chance. If things break the right way and he gets a chance to trade for a bigtime player, will that mean he had a plan all along? To some outside it might look that way, but he's just like any other GM that is searching to put the right pieces together. There are so many GM's of mediocre or losing teams that get labeled as not having a plan and guys like Pop in SA who basically just got lucky to get Duncan. All the other moves they've made are much easier to make when you get that one break.

I happen to think that Isiah's adding Curry was a good sign of him having a "plan" of sorts. He realized that you have to have someone to focus the team around or you have to hope you can be like Detroit. He chose to hitch his cart to Curry and I don't think it was a bad move at all. All we need now is to fill 2 needs and I think this team would be a very good team. That to me is evidence that he has a "plan". He only spent 1.5 going with the 1st plan and the last 3 offseasons have been about this current plan with Curry in the middle.
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
6/26/2007  12:19 PM
Posted by nixluva:

I still maintain that it's very hard to give the look of a team that has a "plan" when you don't have a Tim Duncan to make all your moves look good. Even when you do have a stud, it can be a crap shoot trying to add that supporting talent. Now if you're Chi or Det and you don't have a singular superstar, but you have a philosophy of the kind of players you want to draft or acquire then you can say they have exectued their plan, but really it's not so much a plan as "goal" to start with. When a key player like Rasheed or Ben Wallace becomes available then all of a sudden it looks like you had a plan you've been executing all along, when really you are just hoping that you can get your hands on a player like that. There's no guarantee that Phx gets Nash to lead their team when they cleared out Steph and Penny. They just caught a break. What you can commend them for is being in a position to take advantage of that opening. Just like Riley in Miami getting Shaq. He didn't have a "plan" for that but he took advantage of the opportunity.

In as much as any other GM has a "plan", I believe that Isiah has been implementing his "plan" and we have yet to see it fully realized, but a lot of that is left to chance. If things break the right way and he gets a chance to trade for a bigtime player, will that mean he had a plan all along? To some outside it might look that way, but he's just like any other GM that is searching to put the right pieces together. There are so many GM's of mediocre or losing teams that get labeled as not having a plan and guys like Pop in SA who basically just got lucky to get Duncan. All the other moves they've made are much easier to make when you get that one break.

I happen to think that Isiah's adding Curry was a good sign of him having a "plan" of sorts. He realized that you have to have someone to focus the team around or you have to hope you can be like Detroit. He chose to hitch his cart to Curry and I don't think it was a bad move at all. All we need now is to fill 2 needs and I think this team would be a very good team. That to me is evidence that he has a "plan". He only spent 1.5 going with the 1st plan and the last 3 offseasons have been about this current plan with Curry in the middle.

It went from "the plan is and always was..." to "a sign of him having a "plan" of sorts".

Nice backtracking.

Weren't you the guy who said the "plan" for the next 2 seasons was to get under the cap and sign a big time free agent?

Nevermind, you backtrack so much, who knows what you're saying.
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
6/26/2007  2:44 PM
I still maintain that it's very hard to give the look of a team that has a "plan" when you don't have a Tim Duncan to make all your moves look good

Wait I thought Eddie Curry was that guy. And if he's not that guy, why would you give up two lottery picks for a guy who is not that guy? I think this is why it's so confusing to see this so called "plan". We don't have one. We change our plan constantly to whatever direction the wind is blowing during that particular offseason. This is why it took us 2 years to target players that can play d. And now we are on year 3 and still haven't targeted a two way player. Maybe in year 5 when we are under the cap.
I just hope that people will like me
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
6/26/2007  2:47 PM
Isiah is trying to do just enough to get us into the playoffs to create some enthusiasm, and then like Layden will convince the fan base that we are one player away from a title. The cycle will continue. The front office will continue to make money. And some fans will continue to run around defending the front office and the situation. Thus supporting it. And we will go from year 30 to year 40 without a title. 7 years ago I called this. 7 years I've been called crazy.
I just hope that people will like me
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
6/26/2007  4:05 PM
Come on, you've been called that for a lot longer than 7 years and for reasons other than those that relate to the Knicks.
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30367
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
6/26/2007  4:26 PM
The only road with the highest success rate is to somehow land one of the greatest players to play through the draft.

Like Portland is probably about to do with Oden. Like Cavs did with Lebron. Like Spurs did with Duncan. LA stole what Orlando's success by stealing Shaq.

So the best thing you could possibly do is keep your draft picks no matter what. Thats the down fall so far of Layden & Isiah's tenures. Keep your draft picks. And when sure things like Lebron & Oden are hitting the draft. Target them.
https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
6/26/2007  5:00 PM
Posted by islesfan:
Posted by nixluva:

I still maintain that it's very hard to give the look of a team that has a "plan" when you don't have a Tim Duncan to make all your moves look good. Even when you do have a stud, it can be a crap shoot trying to add that supporting talent. Now if you're Chi or Det and you don't have a singular superstar, but you have a philosophy of the kind of players you want to draft or acquire then you can say they have exectued their plan, but really it's not so much a plan as "goal" to start with. When a key player like Rasheed or Ben Wallace becomes available then all of a sudden it looks like you had a plan you've been executing all along, when really you are just hoping that you can get your hands on a player like that. There's no guarantee that Phx gets Nash to lead their team when they cleared out Steph and Penny. They just caught a break. What you can commend them for is being in a position to take advantage of that opening. Just like Riley in Miami getting Shaq. He didn't have a "plan" for that but he took advantage of the opportunity.

In as much as any other GM has a "plan", I believe that Isiah has been implementing his "plan" and we have yet to see it fully realized, but a lot of that is left to chance. If things break the right way and he gets a chance to trade for a bigtime player, will that mean he had a plan all along? To some outside it might look that way, but he's just like any other GM that is searching to put the right pieces together. There are so many GM's of mediocre or losing teams that get labeled as not having a plan and guys like Pop in SA who basically just got lucky to get Duncan. All the other moves they've made are much easier to make when you get that one break.

I happen to think that Isiah's adding Curry was a good sign of him having a "plan" of sorts. He realized that you have to have someone to focus the team around or you have to hope you can be like Detroit. He chose to hitch his cart to Curry and I don't think it was a bad move at all. All we need now is to fill 2 needs and I think this team would be a very good team. That to me is evidence that he has a "plan". He only spent 1.5 going with the 1st plan and the last 3 offseasons have been about this current plan with Curry in the middle.

It went from "the plan is and always was..." to "a sign of him having a "plan" of sorts".

Nice backtracking.

Weren't you the guy who said the "plan" for the next 2 seasons was to get under the cap and sign a big time free agent?

Nevermind, you backtrack so much, who knows what you're saying.

Isiah has a "plan" to stay in NY as much as possible and suck as much money as possible from Dolan.
I think it's a good plan and it's working to perfection.
The only problem with me it is nothing to do with Knick team success.
Some people are concern about what they did in their live and how people feel about them. IT is not among this people. He is concerned only what he think about himself. No wonder we have some similar-minded players on the team - marbs, steve, eddy.
I have no problem with this guys to have cool life but they spoiled my team in process... f...ers
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
Are Knicks fans so beat down.........

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy